Saturday, May 31, 2008

What Does Obama Do For Whites?...

He unites them against such notions as Multiculturalism, Diversity and Equality!


Geraldine Ferraro laments anti-White attitudes in an article on 'sexism'.
Since March, when I was accused of being racist for a statement I made about the influence of blacks on Obama's historic campaign, people have been stopping me to express a common sentiment: If you're white you can't open your mouth without being accused of being racist. They see Obama's playing the race card throughout the campaign and no one calling him for it as frightening. They're not upset with Obama because he's black; It's not racism that is driving them, it's racial resentment. And that is enforced because they don't believe he understands them and their problems. they're upset because they don't expect to be treated fairly because they're white.That when he said in South Carolina after his victory "Our Time Has Come" they believe he is telling them that their time has passed.
-source


The democrats seem hellbent on nominating the one candidate who could not only loose to McCain in November, but singlehandedly destroy whats left of the USA, while also bringing to an end The West's delusional flirtation with the perverse, un-scientific and thus far disastrous notions of Equality and Diversity.

A lot could be said on the context of Ms. Ferraro's article and the goals behind it, but it is enough for now to point out that the contents of the paragraph above (coming from a such 'mainstream' figure) would have been unthinkable just a few years ago...


.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Back To Basics...

(the above is purported to be a South American tribe that has not been contacted previously.
Whether real or not, the picture represents the civilizational standards most non-Whites would still be in, were it not for contact with Whites. In other words it's what America will look like in the 22nd century after the 'Browning of America')

Paying blacks to behave,
Maryland Transit Administration officials are offering discount cards for area businesses to students who pledge good behavior on city buses, an incentive that transit administrators hope will help curb disrespectful and violent behavior.
MTA administrators registered students for the first time yesterday at the Johns Hopkins Metro Station, where about 100 took the pledge, according to spokeswoman Jawauna Greene.
This summer, MTA drivers will attend various festivals to register students, including the African American Heritage Festival, Artscape and the state fair, as well as Baltimore public schools events.
-source


Where Diversity is, chaos thrives,
Some 15 years ago, the local parent population within the Victor Elementary School District consisted largely of those in the service at George Air Force Base, according to superintendent Ralph Baker.
When the district was unified about 20 years ago, there were about 200 English language learners and Hispanics made up about 15 to 20 percent of the Hesperia district population, McKinney said. Now, there are more than 5,000 English language learners, and 56 percent of the population is Hispanic.

“That well-disciplined and orderly part of our population has been replaced with a percentage of our population that are either attached to somebody within the prison, or that person has been released from a prison to this area,” Baker said. “They tend to be more anti-authoritarian.”
-source


In India,
An Indian woman accused of witchcraft was beaten, gagged and burnt to death in a remote eastern village, police said on Friday.
The woman was dragged out of her home, her hands and legs tied and taken to a crematorium where she was set on fire in front of the village which ignored her screams for help.
-source


In Africa,
Eleven elderly people accused of being witches have been burned to death by a mob in the west of Kenya, police say.
The area has witnessed similar attacks in the past when people suspected of engaging in witchcraft have been killed or ostracised.
The mob dragged them out of their houses and burned them individually and then set their homes alight, our correspondent says.
-source


What is the connection of these stories?

The West's governments have set about to bring as many primitive peoples as possible into a neighborhood near you .
And as the top story shows, governments and media go out of their way to acclimate OUR standards down to the savages in an effort to show tolerance and sensitivity towards them.

The result is increasing levels of crime, poverty, disease and out of control violence spreading like wildfire from Paris, France to Mayberry, USA.

We are all being moved 'Back to Basics' in The West, because to achieve equality, Whites must be either removed or dumbed down to non-White standards. And 'the basics' too which America is being 'brown-downed' to, resembles the primitive savages in the above picture, living in mud huts and chucking spears at airplanes...

If The Media Doesn't Report On it, Is It Still A Crime?...


Here is a well researched and sourced article on black on White race crimes in both Britain and America, and the efforts of the media to suppress the truth...





.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Law And Order Are The Works Of The 'White Devil!...

Chaos erupted in a Bexar County courtroom Wednesday when a convicted killer was in court to learn his execution date. Kevin Watts, who was found guilty of killing three people execution-style during a restaurant robbery in 2002, asked 226th District Judge Sid Harle if he could address the court. Watts, who is black, began a racially-charged tirade when granted permission to speak to the court.
Watts told Harle, "I want to say that you white folks can kill me for something they've been doing for years. You white folks, you've been doing this (expletive) for years. You all started this (expletive)."
The convict continued to protest. At that point, Harle's patience wore out and he ordered Watts out of the courtroom for good.

Watts was sentenced to death for the execution-style murder of three members of a family that owned the restaurant. He shot each of the victims in the back of the head as they knelt in front of him, prosecutors said. Watts also kidnapped the daughter of one of the victims and allowed an accomplice to rape her, according to police reports.
-source

No Guilt.
No Pity.
No Remorse.
Just hatred and contempt for all that is good, manifested in animal savagery.

Watts has no guilt or remorse for the three people he murdered (who were Asian by the way), he is angry at the 'White Devil' for setting standards of behavior and enforcing them.

Crime Rates

• Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.

• When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

• Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.

• The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

• Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.

• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.

• Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

• Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

• Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.

• Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

Incarceration

• Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.

• Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

-source


Morality

Prof. Levin is at his most original and provocative when he sets aside well-established data on intelligence and takes up the even more controversial question of morality. Other researchers have suggested that blacks differ from whites in ways other than IQ, but have not followed this argument very far.

For example, the widely used Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), which subdivides personality into a number of categories, shows consistent differences in how blacks and whites evaluate themselves. Blacks, for example, hold themselves in higher regard than whites (or, in today’s jargon, have “higher self-esteem”). They are consistently more likely to agree with statements like:

I am an important person.
I am entirely self-confident.
If given the chance I could make a good leader of people.
I have often had to take orders from someone who did not know as much as I did.

The common assumption that blacks are “taught to hate themselves” is wrong; blacks are quite pleased with themselves. At the same time, they consistently score higher than whites on the MMPI scales for such things as Hypomania, Psychopathy, Schizophrenia, and Masculinity, which are precisely the traits that distinguish incarcerated criminals from the rest of us. They tend to agree, for example, with statements like:

Most people are honest chiefly through fear of being caught.
Most people make friends because friends are likely to be useful to them.
Most people will use somewhat unfair means to gain profit or an advantage rather than lose it.
It is not hard for me to ask help from my friends even though I cannot return the favor.

Finally, even within races, moral reasoning is closely associated with intelligence. Intelligence does not guarantee good behavior, but a certain level is necessary for self-knowledge and the comprehension of moral distinctions.

Prof. Levin does not flinch from drawing what may appear to be an unkind conclusion: Given the crime rates, social irresponsibility, lack of foresight, impulsiveness, and general self-centeredness of black behavior, blacks probably have a different inherent capacity and appreciation for morality.

That blacks care less about others and worry less about the future is suggested in virtually every area of behavior. Crime is only the most obvious example, nor is it the expression of wretchedness and self-loathing that excuse-making whites pretend it to be. Prof. Levin notes that “the criminal behavior of young black males just does not look like an expression of despair. In account after account, these individuals come across as full of themselves and unrepentant.” He might have added that if blacks were really reduced to hopelessness by white oppression, they would presumably have high suicide rates, whereas in every age group blacks kill themselves at only one half to one quarter the white rate.

The other prominent black deviation from white morality is reckless procreation, but other traits are just as striking: unwillingness to do volunteer work, support charities, donate organs, volunteer as medical test subjects, keep quiet in theaters, recycle trash, save money, exercise, or keep houses in good repair. Black mothers are twice as likely as white mothers to smoke, drink, and take drugs during pregnancy, even when doctors tell them not to. Blacks between ages 15 and 24 are ten times as likely to have fatal gun accidents as whites of the same age even when gun availability is controlled for. By white standards, black behavior is impulsive, shiftless, and inconsiderate.

-more here



...


Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Jonestowning America...


Albert Mohler is 'president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary-the flagship school of the Southern Baptist Convention', which means he is a modern Politically Correct Christian...which means logic, reasoning and reality are, for him, contemptible paradoxes which must be attacked and destroyed with all of the frenzy of an Inquisitor hunting down 'heretics'.

For example, on his blog from Friday, May 23, 2008, he laments the fact that White people aren't dying fast enough, but are rather moving away from non-Whites.
(As a Christian, this grieves him deeply)

He starts off with this zinger,
Demography is not destiny, but that claim is not, humanly speaking, far off the mark. The pattern of populations and social behaviors will establish the character and contours of any civilization. For this reason, any major change in the population is significant, and the more unexpected the change, the more significant its impact.

Dr. Mohler, meet the dictionary;
oxymoron;
Noun
a figure of speech that combines two apparently contradictory terms, for example cruel kindness [Greek oxus sharp + mōros stupid]

Collins Essential English Dictionary 2nd Edition 2006 © HarperCollins Publishers 2004, 2006

He continues,

Thus, Americans should take a close look at the fact that in a handful of major metropolitan areas, deaths now outnumber births. In times past, this would have indicated a major catastrophe such as famine, plague, or war. But with regard to these cities, the causes include nothing to do with famine, plague, or war.

FAMINE, PLAGUE AND WAR! In America! Surely not my good sir!

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, Rep.-Iowa...

But the carnage wrought by illegal alien murderers represents only a fraction of the pool of blood spilled by American citizens as a result of an open border and un-enforced immigration laws.

While King reports 12 Americans are murdered daily by illegal aliens, he says 13 are killed by drunk illegal alien drivers

(The Narrator note: For those keeping count, that means that since September 11, 2001, approx. 55,000 Americans have been killed by illegal immigrants!)

King also reports eight American children are victims of sexual abuse by illegal aliens every day – a total of 2,920 annually.

Based on a one-year in-depth study, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute of Atlanta estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each. She analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 that included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants.

As the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. increases, so does the number of American victims.

...at the end of 2003, approximately 267,000 illegal aliens were incarcerated in all U.S. jails and prisons.

In April 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a report on a study of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003. It found the following:

  • The 55,322 illegal aliens studied represented a total of 459,614 arrests – some eight arrests per illegal alien;
  • Their arrests represented a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses – some 13 offenses per illegal alien;
  • 36 percent had been arrested at least five times before.

source



"...the increasing number of illegal aliens coming into the United States is forcing the closure of hospitals, spreading previously vanquished diseases and threatening to destroy America's prized health-care system, says a report in the spring issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

"The influx of illegal aliens has serious hidden medical consequences," writes Madeleine Pelner Cosman, author of the report. "We judge reality primarily by what we see. But what we do not see can be more dangerous, more expensive, and more deadly than what is seen."

According to her study, 84 California hospitals are closing their doors as a direct result of the rising number of illegal aliens and their non-reimbursed tax on the system.

In addition, the report says, "many illegal aliens harbor fatal diseases that American medicine fought and vanquished long ago, such as drug-resistant tuberculosis, malaria, leprosy, plague, polio, dengue, and Chagas disease."

Among the organizations directing illegal aliens into America's medical systems, according to the report, are the Ford Foundation-funded Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Immigration Law Center, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association's Commission on Immigration Policy, Practice, and Pro Bono, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the National Council of La Raza, George Soros's Open Society Institute, the Migration Policy Institute, the National Network for Immigration and Refugee Rights and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Many illegals entering this country have tuberculosis, according to the report.

"TB's swift, deadly return now is lethal for about 60 percent of those infected because of new Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Until recently MDR-TB was endemic to Mexico. This Mycobacterium tuberculosis is resistant to at least two major anti-tubercular drugs. Ordinary TB usually is cured in six months with four drugs that cost about $2,000. MDR-TB takes 24 months with many expensive drugs that cost around $250,000 with toxic side effects. Each illegal with MDR-TB coughs and infects 10 to 30 people, who will not show symptoms immediately. Latent disease explodes later.

TB was virtually absent in Virginia until in 2002, when it spiked a 17 percent increase, but Prince William County, just south of Washington, D.C., had a much larger rise of 188 percent. Public health officials blamed immigrants. In 2001 the Indiana School of Medicine studied an outbreak of MDR-TB, and traced it to Mexican illegal aliens. The Queens, New York, health department attributed 81 percent of new TB cases in 2001 to immigrants. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ascribed 42 percent of all new TB cases to 'foreign born' people who have up to eight times higher incidences.."

source
Al rambles on,
This report is certain to surprise many Americans -- those unaware of the looming demographic crisis faced by many American communities.

It sure will. Especially considering that America's population jumped form 150 million to 330 million from 1950 to 2008.
And it will continue to surprise us as the population continues to grow towards half a billion by 2050.
Yes I'm sure many people who have seen their towns and neighborhoods turned into crime riddled ghettos by unending hordes of Third World invaders will be shocked to hear of this demographic downturn.

Al then lets his anti-White venom foam,
Those same citizens are also probably unaware that America's birthrate just slightly above base population replacement is sustained at that level only by the higher reproduction rates of new immigrants -- to whom we should be grateful for representing their hopes by having children.

Yes isn't it beautiful the way Gabriela and Shanniqua "express their hopes" by having 37 kids by 37 different fathers and expecting White taxpayers to pay for their food, housing, education, incarceration and eventual treatment for STD related illnesses.
Also Al doesn't believe the racial makeup of America is relevant to it's history, character, culture or future. 'After all', Al reasons, 'Just because America was founded by and created in the image of White people, it would be racist to believe that it should remain White'. He is ecumenical on the matter you see.
Believing that only Whites can be Americans is as bigoted as believing only Christians go to heaven and...whoops, never mind.

The good Dr. has gone down the road of racial ecumenicalism and believes that heaven on Earth comes in the form of Marxist notions of Diversity, tolerance and Racial Integration.
Evidently, here is the Christian idea of Heaven.

Mohler quotes from the New York Times article,

And Pittsburgh is not alone:

Other metropolitan areas, too, are teetering on the brink of natural decrease.

In the 1990s, deaths outnumbered births in only four metropolitan areas with more than 250,000 people, and three of those were in the South. Since 2000, 10 metropolitan areas -- half of them outside the South -- have suffered a net loss of population to natural decrease.

In three other areas hurt by vanishing industry, Buffalo-Niagara Falls and Utica-Rome in upstate New York, and Duluth, Minn., deaths exceeded births in at least one year in this decade.

Okay, I shouldn't do it, but I'll go ahead and use the infamous Wikipedia here,

White flight is a term for the demographic trend where working and middle-class white people move away from racial-minority suburbs or inner-city neighborhoods to white suburbs and exurbs.[1][2] The phenomenon was first named in the United States, but has occurred in other countries as well. Some scholars have noted the impact of redlining, mortgage discrimination, and racially restrictive covenants on white flight: these factors denied or increased the cost of services, such as banking and insurance, to residents in minority suburbs and minority inner-city neighborhoods.

So yeah, as the percentage of non-Whites increase in an area, the percentage of Whites will drop and thus that area becomes yet another zone of death and disease like Mexico or Africa.

Mohler ends with a nugget,
Pittsburgh is becoming a parable of population loss for the rest of the nation. Will anyone take notice?

Gee I don't know Doc. Are you asking if your grandchildren will take note of the fact that there will be about ten times as many people in America in their day than there were in their grandparents day?
I kinda doubt population plunge will be a concern.

The fact is there are WAYYYYYYYYYYYY too many people in The West now anyway.
Worrying about population reduction at this point in time is kinda like fretting over the receding waters of post-Katrina New Orleans.

What Mohler and other anti-White Christian zealots dance around, is the fact that it is Whites alone whose percentage is decreasing. (yes Japan's population has decreased, but over all Asia contains half of the worlds 6.7 billion people)
But even this should not be seen as a problem as there have been ebbs and flows in European population numbers in the past ( the Black Death for example wiped out upwards of half of Europe's population, yet no European Monarch thought to import 40 million africans to 'fill the void'). The problem today is that the Corporate State and their lap dogs Media and Christianity are using the current, and much needed reduction in population in Western nations as an excuse to flood those nations with non-White consumers and pew sitters. This amounts to nothing less than the Passive Genocide of indigenous Europeans and their diaspora populations. And those like Mohler are cheerleading this development.

So where does the Mohleresque attitude of Christian Racial Harmony and Social Justice at the expense of White Civilization come from?

Where in modern America do we find the genesis of the Christian church seeking out equality, tolerance and social justice because, 'we're all God's Children'?

Peoples Temple was a cult founded in 1955 by Reverend James Warren Jones (Jim Jones). In 1961, Jones helped to (racially) integrate churches, restaurants, the telephone company, the police department, a theater, an amusement park, and the Methodist Hospital and became the executive director of the Indianapolis Human Rights Commission. Jones received considerable criticism in Indiana for his integrationist views. In 1965, Jones left Indiana, moving the Peoples Temple to California. The Peoples Temple purported to practice what it called "apostolic socialism....Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that "If you're born in this church, this socialist revolution, you're not born in sin. If you're born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you're born in sin. Jones and his church earned a reputation for aiding the cities' poorest citizens, especially racial minorities, drug addicts, and the homeless. Soup kitchens, daycare centers, and medical clinics for elderly people were set up, along with counseling programs for prostitutes and drug addicts who wanted to change their lives. The Peoples Temple made strong connections to the California state welfare system. During the 1970s, the Peoples Temple owned and ran at least nine residential care homes for the elderly, six homes for foster children, and a state-licensed 40 acre ranch for developmentally disabled persons. In 1974, the Peoples Temple signed a lease to rent land in Guyana...Former Temple member Tim Carter describes the reason for this move...."the United States is a racist place."......Carter said the Temple concluded that Guyana was "a place in a black country where our black members could live in peace". Marceline Jones described Jonestown as "dedicated to live for socialism, total economic and racial and social equality. -wikipedia
Jim Jones and his followers, comprising peoples of various races and backgrounds, gathered together in one integrated community of tolerance and social justice to promote racial harmony and diversity.....then they all drank poisoned cool-aid.

I encourage everyone to look further into the Peoples Temple Ideology, becuse the similarities between the goals, aspirations and beliefs behind Jonestown and modern multicultural America (and her Christianity) are chilling, and should serve as a wake up call to the most dense of American Citizenry.

.

Monday, May 26, 2008

'The Emperor' Has No Cloths! Pass It On...

In the current issue, software executive Jim Manzi warns darkly of powerful (yet unnamed) "genetic maximalists," who threaten human freedom in ominous (but unspecified) ways.
That's because these “popularizers” unscientifically ride the sociobiological "reigning presumption of academic America" in a climate in which "mass media are inundated with this biology-explains-all ideology."
Unfortunately, Manzi never explains what planet in what year he's describing: Htrae in the year 8002 D.A. maybe?

Manzi proclaims:

"If the pretense to scientific knowledge is always dangerous, it is doubly so when wedded to state power, because it leads to pseudo-rational interventions that unduly extend authority and restrict freedom. That the linkage of race and IQ is provocative to contemporary audiences is not surprising: It is almost a direct restatement, in the language of genetics, of the key premise of Social Darwinism."

Manzi then recounts the stereotypical litany of early 20th Century horrors from eugenics to the Holocaust.

Who, exactly, are these dangerous proponents of "geneticism" who are currently running amok? National Review gives Manzi 3000 words, but he doesn't come up with any names more recent than Woodrow Wilson and Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., who was born in 1841.

Perhaps Manzi is alluding to James D. Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA, who indeed mentioned "the linkage of race and IQ" last year. Yet, as you will recall (although Manzi and the NR editors seem to have forgotten), Watson was not immediately elected Big Brother. Instead, in our world, he was subjected to a Two Minute Hate and kicked to the curb by the medical research laboratory he had built up for four decades.

Manzi’s essay is noticeably lacking in ideological balance. There's not even a pro forma mention of anti-Darwinist Lysenkoism under Stalin to balance the eugenics-led-to-Hitler cliché.

Weirdly, Manzi argues that it would be okay to establish a scientific totalitarian state:

"Science may someday allow us to predict human behavior comprehensively and reliably, so that we can live in Woodrow Wilson's 'perfected, co-ordinated beehive.'"

Nevertheless, we shouldn't, yet, because science hasn't become accurate enough:

"Until then, however, we need to keep stumbling forward in freedom as best we can."

Well, that's a relief!

Manzi warns us about these "science popularizers" who

"now believe that … we can explain the causes of the behaviors of individuals and groups sufficiently to predict these behaviors scientifically."

And that's bad, because:

"But if translated into public policy, their belief would likely have disastrous results."

Well, what one "science popularizer" (me) wants is more skepticism about the dogmas about behavior that underlie current public policy—much of which already has disastrous results.


Manzi assumes that we must "believe that we can remove the mind-body problem from the purview of philosophy by reducing the mind to a scientifically explained physical phenomenon" in order to "predict these behaviors scientifically."

That's ridiculous. We don't have to solve possibly insoluble metaphysical problems to make better predictions about human behavior. We just have to make better predictions.

Contra Manzi, we already make predictions that are reliably more accurate than random guesses about individual and group behavior. We do it all the time.

I'll make one right now. I predict that men of West African descent will be over-represented among the eight finalists in the 100-meter dash to determine the Fastest Man in the World at the Olympics this summer.

How can I make that prediction? Do I understand how all the gene variants work together in leg muscles to give West Africans an advantage in sprinting? Have I solved the mind-body problem?

Heck, no.

I simply made that prediction because the last 48 finalists over the last six Olympics have all been men of West African descent. That's not likely to have been a random fluke.

In fact, the Olympics are a major embarrassment to the currently dominant worldview.

We’re living in an Emperor's New Clothes moment. And those moments can go on a lot longer than Hans Christian Andersen suggested. People who have been making fools of themselves seldom say,

"Why, yes, that little boy is right and I am wrong. Of course the emperor has no clothes, just as Occam’s Razor would suggest."

Instead, what they typically say for a protracted period is:

"What a stupid, evil little boy who attacks our poor emperor. That brat just can’t see that our emperor is wearing a higher form of clothing that you have to be really smart and fit for your post to see."

And the closer the emperor's procession comes and the more obvious his nakedness becomes, the angrier the crowd will become at that little bastard.

So, I suspect that, outside of the United States and its First Amendment protections, the word "crimethink" will continue to slowly move from metaphor to reality as the police power is brought down upon heretics.

The long-term outcome will be an increasing stultification of intellectual life in the West—rather like in Brezhnev's Soviet Union. Mathematicians and astronomers at the abstract end were relatively free. At the practical end, engineers were, too. But any Soviet scientist or intellectual in the middle, who tried to theorize about human beings, was in danger of losing his career or his liberty.
- Steve Sailer

Sailer's comment about the Olympics is a good one and the same thing applies to professional sports in America where blacks (representing just 11% of the population of the nation) comprise about 98% of professional athletes.
On the opposite end of the spectrum there are very few black engineers, technicians, computer programmers, etc.., which creates a bit of a problem for Equalitarians.

On the one hand they'll claim that it's 'White Racism' that is keeping brothus from highly skilled positions, yet on the other hand they'll claim that it is 'Market Forces' which allow for the high percentage of black professional athletes to achieve fame and fortune.
Of course another problem explaining away the tiny percentage of black
engineers, technicians and computer programmers as 'racism', is the presence of imported Asians at Silicon Valley outnumbering the Whites.

The West truly is in an "Emperor Has No Cloths' moment and is stubborning clinging to it's Myths.

How long will this last?
Only as long as it is financially and structurally convenient. But when reality starts to seep back in as The West continues its decline into Third World Hell, 'the Emperor' be damned, people will at last declare, 'Enough is Enough' and 'the Emperor', in all it's multicultural depravity, will be overthrown...


.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

WWII: The War Against Western Civilization...

A TEENAGE motorist was told to remove an England flag from his car by a police officer because it could be offensive to immigrants.
Ben Smith, 18, was driving back home to Ingram Road in Melksham on Thursday evening after filling up with petrol, when the officer stopped him on a routine patrol.
He checked the tax disc and tyres on his Vauxhall Corsa but when he noticed the flag of St George on the parcel shelf he told Mr Smith to take it down.
-source


A FORMER soldier who served in Iraq has been barred from joining the police because of a tattoo.
Craig Briggs was told the ‘England’ tattoo on his forearm “might be seen as racist or cause offence” by Greater Manchester Police.
-source


Why is it so hard for people to understand that the outcome of WWII represented the defeat of Western Civilization?

All of the policies that so many people now wring their hands over –feminism, abortion, gay rights, mass invasion of (exclusively) Western nations, removal of prayer from schools, increasing State power, progressive and endless rising taxation, “hate crimes”, rewriting Western history to portray Whites as evil, abolition of Freedom of Association, attacks upon the traditional family, etc…didn't begin to spread like wildfire until AFTER the Axis was defeated and the Allies reigned victorious...


.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Universal Morality In An Evolving World?...

Readers of AR will be aware of the well-documented race differences in intelligence and temperament. The mean black score on valid IQ tests is 85, while the white mean is 100 (and some Asian groups outscore whites). Black children adopted into upper-middle class white families fail to attain IQs much above 85, which implicates genes as the cause of this difference. Twin studies and cross-cultural comparisons implicate genes in the greater levels of impulsiveness and aggression also found in blacks.

A less frequently noted point is that these psychological differences suggest race differences in morality. Part of the difference may be due simply to different levels of intelligence. The mean IQ of incarcerated felons is about 90, and Lawrence Kohlberg’s extensive research on children found that IQ is correlated with moral development. It should not be surprising that mental ability is linked to moral character, since the latter requires grasping rules and thinking through the consequences of one’s actions.

However, different levels of intelligence are not likely to be the sole cause of racial differences in morality. Data reported in The Bell Curve (and noted in the February issue of AR) show that black and white populations differ in crime and illegitimacy rates even when IQ is held constant.
Evolutionary biology suggests an explanation for race differences in moral values. But first, to begin with a definition: An individual’s “morality” is the rules he wants everyone to follow, and that he wants everyone to want everyone to follow. Honesty is a moral value for him if he tries to be honest, tries to make his children honest, hopes others will be honest, and encourages others to reinforce honesty. A group’s morality is the moral rules its members share.

However, selection for morality need not have been uniform, since honesty, cooperation, and the other virtues need not have been equally important in all environments. Cooperativeness (like intelligence) was probably more adaptive in the colder, harsher, Eurasian environment in which whites and Asians evolved than in sub-Saharan Africa. Food grows year-round in a warm climate. There is little danger of freezing to death, so it is not necessary to work together to build large shelters. Sexual patterns are also influenced by environment: Since a woman abandoned by her mate has a better chance of supporting herself and her children in a benign environment, there is less pressure on women to evolve a demand for male fidelity, or for males to evolve a strong sense of attachment.

The situation was otherwise in Eurasia, where large game was a dietary staple. Bringing down a cornered mastodon takes cooperation, with each man in his assigned position, ready to respond to shouted instructions. There must be jointly acceptable rules for dividing the kill. And, since females depend on male hunters for their own survival and that of their children, an advantage would accrue to females who chose mates likely to support them for a lifetime. Sexual selection would then mold males more inclined to satisfy the female demand for fidelity.


1) Black behavior that is unacceptable by white standards—theft, drug use, preoccupation with sex—is not “sick.” It is how traits that were once adaptive in Africa express themselves in Western urban society. This may be part of the reason blacks seem not to experience white laws and standards of personal responsibility as binding, and why black spokesmen are so curiously unapologetic about black crime. They will caution black males that crime is “stupid” (i.e. apt to lead to punishment), and a Jesse Jackson may denounce black-on-black crime as harmful to blacks, but they do not say that crime, particularly black-on-white crime, is intrinsically bad.

In one remarkable incident, Edmund Perry, a Harlem teenager recruited on full scholarship to the prestigious boarding school of Exeter, was killed a few weeks after graduation when he attempted to mug a plainclothes policeman. Angry demonstrations ensued, in which blacks complained of Perry’s alienation at Exeter. Far from expressing regret over Perry’s actions, blacks blamed white society for them. In fact, the difficulties blacks experience in conforming to American society cannot really be blamed on black attitudes or white norms, but on the mismatch between the two.

-more here

The modern notion of universal standards or universal morality has caused more death and destruction than any other ill conceived philosophy with delusions of grandeur. In fact Marxism is deeply rooted in it and was the first to bring us such phrases as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, equality and so on.

Monotheistic religions (Christianity, Islam and Judaism) promoted such notions as well and spurred its adherents into bloody conquest and carnage in an effort bring the 'universal message' to all God's Children.

This belief in universal morality has reached its apex in the modern Western World where Whites routinely project their own morals, value and ethics onto non-Whites then stand dumbfounded and befuddled at their (non-White) vile and disorderly behavior.

To believe that dispersed Homo sapiens, spreading out across the earth and evolving in varying environments over a period of ten's of thousand's of years, would or should reach the exact same level of intelligence, temperament or morality, strains scientific reasoning as well as basic common sense.

To believe that blacks and Whites 'must' have the same level of intelligence or morality is no different than insisting that lizards should be able to fly the same as birds...



.

Shooting Yourself In The Foot...

Julie Spence, Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, said her officers were already struggling to cope with the consequences of migration and warned that if the economic downturn continued, it would heighten tensions in communities with large numbers of migrant workers.
....in Peterborough alone, 93 cultures were now represented and 100 languages spoken.
"There are foreign nationals in our cells every day of the week."
-source


It grows increasing clearer by the day that when the Allies aligned against Germany in WWII, they shot themselves in the foot.
Western Civilization began to crumble almost immediately after the Germans were defeated in 1945...

.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

The Master Race and Burning Books...

JERUSALEM — Orthodox Jews have burned hundreds of New Testaments in the latest act of violence against Christian missionaries in Israel.

Uzi Aharon, the deputy mayor of the central Israeli town of Or Yehuda, says he got into a loudspeaker car last Thursday and urged people to turn over hundreds of New Testaments and missionary material recently distributed by missionaries.

The books were dumped into a pile and religious students set them afire in a lot near a synagogue, he said.

The Maariv newspaper reported Tuesday that hundreds of students took part in the book-burning.

-source


There are a few basic lessons we can learn early in life.

1. Pathological Liars are always the first to call everyone else a liar.
2. Thieves are the most paranoid about theft.
3. Swindlers always assume everyone else is out to cheat them.

And upon these basic observations the actions of millions can be easily judged.

It is rather striking that everything Nazi Germany did (or was accused of doing) that is demonized as grievous sin, is EXACTLY what Jews have done and are labeled as Righteous Acts.

Burning certain books, declarations of a "master or chosen race", building nations to preserve an ethnic people (Israel), desiring to oppress or eliminate a rival ethnicity, etc... everything we are told those "evil" Nazi's were up to are the very things Jews do and have been given a pass on.

But the question is, is there anything wrong with a people seeking to preserve their own?
Of course not.
The problem is, that every race and ethnic group on the face of Earth are free to struggle on their own behalf without it being labeled "Racist" accept Whites.
Whites alone are expected to offer themselves up collectively on the altar of Political Correctness and sacrifice their very existence to the gods of Equality.

Until Whites remove the rose-tinted 'all races are the same' glasses and stop projecting their own morality, ethics, standards of law and temperament onto non-Whites, they will continue to be confounded by the behavior of the peoples of color...

.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Then And Now, And The Graves In Between...

Appeasement is the name given to what Neville Chamberlain did at Munich in September 1938. Rather than fight Germany in another great war—to keep 3.5 million Germans under a Czech rule they despised—he agreed to their peaceful transfer to German rule. With these Germans went the lands their ancestors had lived upon for centuries, German Bohemia, or the Sudetenland.

Chamberlain's negotiated deal with Hitler averted a European war—at the expense of the Czech nation. That was appeasement.

German tanks, however, did not roll into Poland until a year later, Sept. 1, 1939. Why did the tanks roll? Because Poland refused to negotiate over Danzig, a Baltic port of 350,000 that was 95 percent German and had been taken from Germany at the Paris peace conference of 1919, in violation of Wilson's 14 Points and his principle of self-determination.

Hitler had not wanted war with Poland. He had wanted an alliance with Poland in his anti-Comintern pact against Joseph Stalin.

From March to August 1939, Hitler tried to negotiate Danzig. But the Poles, confident in their British war guarantee, refused. So, Hitler cut his deal with Stalin, and the two invaded and divided Poland.
-
Pat Buchanan


Yes in 1939 both Germany AND THE SOVIET UNION invaded Poland. Britain declared war ONLY on Germany.

The result of WWII?

See here.

...

Monday, May 19, 2008

De-White Guilting A Society?...

Hillary Rodham Clinton is right. She has the broader and whiter political coalition, so she should, by all rights, be the Democratic presidential nominee.
After all, in other realms of the political process, we routinely refer to "black districts" or "Latino districts" and speak of the necessity of those jurisdictions to be represented by black or Latino elected officials. Well, then, because the American population is 66% white, maybe the United States is a de facto white district that should be represented accordingly.
Don't scoff at the idea. Ethnic and racial self-determination have been underlying factors in the formation of modern nations. Israel is one example, along with anti-colonial revolutions and states in the Third World. The principle of ethnic self-determination made its way into the United Nations Charter, and it lurks in contemporary domestic discussions about the political and cultural rights of every kind of minority.
The Clinton campaign's assertion of her electability based on "hardworking white American" voters reveals deep divisions in the Democratic coalition. But it isn't a sign of the resurgence of white supremacy in America. Rather, it is a formal re-articulation of whiteness as a social category and a racial interest group.
Last week, exit polls in West Virginia showed that Barack Obama might be facing some fierce racial resistance if he becomes the Democratic nominee. More than half of West Virginia Democratic voters -- 95% of whom are white -- said they would be dissatisfied if Obama won the nomination.
Is this white supremacy? No, in fact it might be its opposite, an acknowledgment that white privilege has its limits. With immigration and globalization reformulating who we are as a nation, it isn't the white elites that are threatened by the changes; rather, it's the nearly 70% of whites who are not college educated who figure among the most insecure of Americans. Many feel that their jobs are being outsourced or taken by immigrants -- legal or otherwise -- and that their culture is being subsumed. When Clinton promises to make their voices heard, she's appealing not to Anglo-Saxon racial triumphalism but to the fear of white decline.
-the rest here

Yes Left Wing zealots are secretly becoming downright giddy at the thought of an emerging "White Community".
Why?
Because it signals the demographic decline of the White Race in America. Whites will soon be just another minority group vying for political attention.

The articles hispanic author notes that America is 66% White, but this is a fallacy promoted by the US census which counts North Africans, Jews, Arabs, Turks, Persians and other middle-eastern groups as "white". And when you factor in the uncounted illegals the percentage of Whites (as in people of indigenous European descent) in America is somewhere around 54%.

The author also mentions globalization. Here the leftists begin to squirm due the fact that in "our global village" Whites account for only 13% of the population. Quite the minority indeed.

The article itself is titled, 'The Fear Of White Decline' .
Is there a fear of White decline in America?
Yes.
For the simple reason that as the percentage of Whites drop in any given area, the greater the increase in crime, drugs, gangs, prostitution, murder, rape, political corruption, theft, infrastructural degradation, poverty and disease.
For example, there is nothing more ironic or comical than hearing about how "dynamic" and "wonderful" Latin-American Culture is from people who are fleeing from it.

Will White Americans come to see themselves as a Community again?
Yep.
But it has nothing to do with what leftist think it is.
The truth is White people's tolerance for "Multiculturalism" is directly related to their distance from it.

And when there is no place left to White-flight to, well, I think a great many of the other minorities are in for a rather rude awakening at the reaction of a couple of hundred million White people (in both American and Canada) who have been striped of their inheritance and backed into a corner with nothing left to loose...

.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Emergence Of A Pattern...

Now risen to the level of an insurgent war, the battle between the falling Kleptocratic Mexican government and supra-wealthy organized crime groups who now control much of Mexico's land areas, police forces, and even some of its military has hit a new milestone.

Exasperating political climates, the violence, bloodshed, and hatred for Americans South of the border, coupled with rising injustices and racism against and by US citizens, compounded by an incompetent federal government North of the border, are propagating the fires of civil discontent on both sides and about to strip-away the last veneers of civility.

Toss into the ugly political salad the mix of illegal immigration, free trade, high treason, disdain for the Constitution by US leaders, anti-rule-of-law anarchists groups and members of Congress (i.e. pro-open borders, pro-illegal immigration groups), and increasing economic pressures and uncertainties on both sides of the border, the climate is now ripe for growing a civil war.

Somewhere, anywhere, perhaps along any stretch of the border where Mexican militants are becoming extremely aggressive, or within any US city where illegal aliens have coalesced, a violent event is now likely to unfold that could trigger a powerful domino effect, bringing both countries to war with lightening speed-...

Each year, foreign invaders murder an estimated 4,380 Americans in their undeclared war on Americans, a death toll totaling more than the 5 years of war in Iraq combined. [7] Compounding the impacts, another 4,735 innocent Americans are slaughtered by illegal alien drunk drivers who should not be in the country at all but are allowed to remain by local, state, and federal law enforcement. [sic] Equally sickening is the fact that over 243 innocent children are brutally molested or raped each month by foreign intruders--tragic crimes that could have been avoided by simply enforcing our immigration laws--clearly Pelosi and Gutierrez stand against American children, given their Draconian positions and respective outcroppings.

The raging war in Mexico has gotten so bad that three high ranking federal officers resigned their posts and asked the US government for "political asylum" last month. The obvious implication is that the Mexican government can no longer protect its own and is now being seen as a political threat to upstanding citizens--such is the infiltration and corruption level within government by organized crime that now appears to be running much of the government (for all intents and purposes).

-more here

The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events

Just consider the following:
  • Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying "Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war". (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
  • Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says "Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for." (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
  • Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred." (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
  • Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to antisemitism?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

the rest here



Connecting the dots...

.

The Immeasurable Value Of Kindred...


The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk --
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to.
They are used to the lies I tell,
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy and sell.

The Stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
They think of the likes of me.

This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf --
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

-Rudyard Kipling


Saturday, May 17, 2008

Why Race Matters...


Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick has implemented a new policy designed to classify text messages sent on city-funded devices as private and exempt from rules governing the city’s electronic communications system policy.
Previous city policy stated that all messages sent via the city’s electronic communications system were city property, a policy that gained interest after revelations that Kilpatrick and his former chief of staff exchanged damaging text messages showing they lied under oath during a whistle-blower trial. The previous policy contradicted the argument of Kilpatrick and city lawyers that the text messages were private.
The new policy, obtained by the Free Press, took effect April 15 through a directive signed by Kilpatrick. However, it was distributed to city employees last night.
-source

About the same time Detroit City Council members were quizzing the chief judge of 36th District Court about her decision to not recuse her court from hearing the case against the mayor and his former chief of staff, a Detroit woman was filing recall petitions Wednesday against the five members who voted Tuesday to remove Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.

The petitions were filed by Glenda Morgan against Council President Ken Cockrel Jr. and members Sheila Cockrel, Brenda Jones, Kwame Kenyatta and JoAnn Watson. All five voted Tuesday to remove Kilpatrick from office. The petitions cited abuse of power and negligence but offered no details.

The Wayne County Election Commission tentatively scheduled a hearing for 9 a.m. May 30 to determine whether the petitions cite a course of conduct with enough specificity to proceed. A state election law expert said Morgan’s petitions are so vague they probably won’t pass commission muster.

“Based on the wording, there’s virtually no chance that something that vague would be approved,” said Bingham Farms lawyer Gene Farber.

-source

Despite the utopian wishes of Equalitarians the races are in fact NOT EQUAL. The above behavior by a black "leader" is congruent and systemic in EVERY SINGLE BLACK COMMUNITY ON PLANET EARTH.
This coupled with their lower IQ's is the reason advanced civilization has never took root in Africa and why advanced cities and areas in The West where Whites have fled and left blacks the majority (such as Detroit) are in sever states of digression.

But this is nothing new. Speaking of the inability of Africans to advance, Thomas Nelson Page wrote in 1904,
"It may be charged that as a slave he never had an opportunity to give his faculties that exercise which is necessary to their development. But the answer is complete. He has not been a slave in all places, at all times. In Africa he was not a slave, save to himself and his own instincts; in Rome he was no more a slave than was the Teuton, the Greek, or the Gaul; in New England he has not been a slave for over a hundred years, and may be assumed to have had there as much encouragement, and to have received as sustaining an influence as will ever be accorded him by the White. What has been the result even in New England?
Dr. Henry M. Field a few years since wrote a book of travels in the South with his reflections thereon. Dr. Field comes of a distinguished Northern family, of which the whole country is proud. He is a close observer, a fair recorder, and the friend of the whole human race. He will not be accused of prejudice. Speaking of the present intellectual condition of the Negro in Massachusetts, he says:
Yet here we are doomed to great disappointment. The black man has had every right that belongs to his white neighbor; not only the natural rights which, according to the Declaration of Independence, belong to every human being — the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness — but the right to vote, and to have a part in making the laws. He could own his little home, and there sit under his own vine and fig-tree with none to molest or make him afraid. His children could go to the same common schools, and sit on the same benches, and learn the same lessons as white children.
With such advantages, a race that had natural genius ought to have made great progress in a hundred years. But where are the men that it should have produced to be the leaders of their people? We find not one who has taken rank as a man of action or a man of thought; as a thinker or a writer; as artist or poet; as discoverer or inventor. The whole race has remained on one dead level of mediocrity.
If any man ever proved himself a friend of the African race it was Theodore Parker, who endured all sorts of persecution and social ostracism, who faced mobs and was hissed and hooted in public meetings, for his bold championship of the rights of the Negro race. But rights are one thing, and capacity is another. And while he was ready to fight for them he was very despondent as to their capacity for rising in the scale of civilization. Indeed, he said in so many words: 'In respect to the power of civilization, the African is at the bottom, the American Indian next.' In 1857 he wrote to a friend: T'here are inferior races which have always borne the same ignoble relation to the rest of men and always will. In two generations what a change there will be in the condition and character of the Irish in New England. But in twenty generations the Negroes will stand just where they are now; that is, if they have not disappeared.'
That was more than thirty years ago. But to-day I look about me here in Massachusetts, and I see a few colored men; but what are they doing? They work in the fields, they hoe corn, they dig potatoes; the women take in washing. I find colored barbers and white-washers, shoe-blacks and chimney-sweeps; but I do not know a single man who has grown to be a merchant or a banker, a judge or a lawyer, a member of the legislature or a justice of the peace, or even a selectman of the town. In all these respects they remain where they were in the days of our fathers. The best friends of the colored race, of whom I am one, must confess that it is disappointing and discouraging to find that with all these opportunities they are little removed from where they were a hundred years ago."
-The Negro:The Southerner's Problem (1904)


And so it is. Four hundred years living within White Civilization; nearly a century and a half of freedom and a half a century of "civil" rights. And yet the best they can lay claim to is Barak Hussein Obama, a half White politician who was gifted opportunities through race quotas and affirmative action.

For more on this, here is a review by Jared Taylor of the book, "Why Race Matters'...

.