Sunday, July 17, 2016

Magic Dirt & The “Need” to Bear Arms...



The Magic Dirt theory says that by simply moving to a Western (i.e, White)  nation, other races and ethnicities will be magically transformed into White-ish types of constructive, compatible, citizens.

It’s not genetics, you see, it’s the dirt. The zip code literally transforms DNA, some how, magically.

Of course there are mountains of historical, biological, scientific and anecdotal evidence that testifies to the contrary, but when your entire paradigm revolves around economics, there are no races, ethnicities, cultures, genders, families, nations or borders. There are only customers and voters.

This is particularly striking though when one considers that Africans have been living in proximity to Europeans in North America for nearly 400 years, and yet there has been no hint of that 10 - 13% being enculturated into, what has historically been, a White, European, society.

Marxists (and since the 1960‘s, Christians) insist that race and ethnicity (and now gender) are of no relevant importance to the form and function of society. The atomized, isolated individual is the be all and end all of existence. The individual finds purpose and form only through the state/God.

This is “The Narrative”.

This is how the leftist work. This is how they dominate the discourse; via non-Leftists adhering to the Left’s control of “the narrative”.


Case in point: Gun Control.

How many times have you heard, “nobody needs that sort of weapon”?

This is the Left creating a “narrative” to accommodate their ideological paradigm.


But do you see the asinine shift in point?

“Need”.

What does “need” have to do with anything?

You either have the right to bear arms or you don’t. “Need” doesn’t have a frickin thing to do with it.


And with immigrants: America is a historical society with a historical people (who, mostly, came from around the North Sea -especially Britain). If simply moving into a certain legally recognized section of North America magically transforms you into an American (who are an historical people), then why stop there? Why could you not be transformed into, say, a Comanche Indian?
Same piece of dirt!

No, DNA is the be all and end all. That blood that flows in your veins is an inheritance. In it, are all of your traits: intellect, temperament, personality, talents, preferences, predilections, etc.

The blood is the life.

When blood flows out of the body, the body dies.

So when people say “blood is irrelevant” they are asserting something that is so fundamentally untrue that it represents the ultimate perversity -the denial of life itself, and the exaltation of death.

Thus, “anti-racism” is a literal death cult.


Remember, the Left are not ideological do-gooders. Their hearts are NOT in the right place. They are NOT misguided, foolish or naive.

They know exactly what they are doing, and they have absolutely no moral qualms about the death and destruction they leave in their wake.


And yet, they are not Goliath. They are, in fact, miserable little creatures who, when exposed, scurry back into the dark pits from which they have crawled out.

No, they are not Goliath, they are more like Wormtongue from ‘Lord of The Rings’. They lurk around places of power and council surrender and oblivion. They preach perversion and nihilism. They mock beauty and exalt the ugly.

Their power is their linguistic craft; their ability to switch words and concepts around, like “need” instead of “right”.

They use it almost like a magic spell.

 But call them on their bulls@*t, break their spell, and watch them recoil like a vampire shown the cross.


Reject the left’s paradigm, and their power structure crumbles. The way to defeat them is to ignore them and their council.





And just a quick note. By leftists, I am not talking about liberals alone. I am talking about social activist Imperialists who are hell bent on conquering the world and enforcing their ideology everywhere, on all peoples. The vast majority of Christians and casual conservatives are also in this group.



...

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

July In America...



2014 - 2018 is the 100 year anniversary of WWI.

In July of 1918, as the "Great War" was in its closing months, Czar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, their five children (four girls and a boy) and four servants were taken into a basement by their Bolshevik captors and viciously butchered.

They weren't merely shot. No, they were beaten with riffles and stabbed to death with bayonets. The four girls, Olga, Tatiana, Maria and Anastasia (aged 22 to 17) died the hardest as, according to the man who oversaw the massacre, it took close to 30 minutes to beat and stab them to death as they screamed and cried and fought for life.

The reaction from the outside world ranged from silence to jubilation. And that includes America, who, after all, was fighting to keep the world “safe for democracy” and the Czar was a king and we believe in “freedom and equality”.

There are many pictures of the royal family online and many of them are of private family moments. In them you see what looks like a typical White Christian Middle-Class family.

Which is, essentially, what they were.

Nicholas abdicated in the hopes of avoiding a civil war. What he was blind to was the fact that the Bolsheviks had engineered the crisis’s which had swept the country. They had bribed, threatened and murdered officials, big and small, organized riots and disrupted transportation routes to cause a breakdown in the infrastructure and cause maximum chaos.

They created a crisis, and then offered themselves up as the solution.

Great Britain and the Good Ol’ USofA gave financial and tactical support to the Bolsheviks in the hopes that a broken Russia could then be plundered of its resources. This is especially grievous as Russia was a key ally of Britain and the USA during the war.


After the Czar abdicated he and his family were placed under arrest by the provisional government, which soon fell to the Bolsheviks. The royal family was moved east, near the Ural Mountains, where they spent the remaining months of their lives in captivity.

They were, based on the testimony of their guards, polite, respectful and friendly to their captors even as their captors plotted their murder.

They passed their time growing vegetable gardens, chopping wood and reading to one another in the evenings. There are even photographs of the home altar they built for Christmas.

They held out hope that their friends and family in England (king George was Nicholas’ cousin and the Czarina was the granddaughter of Queen Victoria) were working on negotiating their release and exile from Russia.


Their final residence was known as “the house of special purpose”.



The day of their deaths the Bolshevik captain, Yakov Yurovsky, planned their demise while giving the family the pretense of normalcy. During his inspection of their rooms he even asked about the health of the Czar’s son, 13 year old Alexi.

By all accounts the family never suspected a thing.

Some time after midnight on July 18, Yurovsky woke the family and their four servants and told them they must move into the basement of the house for their own safety as the White Russians (who were anti-Communists) were advancing on the town and stray bombs might hit the house. This was, of course, a lie.

They all filed into the basement, politely smiling at their guards. The Czar came carrying his son Alexi in his arms, as the boy was too sick to walk (he spent most of his short life sick and an invalid).

Some time later Yurovsky read the order for the killing of the Czar. He and 9 to10 other assassins opened fire on the whole group. But the bullets missed most of their marks and after letting the room clear of smoke it was found that most of the victims were still alive, but wounded. And so the butchery began. The still living were violently beaten and stabbed to death in an ordeal that went on, and on and on.

The bodies were stripped and then thrown into an unmarked mass grave.

The four servants, who stayed voluntarily in spite of the Czar and his wife encouraging them to leave when they could, were a doctor, a cook, a maid and a butler.


The Communist Revolutionaries in Moscow had no problem giving the order or owing up to the crime afterwards.

Because for them it was all worth it, in the long run.

So what if Russia fell into chaos and catastrophe? They could then remold it into their own image.

So what if tens of millions suffered and perished horribly? That is the price of progress.

So what if untold numbers of innocent people fell prey to hoards of thugs, rapists and murderers? That is the necessary cost for the grand vision of social engineering on a large scale.

And it was all done in the name of Freedom and Equality.



And if you accept Equality on moral principle, you will accept it on moral mandate as well.

If there is to be equality, there can be no Czars and there can be no Middle-Class. There can be no royal families or families of any kind, and there can be no borders or nations.



This is all pertinent today as it is now July 1918 for Whites in America.

If you are White then you are already in the “house of special purpose” and you’re most likely still passing the time planting vegetable gardens and chopping wood. Your leaders are kindly re-assuring you that all is well and there is no need to be alarmed.

Though increasingly stressed and unnerved, you still hold out hope that this will all resolve itself in time to come and everything will be fine.

You’re still polite and passive and if you do protest anything, it is orderly and legal and you clean up after yourself.



But soon, very soon, you are going to be awoken in the middle of the night and told that you need to urgently move to the basement…for your own safety.





“How dim is the light in so many that they champion the cause of their own and their children’s demise?
That they walk like sheep to the slaughter.”
-TSN


Friday, July 8, 2016

Re Up (The Dark Ages Are Coming To A Close…)



Perspective affects everything, doesn’t it.

It’s often been repeated here that historical eras or epochs are generally defined AFTER the fact. For instance, those living in the aftermath of the fall of the Roman Empire might very well have reacted incredulously at the suggestion that the empire had fallen.
Case in point, it is historians who have given the title of Byzantine Empire to the eastern half of the Roman Empire. The Byzantines themselves would not have called themselves Byzantines as they considered their empire simply to be the still functioning, eastern half, of the Roman Empire.

So it is with that in mind that we look back to the more recent past and examine the curve and flow, or lack thereof. And in doing that we can’t help but notice the dark giant shadow that has seemingly swallowed the world whole over the past few centuries.

History, as in the normative day-to-day course of human lives/events as ordained by nature, went completely off the rails in the 18thcentury. Yes, it had been trying to jump the tracks since the 16thcentury, but by the late 1790’s it had leapt completely off the rails and landed in a swamp (where its wheels continued to spin for some time).

You see, when Nietzsche wrote, “God is dead” he wasn’t trying to troll Christendom. He was lamenting that Western Man had become smug and arrogant in his ignorant belief that he had, at last, the world by the tail and could re-forge the elements to fit his whims and fancies (which is to say, his notion of “progress”). This “new man” was obtusely celebrating his discovery of fire, oblivious to the forest burning down around him.

So yes, what is being said here is that the Dark Ages actually began about the time when many modernists have suggested that they ended.

If that runs counter to everything you’ve been told to think, consider the conundrum that both medieval tales and “post-apocalyptic” stories hold a certain appeal to people because they present a world more relatable and natural than the present system.

Civilization has indeed been lost.

Yes, science and technology have advanced, in some ways, but technological advancements have never been the measuring rod with which to adduce civilization’s standing pillars. (Right now, somewhere in the world, along a muddy road littered with garbage and sewage, stands a cobbled together shack with no running water; within which sits a semi-literate man in raggedy clothes checking his facebook updates.)

We have interesting gadgets all right. And we desperately need them to distract us from the horror and chaos enveloping us at every corner.




Technology has advanced to the point that we can get paramedics in automobiles promptly out to the scene of accidents, caused by automobiles.

Thus one of Civilizations central pillars, the concept of Cause and Effect, has long since crumbled, technology not withstanding.

And the cornerstone of civilization, Truth, has been thrown down in favor of populist slogans such as “Freedom and Equality” which, un-ironically, was essentially Satan’s rallying cry in the Garden of Eden.

In Dark Ages “new truths” are revered and enshrined, even as they posit a reality that inverts and perverts the very notion of truth.

As such, in our day,


We have access to better “healthcare”, and, subsequently, fewer hospitals.

We have “democracy” and, subsequently, our government is populist, morally ambiguous and self-serving.

We have “buying power” and, subsequently, our lives are full of cheap plastic junk.

We are “empowered”, and, subsequently, feel isolated and atomized.

We are “independent” and, subsequently, have the mammoth nanny welfare state that autocratically meets our every want from womb to tomb.

We have “freedom” and, subsequently, broken homes and more prisons.

We have “diversity” and, subsequently, the para-militaristic police forces that accompany it.

We are “more tolerant and less judgmental” and, subsequently, have the medications, antidepressants and ever-burgeoning number of mental health specialists to keep us from jumping off of bridges.

We “liberate” other peoples and, subsequently, have terrorist attacks in our own lands.

We are “better informed than people in the past” and, subsequently, score lower on tests in math, science, history, civics, biology, and geography, et al.

The list goes ever on.



No sane man or woman, of any era, could look upon the streets of the present age and not shudder at the sight. And it wouldn’t be the dazzling lights, towering buildings or dizzying technology that would catch their attention. No, it would be the slug-like denizens wandering the streets, nearly all of them drugged, obese, opaque and oblivious.

In other words, you could take a man from the 12th century and drop him into the 21th century and it would take him all of about two weeks to adapt to (and be comfortable with) recent technology, from cars to cell phones.

However he would most likely be unable to embrace 21st century Western Civilization’s sense of being. He would pity us as ignorant, dumb, vulgar and backwards. Which is to say, he would view us as uncivilized.


A great many people are deeply distraught and stressed out over what they see happening around them. Yes, it’s obvious the Age is coming to an end. But it’s the Dark Age that is coming to a close, and that is reason enough to have hope.

Our “way of life” is only falling apart if you think of it as “our way of life”. It’s a system that is dying, not the world; an unnatural system that has shrouded civilization in darkness for centuries. Its collapse was inevitable.


That system may have, for a moment, seemed like a mighty sorcerer bringing all under his spell, but increasingly it is revealed to be yet another phantom in the night, brushed away by the coming of dawn.


As the coming days and years unfold and the collapse of this Dark Age System rapidly increases, the spell will be broken and the system will be done in, not by armed conflict, but through ignoring it and letting it wither away.


In the meantime, you don’t conquer a wasteland by sword and fire, but by planting trees and gardens.




Turn away from the shadow and begin to rebuild and restore in the light. 







...

Thursday, June 16, 2016

How Charles Manson Saved Murica...



Everyone knows Charles Manson: the 6' 4", 230lb ex-Marine, five time Ultimate Fighting Champion, who, in the 1960's, led an army of millions of Mad Max-style dystopian brutes on a rampage across the continent of North America, leaving entire cities in ruins.

Well, no.

Actually Manson was a 5' 3" 100 lb spaz whose "army" consisted of a handful of low IQ dope-heads and toothless, strung out hookers, whose crimes appear to be drug related.

And, tragic as it is, the crimes were not that unusual in major cities like L.A., even at that time. It was the celebrity status of the victims at one crime scene that made national headlines.

Manson himself was never charged with murder in the infamous Tate murders, which drew national attention, but, rather, conspiracy to commit murder.


So how and why was he turned into the greatest existential threat to Murica, ever?


In the 1960's America was seemingly spiraling out of control. The sexual revolution, JFK, cities ravaged by race riots, Vietnam, smelly hippies, so on...you know the basics. Chaos was ascendant.

Manson presented the opportunity for the establishment to demonstrate that they were still in control. So he was turned into the anti-christ and then paraded around in handcuffs by guys in suits.

"See Murica, we've caught the devil himself! All is fine. We've got everything under control."

Manson, a goofball nobody, was turned into the effigy of Societal Chaos of the time. And he's been on display in prison ever since, demonstrating Murica's social solidity and political professionalism.


It is a decades long farce. A genuine tragicomedy. While certainly not a model citizen, Manson was also no more than a common pimp/drug dealer.


But the Murica vs. Manson episode stands tall as the mentality that prevails over Murican people and their elite in government, law enforcement, media, journalism, academia, etc.

As long as there are guys in suits and/or uniforms, giving "official statements" in front of the cameras, we can rest assured that everything is A-Okay.

If, god-forbid, a guy in a t-shirt and blue jeans should ever appear on TV as an official -official, and admit, "we really don't know what the hell is going on right now", Murica as we know it, would cease to exist.

Murica loves the notion of absolutes. Maybe this is due to the influence of Calvinism, which posits a god that pre-determines and pre-plans everything and thus is in control of everything, good and bad. Murica can accept any kind of tragedy so long as it can affirm that it was part of a grand plan and/or "officials" have everything under control.

 And maybe that explains the illuminati type conspiracy stuff, as Muricans believe that every-day random events "don't just happen" but are controlled by some all powerful group or individual mastermind.

But as was said above, this same mentality plays both ways via guys in suits or uniforms ("officials") in front of cameras with "official statements".

The presumption that somebody, somewhere, is in complete control is central to Murica's mental well being. American Exceptionalism, The End of History, Progress, etc... it's all the same thing.

The reality that the guys in suits or uniforms are just run of the mill jackasses like the rest of us, pretending to know what the hell is going on, is more terrifying to Muricans than the potential of the earth colliding with an asteroid.


So yes, Charles Manson, in his way, saved Murica. Manson, a villain with X-Men type superpowers and a legion of highly trained and well armed followers from all over the universe, is currently held in an 8 X 8 cell, watched over, and kept in check, by officials, aka, guys in suits.

The system works!

Our presuppositions are validated!

All is well!

Everything is under control!


Stay fat and in debt my fellow Muricans!


...











Monday, June 13, 2016

"What I've Discovered" Vs. "What I Believe"...



Progress functions on the notion that the present is better than the past (What metric is used to assert this is generally an ever evolving construct constantly redefined and reconstructed by progressives themselves).

GNON, however, would say otherwise. For those who don't know, GNON means 'the God of nature or Nature'. Here is a description of it from 'the Orthosphere',

'The general idea is  that, whether or not there be any God of Nature who is its source, Nature herself has an inherent and utterly implacable, incontrovertible order, which we contravene at our peril, and which it behooves us therefore to discover and then faithfully and meetly enact; so that, recusing ourselves for the nonce from any tiresome discussions of a religious sort, with their endless bitter controversies over obscure points of doctrine, we may get on quickly to remembering that it is a Very Bad Idea to Mess with Mother Nature, to learning about her, and to shaping our policies accordingly.'

No, I'm not a neo-reactionary. Though obviously some of their discoveries overlap with mine.

GNON is a brilliant articulation. It almost single-handedly justifies the existence of the internet.

The fact that there is a natural order that functions irrespective of man's personal wants and whims is at the heart of what has been called 'Paleo-conservatism',  'White Nationalism', 'Traditionalism', 'Neo-Reactionism' , 'Alt-Right', etc.

Far from representing supremacism, arrogance or hubris, they actually stand for the opposite: humility and submission to GNON, aka, Nature, the natural world, "god",  reality, what-have-you. Objective truth, in other words.

Progressives, Liberals and the like work to overthrow GNON and twist reality to fit their own finite, personal preferences or "emotional needs" -aka, The Narrative.


Which brings me to the post title.


Discovery vs. Belief.

Let's face it, belief today means "personal (subjective) choice".  And nothing better illustrates this than law. Laws are being invented to enforce the emotional zeitgeist of the current generation's elite and their hubris.

Yet, law cannot be invented. It can only be discovered and understood and then articulated. The Law of Gravity, for example.

Governments don't legislate gravity. Though progressives may just try to delegislate it in the name of equality. And no doubt many deaths would follow as the enemies of GNON would leap from rooftops, empowered by the notion that law is man-made and progressive/evolving.

The notion of Progress or of man "going forwards" or "going backwards" is a radical, unfounded, proposition of the current elite. Naturally they seek to justify their rule, like a politician claiming his tenure brought better jobs.

In reality, there is no forward or backward for mankind. There is only true or false, good or bad, etc.

Like with architecture: "modern" vs. "classical" is a false paradigm. Buildings are either ugly or beautiful. Saying some buildings are modern and some are classic is as nonsensical as saying some buildings are Thursday and some are apple.

Belief or ideology can only bulls@*it its way through life for so long. You can believe all men are created equal, but it is patently and observably not true. Your ideology might assert that a man can be a woman or that race doesn't matter, but eventually, inevitably, GNON will show that the opposite is reality.

GNON is constantly and eternally deconstructing the notion of progress in everything from grass breaking through cracks in the concrete to the rise, fall and rise of the sun, each and every day.

You can believe the sun won't set today. You can believe gravity doesn't apply to you. You can believe you are an oak tree.

See if GNON bows to your beliefs.

You can attempt to believe what you want to be true, or you set aside your hubris and emotional hysteria and discover what is true.

And even that is no more a "personal choice" than obeying the law of gravity is.



...


Sunday, June 12, 2016

Is Mitt Romney A White Nationalist?...


It would appear so!

Holy Cow!

With the internationalist wing of Conservative Inc. holding a "summit" on the 2016 election in a desperate bid to try and prove that they are still relevant, Mitt Romney (who lost to Barack Hussein Obama in 2012) has seemingly come out of the closet as a representative of nominal White Nationalism.

He expressed concerns about "trickle down racism" due to Barak Obama's administration...WHOOPS!, I mean, in regards to BlackLivesMatter....No, wait, I mean over La Raza, no, no, the Black Panthers, no, the ADL, no...

You get the point.

Romney, a white guy, expressed concern over positions held by HIS People, aka, White people.

See, that's the thing: when  white people expresses concern about "racism" it is ALWAYS in relation to other whites, aka, THEIR COMMUNITY -THEIR PEOPLE.  Which is an act of openly acknowledging the racial balkanization of America.

White people expressing concern about White "racism", White oppression, etc, is an explicit expression of their own White Racial consciousness. To criticize your own people, is to identify them (and with them) in a ethnic/tribal way, acknowledging that they are particular and set apart from non-Whites.

As the U.S. is currently just over 50% White; North America about 25% White; Globally, about 10% White, having a well known politician take such a position publicly is truly groundbreaking.


So Romney's comments are indeed a fantastic development and a historical moment for the cause of White Nationalism!



...





Saturday, June 4, 2016

The Legacy Of Anti-Nationalism...



Little known fact: systems, and the people who empower and participate in them, don’t like to have the ideological pillars upon which said system resides, questioned.

This fact astounds many people!

But it's true.

The extent to which systems will go to insulate themselves from reality, knows no bounds.


Take for example ideological presuppositions such as equality, tolerance and diversity.

Over the past century, more than a billion people were enslaved, and more than 100 million people murdered in the name of equality, tolerance and diversity. 


Great anti-nationalist heroes include, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot and Fidel Castro, just to name a few.

And, naturally, every one of them was a mass murdering maniac.

In fact, the promoters and practitioners of racial equality and anti-nationalism have been responsible for more death, destruction and horror than smallpox.


How do the defenders of equality, tolerance and anti-nationalism justify themselves?

By appealing to the utopia: The hypothetical New Eden exists, somewhere, some how, in the distant future. And if oceans of blood are the seas upon which mankind must sail to get there, then so be it. 


That is their creed. Hell on earth is their legacy.




...