Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Is Race A Social Construct?...

When true believers spout that nugget of wisdom it always seems to be under the pretext that a social construct is a thing without merit or legitimacy. Which is…strange, to say the least.

So whenever I hear someone say, “race is a social construct,” I always reply, “so are rights.”

Yep. Rights are a social construct. So is law, justice, equality, etc. The list is endless.

Really, I have no idea what-so-ever about what those who say “race is a social construct” are trying to imply or suggest. And it’s rather obvious that they don’t either. It’s just a slogan with not an ounce of thought behind it.

Such are the times we live in.

On the one hand there is no such thing as race. On the other hand there is racism.

Go figure!

There’s no such thing as White people, and yet, somehow, there is White privilege.

Racial profiling is bad, but please support racial quotas, affirmative action, the Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Asian Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, the NAACP, the ADL, the United Negro College Fund, Black Entertainment Television, Latino Entertainment Awards, La Raza and hundreds of other such organizations and institutions which receive government subsidies.

Minorities? Native Americans? Anti-Semitism? Apparently, none of these things exist since race is a social construct.

Come to think of it, the mere act of accusing someone of anti-semitism is racist, since it requires an acknowledgement that one person is a semite and the other person is not!

Let that sink in. The charge of racism is, itself, an acknowledgement of the existence of race.

In fact the pursuit of “equality” betrays the belief in differences to begin with, now doesn’t it.

As to the question of the reality of race,

  1. Skulls of Whites, Blacks and Asians are identifiable as White, black and asian. As are hair samples.

      b. ‘At the same time evidence is slipping out of the laboratory and into everyday life, carrying with it the inescapable message that people of different races have different DNA.’
-New York Times, Nov. 11, 2007 ‘In DNA Era, New Worries About Prejudice’

There are mountains of evidence of the reality of race and racial differences.
The Archeological, Forensic, Scientific, sociological, anthropological and Historical evidences reach into the Heavens.

It takes a certain kind of ideological zealotry to deny it.

And a special kind of thoughtless stupidity to utter inane phrases like “race is a social construct.”

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Technology’s Unintentional War on Cause and Effect…

To what extent do most people know how the technology in their life actually works?

How many people can take apart an iPhone and then put it back together again?

How many people could build an iPhone or computer or television from scratch?

Very, VERY few.

So much of our life today is dependent upon technology: from cars and telephones, to microwaves and computers.

And the reality is we don’t really need to know how they work to use them.

And therein is the problem. The process by which we think (or don’t think) in small, daily, ways, will inform the way we think (or don’t think) in big ways.

If Consumer A doesn’t need to know how his iPad actually works and why it functions to use it, then he doesn’t need to consider how societies form and function to live and prosper in them. He’ll simply assume they work and will always work, just because.

Political Correctness, Immigration, Gay Marriage, Race, Gender, Ethnicity, Democracy, Free Trade, Climate Politics, Etc…None of these issues and their impacts upon the functioning of society are considered in any depth by Consumer A because society works, just because.

Societal collapse?

Well, you can always just buy another iPhone!



The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.
 The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death.
“These findings are appalling and chilling in their indictment of our criminal justice system, not only for potentially innocent defendants who have been wrongly imprisoned and even executed, but for prosecutors who have relied on fabricated and false evidence despite their intentions to faithfully enforce the law,” Blumenthal said.
We scoff at the idea of witch doctors but, really, “experts” have, in fact, become our witch doctors. Be they lawyers, politicians, scientists, judges, historians, psychologists, doctors, etc, etc, the “expert” knows all and is impervious to basic human qualities such as malice and deceit.

And of course the diploma and (or license) is a mystical piece of paper that bestows magical powers of objective truth and applied knowledge on the recipient.

It’s all magic!

Monday, April 13, 2015

Is fighting cancer bigotry?...

Is it not true that a tumor is just undocumented cells?

Is it not a form of discrimination on the part of the, so-called, “native” cells to deny the new cells a chance to grow and prosper in their new home?

Is the word “cancer” not a form of hate-speech directed at the newly arrived cells?

Isn’t fear of cancerous cells merely a fear of the new and the different?

Isn’t diversity a strength?

Are not all cells part of the same body?

Aren’t we all children of God?

Stop the hate!

Love all cells equally!

Friday, March 20, 2015


In the late 1950’s the FBI finally, officially, acknowledged the existence of the mafia, after having denied it for decades.

That’s right. All throughout the heyday of Al Capone, Lucky Luciano, Meyer Lansky, Bugsy Siegel, etc… the United States Government denied the existence of organized crime and ridiculed those who asserted otherwise as, essentially, tinfoil hat wearing kooks.

It was only after the ‘Appalachian Meeting’ of 1957, in which the non-existent mafia was caught out by the New York state police, that the federal government was forced to admit that, well, yeah, OBVIOUSLY, there is a mafia.

This is the very same government that today assures us that the economy is booming, crime is decreasing and millions of third world orcs pouring across the border to pillage and plunder is unstoppable and, frankly, a net positive for society!

Sunday, February 8, 2015

The Change That Was Un-Changed…

The Inquisition is one of the most maligned movements in history.


The Inquisition was the culmination of victory over multiculturalism and the reversal of centuries of mass immigration into Europe.

Muslims, with tactical and economic assistance from their cousins, Judah, swarmed into Europe from North Africa and dominated Iberia, southern France and portions of Italy for hundred of years.

Leftist historians celebrate this era of conquest and carnage in the most flowery of terms, describing it as an age of enlightenment and diversity.

Europeans felt differently, however, and fought to drive the orcs out and reclaim their homelands.

After more than 700 years of “change and progress” the tide was turned and a period of restoration was implemented. And so the efforts of the subversives and their armies of invaders was undone.

That is why the Inquisition is attacked and maligned today. It ably demonstrated that change, no matter how dramatic and extensive, can be un-changed.

Monday, December 29, 2014

When Everybody Else Is Us…

People today do not identify themselves, and others, as flesh and blood beings grounded in concrete absolutes (such as race, ethnicity, gender, particular families etc) but as adhering to this or that faddish ideology
There are no longer Irishmen, or Germans, or Italians, or Saxons, or Bavarians or Johnsons or Smiths.

No, there are only now Capitalists, Socialists, Feminists,  Islamists, Fundamentalists, Pro-Abortionists, Liberals, Conservatives, Nazis, Communists, Free Traders, Progressives, Reactionaries, Traditionalists, Atheists, Agnostics, Revisionists, Revolutionaries…the list goes ever on.

And people wonder why we have wide-open borders.

Upon what grounds should the borders be sealed and protected, let alone acknowledged? Many of the invaders are capitalists: or progressives or conservatives or Christians or, take your pick.

So is it upon the grounds of a mere technicality that you object to open borders? Is it because it’s not legal or because so and so did not go through the proper process?

If so, what happens when the laws are re-written to make that which was once illegal, legal?

Think of it this way, most Whites in the US of the conservative Christian bent are opposed to gay marriage. Is it because, hitherto, it has been technically illegal?

Or is it because it is seen as unnatural for two people of the same physical (absolute, concrete) gender to marry?

How about this: what if one of them got a sex change operation and became “female”; would it then be okay for them to marry?

Or, more fittingly, what if one of them simply identified themselves as, ideologically, female?

Would conservative Christians then okay the marriage?

If not, why not?

If your primary worldview is predicated upon the notion of identities being based upon adherence to an ism then at what point does abnormal become normal or the proverbial them become us?

After all, there is no customs office for becoming a conservative. No paperwork or procedural steps to become a progressive or capitalist. There is no recognized jurisdiction dividing pro-abortionists from agnostics.

So what then keeps one from becoming an American?  Is an American a particular kind of person, genetically, or is he merely someone who agrees to a general ideology (capitalism, democracy, constitutional government, etc)?

If it’s the later then a physical border is illogical because it is merely an expression of sentiment or faith to adhere to certain principles.

And faiths and Creeds do not know borders anymore than merchants do.

Look at it this way,

Did the average Englishman fight against the Germans because the Germans were Nazis?

No, of course not.

They fought the Germans because they were Germans, and, therefore, not Englishmen. Just as they fought the French because they were French and the Spanish because they were Spanish.

Fighting for a faith or creed or ideology or form of government is like challenging the wind to a swordfight for supremacy of the air. It is madness personified. It is empty and vain and though you may charge forth without fear and march victoriously forward without wound, you will eventually collapse of weariness, slashing at a foe that has no shape in defense of a thing you can neither see nor touch.

Thus on the flip side, we must ask, do Americans fight for Americans?

No, of course not. American is too generic a term to even define.

Which is why Americans fight for isms such as democracy, free trade and equality. And that might explain why Americans are always fighting IN OTHER COUNTRIES FAR FROM AMERICA.

In other words, Americans are missionaries for Americanism, spreading the faith far and wide across the whole world. A quest to make all men “Americans”.

And, still, they wonder why we have open borders.