Thursday, October 30, 2008

The End Draweth Nigh?...

Here is an interesting critique.

It's amazing how, every four years, politicians come out and repeat the same promises they made four years earlier (and never kept) and a certain percentage of the population get all whipped up into a feeding frenzy over the "new era" to come.

Every four years this happens.

This election is no different in this regard.

The only thing worth noting this time is that the candidates are both further to the left than any Presidential candidates have ever been. But they're only slightly to the left of Bush and Kerry in 2004, who were slightly left of Bush and Gore in 2000, who were slightly left of Clinton and Dole in 1996 and so on and so forth.
This is the natural progression of continually voting for "the lesser of two evils".

Both candidates this year, as in years past, represent two doors that lead to the same hell. They're both essentially Corporate Socialists who only differ on how they believe Corporate Socialistic programs should be implemented.

Of course, this election is different in one crucial way though. Race!
Naturally the left is playing the race card, garnering around 99% of the black vote.
Yet the Republicans have done no less in their grand scheme to flood the nation with 35 million Mexicans, believing that if they were encouraged to maintain their language, given no-fault mortgages and Amnesty, that they would instantly mutate into "conservatives".

But despite the GOP's ongoing protocol of kicking White America in the collective nuts, the Republican party, never-the-less, remains the default political party of White Americans. (the portion of White guilt-induced lemmings not withstanding) This is why Uncle Jauns' campaign went with Sarah 'All American -moose hunting-gal next door' Palin as VP. It was a direct and overt courting of White voters. Hence the Left's unhinged attacks upon the femitician.

And it's been interesting seeing how Whites react to this new found reality wherein, despite all of their best efforts to deny it to the contrary, Race matters.

I've seen it in the way Evangelical and Catholic Christians bring up abortion (and "black genocide" by inference, directly or not) as a way to appeal to black voters to reject the pro-abortion 'Man With No Middle Name'.

But then there are those intrepid few who are still strolling through a balkanized, ghettoized and crumbling post-American America and still seeing Mayberry RFD everywhere they look.

You know the types. They go on and on about The New World Order, or The War on Terror or re-surging Russia or emerging China.....Armageddon, WWIII, Economic Meltdown, Pandemics, Epidemics etc, etc...anything but what is actually happening in America in terms or demographic race replacement and the cultural move to the far left.
And these are the same people who went hook, line and sinker for the whole Y2K thing!

And why?

Because fictional bogymen and convoluted conspiracies are a heck of a lot more fun (and easy) to cope with than the actual hellish ruin that is ensconcing real world Western Civilization.

And a great many of these people are going to be gravely disappointed when they find that, if for example, the economy does crash, life keeps going right on along, the economy gets rebuilt and things trudge along as they always did.
The same goes for World Wars, Epidemics and a whole host of other calamities that have, time after time, struck kingdoms, nations and empires.
"There is nothing new under the sun."

Could things "get bad" in the immediate future?
Then they'll get good again, then bad again, then good again and so on....relatively speaking.

But then again, things have been getting gradually bad for 60+ years, occasionally seasoned with a few "good" things.

The point is, those expecting some "event" to come along and stop the world from turning, are in for a big let down.

Our situation today is like being in a slowly sinking boat.
The first steps for White America is to except the fact that,
1. The Ship is being flooded and is in fact sinking.
2. There are a pesky few rascals going around drilling holes in the ship.
3. The only solution is to stop the rascals, bail out the water and plug up the holes.

Will future events precipitate the above steps?


But as with all history, it is likely to be an occasion whose beginning may not be recognized by those who lived it and whose conclusion will likely be decades, if not centuries, removed from its genesis.

Most of the truly great Historical Moments are only noted as such, long after they have occurred.

Many potentially great men have gone mad and gray haired, hauled up in a compound or cave somewhere, waiting for the sky to fall.
While many others expectantly (and sadly, excitedly) wait upon a doomsday (that will never arrive) for the opportunity to run up to the rest of us and say, "I told you so!"

From these types it would be well advised to flee.
They will either turn on you when the going gets rough, or abandon you when needed most.

Ally yourself with only those who can, rationally, place events in greater contexts and except reality for what it is, rather than what they wish it to be.

The End is not nigh...



Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Of Fate...

'Much doth it task me
My tongue to move,
Through my throat to utter
The breath of song.
Poesy, prize of Odin,
Promise now I may not,
A draught drawn not lightly
From deep thought's dwelling.

'Forth it flows but hardly;
For within my breast
Heaving sobbing stifles
Hindered stream of song—
Blessèd boon to mortals
Brought from Odin's kin,
Goodly treasure, stolen
From Giant-land of yore.

'He, who so blameless
Bore him in life,
O'erborne by billows
With boat was whelmed.
Sea-waves—flood that whilom
Welled from giant's wound—
Smite upon the grave-gate
Of my sire and son.

'Dwindling now my kindred
Draw near to their end,
Ev'n as forest-saplings
Felled or tempest-strown.
Not gay or gladsome
Goes he who beareth
Body of kinsman
On funeral bier.

'Of father fallen
First I may tell;
Of much-loved mother
Must mourn the loss.
Sad store hath memory
For minstrel skill,
A wood to bloom leafy
With words of song.

'Most woful the breach,
Where the wave in-brake
On the fenced hold
Of my father's kin.
Unfilled, as I wot,
And open doth stand
The gap of son rent
By the greedy surge.

'Me Ran, the sea-queen,
Roughly hath shaken:
I stand of beloved ones
Stript and all bare.
Cut hath the billow
The cord of my kin,
Strand of mine own twisting
So stout and strong.

'Sure, if sword could venge
Such cruel wrong,
Evil times would wait
Ægir, ocean-god.
That wind-giant's brother
Were I strong to slay,
'Gainst him and his sea-brood
Battling would I go.

'But I in no wise
Boast, as I ween,
Strength that may strive
With the stout ships' Bane.
For to eyes of all
Easy now 'tis seen
How the old man's lot
Helpless is and lone.

'Me hath the main
Of much bereaved;
Dire is the tale,
The deaths of kin:
Since he the shelter
And shield of my house
Hied him from life
To heaven's glad realm.

'Full surely I know,
In my son was waxing
The stuff and the strength
Of a stout-limbed wight:
Had he reached but ripeness
To raise his shield,
And Odin laid hand
On his liegeman true.

'Willing he followed
His father's word,
Though all opposing
Should thwart my rede:
He in mine household
Mine honour upheld,
Of my power and rule
The prop and the stay.

'Oft to my mind
My loss doth come,
How I brotherless bide
Bereaved and lone.
Thereon I bethink me,
When thickens the fight
Thereon with much searching
My soul doth muse:

'Who staunch stands by me
In stress of fight,
Shoulder to shoulder,
Side by side?
Such want doth weaken
In war's dread hour;
Weak-winged I fly,
Whom friends all fail.

'Son's place to his sire
(Saith a proverb true)
Another son born
Alone can fill.
Of kinsmen none
(Though ne'er so kind)
To brother can stand
In brother's stead.

'O'er all our ice-fields,
Our northern snows,
Few now I find
Faithful and true.
Dark deeds men love,
Doom death to their kin,
A brother's body
Barter for gold.

'Unpleasing to me
Our people's mood,
Each seeking his own
In selfish peace.
To the happier bees' home
Hath passed my son,
My good wife's child
To his glorious kin.

'Odin, mighty monarch,
Of minstrel mead the lord,
On me a heavy hand
Harmful doth lay.
Gloomy in unrest
Ever I grieve,
Sinks my drooping brow,
Seat of sight and thought.

'Fierce fire of sickness
First from my home
Swept off a son
With savage blow:
One who was heedful,
Harmless, I wot,
In deeds unblemished,
In words unblamed.

'Still do I mind me,
When the Friend of men
High uplifted
To the home of gods
That sapling stout
Of his father's stem,
Of my true wife born
A branch so fair.

'Once bare I goodwill
To the great spear-lord,
Him trusty and true
I trowed for friend:
Ere the giver of conquest,
The car-borne god,
Broke faith and friendship
False in my need.

'Now victim and worship
To Vilir's brother,
The god once honoured,
I give no more.
Yet the friend of Mimir
On me hath bestowed
Some boot for bale,
If all boons I tell.

'Yea he, the wolf-tamer,
The war-god skilful,
Gave poesy faultless
To fill my soul:
Gave wit to know well
Each wily trickster,
And force him to face me
As foeman in fight.

'Hard am I beset;
Whom Hela, the sister
Of Odin's fell captive,
On Digra-ness waits.
Yet shall I gladly
With right good welcome
Dauntless in bearing
Her death-blow bide.'

-Egil Skallagrimsson, 'Egil's Saga'

The above is composed using Kennings.
Some are obvious, others more complex while some require knowledge of the Saga for context.


Monday, October 27, 2008

From Out Of 'Left', Left Field...

Every now and again you run across some editorial or commentary that is just so freaking bizarre you have to laugh.

Example provided by

The author states,
One of the greatest tools in perpetuating the myth of American exceptionalism is the deeply-held American belief that virtually all other countries on earth are filthy hell holes.

Ironically the only people who do this are neo-cons who are in fact lefties who are very much anti-nationalists.
To them, "America" is not a location, culture, people or physical reality. No, to them it is an ideology in competition for the hearts and minds of all people everywhere.

The State Department does its damnedest to keep up the bad press for other countries by issuing ludicrous "warnings" about traveling to other countries. These warning usually consist of descriptions about how country X is overrun by criminals, and that if you travel to country X, you'll be kidnapped. And so on.

Yeah, kind a like this.

And again, it is the lefties and the Christian charities that keep going to these countries and returning home with sad sob stories about how these poor wretched souls live and how it's understandable of people to want to come here.
And of course the Government isn't going to rebuke these "hell-hole" type of claims as cheap labor is in high demand by our Corporate overlords.
And the churches, likewise, are not about to encourage hispanics to stay at home in Mexico and out of their collection-plate-passing pews in America.
And certainly Mexico is not going to do anything to dispute it's image as a hellhole since it derives a rather large portion of its economy from the "pay checks" of migrant workers in the US.

In fact the only person complaining about Mexico's reputation is the guy writing the article at LewRockwell.

He continues,
American conservatives, and especially the Paleocon dupes who (in spite of their claims to the contrary) dutifully sing the praises of the American state every chance they get,

There are, what, about four or five palecons on earth? This guy must subscribe to each one of their newsletters.

Mexico is a common target of these ultra-nationalists, and apparently Fred Reed, my favorite ex-pat living in Mexico, finds these characterizations of Mexico to be about as idiotic as I do.

And I saw a guy on Fox News the other day describing how peaceful and wonderful life was in Baghdad right now.

So (in other words) the author postulates that the universe revolves around him (and possibly Fred Reed) and that his personal experience trumps actual crime statistics.

This would be akin to a healthy fifty year old man mocking concerns about cancer by assuring, "Look, I've never had it, so I can only assume it's mostly a myth."

If all one read of Mexico is what is written by right-wing Americans one would of course think that those lousy Mexicans must have no cities, or automobiles, or commerce, or even literacy.

Who wrote this?
What/which right wing sources?

Once more, it is THE LEFT that goes on and on about the deprived and depraved Mexicans, living in cardboard boxes and eating dog food, all because the greedy White-Devil capitalists in America stole the land after getting the natives hooked on fire water.

He fumbles on,

Mexico is no paradise of course, but as Reed notes:

I read Steve Sailer on Mexico and expect to wake up in the morning and find illiterate doctors curing people by sacrificing chickens. It ain’t so.
Of course it ain't.

In reality, however, Europeans emigrate to Latin America by the thousands because it is a nice place to retire...

No, in reality many Europeans are fleeing to White enclaves in the still majority White Latin American nations of Argentina and Uruguay to get away from the "enrichment" multiculturalism + ever escelating taxes (to pay for the social programs for the new arrivals) has brought them back home.

Reed goes on to note that much to everyone's surprise, it turns out that Mexico has book stores and universities, and schools where people learn calculus.

Again, Who?
Where does he find people claiming Mexico has no Universities or Book Stores?
Try, nowhere.

He is just projecting in that creepy way Marxists do, through which they try to re-write history.
He also mentions though,that the globalized-urban, middle-income part of Mexico lives side-by-side with the poor agrarian non-globalized side of Mexico:
From my bedroom window in the morning, I can see kids riding bareback into the mountains to care for goats. They don't go to school. This isn't governmental policy, but it's how things are.

In America of course, SWAT teams would descend on the homes of the parents of those goatherd children, knock out their teeth, and court-order them to send the children to government schools. It seems that Mexico's biggest problem is that the government can't seem to be bothered with nearly as much social engineering as the Americans demand.

Kind of like when the leftist Clinton Administration sent in swat teams to remove a kid from his family in a Miami home and send him back to be "re-educated" in Castro's Cuba?

Kinda like that?
And we all know how supportive Marxists are of home schooling don't we.

Mexico's other problem is that many Mexicans are allowed to live at subsistence level by adhering to their old Indian ways. The central problem in this case is that the Spanish government, and later the Mexican government, wasn't nearly as good at exterminating the indigenous populations as the Americans.

And this from a guy telling us not to generalize or stereotype!
It's true that the Spanish didn't kill all of the Indians. Just the men (the Spanish soldiers didn't bring Spanish women). Hence, the Mestizo.

And of course the White Devil went about "exterminating" all of the non-Whites, which is why today Whites make up a whopping 13% of the global population vs. the 87% non-Whites.

And I just love how the lefty nuts will, on the one hand, go on and on about how there is no such thing as race, how culture is migratory or how there is no such thing as a pure race and how peoples have been migrating back and forth since forever,.....YET, on the other hand, they can immediately (and with no hesitance) identify "indigenous (non-White) peoples" and talk of "their land" and "their culture".

But of course his entire point is rendered moot by one overarching fact.

If Mexico is the enriching wonderland he suggests, then why the f**k are millions of Mexicans fleeing it?


Watching The Darkness Drop Again...

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

-William Butler Yeats

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Cause Your Vote Counts...

After a spirited, emotional and at times raucous debate, the New York City Council voted, 29 to 22, on Thursday afternoon to extend term limits, allowing Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg to seek re-election next year and undoing the result of two voter referendums that had imposed a limit of two four-year terms.

The vote was a major victory for Mayor Bloomberg — a billionaire and lifelong Democrat who was elected mayor as a Republican in 2001, won re-election in 2005, became an independent last year, and decided just weeks ago that he wished to seek a third term for himself in 2009...

The Council has 48 Democrats and three Republicans. All three Republicans — James S. Oddo and Vincent M. Ignizio, of Staten Island, and Anthony Como of Queens — voted no.

Opponents of the bill accused the mayor and his supporters on the Council of flouting the will of the people — as expressed in a 1993 voter initiative that established a limit of two consecutive terms and a 1996 referendum in which voters rejected a Council-led effort to change the limit to three terms. They said that democratic procedure demanded a public vote on the issue, no matter what one thinks of Mr. Bloomberg or term limits.

Supporters of the bill said the dire economic situation confronting the city — and the possibility of multibillion-dollar budget shortfalls — demanded continuity of leadership.

Nothing like a little fear mongering to justify nullifying the will of the people and established law.

When politicians speak of "change" the above is exactly what they have in mind...


Thursday, October 23, 2008

Crackin Crackers...

A knife-wielding man robbed a McCain-Palin campaign volunteer and etched a “B” into her face after he saw a McCain bumper sticker on the woman’s car, Pittsburgh police said.

Ashley Todd, 20, of College Station, Texas, was using an ATM at Liberty Avenue and Pearl Street in Bloomfield just before 9 p.m. Wednesday when a man approached her, put a knife to her throat and demanded $60, police said.

The man became very angry, made comments to Todd about John McCain and punched her in the back of the head, knocking her to the ground, police said.

The man then carved the "B" into Todd's right cheek.

Police described the suspect as black, about 6-foot-4, and said he was wearing dark-colored jeans and a black undershirt.

(there is the possibility that the above story is a hoax. But the statistical information below is 100% truth)
The home of a Central Florida Republican headquarters manager was shot up and damaged over his support of Sen. John McCain, the man told police.

"It says this campaign is getting vicious," Coverely said.Coverely said it appears Democrats are becoming more aggressive in the county.

Crime Rates

  • Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
  • When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
  • Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
  • The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

  • Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
  • Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
  • Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
  • Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.


  • Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
  • Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.


  • Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
  • Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.


Zimbabwe began officially trading in foreign currency Friday in what is seen as tacit acknowledgment that its own currency has collapsed.
President Robert Mugabe, in power since independence from Britain in 1980, blames Western sanctions for the economic collapse. But critics point to his 2000 order that commercial farms be seized from whites.
A defiant Robert Mugabe has sailed unchallenged through the first test
of his presidency by his peers.

Western leaders from France, the United States and Canada joined
Britain in ratcheting up pressure on the organisation to reject Mr Mugabe’s

Freshly sworn in after a single candidate election, he received a
leader’s welcome when he strode into the African Union summit in Sharm el-Sheikh
yesterday and emerged unfazed, his authority intact.
He dined at a lavish
luncheon given by his Egyptian hosts, hugged heads of state and other diplomats
in the corridors and stayed at the Peninsula Hotel, one of the most luxurious in
this Red Sea town. “Mr Mugabe is staying there as a courtesy by the Egyptian
Government,” a hotel spokesman said. Delegates from the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) lodged at the Sheraton, while their leader, Morgan
Tsvangirai, remained in Zimbabwe.
The African Union’s public response to Mr
Mugabe’s seizure of power was seen as a key measure of the organisation’s
commitment to democracy after Zimbabwe’s violent run-off elections.

Mugabe has said time and again he regards the upcoming vote not as an
election but as a continuation of the liberation struggle against western
imperialism and its "puppet", Tsvangirai. "This country shall not again come
under the rule and control of the white man, direct or indiret"....-

Elsewhere in previously White ruled lands...
Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama said on Friday he expects
Republicans to highlight the fact that he is black as part of an effort to make
voters afraid of him.“They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. He’s young
and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s
The first ever purpose built village for people living with the Aids disease
has opened in South Africa aiming to give more dignity and purpose to
ill patents.-
Africa accounts for only one tenth of the world's population but nine out of
ten new cases of HIV infection. Eighty three percent of all AIDS deaths are
Africa, where the disease has killed ten times more people than war.
In nine
countries in sub-Saharan Africa, more than 10 percent of the
adult population is
HIV positive. In Botswana, Namibia, Swaziland and
Zimbabwe, 20 to 26 percent of
the population aged 15-49 is living with HIV
or AIDS -
Africa at war: The genocide spilling from the Darfur region of Sudan into
neighboring Chad has captured attention in the United States mainly because of
(belated) media coverage and an aggressive advocacy campaign by concerned
groups, but the prospects of Washington dealing with the problem seem slim.
Darfur, however, is only one of a pox of conflicts that, together with HIV/AIDS,
are depopulating parts of Africa and robbing it of potential wealth from
mineral, oil and gas deposits. Wars have also raged in Chad, Congo, Liberia,
Sierra Leone and Somalia. Were it not for the Iraq war, Washington may have
acted to stop what the Bush administration admits is genocide in Darfur, or
taken steps to prevent the chaos sweeping Somalia after a group affiliated with
al-Qaeda took over the country and left Ethiopia no choice but to invade in
hopes of preventing a more disastrous war. Unfortunately, even designating a
small presence of U.S. Special Forces to lead a U.N.-approved peacekeeping force
in Darfur appears beyond the capability of the badly stretched American
Formerly White ruled South Africa, now in the hands of blacks,
South Africans today are deeply demoralised people. The lights are going out
in homes, mines, factories and shopping malls as the national power authority,
Eskom - suffering from mismanagement, lack of foresight, a failure to maintain
power stations and a flight of skilled engineers to other countries - implements
rolling power cuts that plunge towns and cities into daily chaos.Major
industrial projects are on hold. The only healthy enterprise now worth being
involved in is the sale of small diesel generators to powerless households but
even this business has run out of supplies and spare parts from China.Newly
elected African National Congress (ANC) leader Jacob Zuma, the state
president-in-waiting, narrowly escaped being jailed for raping an HIV-positive
woman last year, and faces trial later this year for soliciting and accepting
bribes in connection with South Africa's shady multi-billion-pound arms deal
with British, German and French weapons manufacturers.Commenting on the massive
power cuts, Trevor Gaunt, professor of electrical engineering at the University
of Cape Town, who warned the government eight years ago of the impending crisis,
said: "The damage is huge, and now South Africa looks just like the rest of
Africa. Maybe it will take 20 years to recover."Last week, for example,
18-year-old Razelle Botha, who passed all her A-levels with marks of more than
90% and was about to train as a doctor, returned home with her father, Professor
Willem Botha, founder of the geophysics department at the University of
Pretoria, from buying pizzas for the family. Inside the house, armed gunmen
confronted them. They shot Professor Botha in the leg and pumped bullets into
Razelle.One severed her spine. Now she is fighting for her life and will never
walk again, and may never become a doctor. The gunmen stole a laptop computer
and a camera.Feeding the perfect storm are the two centres of ANC power in the
country at the moment. On the one hand, there is the ANC in parliament, led by
President Mbeki, who last Friday gave a state-of-the-nation address and
apologised to the country for the power crisis.Mbeki made only the briefest of
mentions of the national Aids crisis, with more than six million people
HIV-positive. He did not address the Scorpions crisis. The collapsing public
hospital system, under his eccentric health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang,
an alcoholic who recently jumped the public queue for a liver transplant,
received no attention. And the name Jacob Zuma did not pass his lips.Zuma, a
Zulu populist with some 20 children by various wives and mistresses, hoped to
prove that last year's rape case, and the trial he faces this year for
corruption and other charges...-
Formerly White ruled Rhodesia, now renamed Zimbabwe and ruled by blacks,
HARARE (AFP) — Zimbabwe's inflation rate, already the highest in the world,
has soared to a new high of 66,212.3 percent, according to official figures
obtained by AFP on Thursday.Zimbabwe's economy has been on a downturn for the
past eight years characterised by galloping inflation and shortages of basic
foodstuffs such as sugar and cooking oil.At least 80 percent of the population
is living below the poverty threshold, often skipping meals to stretch their
income, which frequently fails to cover basic needs.-
Formerly White ruled Kenya, now ruled by blacks,
Several people were beaten and hacked to death with machetes in a Nairobi
slum Sunday in renewed ethnic fighting over Kenya's disputed election, residents
said.Elsewhere, police managed to quell more than two days of fierce fighting
around a Catholic monastery that killed 22 people and left 200 homes burned in
the Rift Valley, 190 miles northwest of the capital Nairobi, officials said.A
government commission says more than 600 people have been killed in violence
that erupted after the Dec. 27...One man staggered past with blood streaming
from the stump of his arm, which had been cut off with a machete. The arm was
taken by a group of youths and placed on top of a pile of stones barricading an
alleyway. In a separate incident, around 50 people attacked welder Dominic
Owour, a 23-year-old Luo, and tried to cut off both his hands at the forearm,
Owour said.Both men said police watching the attacks did not intervene.A local
reporter at the scene counted 14 people dead from machete wounds, three bodies
stuck with arrows and five people shot dead by police.-
Formerly White ruled Congo, now ruled by blacks,
Le Blanc and I are into our 500th kilometer on the river when he turns my
view of modern African history on its head. "We should just give it all back to
the whites," the riverboat captain says. "Even if you go 1,000 kilometers down
this river, you won't see a single sign of development. When the whites left, we
didn't just stay where we were. We went backwards.""The river is the artery of
Congo's economy," he says. "When the Belgians and the Portuguese were here,
there were farms and plantations — cashews, peanuts, rubber, palm oil. There was
industry and factories employing 3,000 people, 5,000 people. But since
independence, no Congolese has succeeded.Around 45,000 people die each month in
the DRC as a result of the social collapse brought on by civil war, according to
a study released in January by the International Rescue Committee. It estimated
the total loss of life between 1998 and April 2007 at 5.4 million. For many
Congolese like Le Blanc, the difficulties of today blot out the cruelties of the
past. "On this river, all that you see — the buildings, the boats — only whites
did that. After the whites left, the Congolese did not work. We did not know how
to. For the past 50 years, we've just declined." He pauses. "They took this
country by force," he says, with more than a touch of admiration. "If they came
back, this time we'd give them the country for free."-
Formerly White ruled Detroit, now ruled by blacks,
Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick took his text message scandal to the Michigan
Supreme Court on Friday, urging justices to strike down decisions from two lower
courts to provide the public with secret documents he used to settle police
whistle-blower lawsuits last year for $8.4 million.The city filed the appeal
under seal, but city law director John E. Johnson Jr. said in a statement the
city asked the high court to consider the same arguments that were rejected
Wednesday by the Michigan Court of Appeals and on Feb. 5 by Wayne County Circuit
Judge Robert Colombo Jr., in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the
Free Press.Councilman Kwame Kenyatta said in a statement, "Either the mayor has
something to hide or he's buying packing time.""When you have two lower courts
going against you, it's pretty rough," said Wayne State University law professor
Peter Henning. "It's any litigant's right to seek review, but it's not a
cost-free decision."He questioned -- as have many council members -- whether the
city Law Department is acting on behalf of the city or just the mayor.-
source here is a photographic essay
of the post-White ruin that has come upon Detroit.
Formerly White ruled New Orleans, now ruled by blacks,
As District Attorney Eddie Jordan descended last week to his moment of
greatest political vulnerability, a group of prominent business leaders met with
New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin to craft an exit strategy for the beleaguered
prosecutor -- one that chiefly involved giving him a soft landing in a private
sector job, sources familiar with the talk said Tuesday.The unprecedented move
ends a tenure mired in criticism over a widely perceived failure to successfully
prosecute violent criminals, chronic turnover in his office, and most recently
the bizarre disclosure that a robbery suspect fled to Jordan's Algiers house
only to then become a suspect in the shooting of a New Orleans police
officer.Now, Jordan's undoing appears rooted in one of his first official acts:
Systematically firing white employees and replacing them with black applicants
two weeks after taking office. While it's hardly uncommon for politicians to
clean house and install loyalists, a federal jury of eight white and two black
jurors unanimously found that Jordan, who is black, fired 43 employees -- all
white but for one Hispanic -- because of their race.Of 56 total dismissals, 53
of the employees were white. Within six months of his administration, Jordan had
hired 68 people, 92 percent of them African-American. Critics further have
suggested that the firings had the effect of stripping the office of
institutional knowledge and experienced talent, throwing its daily management
into confusion and setting off a trend of poor working conditions and chronic
turnover.This criticism climaxed this summer, when his office dismissed charges
against suspects in the 2006 murders of musician and teacher Dinerral Shavers
and the Central City massacre that left five teenagers dead in the street. Both
cases fell apart, with Jordan claiming uncooperative witnesses.Earlier this
year, Jordan was further lambasted for his office's repeated release of
suspects, even occasionally ones arrested for violent crimes, because his
prosecutors could not make a decision about whether to press charges under the
state mandated deadline. These releases are called "701s," shorthand for Article
701 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, which states that no one can be
held longer than 60 days on a felony arrest without an indictment.In the latest
and strangest flare-up, police recently questioned Jordan after robbery suspect
Elton Phillips, 20, allegedly fled to his home after holding up a man outside a
nearby Algiers Shell station.-
source You
can read more about post-White ruled New Orleans here.
Below is excerpted review by Jared Taylor of 'Why Race Matters'........................................................................................................"

As Prof. Levin points out, a book like Why Race Matters should not have to
be written. The only sensible conclusion to be drawn from simple observation is
that races differ: “To put the matter bluntly, the question is not why anyone
would believe the races are unequal in intelligence, but why anyone would
believe them equal.” For centuries, people as different as Arabs and Englishmen
have judged Africans to be unintelligent, lascivious, jolly, and keen on rhythm.
Today, in whatever corner of the globe one looks, blacks behave in certain
consistent ways.There is now not much informed opposition (though a great deal
of uninformed opposition) to the conclusion that IQ tests test intelli- gence,
that intelligence is at least partly hereditary, and that the races differ in
average IQ.Prof. Levin is at his most original and provocative when he sets
aside well-established data on intelligence and takes up the even more
controversial question of morality.
For example, the widely used Minnesota
Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), which subdivides personality into a
number of categories, shows consistent differences in how blacks and whites
evaluate themselves. Blacks, for example, hold themselves in higher regard than
whites (or, in today’s jargon, have “higher self-esteem”). They are consistently
more likely to agree with statements like:
I am an important person.I am
entirely self-confident.If given the chance I could make a good leader of
people.I have often had to take orders from someone who did not know as much as
I did.
The common assumption that blacks are “taught to hate themselves” is
wrong; blacks are quite pleased with themselves. At the same time, they
consistently score higher than whites on the MMPI scales for such things as
Hypomania, Psychopathy, Schizophrenia, and Masculinity, which are precisely the
traits that distinguish incarcerated criminals from the rest of us. They tend to
agree, for example, with statements like:
Most people are honest chiefly
through fear of being caught.Most people make friends because friends are likely
to be useful to them.Most people will use somewhat unfair means to gain profit
or an advantage rather than lose it.It is not hard for me to ask help from my
friends even though I cannot return the favor.
Another finding is that
blacks are more impulsive or present-oriented than whites. Given a choice
between a small candy bar today and a big one tomorrow, black children are more
likely than white children to want the small one today.
Finally, even within
races, moral reasoning is closely associated with intelligence. Intelligence
does not guarantee good behavior, but a certain level is necessary for
self-knowledge and the comprehension of moral distinctions.Prof. Levin does not
flinch from drawing what may appear to be an unkind conclusion: Given the crime
rates, social irresponsibility, lack of foresight, impulsiveness, and general
self-centeredness of black behavior, blacks probably have a different inherent
capacity and appreciation for morality.
He proposes that this difference can
be explained by the environments in which blacks and whites (and Asians)
evolved. In a warm climate where food can be gathered year-round, people do not
need to develop habits of cooperation and planning in order to get through the
winter. In the north, it took mutual trust and cooperation for groups of men to
bring down large game, so reciprocal morality evolved along with intelligence.
Climate and terrain could also have influenced sexual behavior. Since
African women could gather food for themselves and their children even if a mate
abandoned them, there was less pressure to insist that men support their
children. For the same reason, there was less evolutionary pressure on fathers
to stick around. In the north, a man who abandoned his children might well leave
no descendants to behave in like manner. And in fact, the family habits of
Africans and transplanted blacks are extremely loose by white standards.
What we think of as moral behavior, including sexual morality, is now known
to be heavily influenced by genes. As Prof. Levin points out, there is no
biological reason to expect different populations to have evolved exactly the
same distribution of morality-influencing genes. Therefore it is likely that
“the races have … evolved divergent evaluations of cooperativeness, aggression,
rule-following, and concern with the future.”
That blacks care less about
others and worry less about the future is suggested in virtually every area of
behavior. Crime is only the most obvious example, nor is it the expression of
wretchedness and self-loathing that excuse-making whites pretend it to be. Prof.
Levin notes that “the criminal behavior of young black males just does not look
like an expression of despair. In account after account, these individuals come
across as full of themselves and unrepentant.” He might have added that if
blacks were really reduced to hopelessness by white oppression, they would
presumably have high suicide rates, whereas in every age group blacks kill
themselves at only one half to one quarter the white rate. "more of this review
of Prof. Levin's book 'Why Race Matters'


An Uncle Tom Or An Uncle Juan?...

Mexico interviews the Femitician,

Governor, let me ask you about immigration. How many undocumented immigrants are there in Alaska?
I don't know, I don't know. That's a good question.

Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.

To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America.

A "path to citizenship" (that little technicality illegals skipped to begin with) IS Amnesty.
And McCain, like Obama, is unquestionably devoted to the third-worldification of America.

And I also know why (certain) people want to "be in America".
Because the countries they came from, which are populated by people like them, suck!
Because they have people like them in it.


Wednesday, October 22, 2008

From Sea To Dimming Sea...

Madison (Wisconsin's) Memorial High School was on edge on Friday, the day after a racially tinged fight and amid rumors of a possible gun at school. Students were sent home just before 1 p.m.

Police set up a command post and five detectives were brought in to help more than 10 officers determine if a safety threat existed. No guns were found and no fights or incidents were reported.

The police intervention — which also included officers who followed school buses and monitored West Towne Mall and Metro Transit transfer points — came after a fight between black and Latino students at the school on Thursday. Several students were arrested, and the fight sparked rumors of retaliation, including reports that a gun might have been brought to school on Friday, police and school district officials said...

According to a criminal complaint filed in Dane County Circuit Court, Smith repeatedly punched a 17-year-old Latina student in the face. The Latina student lost consciousness. She later told police that as she came out of class, a group of black students called a group of Latino students “wetbacks,” the complaint states.

A Long Island school was on guard on Tuesday after two days of fighting led to dozens of suspensions at Hempstead High School. District officials took action against the troublemakers, fearing the violence would escalate.

They held up their suspension notices like badges of honor. One dozen Hempstead High students kicked out Tuesday, separated themselves by racial and ethnic affiliation.

Suspended Jhakim Morrison blamed the school for the incident.
"What do you expect … a bunch of Hispanic kids coming at a bunch of black kids."

And this,

Police departments in cities across the country are beefing up their ranks for Election Day, preparing for possible civil unrest and riots after the historic presidential contest.

Some worry that if Barack Obama loses and there is suspicion of foul play in the election, violence could ensue in cities with large black populations.

Yes we've come a long way baby.

From a prosperous, racially, culturally and linguistically homogeneous superpower (then conquering space) to a decaying multicult corpse with crumbling roads, bridges, cities, towns and civility in just four short decades.

It is a rather simple construct,

If you have no official language, no historically recognized culture and no borders, then you do not have a nation.

Amerika is not electing a President in 2008.
Our elites are merely appointing a Warden.


Holding Up A Mirror...

As Britain is being overrun with Muslims, they are at least keeping up to date with the situation in America, which is being overrun with Mexicans,
The severed heads of four men have been delivered by a courier service to a police station in northern Mexico, according to the local authorities.

The gruesome delivery was made in the town of Ascension, not far from Ciudad Juarez, close to the US border.

Ciudad Juarez has a reputation as one of Mexico's most violent cities, with more than a quarter of the country's 3,800 drugs-related murders reported to have taken place there since the start of the year.

Just a taste of America's Latin flavored future.


  • Hispanics are 3.3 times more likely to be in prison than whites; they are 4.2 times more likely to be in prison for murder, and 5.8 times more likely to be in prison for felony drug crimes.
  • Young Hispanics are 19 times more likely than young whites (and slightly more likely than young blacks) to be in youth gangs.


  • Hispanics drop out of high school at three times the white rate and twice the black rate.
  • Even third-generation Hispanics drop out of school at a higher rate than blacks and are less likely to be college graduates.
  • From 1992 to 2003, Hispanic illiteracy in English rose from 35 percent to 44 percent.
  • The average Hispanic 12th-grader reads and does math at the level of the average white 8th-grader.

Families and Health

  • At 43 percent, the Hispanic illegitimacy rate is twice the white rate, and Hispanic women have abortions at 2.7 times the white rate.
  • Hispanics are three times more likely than whites not to have medical insurance, and die from AIDS and tuberculosis at three times the white rate.
  • In California, the cost of free medical care for illegal aliens forced 60 hospitals to close between 1993 and 2003.


  • Only 33 percent of citizens of Hispanic origin consider themselves “Americans” first. The rest consider themselves either “Hispanic/Latino” or their former nationality first.

Demographics IS Destiny...


Tuesday, October 21, 2008

History Drips The Future...

Fourteen years and approximately 300,000 murders after black rule devastated my homeland, the New York Times is shocked to discover that South Africa is fast disappearing down the same hole into which Rhodesia, rest in peace, was dropped. [Post-Apartheid South Africa has entered an Anxious Era, by Barry Bearak , October 5, 2008)

I guess some latitude is in order. It took decades and piles of dead bodies before Robert Mugabe lost luster in the eyes of the American MainStream Media [MSM]. By the time the megalomaniac Mugabe was conferred with honorary doctorates (1984 and 1986) and a knighthood (1994), he had already done his "best" work: slaughter an estimated 20,000 innocent Ndebele in Matabeleland (1983), with whose leader, Joshua Nkomo, he refused to share power.

The NYT claims that "The country’s power company unfathomably ran out of electricity and rationed supply." (My emphasis)

No, Eskom, the utility that supplied most of the electricity consumed on the continent, did not run out of juice. It just ran out of experienced engineers, expunged pursuant to Black Economic Empowerment policies. (Known in South Africa as "BEE", these are the equivalent of the racial quotas Barack Obama champions, only with many times the sting.)

The MSM is equally cavalier about the culprits: a thriving black criminal class and a corrupt black government.

And, of course, their enablers in the West.

Remember that when the MSM endorses Obama.

-taken from here

Ms. Mercer makes some good points (of course she is selling a book) but how sincere is she?

Well, according to her biography, which can be seen here, her father was a Rabbi who, "was forced to flee (South Africa) due to his anti-apartheid activism."

The family then fled to Israel where Jewish-Arab apartheid was, and still is, official government policy.

Color me skeptical.

Never-the-less her biography plus her points on African tribal (read racial) politics makes a point in and of itself.

Adding to this is Pat Buchanan's article.

Was race a factor in the decision of Colin Powell to repudiate his party's nominee and friend of 25 years, Sen. John McCain, two weeks before Election Day, and to endorse Barack Obama?
in hailing Barack as a "transformational figure" whose election would "electrify our country ... (and) the world," Powell seems to testify to the centrality of Barack's ethnicity to his decision.

For what else is there about this freshman senator, who has no significant legislative accomplishment, to transform our politics and to electrify the world, other than the fact that he would be the nation's first African-American president?

Yet, what kind of Republican can Powell be when he professes deep concern that McCain might choose Supreme Court justices like John Roberts and Sam Alito? Every Republican in the Senate voted for Roberts. All but one voted for Alito.

The issue cannot be avoided.

After all, we are in a year where Obama defeated the wife of "our first black president," Bill Clinton, 90-10 in the black wards of Philly, and African-Americans, in one poll, are going 94-1 for Barack. And a Republican ticket that is hammering Barack on his ties to William Ayers fears to bring up his far closer ties to the Afro-racist anti-American Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Organizing a fundraiser last year for New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, an Hispanic Democrat, Lionel Sosa of San Antonio, a political strategist for Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II, said, "Blood runs thicker than politics."


So what is the connection, beyond the obvious destruction of Western Nations?

Tribalism....Jungian Archetypes... "Economic Transformation"....The Fate of Nations...and the like.

Too Cryptic?

While constituting approximately 2.4 percent of the population of the United States, Jews represented half of the top one hundred Wall Street executives and about 40 percent of admissions to Ivy League colleges. Lipset and Raab (1995) note that Jews contribute between one-quarter and one-third of all political contributions in the United States, including one-half of Democratic Party contributions and one-fourth of Republican contributions.

The general message of Goldberg’s (1996) book, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, is that American Judaism is well organized and lavishly funded. It has achieved a great deal of power, and it has been successful in achieving its interests. There is a great deal of consensus on broad Jewish issues, particularly in the areas of Israel and the welfare of other foreign Jewries, immigration and refugee policy, church-state separation, abortion rights, and civil liberties (p. 5). Indeed, the consensus on these issues among Jewish activist organizations and the Jewish intellectual movements reviewed here despite a great deal of disagreement on other issues is striking. Massive changes in public policy on these issues beginning with the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s coincide with the period of increasing Jewish power and influence in the United States.

The Jungian Archetype?

See here. (It's sarcastic but the point is made towards the end)

And it is getting more and more difficult for the naysayers to write off or disregard the above points as we can clearly see our civilization literally being disassembled right in front of our eyes on a daily basis.
And what was once called "history" drips reality into a present that is quickly becoming the same old- recycled- tragic "future"...

And to be clear, there is nothing sinister or immoral about the tribalistic tendencies highlighted above. Each and every race, from Jews to Africans to Whites, have a right, if not obligation, to do what is best for their own kind.
What is sinister, is when one group is singled out and denied this right. Or when such activities (as group survival strategies) are denied by one group or another.


Monday, October 20, 2008

It Rains In Seattle?...

Yet again a White man is baffled to learn that people of other races don't think exactly like he does.

Rush Limbaugh said Colin Powell's decision to get behind Barack Obama appeared to be very much tied to Obama's status as the first African-American with a chance to become president.

"Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race," Limbaugh wrote in an e-mail. "OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all the inexperienced, very liberal, white candidates he has endorsed. I'll let you know what I come up with."

As was written here before in regards to the Rev. Wright scandal,
There have been many "shocked" and "stunned" stories of late about Obama's black minister and the afro-centric views both he and others have expressed.

But the fact is that what Wright, Cone and other afro-centrists are saying is accurate and 100% true......from their point of view.

This is what many Whites refuse to accept and acknowledge despite the overwhelming historical (as well as every day manifestations of) evidence about them, which is that non-Whites do not share their genetically ingrained individualist and altruistic view of the world.

Whites continue to look through rose tinted glasses at the seemingly innumerable racial organizations within The West representing Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, Arabs and others and even continue to overlook sub-racial groupings such as Black and Hispanic Churches, Messianic Jews, Black Congressional Caucus, Immigrant rights groups and so on.

Every day and in a variety of manners, non-Whites gather as distinctive racial groups and advocate on behalf of them, even while making antagonistic or outright anti-White statements.

And to reiterate and bring this point up to date, Powell should endorse Obama. He is one of his people.
Blacks should support blacks, just as Asians should support Asians and Jews support Jews.
It is good. It is normal. It is moral.

Whites, immersed in White guilt and (in the modern state of things) afflicted by their altruistic instincts (currently being used to undermine them in the current globalist push), have carelessly disregarded their own vested interests in the name of "Multiculturalism" even as they applaud the race-conscience movements of the other races.

Once again, the White liberal has no non-White counterpart.

So yes, Mr. Limbaugh, Colin Powell is naturally going to support one of his own.
That is as natural and predictable as rain in Seattle...


Friday, October 17, 2008

Stoop And They Will Bow?...

Among the ways in which freedom is being chipped away in Europe, one of the less obvious is the legislation of memory. More and more countries have laws saying you must remember and describe this or that historical event in a certain way, sometimes on pain of criminal prosecution if you give the wrong answer. What the wrong answer is depends on where you are. In Switzerland, you get prosecuted for saying that the terrible thing that happened to the Armenians in the last years of the Ottoman empire was not a genocide. In Turkey, you get prosecuted for saying it was. What is state-ordained truth in the Alps is state-ordained falsehood in Anatolia.
This week a group of historians and writers, of whom I am one, has pushed back against this dangerous nonsense. In what is being called the "Appel de Blois", published in Le Monde last weekend, we maintain that in a free country "it is not the business of any political authority to define historical truth and to restrict the liberty of the historian by penal sanctions". And we argue against the accumulation of so-called "memory laws". First signatories include historians such as Eric Hobsbawm, Jacques Le Goff and Heinrich August Winkler. It's no accident that this appeal originated in France, which has the most intense and tortuous recent experience with memory laws and prosecutions. It began uncontroversially in 1990, when denial of the Nazi Holocaust of the European Jews, along with other crimes against humanity defined by the 1945 Nuremberg tribunal, was made punishable by law in France - as it is in several other European countries. In 1995, the historian Bernard Lewis was convicted by a French court for arguing that, on the available evidence, what happened to the Armenians might not correctly be described as genocide according to the definition in international law.

This kind of nonsense is all the more dangerous when it comes wearing the mask of virtue. A perfect example is the recent attempt to enforce limits to the interpretation of history across the whole EU in the name of "combating racism and xenophobia".

How, for example, do you refute the absurd conspiracy theory, which apparently still has some currency in parts of the Arab world, that "the Jews" were behind the September 11 2001 terrorist attacks on New York? By forbidding anyone from saying that, on pain of imprisonment? No. You refute it by refuting it. By mustering all the available evidence, in free and open debate. This is not just the best way to get at the facts; ultimately, it's the best way to combat racism and xenophobia too.

The only problem here is that the very same people (Marxists) who invented the words "racism" and "xenophobia" are the ones now trying hardest to persecute and prosecute those who investigate historical events.

The author also states that, "I believe it is very important that nations, states, peoples and other groups (not to mention individuals) should face up, solemnly and publicly, to the bad things done by them or in their name."

And of the good things done by them or in their name?

And who is to define what counts as "bad things" vs. "good things", because different groups will most certainly have varying notions.

And will we see apologies and/or at least recognition of the "bad things" inflicted upon European peoples by the likes of the Mongols, Arabs, Berbers, Muslims, Jews and Turks?

How was it Orwell put it,

"those who control the past control the present; those who control the present control the future"


History: The Sequel!...

With riots by immigrants almost a weekly occurrence in France, it might be expected that French President Nicolas Sarkozy would be taking steps to combat this pressing problem. After all, Sarkozy largely came to power on the anti-immigration ticket, his hard-line words on this topic stealing the thunder of Jean Marie Le Pen’s Front National, the party usually associated with tackling this problem in the minds of the French people.

But at a conference earlier this month, Sarkozy showed his true colours...

In a blatant attempt to court the ever increasing Arabic and Islamic voter base in France, Sarkozy called Arabic “the language of the future, of science and of modernity” and expressed the wish that “more French people share in the language that expresses great civilisational and spiritual values.” He continued:
“We must invest in the Arabic language because to teach it symbolizes a moment of exchange, of openness and of tolerance, and it brings with it one of the oldest and most prestigious civilizations of the world."

Sarkozy is not even French, but Jewish.
So his description of middle-eastern Islamic "culture" being more preferable to European civilization is not without precedent.

The Spanish Inquisition, which began in 1481, cannot be understood without recognizing the significance of this epic 771-year struggle between Christians and Muslims over the Spanish peninsula. What took the great Berber Gen. Tariq ibn Zayid only eight years to conquer on behalf of the Umayyad Caliphate required almost 100 times as long to regain, and neither King Ferdinand II of Aragon nor his wife, Queen Isabella of Castile, was inclined to risk any possibility of having to repeat the grand endeavor. Isabella, in particular, was concerned about reports of conversos, purported Christians who had pretended to convert from Judaism but were still practicing their former religion. This was troubling, as it was reasonable to assume that those who were lying about their religious conversion were also lying about their loyalty to the united crowns and it was widely feared that Jews were again encouraging Muslim leaders to attempt the recapture of al-Andalus, as they had its original capture eight centuries before. ("It remains a fact that the Jews, either directly or through their coreligionists in Africa, encouraged the Mohammedans to conquer Spain." The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906). Vol XI, 485.)

This is the reason why the Muslim destruction of Southern Europe for nearly seven centuries is, today, portrayed as a wonderful event, while the hard-fought-for struggle on behalf of the Spaniards to reclaim their lands and re-plant the Christian flag is portrayed as a hideous injustice.

Once again we see that the destruction of European Civilization and European Peoples is called "tolerance" and "diversity", while any suggestion that European Peoples have a right to live is denounced as racist and xenophobic.

For more perspective on this, see here.


Thursday, October 16, 2008

The Welfare State! Doing What The Black Death Couldn't...

MORE than 50 million African workers are to be invited to Europe in a far-reaching secretive migration deal, the Daily Express can reveal today.

A controversial taxpayer-funded “job centre” opened in Mali this week is just the first step towards promoting “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”.

Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe.

The report, by the EU statistical agency Eurostat, warns that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.

It states: “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming dec ades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age.

“Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.”


Fortunately European leaders did not impose the same logic when nearly half of Europe was wiped out from the Black Death.

By this messed up standard of reasoning the living standards in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Mexico should be a hundred time better than that of Ireland, England or the Netherlands.

But then, restructuring economies to match demographic changes would cut into the profits of mega corporations. And we just can't have that.


Never Ceases To Amaze...

The Red Sox look very white.
The trade of left fielder Manny Ramirez and loss of shortstop Julio Lugo to injury left the Sox with a predominantly Caucasian roster.

Of the Red Sox's current players in the ALCS, the only African- American is outfielder Coco Crisp.

The only Latin Americans are designated hitter David Ortiz, who is from the Dominican Republic, and utility infielder Alex Cora and reliever Javier Lopez, both of whom are from Puerto Rico.

Center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury is Native American. Pitchers Daisuke Matsuzaka and Hideki Okajima are from Japan. Reliever Manny Delcarmen is of Dominican descent, and injured third baseman Mike Lowell was born to Cuban parents in Puerto Rico.

The Sox's composition is surprising in an era in which rosters are more diverse than at any point in the game's history, even as the number of African-American players continues to decline.
-Ken Rosenthal

After listing the teams non-White players Mr. Rosenthal laments that it simply isn't enough despite the fact that, demographically, Whites are supposedly (officially) still the majority here in America.

Tell us Mr. Rosenthal, since you speak so warmly of diversity, is the NBA too Black?
How about the NFL?
Is the MSM too liberal?
Is Israel too Jewish?