Monday, May 21, 2018
Capitalism or Communism.
That’s it. The only two systems mankind could come up with.
Ditto Republicans or Democrats.
There are rumors that other countries have more than two political parties but DON’T YOU BELIEVE IT.
Also it’s either Trump or the Deep State.
United States or the Soviet Union.
End of history, and whatnot and so forth.
It’s kind of a relief really -only having two choices. Otherwise it would eat up precious “me time” in front of the boob-tube or out buying cheap Chinese imported crap at my local Wal-mart.
what was I saying?
Saturday, May 19, 2018
How does an actor/singer/performer make money?
They go on a stage and tease, excite, entertain and dazzle a paying audience.
How do politicians get votes?
They go on a stage and tease, excite, entertain and dazzle a voting audience.
How do you survive day to day in a capitalist democracy?
You tease, excite, entertain and dazzle your fellow citizen-consumer brethren.
Now how does a hooker make money?
Democracy + Equality = we are all reduced to desperate performers trying to win the affections and applause of others just to get what we need to keep going about our business.
This is Capitalism. This is Democracy. It turns every single person into a pathetic circus freak.
Thursday, May 17, 2018
Nation: from Latin nationem (nominative natio) "birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people...from natus, past participle of nasci "be born" (Old Latin gnasci), from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget," with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.
From this word we also get words like natal -as in post-natal unit, etc.
Patriot: from patrios "of one's fathers," patris "fatherland," from pater (genitive patros) "father"
From this word we also get patriarchy: from patria "family, clan," from pater "father"
Both patriot and nation mean, essentially, blood -race, ethnic group, a particular people descended from the same biological fathers lineage.
A nation is NOT a place. A nation is an ethnic group.
A patriot is a son who carries the blood of his father, grandfather, etc.
Both Patriot and Nation are explicitly racial connotations.
Those who wish to set aside racial and ethnic differences are known as globalists, aka, universalists, aka Marxists.
Monday, May 14, 2018
America was founded and created by people from around the North Sea: mainly England and Scotland, but also Holland and the northern states of what is today, Germany. (many of the so-called Irish are actually Scotch-Irish, which are people from southern-Scotland and northern-England who briefly settled in northern-Ireland before moving on to the New World).
Yes, French and Spanish ruled parts of the South and West were, unfortunately, absorbed later on by greedy merchants and their puppet politicians, but the critical phase of American identity was the first century of our history, 1607 to 1707.
Let me repeat, the key phase of American history is its first century of existence: 1607-1707.
And let me be specific: Americans are people descended, wholly, from English, Scottish, Dutch & German Protestant settlers who arrived in the New World between 1607 and 1707. If that isn’t you then you are an ethnic (a hyphenated American) citizen, not an American.
Other North Sea peoples came later and fit right in, but they are still Johnny-come-latelies.
Some might argue that there were Catholics in Maryland, but you’re missing the point. I’m not talking about zip-code identity. There were Indians here too, but they were Indians, not Americans.
As I’ve pointed out numerous times, a nation is an ethnic group, not a place.
The Revolutionary War of 1776 came late in our history and most Americans were opposed to it.
In fact a very good case could be made that real Americans lost in that war. 1776 was a Merchant’s Coup against the American people.
Basically, 1776 was the East India Company as a land-based empire. Maybe this is why the US flag is a near exact replica of the East India Company Flag -with stars instead of St. George’s cross in the blue box.
Again, the majority of Americans were opposed to the Revolutionary War of 1776. This is most likely why no one wanted to claim authorship to the Declaration of Independence. Today, it is generally accepted that Jefferson wrote it. He hinted at it decades after the fact, but it is still not known for certain who the authors were. They were afraid to owe up to it because the average American despised the perpetrators of the Revolution for generations after it.
The Civil War was (or became) an attempt to overthrow the yoke of oppression caused by 1776.
So yes, the Civil War was not a simple North vs. South conflict. A great many people in the north were sympathetic to the rebels and their cause, which was opposition to the ‘globalism’ ideology of the Seventy-Sixers and their ideological offspring who ruled out of D.C. and New York. It may not have been articulated in those terms at the time, but in retrospect that is indeed what it was.
The one percent who fostered 1776 ruled the north via industrialism, which blackened the skies of northern cities and herded children into their ‘Dark Satanic Mills’ to labor unto death, literally.
The South had its own one percent who imported Africans to labor in their more agrarian-based economy.
Whites didn’t benefit from the presence of African slaves. No, it drove down wages and pushed all but the richest one percent into the wilderness to scratch out an almost pre-historic level of subsistence. Exploration of the West was actually a flight to survive by dispossessed Southern Americans.
The wild and violent conflicts of the Old West of Jesse James and Billy the Kid was the result of ever expanding globalists snaking their way into the realms that previous generations of Whites had fled to, to escape globalism.
The outlaws of the Old West were the folk heroes of the common people because they were the despised (yet dashing) foes of the globalists, aka the one percent.
And the KKK?
A people with the power to rule over a society do no resort to the tactics of the original KKK. If the so-called W.A.S.P’s were in power they would have used the military openly to resolve their problems.
You’ll notice that the military was openly authorized by the United States Government to re-arrange and remove Indians. ‘Trail of Tears’ anyone?
No, the KKK was the result of the little people, Americans, fighting for survival against the Globalists, who were using everything from the U.S. military to freed African slaves to numerous immigrant groups (mostly Irish, Italian and German Catholics) to make war on them.
This is why the original KKK targeted mostly Whites (carpetbaggers). The blacks that were targeted were seen as the useful tools of the Globalists.
The original KKK was a manifestation of a last resort; a desperate fight for survival, not a representation of political and economic power.
The early 20th century version of the KKK became more of a social gathering centered mainly in the North (the midwest). Post WWII, the goofball incarnation of the KKK is comprised of drug addicts and runaways and seemingly run by the FBI and the ADL.
But the original KKK was a final, desperate push-back against the globalism of both Northern Industrialists and Southern Slavers, both of whom were driven by a universal mercantilist worldview. Today theses two globalist factions are importing Muslims and Mexicans for the same purposes.
In this sense the rise of the original KKK was similar to the Vikings, who are now thought to have been motivated to attack mainland Europe as a reaction to the expanding reach of Christendom.
And this is a historical pattern.
Those original North-Sea settlers were fleeing Europe to escape this growing Babylon. It might be dressed up as “religious freedom” but in truth it was more about the survival of their people, as a people, free from the universal machinery of globalism.
Before that came the Protestant Reformation, which was essentially a move by the North-Sea peoples to free themselves from the clutches of the global Catholic Roman Empire.
And before that you had the Saxons, led by Widukind, resisting the growing globalist-minded Kingdom of the Franks.
And before that it was the Scandinavians resorting to Viking to push back against the encroaching universal “Kingdom of God’.
Going all the way back to antiquity, it is said (by Saxo Grammaticus, I think) that the North God, Odin, was in fact a powerful Chieftain who fled north from his black sea homeland to escape the growing realm of the Roman Empire.
We come now to the great irony of all this: President Trump.
These Americans, these descendants of the North Sea peoples, who have forever and anon been at war with the one-percent globalist merchant class have, overwhelmingly, chosen a one-percenter globalist merchant to be their spear-point in the fight against their enemy!
And as there is no place left to go to escape, we seem to have reached the final battle.
The analysis and potential historical ramifications of that would be a whole other thesis.
So, I’ll end here.
Thursday, May 10, 2018
Whites, aka ‘non-hispanic white’, are officially estimated to be 61% of the US population as of 2016. So yes, it’s two years behind.
In 1965 Whites were 90% of the population.
But that 61% is (((official)))).
The census has two problems: it under counts illegals and it has a, ahem, rather liberal definition of White.
15 years ago The Heritage Foundation estimate that there were around 30 million illegals, where the us census put the number at 8 million. Most everyone agreed the former number was correct.
Today the actual number of illegals is probably around 50 million and growing as they continue to pour across the border -around 25,000 cross every week. And add to that those let in legally or as asylum seekers or refugees.
Officially the US is at 327 million. In reality it’s at about 360 million and rapidly headed for half a billion.
The US census counts north-Africans and west and central Asians as “white”.
That means Arabs, Turks, Jews, Pakistanis, Egyptians, Iranians, Libyans and others are added to the “non-hispanic white” count.
So yeah, you can subtract at least about 20 million “whites” from the actual White demographic.
So if you do the math, there are about 178 million actual White people in America vs. 182 million non-Whites. Non-White children outnumbered White children several years ago.
Which means Whites are 49% of the US population. Less than half.
But that’s not the end of it.
A significant portion of Whites are over 65.
And as Whites continue to refuse to have large families, the percentage of Whites will collapse to around 25% of the total population in the next 20 to 30 years.
Now you know why White monuments and statues are being torn down.
Now you know why streets and schools are being renamed.
Now you know why the American flag is no longer welcome at an increasing number of public venues and gatherings.
Just as Europeans didn’t become Comanche Indians, the new inhabitants of the land are going to transform it to fit their identity -their ideas of law, customs, norms, government and so on.
A nation is an ethnic group, not a place.
Tuesday, May 8, 2018
It’s hard to take serious anyone who is optimistic about tomorrow.
In case you didn’t know,
Tomorrow you will be older and one day closer to death.
Tomorrow you will be older and weaker -even with “keeping in shape”.
Tomorrow you will be older and thus sicker.
Tomorrow the chances that someone you love will be hurt or die, increases.
Tomorrow something you’ve known will be torn down.
Tomorrow something you’ve built will begin to fall into ruin.
I could go on, but.....
And this is all assuming that you’ve got a tomorrow.
We never know that for certain.
No, I’m not being “gloomy”.
This is about perspective.
The trajectory of your life is fixed. The end, known.
The cult of progress and advancement and “tomorrow” are cons perpetuated by corporations to sell you useless crap or politicians trying to justify their policies.
A man who does not look upon tomorrow with anxiety and trepidation is a damn fool, aka, a good consumer.
You plan for tomorrow in much the same way to prepare for war.
A friend of a friend wanted to know If I was serious about the written word having no value to honest people.
“You were being hyperbolic, right?”
Actually, it was more like being poetic.
Not that I was trying to be witty, but c’mon!