Sunday, November 30, 2008

The Truth In Media Assistance Program....

The Truth In Media Assistance Program is designed to aid Mainstream Media, which is inclined and encouraged to obfuscate truths and undermine reality, in properly headlining articles to reflect a more truthful subtext.

Today's charitable act goes to this Reuters article titled, 'Poverty Spreading in Suburbs: Study'

The Truth In Media Assistance Program, working to help the Media better itself and create more honest reporting, gives the linked article above the more truthful title, 'As Illegal Immigrants And Other Minorities Spread Into Suburbs Crime Skyrockets Leading To An Increase In Poverty: Study'

Have you helped your local Media tell the truth today?


The Convenient And The Inconvenient Terrorist Attack...

We've all heard about Mumbai, India by now, but how many have heard of this,

CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico — Police say at least 12 masked gunmen opened fire inside a restaurant in the northern border city of Ciudad Juarez, killing eight.

The attack comes days after police found the bodies of seven men who were killed in a school soccer field in an upscale neighborhood of Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso, Texas.

The homicides were the latest of hundreds of killings in the city, where drug violence has taken a heavy toll during Mexico's nationwide crackdown on drug cartels that supply U.S. consumers.

Funny how, even though it's closer to home, stories like that get buried on page 10, whereas the India story, taking place thousands of miles away, gets wall-to-wall coverage...

Corporate media detests stories that reflect actual on-the-ground reality and instead prefer propaganda puff pieces like this, which, ironically, portrays all non-Whites as ignorant savages incapable of civilization outside of the White Man's guiding hand in a White Man's land. (nobody ever calls them "racist" for that)

But with so many third-wolrders pouring in, they are, through sheer volume of numbers, re-producing here, the very environment that they left behind in their own lands,

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, Rep.-Iowa...

But the carnage wrought by illegal alien murderers represents only a fraction of the pool of blood spilled by American citizens as a result of an open border and un-enforced immigration laws.

While King reports 12 Americans are murdered daily by illegal aliens, he says 13 are killed by drunk illegal alien drivers

(The Narrator note: For those keeping count, that means that since September 11, 2001, approx. 55,000 Americans have been killed by illegal immigrants!)

King also reports eight American children are victims of sexual abuse by illegal aliens every day – a total of 2,920 annually.

Based on a one-year in-depth study, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute of Atlanta estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each. She analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 that included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants.

As the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. increases, so does the number of American victims. the end of 2003, approximately 267,000 illegal aliens were incarcerated in all U.S. jails and prisons.

In April 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a report on a study of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003. It found the following:

  • The 55,322 illegal aliens studied represented a total of 459,614 arrests – some eight arrests per illegal alien;
  • Their arrests represented a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses – some 13 offenses per illegal alien;
  • 36 percent had been arrested at least five times before.


WASHINGTON – Mexican drug cartels operating in cities in the U.S. are buying up legitimate businesses to launder money and using some of the proceeds to win local mayoral and city council seats for politicians who can shape the policies and personnel decisions of their police forces, according to Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo....
Tancredo exposes what he has learned from meetings with law enforcement authorities regarding a concerted effort by the Mexican mafia and drug cartels to extend their corruptive influence in urban areas dominated by illegal alien populations.

"The Tijuana-based Felix drug cartel and the Juarez-based Fuentes cartel began buying legitimate business in small towns in Los Angeles County in the early 1990s," he writes in his new book published by WND Books. "They purchased restaurants, used-car lots, auto-body shops and other small businesses. One of their purposes was to use these businesses for money-laundering operations. Once established in their community, these cartel-financed business owners ran for city council and other local offices. Over time, they were able to buy votes and influence in an effort to take over the management of the town. They wanted to create a comfort zone from which they could operate without interference from local law enforcement." an example, to the L.A. County city of Bell Gardens – where corrupt elected officials under the influence of drug lords actually tried to shut down the police department.

"City officials who would not cooperate with the Mexican-born city manager were forced out of office," he writes. "Eventually, the L.A. County attorney's office moved in, and the city manager was prosecuted on charges of corruption. Unfortunately, Bell Gardens was only the tip of the iceberg. Other Los Angeles suburbs – including Huntington Park, Lynwood and Southgate – became targets for the cartels."

In fact, similar efforts to undermine law and order by Mexican criminal gangs are under way, Tancredo says, in Texas, Arizona and elsewhere. "The corruption spreading from south of the border is not confined to Southern California," he writes.

The number of illegals in America is unknown, but is estimated to be between 12 to 30 million. Every day thousands more pour across the border...
And these numbers do not even touch upon the millions more legal immigrants who are flooding the nation...

The New Century Foundation released the following report,

The great majority of Hispanics — 66 percent — are of Mexican origin. No less than ten percent of the population of Mexico now lives in the United States, and one out of every seven Mexican workers migrates here.(3) Many more would like to come: According to a recent survey, almost half of all Mexicans said that they would move to the United States if they had the chance.(4)

The 33 percent of Hispanics who are not from Mexico have mainly the following heritages: 17 percent Latin American, nine percent Puerto Rican, and four percent Cuban (See figure to the right).(5) The characteristics of these populations are often quite different, with Cuban immigrants generally more economically successful than those from Mexico, Central America, or Puerto Rico.

Major Findings

Income and Wealth

  • Per capita income of Hispanics is one half that of non-Hispanic whites, and household net worth is less than one tenth.

  • Fifty percent of Hispanic households use some form of welfare, the highest rate of any major population group.


  • Hispanics are 3.3 times more likely to be in prison than whites; they are 4.2 times more likely to be in prison for murder, and 5.8 times more likely to be in prison for felony drug crimes.

  • Young Hispanics are 19 times more likely than young whites (and slightly more likely than young blacks) to be in youth gangs.


  • Hispanics drop out of high school at three times the white rate and twice the black rate.

  • Even third-generation Hispanics drop out of school at a higher rate than blacks and are less likely to be college graduates.

  • From 1992 to 2003, Hispanic illiteracy in English rose from 35 percent to 44 percent.

  • The average Hispanic 12th-grader reads and does math at the level of the average white 8th-grader.

Families and Health

  • At 43 percent, the Hispanic illegitimacy rate is twice the white rate, and Hispanic women have abortions at 2.7 times the white rate.

  • Hispanics are three times more likely than whites not to have medical insurance, and die from AIDS and tuberculosis at three times the white rate.

  • In California, the cost of free medical care for illegal aliens forced 60 hospitals to close between 1993 and 2003.


  • Only 33 percent of citizens of Hispanic origin consider themselves "Americans" first. The rest consider themselves either "Hispanic/Latino" or their former nationality first.

article here

"...the increasing number of illegal aliens coming into the United States is forcing the closure of hospitals, spreading previously vanquished diseases and threatening to destroy America's prized health-care system, says a report in the spring issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

"The influx of illegal aliens has serious hidden medical consequences," writes Madeleine Pelner Cosman, author of the report. "We judge reality primarily by what we see. But what we do not see can be more dangerous, more expensive, and more deadly than what is seen."

According to her study, 84 California hospitals are closing their doors as a direct result of the rising number of illegal aliens and their non-reimbursed tax on the system.

In addition, the report says, "many illegal aliens harbor fatal diseases that American medicine fought and vanquished long ago, such as drug-resistant tuberculosis, malaria, leprosy, plague, polio, dengue, and Chagas disease."

Among the organizations directing illegal aliens into America's medical systems, according to the report, are the Ford Foundation-funded Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Immigration Law Center, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association's Commission on Immigration Policy, Practice, and Pro Bono, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the National Council of La Raza, George Soros's Open Society Institute, the Migration Policy Institute, the National Network for Immigration and Refugee Rights and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Many illegals entering this country have tuberculosis, according to the report.

"TB's swift, deadly return now is lethal for about 60 percent of those infected because of new Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Until recently MDR-TB was endemic to Mexico. This Mycobacterium tuberculosis is resistant to at least two major anti-tubercular drugs. Ordinary TB usually is cured in six months with four drugs that cost about $2,000. MDR-TB takes 24 months with many expensive drugs that cost around $250,000 with toxic side effects. Each illegal with MDR-TB coughs and infects 10 to 30 people, who will not show symptoms immediately. Latent disease explodes later.

TB was virtually absent in Virginia until in 2002, when it spiked a 17 percent increase, but Prince William County, just south of Washington, D.C., had a much larger rise of 188 percent. Public health officials blamed immigrants. In 2001 the Indiana School of Medicine studied an outbreak of MDR-TB, and traced it to Mexican illegal aliens. The Queens, New York, health department attributed 81 percent of new TB cases in 2001 to immigrants. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ascribed 42 percent of all new TB cases to 'foreign born' people who have up to eight times higher incidences.."


None of the above facts are "convenient" to the fiction that our elite spin to keep us docile and cowered (at the wrong things).

Just to put it all in perspective, which should the "average Joe" American fear more on a daily basis, Al Queda or this?


Friday, November 28, 2008

If They Just Had More Conflict, Then There Wouldn't Be So Many Wars...

Anytime you see the words "diversity" or "multiculturalism" used in some propaganda puff piece, just insert the word Conflict in their place instead.....because that is what "diversity" actually (always) creates.

At least 124 people have been killed and 284 wounded in the attacks in the attacks on India's financial hub and Indian officials say the death toll could rise.

Indian commandos on Friday stormed the Jewish center, killing two suspected Islamist gunmen but failing to save five hostages. It was unknown if any of the hostages in the Jewish center were American or dual Israeli-U.S. citizens.

Separately, the New York office of the Chabad-Lubavitch Jewish group, said a Brooklyn-based rabbi and his wife were killed in the siege on a Jewish center in Mumbai as part of the coordinated attacks that have killed at least 124 people. The rabbi is a dual U.S.-Israeli national and his wife Israeli, the group said.

The Virginia-based Synchronicity Foundation said on its Web site that Alan Scherr and his 13-year-old daughter Naomi, Americans who were in India as part of a meditation program, had died in the attacks.

Beyond all that could be said about this (the obvious), it brings up something else I've never understood.......all of the Western gentiles going to India 'in search of enlightenment'.

I mean do these people leave their $250,000 air conditioned -wall-to-wall carpeted- homes in the first all the way to the third world....wade out into the middle of some sewage infested street in the midst of some post-apocalyptic looking ghetto, with poverty all around them, disease at every corner and the stench of death and civilizational rot in the air and think to themselves, "Truly these are a people from whom great wisdom can be learned"?


Thursday, November 27, 2008

So Obvious, It's Overlooked...

Truth is usually obvious. The more convoluted an argument becomes the more BS its premise is likely to be.
This is why liberals always resort to satirical and sarcastic "comebacks" as they dread being pulled into an indepth discourse where their spurious arguments are easily exposed.

Sometimes the simpleness of a truth can cause it's revelation to be overlooked and neglected in discussing related issues.

The other day I came across an "anti" comment at Stormfront about Indians and America that was so silly I doubt even the Indians use it.

This lady states,

This nation belongs to Native Americas first and foremost and we raped their poeple and took their land. Im also concerned when people are so extreme and dont look at all sides before making judgements , rash statements and comments.

Now obviously she doesn't understand what a nation-state is. Nations are political, cultural and (more often than not), biological constructs.

"This nation" happens to be located on the giant land mass known as North America. Saying that "this Nation" really belongs to Native Americans(?) because they were here before "this nation" existed is about as logical as saying that Microsoft belongs to the Native Americans as well since they once roamed the land where its headquarters are currently located.

I bring this up because Thanksgiving has, in the past fifteen or so years, become a politically correct "issue" due to the relationship between the White settlers and the Indians.

The "issue" is cast in the usual minority-feelings -oppressed minority- mode.

Here is where the 'so obvious, it's overlooked' part comes in.

Commenting about the Thanksgiving controversy at Vdare, James Fulford writes,

The complaining, as is traditional at modern Thanksgivings, comes from an unThankful Indian:

"'It's demeaning,' Michelle Raheja, the mother of a kindergartner at Condit Elementary School, wrote to her daughter's teacher.’I'm sure you can appreciate the inappropriateness of asking children to dress up like slaves (and kind slave masters), or Jews (and friendly Nazis), or members of any other racial minority group who has struggled in our nation's history.'

“Raheja, whose mother is a Seneca, wrote the letter upon hearing of a four-decade district tradition, where kindergartners at Condit and Mountain View elementary schools take annual turns dressing up and visiting the other school for a Thanksgiving feast. This year, the Mountain View children would have dressed as Native Americans and walked to Condit, whose students would have dressed as Pilgrims."

Of course, it's Raheja casting the Pilgrim Fathers as the Nazis/slave masters, and the Indians as the minority group. This is false—the Pilgrims were Protestant Christians, the Indians were pagan savages. The Pilgrims were anti-slavery Puritans whose descendants would fight on the Northern side in the Civil War, the Seneca were slave-owners and raiders. (Their victims being mostly other Indians, of course. They used to capture whole villages of Hurons and assimilate them.) And while Indians are now a minority group, at the time of the first Thanksgiving, the Pilgrims were the minority—they were the only white people for thousands of miles in any direction. What this is, of course, is history told from the enemy's point of view.

For at least the first century that Whites were in what is now the United States, they were the minority!
And based on written accounts, a poorly treated minority at that.

The same holds true for the Spaniards in South America as well as the British in India and various European peoples in Africa and Asia.

Now obviously this theme needs to be explored more and there are contextual considerations to all of those examples, but the main context (as in minority/majority relations) is clear. Colonial Whites were a minority group.


Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Things To Be Thankful For On Thanksgiving...

....not living in Shelbyville Kentucky.

Mexican gangs now infiltrating Kentucky; Shelbyville fears violence in the future

a new wave of illegal immigrants has been arriving in recent years, and law enforcement agencies say many of these undocumented citizens are bringing with them drugs, gangs and violent crime.

llegal immigrants arrive in Kentuckiana daily.

Shelbyville looks like most small towns in Middle America.
A quaint downtown, a thriving farm community, and in general a good quality of life.

Shane Suttor is a Shelbyville city councilman. Sutter says a growing number of illegal aliens aren’t here to share in the quality of life, but to threaten it.

Police tell us that the Latin Kings, Surenos and MS-13 gangs, all with ties to the Mexican Mafia are operating criminal enterprises in Kentucky. Cells have been identified in Shelbyville, Louisville and Lexington. A narcotics officer told us some illegals have wired 15000 dollars a week for months to cartels in Mexico.

Shane Sutter said, “We don’t have a swat team. We don’t have a gang task force. We’re just a small town.”

Suttor says it’s a small town preparing for a siege.

The latest report by the National Drug Intelligence Center reports drug cartel activity involving the Federation Cartel in Louisville and the rival Gulf Coast Cartel in Lexington.

Authorities fear violence in the future as these two groups begin to fight over territory here in Kentucky.


And if our Congress and President get their way, these people (along with the 30 to 40 million other illegals in the country) will be given Amnesty.
And with that will come Chain Migration which means Mexico will unofficially be merged with America.

Welcome to third world America Kentucky....

The Politically Incorrect Illness...

OTTAWA - The Carleton University Students' Association has voted to drop a cystic fibrosis charity as the beneficiary of its annual Shinearama fundraiser, supporting a motion that argued the disease is not "inclusive" enough.

Cystic fibrosis "has been recently revealed to only affect white people, and primarily men" said the motion read Monday night to student councillors, who voted almost unanimously in favour of it.

"The reasoning behind this is totally ridiculous. Eventually cystic fibrosis is a fatal disease. I wouldn't wish it on anyone," said Marie Lunney, a Carleton graduate who has worked as a foundation volunteer.

One can't help but wonder if there is a fundraiser to help those suffering from the mental ailment known as Political Correctness...


Tuesday, November 25, 2008

The Wanderer...

Often the lone-dweller waits for favor,
mercy of the Measurer, though he unhappy
across the seaways long time must
stir with his hands the rime-cold sea,
tread exile-tracks. Fate is established!

So the earth-stepper spoke, mindful of hardships,
of fierce slaughter, the fall of kin:
Oft must I, alone, the hour before dawn
lament my care. Among the living
none now remains to whom I dare
my inmost thought clearly reveal.
I know it for truth: it is in a warrior
noble strength to bind fast his spirit,
guard his wealth-chamber, think what he will.

Weary mind never withstands fate,
nor does troubled thought bring help.
Therefore, glory-seekers oft bind fast
in breast-chamber a dreary mind.
So must I my heart--
often wretched with cares, deprived of homeland,
far from kin--fasten with fetters,
since long ago earth covered
my lord in darkness, and I, wretched,
thence, mad and desolate as winter,
over the wave's binding sought, hall-dreary,
a giver of treasure, where far or near
I might find one who in mead-hall
might accept my affection, or on me, friendless,
might wish consolation, offer me joy.

He knows who tries it how cruel is sorrow,
a bitter companion, to the one who has few
concealers of secrets, beloved friends.
The exile-track claims him, not twisted gold,
his soul-chamber frozen, not fold's renown.
He remembers hall-warriors and treasure-taking,
how among youth his gold-friend
received him at the feast. Joy has all perished!
So he knows, who must of his lord-friend,
of loved one, lore-sayings long time forgo.

When sorrow and sleep at once together
a wretched lone-dweller often bind,
it seems in his mind that he his man-lord
clasps and kisses, and on knee lays
hands and head, as when sometimes before
in yore-days he received gifts from the gift-throne.
When the friendless man awakens again,
he sees before him fallow waves,
sea-birds bathing, wings spreading,
rime and snow falling mingled with hail.
Then are the heart's wounds ever more heavy,
sore after sweet--sorrow is renewed--
when memory of kin turns through the mind;
he greets with glee-staves, eagerly surveys
companions of men. Again they swim away!
Spirits of seafarers bring but seldom
known speech and song. Care is renewed
to the one who frequently sends
over the wave's binding, weary, his thought.

Therefore, I know not, throughout this world,
why thought in my mind does not grow dark
when the life of men I fully think through,
how they suddenly abandoned the hall,
headstrong retainers. This Middle-Earth
each of all days so fails and falls
that a man gains no wisdom before he is dealt
his winters in the world. The wise man is patient,
not too hot-hearted, nor too quick tongued,
nor a warrior too weak, nor too foolhardy,
neither frightened nor fain, nor yet too wealth-greedy,
nor ever of boasts too eager, before he knows enough.
A warrior should wait when he speaks a vow,
until, bold in mind, he clearly knows
whither mind's thought after will turn.

A wise man perceives how ghastly it will be
when all this world's weal desolate stands,
as now here and there across this Middle-Earth
blown on by wind walls stand
covered with rime, the buildings storm-shaken.
The wine-halls molder, the wielder lies down
deprived of rejoicing, warband all fallen,
proud by the wall. Some war took utterly,
carried on forth-way; one a bird bore off
over the high holm ; one the hoar wolf
dealt over to death, one a warrior,
drear-faced, hid in an earth-cave.
Thus the Shaper of men destroyed this earth-yard,
until, lacking the cries, the revels of men,
old giants' work stood worthless.

When he with wise mind this wall-stone
and this dark life deeply thinks through,
the wise one in mind oft remembers afar
many a carnage, and this word he speaks:
Where is the horse? Where the young warrior? Where now the gift-giver?
Where are the feast-seats? Where all the hall-joys?
Alas for the bright cup! Alas byrnied warrior!
Alas the lord's glory! How this time hastens,
grows dark under night-helm, as it were not!
Stands now behind the dear warband
a wondrous high wall, varied with snake-shapes,
warriors fortaken by might of the ash-spears,
corpse-hungry weapons--famous that fate--
and this stone-cliff storms dash on;
snowstorm, attacking, binds all the ground,
tumult of winter, when the dark one comes,
night-shadow blackens, sends from the north
rough hailstorm in anger toward men.
All is the earth-realm laden with hardship,
fate of creation turns world under heaven.

Here goldhoard passes, here friendship passes,
here mankind passes, here kinsman passes:
all does this earth-frame turn worthless!
So said the one wise in mind, at secret conclaves sat him apart.
Good, he who keeps faith, nor too quickly his grief
from his breast makes known, except he, noble, knows how beforehand
to do cure with courage. Well will it be
to him who seeks favor, refuge and comfort,
from the Father in heaven, where all fastness stands.


A second translation can be found here.


Films White People Don't Like...

It’s not often that you see a documentary about your own society that makes you squirm a little bit…without any sex or violence. And that’s especially true when you agree with the filmmaker’s viewpoint.

But the subject of racism in America has become so taboo, so powerfully charged, that any discussion of it in an open, honest, way is both refreshing and disturbing.

Bodeker interviews “some of racisms believers, (to) look for inconsistencies” whom he found either by posting a CraigsList ad to “stop racism now” or by interviewing random people on the streets of Denver. He didn't have to go far to find either the volunteers or the gaping logical and experiential holes in their beliefs.

Bodeker’s premise, which is clearly borne out by the answers his interviewees give, is that “Racism is used as a tool of intimidation, like a hammer, against Caucasian whites.” He shows how so many people who say they believe racism is around them all the time actually can’t come up with any examples of it, or even with a good definition.
Bodeker says he isn’t aware of “another issue that is more artificial, manufactured, or manipulated than this whole construct called ‘racism.’”

A documentary for Stuff White People Like?
In fact there are few things white people love more than being offended.
Naturally, white people do not get offended by statements directed at white people.
In fact, they don’t even have a problem making offensive statements about other white people (ask a white person about “flyover states”). As a rule, white people strongly prefer to get offended on behalf of other people.

It is also valuable to know that white people spend a significant portion of their time preparing for the moment when they will be offended. They read magazines, books, and watch documentaries all in hopes that one day they will encounter a person who will say something offensive. When this happens, they can leap into action with quotes, statistics, and historical examples. Once they have finished lecturing another white person about how it’s wrong to use the term “black” instead of “African-American,” they can sit back and relax in the knowledge that they have made a difference.

-Stuff White People Like

There is a certain programmed mechanism in Modern Whites which precludes them from intentionally critiquing the behavior or 'culture' of non-Whites while at the same time freeing them up to mock and ridicule their own in a rather vicious and intentional way. (Think White Guilt brownie points)

In talking with other Whites I've noticed a rather 'strained hypocrisy' coming from them whereby they consciously work to attack their own while defending others.

Example: The whole 'Mormon Compound' scandal that broke out earlier this year.

Them: 'God, did you see those Mormon Women in their Little House on the Prairie Dresses?'

Me: 'No I missed that. Have you seen all those Muslim women up in Michigan dressed in Burqas or head scarves?'


'Have you seen those blacks with the baggy pants hanging halfway off their ass and 'grills' on their teeth?'

Them: ........................(the sound of crickets)...................

At this point I can see them begin to work around a comeback that will continue to defend the Muslim or black dress/culture while still mocking the White dress/culture.
Usually you'll get the concessionary response, 'Well, it's a strange world' or 'Takes all kinds, I guess'. But nevertheless you can see them desperately searching for ways to defend the indefensible.

Another example of this is when the topic of black crime is brought up; Whites will quickly offer the defense, 'you can't a judge a whole group of people by the actions of a few rotten apples'.
Yet when the subject of colonization arises, these same Whites will then wax collective with, 'White people sure have done the Indians bad'.
-There is nothing more comical and pathetic than hearing a White person talk about 'White Privilege' on the one hand, yet proudly assert on the other that they, 'judge the individual'-.

So where does this mentality come from?

Most likely from the belief on the part of these same Whites, that Whites, or more specifically, White Culture and Standards are indeed 'superior', or of a higher grade than everyone else's. And this is based not upon some deep-rooted animosity towards other races, but rather upon innate White cultural standards of behavior which far too few Whites take time to ponder as their own.

You can see this in the way that Whites are constantly projecting (at least rhetorically) their own moralities and temperaments upon non-Whites.

You see when I made the above rebuttal to a White person by comparing the absurdities of Muslim or black dress and behavior to that of the perceived White Mormon ‘absurd dress’, what this typical White person was trying to find a way of saying without saying it, is, 'Yeah but these are White people we're talking about, not a bunch of savages!'

All his instincts and common sense lead him in that direction (preference for his own people and their ways) which is why he has to continually make a conscience effort to basically lie to himself about what he knows to be true, which is, 'their culture is different from my own White Culture'.

Now granted there are some truly freakish Whites strolling around out there, but when we look back on history we see that there was a time when this freakishness was not tolerated and thus stayed undeveloped or hidden.

What happened?

Diversity happened.

In order for Whites to justify their tolerance of non-White behaviors they were simultaneously forced to tolerate White absurdities as well. The more the merrier in fact, because it gave leftist Whites a few tokens on the scales of ‘f***ed-up’ with which to balance out the more general (or normal) attitudes and behaviors of Whites.

This is why ‘White Trash’ is such an important term today in the media and society.
It gives the illusion of an equally depraved culture amongst Whites with which to point towards when ghettos are mentioned. Yet of course when other factors are taken into account (such as the crime rates in Appalachia) this illusion crumbles.

Still, the perception is what matters and the very existence and free use of the term adds a few more tokens on the illusionary scale.

Where is all this leading?

Multicultural inertia.

The mental gymnastics Whites currently go through to defend equality will last only as long as they are fat and happy, and survival is a given.

In other words, as long as Law And Order are sustained.

One of the hallmarks of White Civilization is, and has been, reciprocal law and order.

Necessity (as in the basics of survival) makes even the most burdensome of laws obvious and easily oblige-able to Whites. Not so much so for blacks and Hispanics.

Comfort on the other hand will breed sloth, and sloth is weary of competition, especially when it comes in the form of obligation.

As Law and Order break down (with the increase of non-Whites), the general comfort in which sloth germinates is destroyed, leaving, once again, necessity, in its rightful place.

And this is where Whites once again embrace reality, as Law and Order, and the Obligation it brings, is not exactly a high virtue amongst many peoples of color...


Saturday, November 22, 2008

'Culture Is Gene Expression'...

This is a nice paper on European population structure with a large number of SNPs, which comes at the heels of some earlier studies...

It is clear that some nations appear to be distinct. For example, most test Spaniards (94.5%) are correctly guessed as Spaniards, with some (5.5%) guessed as French. Of course, this distinctiveness would be reduced if further populations (e.g. the Portuguese) were added to the analysis. More strongly, 99.1% of Norwegians are guessed correctly as Norwegians. is now possible to identify particular ethnic groups, e.g., Norwegians, with great accuracy from DNA.

And the distinction is even more pronounced when extended beyond ethnic groupings and into racial groupings.
On July 16, 2002, a survey crew from the Department of Transportation found Pam Kinamore's nude, decomposing body in the area along the banks of the Mississippi known as Whiskey Bay, just west of Baton Rouge. The police tested the DNA and quickly realized that they were dealing with a serial killer...

In early March, 2003, investigators turned to Tony Frudakis, a molecular biologist who said he could determine the killer's race by analyzing his DNA. They were unsure about the science, so, before giving him the go-ahead, the task force sent Frudakis DNA swabs taken from 20 people whose race they knew and asked him to determine their races through blind testing. He nailed every single one.

DNAWitness, the test Frudakis applied in the Baton Rouge case, uses a set of 176 genetic markers selected precisely because they disclose the most information about physical characteristics. Some are found primarily in people of African heritage, while others are found mainly in people of Indo-European, Native American or South Asian heritage.

No one sequence alone can predict ancestral origin. However, by looking collectively at hundreds and analyzing the frequency of the various markers, Frudakis says he could predict genetic ancestry with 99 percent accuracy.
-more here from

Still, some people will not except these facts because they contradict their own personal dogmatic belief structures.

As a poster at Dienekes' states,
The more that I read and listen to the advocates of the social construct theory of race the more they seem like left-wing versions of creationists who just can't accept the scientific evidence because it disagrees with their personal views.

And over at, the theme runes similar,

The writer is 100% correct that a society is a reflection of the people in it. I've said the same myself. If you get Africans to flee to Europe then their behaviour in Europe is the same as it was in Africa. People do not change. If you leave blacks to dominate enough, you will see America and Europe slowly being transformed into Third World countries and later into copies of African states. People who are losers, take their loser habits with them in the same way that people who are successes, also become successes when they move to another country. If a society or a country or a continent is a mess, it is not the fault of the land or the geography, it is the fault of the people. It is that simple. Africa should actually be the richest continent on Earth but its the people who live in Africa who have turned it into a living hell. And it will probably stay that way. Jan]

"There's this hilarious disconnect in the sheeple brain, where they
have been progressively brainwashed over a forty year period into
believing that once they have committed suicide themselves, an
identical civilization will be left behind except with a different
demographic makeup. They will yank the white tablecloth out from under
the dinnerware and the society will remain standing, only
melanin-enriched but otherwise the same.

It's like white people all over the planet were each taking turns
shooting themselves in the head with the same gun, convinced when they
have all killed themselves they will leave the perfect society behind.
I've got bad news for you. What you think of as civilization is joined
at the hip with the Indo-European gene pool. It's not even like oil
and water because it's all an unbroken continuum.

Culture is gene expression. If enough Mexicans inhabit any area on the
planet, that area will look exactly like Mexico in short order.


It's What Forecasts Are For...

Washington imposed a minimum wage higher than the average wage in war-devastated Germany and Japan. The Feds ordered that U.S. plants be made the healthiest and safest worksites in the world, creating OSHA to see to it. It enacted civil rights laws to ensure the labor force reflected our diversity. Environmental laws came next, to ensure U.S. factories became the most pollution-free on earth.

It then clamped fuel efficiency standards on the entire U.S. car fleet.

Next, Washington imposed a corporate tax rate of 35 percent, raking off another 15 percent of autoworkers’ wages in Social Security payroll taxes

State governments imposed income and sales taxes, and local governments property taxes to subsidize services and schools.

The United Auto Workers struck repeatedly to win the highest wages and most generous benefits on earth—vacations, holidays, work breaks, health care, pensions—for workers and their families, and retirees.

Now there is nothing wrong with making U.S. plants the cleanest and safest on earth or having U.S. autoworkers the highest-paid wage earners.

And under the 14th Amendment, GM, Ford and Chrysler had to obey the same U.S. laws and pay at the same tax rates. Outside the United States, however, there was and is no equality of standards or taxes.

Thus when America was thrust into the Global Economy, GM and Ford had to compete with cars made overseas in factories in postwar Japan and Germany, then Korea, where health and safety standards were much lower, wages were a fraction of those paid U.S. workers, and taxes were and are often forgiven on exports to the United States.

All three nations built “export-driven” economies.

Japan, China and South Korea do not believe in free trade as we understand it. To us, they are our “trading partners.” To them, the relationship is not like that of Evans & Novak or Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers. It is not even like the Redskins and Cowboys. For the Cowboys only want to defeat the Redskins. They do not want to put their franchise out of business and end the competition—as the Japanese did to our TV industry by dumping Sonys here until they killed it.

While we think the Global Economy is about what is best for the consumer, they think about what is best for the nation.

Like Alexander Hamilton, they understand that manufacturing is the key to national power. And they manipulate currencies, grant tax rebates to their exporters and thieve our technology to win. Last year, as trade expert Bill Hawkins writes, South Korea exported 700,000 cars to us, while importing 5,000 cars from us.

That’s Asia’s idea of free trade.

-more here

You cannot have your cake and eat it too. 'Live free and play hard' people, institutions and nations eventually come to an abrupt and painful end, because in the end the Piper will have his pay.

And it still amazes me how completely naive people are in regards to the motives of government/corporate policies.

As a poster here aptly puts it,

Transnational corporations and international bankers advocate a cosmopolitan worldview because they desire free trade and open borders. Big Government propagates equality and social justice because this provides a moral license to expand the leviathan powers of social engineering. Minorities march for equality in order to attain superequality, affirmative action and a redistribution of wealth in the form of neoslavery (welfare). Pro-Israel pundits corrupt American foreign policy with notions of universal democracy achievable through wars that serve Israeli interests. Liberal idealists find salvation and divine purpose in worshiping the spawn child of Christianity known as secular progressivism. Truly there are sinister anti-Western forces at work and they are manipulating the Western world with the politics of guilt.

Most suffering in life is predictable to those who think in terms further off than 'What's for dinner?'

Yet I still come across people getting caught in proverbial (as well as literal) blizzards even though the storm was forecast on the evening news.

Not much you can do for those types.

But for those who look ahead and calculate cause and effect, the forecast for the next fifty years is for one long, dark winter...


Thursday, November 20, 2008

Re-Up (Begrudging The Self Evident...)

Over the years egalitarians have questioned the taxonomic classification of race in terms of its empirical value and utility. Notwithstanding these criticisms which seek to undermine the legitimacy of race as a scientific concept, the answer to the question posed in the title of this paper is “yes.” If the concept of race didn’t exist, science would have to invent it (and did)! Race is a valid taxonomic construct because it allows us to make predictions about people’s behavior, especially at the group level.

In science, a concept is useful if it groups facts so that general laws and conclusions can be drawn from them. Predictions can be made using the taxonomic category of race because, on average, the Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans are similar to each other and different from White Americans, Germans, and Russians, who are similar to each other and different from Black Americans, Haitians, and sub-Saharan Africans. Predictability is the criterion by which the value of a hypothetical construct like race is evaluated. As I will show, race is highly predictive.

For the past 20 years my research has focused on differences between the three major races, commonly termed Orientals (East Asians, Mongoloids), Whites (Europeans, Caucasoids), and Blacks (Africans, Negroids). Roughly speaking, Orientals are those who have most of their ancestors from East Asia. Whites have most of their ancestors from Europe. And Blacks have most of their ancestors from sub-Saharan Africa. In the main, I have not addressed the many other groups outside of these three major races, or sub-groups within the three major races, though they are of interest as well.

What I've found is that in brain size, intelligence, temperament, sexual behavior, fertility, growth rate, life span, crime, and family stability, Orientals, as a group, consistently fall at one end of the spectrum, Blacks fall at the other end, and Whites fall in between. On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, and less sexually active, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the opposite end in each of these areas. Whites fall in the middle, often close to Orientals (see Chart 1).

Of course, these three-way racial differences are averages. Individuals are individuals. However, I've found that this three-way pattern is consistently true over time and across nations. That the same three-way racial pattern occurs repeatedly on some 60 different biological and behavioral variables is profoundly interesting and shows that race is more than “just skin deep.” The international data come from the World Health Organization, the United Nations, and Interpol. Recently, I even traveled to South Africa to collect new IQ data.

Let's start with the biological differences in sports, which is something almost everyone observes. Jon Entine's recent book Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We Are Afraid to Talk About It, addresses the old cliché that "White men can't jump" (and the new one that Oriental men jump even less well). Entine shows that in sports, it is Black men and women who can sky! And yet, as the data also show, it is mainly Blacks of West African descent who excel at running over short distances, while Blacks of East African descent – from Kenya and Ethiopia – excel at marathon running over long distances. These differences between East and West Africans show that taking an average can sometimes gloss over important distinctions. Still, Blacks from both East and West Africa excel at one or another kind of running. In sports, Blacks as a group, have a genetic advantage.

It is interesting to know that race differences show up early in life. Black babies are born a week earlier than White babies, yet they mature faster as measured by bone development. By age five or six, Black children excel in the dash, the long jump, and the high jump, all of which require a short burst of power. By the teenage years, Blacks have faster reflexes, as in the famous knee-jerk response.

Blacks also have from 3 to 19% more of the sex hormone testosterone than Whites or Orientals. This means more explosive energy, which gives Blacks the edge in sports like boxing, basketball, football, and sprinting.

Why is it taboo to say that Blacks are on average better at sports? Because the hormones that give Blacks the edge in sports also make them more masculine in general. They are physically more active in school, and this can sometimes get them into trouble or even lead to their being diagnosed as hyperactive.

So the next question is, “Why do East Asians and Whites and have wider hips than Blacks, and so make poorer runners?” The answer is that they give birth to larger brained babies. During evolution, as the head size of newborns increased, women had to have a wider pelvis. Orientals average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites, and Whites average a very large 5 cubic inches more cranial capacity than Blacks.

Some people are surprised to hear that the races differ in brain size. And they wonder how convincing the evidence is that brain size is related to intelligence. In fact, dozens of studies, including those based on state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated the relation between brain size and intelligence.

Race differences in brain size have been demonstrated using four different methods: (1) magnetic resonance imaging, (2) brain weight at autopsy, (3) endocranial volume, and (4) external head measurements. These data are summarized in Chart 2 which presents the brain size averages across the four measurement techniques and also, where possible, corrected for body size. Orientals averaged 1,364 cm3, Whites averaged 1,347 cm3, and Blacks averaged 1,267 cm3. Naturally the averages vary between samples and the races do overlap. But the results from different methods on different samples, measured from the 1840s to the 1990s, show the same strong pattern.

The racial differences in brain size show up at birth. One study of my own, published in the 1997 issue of the journal Intelligence, was carried out using the resources of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) in Bethesda, Maryland. In it, I analyzed data from the enormous Collaborative Perinatal Project, which took head circumference measures and IQ scores from over 50,000 children followed from birth to seven years. The Oriental children averaged larger head circumferences than did the White children at birth, four months, one year, and seven years; the White children averaged larger head circumferences than did the Black children (see Chart 3).

I published several other studies during the 1990s, also in Intelligence, confirming the racial differences in brain size. In one study, I (1991) analyzed data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and found the mean cranial capacity for East Asians was 1,460 cm3, and for Europeans it was 1,446 cm3. From a stratified random sample of 6,325 U.S. Army personnel, I (1992) calculated average cranial capacities for Asians, Whites, and Blacks, respectively, of 1,416 cm3, 1,380 cm3, and 1,359 cm3. (I also found that officers averaged 1,393 cm3 while enlisted personnel averaged 1,375 cm3.) From a compilation made by the International Labour Office in Geneva of tens of thousands of people from around the world, I (1994) found that samples from the Pacific Rim, Europe, and Africa averaged cranial capacities, respectively, of 1,308 cm3, 1,297 cm3, and 1,241 cm3. Travis Osborne and I (1995) published a paper showing that brain size was about 50% heritable for both Blacks and Whites using data from the Georgia Twin Study based on 236 pairs of Black and White adolescent twins. And once again we found Whites averaged greater cranial capacity than Blacks.

Since one cubic inch of brain matter contains millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of nerve connections, brain size helps to explain why the races differ in IQ. On standardized IQ tests, hundreds of studies show the three-way pattern. Orientals average slightly ahead of Whites on such tests and Whites average substantially ahead of Blacks. Most IQ tests have an average score of 100, with a “normal” range from 85 to 115. Around the world, Whites average an IQ of about 100, Orientals an IQ of about 104, and Blacks in Britain, the Caribbean, and the U.S. average lower IQs -- about 85. The lowest average IQs are found for sub-Saharan Africans – around 70 (see Chart 4). Like the other data sets in this essay, these are reviewed in my book Race, Evolution, and Behavior. An even more recent book on the topic is by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, IQ and the Wealth of Nations.

The extremely low average IQ of 70 for sub-Saharan Africans has been difficult for many people to accept. To determine for myself how realistic a figure it was, I traveled to South Africa to initiate a series of studies at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, one of the most prestigious universities in Africa. In the first study, we administered the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices to 173 African first year psychology students who scored at the 14th percentile on 1993 U.S. norms, giving them an average IQ of 84. In a second study, we administered the same test to another group of psychology students who scored an IQ of 83. After training on how to solve these types of tests, their IQs rose to 96. In a third study, we gave the same test to a more academically select student population -- 198 African engineering students who had taken mathematics and sciences courses in high school. This group scored at the 41st percentile with an IQ of 97. These results, from an elite university, showing mean IQ scores for African undergraduates ranging from 83 to 97, confirm the overall IQ of 70 for Africans because around the world university students typically score 15 to 30 IQ points above their population average.

Race differences in brain size and IQ, along with those in testosterone, have important implications for social behavior. For example, in the United States, Orientals are seen as a “model minority.” They have fewer divorces, out-of-wedlock births, and cases of child abuse than do Whites. More Orientals graduate from college and fewer go to prison. Blacks, on the other hand, are 12% of the American population but make up 50% of the prison population.

The racial pattern of crime in the U.S. is not due to local conditions like “White racism.” For nearly 20 years I have been monitoring the Interpol Yearbooks and publishing data on the worldwide crime statistics. These consistently show that the rate of violent crime (murder, rape, and serious assault) is about three times lower in East Asian and Pacific Rim countries than they are in African and Caribbean countries. Whites in European countries are intermediate. The 1996 rates of violent crime, for example, were: East Asian countries, 35 per 100,000 people; European countries, 42; and African and Caribbean countries, 149 (see Chart 5).

Orientals are the least sexually active, whether measured by age of first intercourse, intercourse frequency, or number of sexual partners. Blacks are the most active on all of these. Once again Whites fall in between. National surveys in Britain and the U.S., and international surveys by the World Health Organization, reveal the three-way racial pattern in sexual behavior. These racial differences, in turn, affect the rate of sexually transmitted diseases. For example, the latest figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (for the year 2000) shows the rate of chlamydia in African Americans is 10 times higher than it is for Whites, and for gonorrhea and syphilis the rate among Blacks is nearly 30 times the White rate.

Sadly, racial differences are also reflected in the current AIDS crisis. Over 40 million people around the world are living with HIV/AIDS. Chart 6 shows the HIV infection rates in various parts of the world based on the latest figures from UNAIDS (December 2001). The epidemic started in Black Africa in the late 1970s. Today 28 million adults there are living with HIV/AIDS. Over fifty percent of these are female. This shows that transmission is mainly heterosexual. Currently, nearly 9 out of every 100 Africans are infected with the AIDS virus and the epidemic is considered out of control. In several countries the AIDS rate is over 20%, including South Africa, where one in 5 adults is living with HIV/AIDS.

The HIV infection rate is also high in the Black Caribbean – 2.2%! The high rate of HIV/AIDS in the 2,000-mile band of Caribbean countries extends from Bermuda to Guyana, and it is highest in the Bahamas and in Haiti, where the rates are 4% and 5%, respectively.

Data published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that African Americans have HIV/AIDS rates similar to the Black Caribbean and parts of Black Africa. Three percent of Black men and 1% of Black women in the U.S. are living with HIV. The rate for White Americans is about 0.4%, while the rate for Asian Americans is less than 0.05%. Rates for Europe and the Pacific Rim are also low. Of course AIDS is a serious public health problem for all racial groups, but it is especially so for Africans and people of African descent.

Importantly, the races also differ in rate of ovulation. Not all women produce just one egg during the menstrual cycle. When two or more eggs are produced at the same time, pregnancy and the likelihood of producing two-egg twins are more likely. The number of such twins born is 16 out of every 1,000 births for Blacks, 8 out of every 1,000 births for Whites, and 4 or less for Orientals. Black women also average shorter menstrual cycles than White women. These and other data make it plain that the race differences in reproductive behavior are biological in nature.

Twin and adoption studies show that genes play a big part in athletic ability, brain size, IQ, and personality. Trans-racial adoption studies, where infants of one race are adopted and reared by parents of a different race, provide some of the strongest evidence that race differences are heritable. Oriental children, even if malnourished before being adopted by White parents, go on to have IQs above the White average. Black infants adopted into middle-class White families end up with IQs lower than the White average. Some of these data are summarized in Chart 7.

The Evolution of Racial Differences

Look back again at all the traits in Chart 1. They form a pattern. Whites consistently average between Orientals and Blacks in dozens of areas. Also, the groups with the largest brains have the lowest rates of two-egg twinning! Why? The answer lies in evolution. No purely cultural theory can explain all of these traits taken together. There is, however, a gene-based explanation that explicitly involves the trade-off between reproductive effort (twinning rates) and brain size. The patterns make up what is called a “life-history.” They evolved together to meet the trials of life -- survival, growth, and reproduction.

I have explained the racial pattern in brain size, intelligence, and other traits using a gene-based life-history theory that evolutionary biologists call the r-K scale of reproductive strategies. At one end of this scale are r-strategies that rely on high reproductive rates. At the other end are K-strategies that rely on high levels of parental care. This scale is generally used to compare the life histories of different species of animals. I have used it to explain the smaller but real differences between the human races.

On this scale, Orientals are more K-selected than Whites, while Whites are more K-selected than Blacks. Highly K-selected women produce fewer eggs (and have bigger brains) than r-selected women. Highly K-selected men invest time and energy in their children rather than the pursuit of sexual thrills. They are “dads” rather than “cads.”

Race differences also make sense in terms of human evolution. Modern humans evolved in Africa about 200,000 years ago. Africans and non-Africans then split about 110,000 years ago. Orientals and Whites split about 40,000 years ago, around the time that modern humans were first in Europe. Analyses of DNA sequencing, along with the fossil and archaeological record, demonstrate this sequence, as does the pattern of traits shown in Chart 1.

The further north people went out of Africa, the harder it was to get food, gain shelter, make clothes, and raise children. So the groups that evolved into today’s Whites and Orientals needed larger brains, more family stability, and a longer life. But building a bigger brain takes time and energy so there is a trade off with slower rates of growth, lower levels of sex hormones, less aggression, and less sexual activity. Thus came about the pattern of traits in Chart 1.

What are the implications of this research? One is, obviously, that race is a valid taxonomic construct. If it were not it would have no reliable predictive value and we would not find the same racial pattern all around the world and over time. The fact that, on average, African-descended children are born with smaller brains than European- or East Asian-descended children, regardless of where in the diasporas the children are located, allows reliable predictions to be made about their future academic and occupational achievement. Similarly, the fact that throughout the world Blacks have a stronger sex drive than Whites or East Asians explains why Black Americans, Black Caribbeans, and sub-Saharan Africans have the highest rates of sexually transmitted diseases, and why East Asians have even lower rates than Whites.

A second implication is that “White racism” is not responsible for all of society’s problems. Black underachievement is not simply due to “White prejudice.” It is more deeply rooted. On average, Black children are born with smaller brains than White or East Asian children. Pointing this out is not constructing stereotypes, it is simply observing facts as they are. Both science and justice call for us to seek and tell the truth, not to tell lies and spread error.

Another implication is that we have to accept that racial differences will not just disappear. Hitherto, most theories in the behavioral sciences have assumed that all human populations have equal abilities to achieve equal levels of social development. We need to accept the existence of the evolved diversity of human populations.

Sometimes it is claimed by those who argue that race is just a social construct that the human genome project shows that because people share 99% of their “genes” in common, that there are no races. This is silly. Human genes are 98% similar to chimpanzee genes. Yet no one thinks that chimpanzees have the same intelligence, brain size, or social behavior patterns as human beings; they look and behave very differently. In fact humans share 90% of their genes with mice, which is why we can use them to test drug therapies. Similarly, although men and women are genetically 99% the same, it is foolish to believe that sex is just a “social construction.”

Much confusion arises because there are several sets of genetic measures. A much more realistic story comes from looking at the 3.1 billion base pairs that make up the 30,000 genes. People differ in 1 out of every 1,000 of these base pairs. Each change in a base pair can alter a gene. Technically, base pair differences are called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Base pair differences are important and SNPs clump together in races. Just one change in the base pair for hemoglobin, for example, causes sickle-cell anemia, from which many Blacks suffer. Other base pair differences affect IQ, aggression, and mental illness. The 3.1 billion base pairs provide plenty of room for large racial differences.

In summary, the same racial pattern would not occur so consistently all around the world and over time if race were a mere social construct. If it were a meaningless construct, it would have no power to predict phenomena like brain size, growth rate, life span, crime, and family stability. Other evidence also shows that race is a biological reality. For example, coroners in crime labs can identify race from a skeleton or even just the skull. They can even identify race from blood, hair, or semen. How could they do this if race was only a social construct? The scientific evidence shows that the politically correct mantra “race is just skin deep” is a case of deep denial.

J. Philippe Rushton is professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario and the author of Race,Evolution and Behavior: A Life History Perspective (3rd Edition).


Beals, K. L., Smith, C. L., & Dodd, S. M. "Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines," Current Anthropology, 1984: 25, 301-330.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P., & Piazza, A. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.University Press, 1994.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2000. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.

Ellis, L., & Nyborg, H. "Racial/ethnic variations in male testosterone levels: A probable contributor to group differences in health," Steroids, 1992: 57, 72-75.

Entine, J. Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We Are Afraid to Talk About It. New York: Public Affairs Press, 2000.

Herman-Giddens, M. E., et al, "Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in the office practice," Pediatrics, 1997: 99, 505-512.

Ho, K. C., Roessmann, U., Straumfjord, J. V., & Monroe, G. "Analysis of brain weight," Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 1980: 104, 635-645.

Jensen, A. R. The g Factor. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.

Lewis, B. Race and Slavery in the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.

Rushton, J. P. " Cranial capacity related to sex, rank, and race in a stratified random sample of 6,325 U.S. military personnel," Intelligence, 1992: 16, 401-413.

Rushton, J. P. "Brain size and cognitive ability in Asian Americans from birth to age seven," Intelligence, 1997: 25, 7-20.

Rushton, J. P. Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective (3rd edition). Port Huron, MI: Charles Darwin Research Institute, 2000.

Rushton, J. P., & Ankney, C. D. "Brain size and cognitive ability: Correlations with age, sex, social class and race," Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1996: 3, 21-36.

Rushton, J. P., & Osborne, R. T. "Genetic and environmental contributions to cranial capacity estimated in Black and White adolescents," Intelligence, 1995: 20, 1-13.

Rushton, J. P., & Skuy, M. "Performance on Raven's Matrices by African and White university students in South Africa," Intelligence, 2000: 28, 251-265.

Stringer, C. & McKie, R. African Exodus. London: Cape, 1996.

Taylor, J., & Whitney, G. "Crime and racial profiling by U.S. police: Is there an empirical basis?" Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 1999: 24, 485-510.

UNAIDS/WHO AIDS epidemic update: December 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO).

Weinberg, R. A., Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. "The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study: follow-up of IQ test performance at adolescence," Intelligence, 1992: 16, 117-135.

-source with charts here

At some point in the coming decades the irrational belief in equality will crumble under the weight of its own preposterousness, which will have led Western Civilization into a Second Dark Ages.

When those false walls come tumbling down, a paradigm shift will occur in human development which will lead us back to where the reality of race left off in the 1930's.
What will follow will be a a next step in the evolutionary progress of man and a formal denunciation of the dubious flirtation with the fiction of "Racial Equality" that so marred the latter half of the 20th Century and the opening years of the 21st Century, stagnating technological and social development.

The only relevant question is how long will it take for this process to begin; how much suffering will Western Man have to endure in the mean time.

Let there be no doubt though, that new Golden Dawn will arrive and The West will pick up where it left off.
And those who begrudge the self evident will find themselves relegated to the 'Societal Missteps' pages of History....

'All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self evident.'


A Well Ordered Society Is A Work Of The White-Devil!...

When Affirmative Action come-a-knockin,
A young TV news intern is now facing charges after allegedly going on a bleep-worthy, destructive rampage when her station in Minnesota fired her for not being able to handle her duties.

"This is a young girl who was not understanding concepts in a television newsroom," Danielle Prenevost, 33, executive producer of the station's early evening newscasts, told the Pioneer Press. "I said, 'I don't think your level of college experience is enough for this job.'"

Several newsroom employees heard Anato-Mensah shouting, yelling obscenities and threatening Prenevost, saying, "You don't know where I'm from. I'll mess you up, b----."

Police arrived after Anato-Mensah was already gone. She has since been charged with criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct, both of which are misdemeanors. Her first court appearance is scheduled for Dec. 30.

The case is already getting plenty of public reaction at the newspaper's website, with comments including:

"Welcome the new generation to the workplace! We can look forward a great deal more of this sort of behavior. There is a word, which begins with the letter "e" which accurately describes them. It's not "excellent." It's not "exceptional." Try "ENTITLED." And if they do not get their way, look out!"


"Was not understanding concepts", pretty much sums up what created and sustains the gap between the races. Cause and Effect is something the African peoples have never grasped for the simple reason that they cannot.
And this lack in ability to "understand concepts" is the reason for their sustained primitiveness in regards to the abilities to build or even sustain a functioning society.

Multiple excuses are made, such as the popular, "Poverty leads to crime" retort, yet the truth is always the exact opposite....endemic criminality and a lack of desire to conform to standards leads to poverty stricken societies.

Crime leads to poverty, not the other way around. Social Environments and Cultures are genetic based. They are not creeds or ideologies that one can simply apply to.
This is why, for example, Haiti, a nation that has been under black rule for two centuries, looks no different that any other sub-Saharan third world African banana republic, with endless poverty, unrelenting criminality and unyielding depravity.

The races cannot be made equal because nature has already made them unequal. That is just obvious.

And none of this is a modern or even Western revelation,

"Of the neighbors of the Bujja, Maqdisi had heard that "there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people -- but God knows best. As for the Zanj, they are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence."

Maqdisi, also known as Al-Muqaddasi (fl. 966 AD), Kitab al-Bad' wah-tarikh, vol.4

"The geographer al-Idrisi ascribes 'lack of knowledge and defective minds' to the black peoples. Their ignorance, he says, is notorious; men of learning and distinction are almost unknown among them, and their kings only acquire what they know about government and justice from the instruction of learned visitors from farther north."
Al Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 2

"[inhabitants of sub-Saharan African countries] are people distant from the standards of humanity" "Their nature is that of wild animals..."

Persian geography Hudud al-`alam, 982 AD

"We know that the Zanj (blacks) are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions."

Jahiz (d. 868 AD), Kitab al-Bukhala