Friday, May 29, 2009

Don't Complain America...

This is exactly what "diversity" and multiculturalism means!

Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.

The incident - which gained national attention when it was captured on videotape and distributed on YouTube - had prompted the government to sue the men, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring would-be voters with the weapon, racial slurs and military-style uniforms.

The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.

A Justice Department spokesman on Thursday confirmed that the agency had dropped the case, dismissing two of the men from the lawsuit with no penalty...


Wake up White people.

You are not the bad guys.

You never have been.

You've been lied to about your history and the struggle of your people to survive in the face of countless invasions of other races. From the Carthaginians and Huns to the Moors, Turks and Mongols (and others) Western peoples (White people) have endured one assault and occupation after another.

And yet there are no monuments or memorials to the unknown millions of White victims attacked, raped, enslaved or outright murdered over the countless centuries by foreign hordes.

No, instead history is re-written to portray our struggle to resist destruction as evil.

When our lands are overrun and our peoples enslaved and slaughtered by muslims (France and Spain), we are told it was a time of "enlightenment". Yet when we spend centuries retaking our lands, chasing the invaders out, we hear it called an unjust atrocity

Yes, your sense of fairness, honor and civility is unique to your people.

No other peoples share it.

Wake up!

Warning For America
From South Africa

By Gemma Meyer (Gemma Meyer is the pseudonym of a South African journalist. She and her husband, a former conservative member of parliament, still reside in South Africa.)

People used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa (but so did pornography and the gay rights movement).

Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country.

America's structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character.

Writing letters to the press, manning stands at county fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing your Congressman - that is what you know, and what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods you've created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.

But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change. White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.

That is exactly what happened in South Africa. I know, because I was there and I saw it happen.

Faced with revolution in the streets, strikes, civil unrest and the sheer terror and murder practiced by Nelson Mandela's African National Congress (ANC), the white government simply capitulated in order to achieve "peace."

Westerners need peace. They need order and stability. They are builders and planners. But what we got was the peace of the grave for our society.

The Third World is different - different peoples with different pasts and different cultures. Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples. Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe - once the thriving, stable Rhodesia - is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country. Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion.

Those in the West who forced South Africa to surrender to the ANC and its leaders did not consider Africa to be the dangerous, corrupt, and savage place it is now in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Those Western politicians now have a similar problem looming on their own doorsteps: the demand for power and treasure from the non-Western peoples inside the realm.

It is already too late for South Africa, but not for America if enough people strengthen their spine and take on the race terrorists, the armies of the "politically correct" and, most dangerous of all, the craven politicians who believe "compassionate conservatism" will buy them a few more votes, a few more days of peace.

White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you.

We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy - none of which are part of the Third World's history.

The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today's tyrants were yesterday's mission-school proteges. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the "brotherhood of man."

Other tyrants, like the infamous Idi Amin, were trained and schooled by the whites themselves, at Oxford, Cambridge, and Harvard. After receiving the best from the West, they unleashed a resentful bloodlust against their benefactors.

From what I have seen and read thus far, I fear Americans will capitulate just as we did. Americans are, generally, a soft lot. They don't want to quarrel or obstruct the claims of those who believe they were wronged. They like peace and quiet, and they want to compromise and be nice.

A television program that aired in South Africa showed a town meeting somewhere in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrunk back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didn't want to quarrel.

In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of society's laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings - as in Zimbabwe. What will happen when the new majority says the judges are racists, and that they refuse to acknowledge "white man's justice"? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned.

What will you do when the future non-white majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white "racists" and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language?

Don't laugh. When the "majority" took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols.

In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing - invasions of private land by the "have-nots;" the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair; the banishment of your history from the education of the young; the revolutionization of your justice system.

In South Africa today, only 9 percent of murderers end up in jail. Court dockets are regularly purchased and simply disappear. Magistrates can be bribed as can the prison authorities, making escapes commonplace. Vehicle and airplane licenses are regularly purchased, and forged school and university certificates are routine.

What would you think of the ritual slaughter of animals in your neighbor's backyard? How do you clean up the blood and entrails that litter your suburban streets? How do you feel about the practice of witchcraft, in which the parts of young girls and boys are needed for "medicinal" purposes? How do you react to the burning of witches?

Don't laugh. All that is quite common in South Africa today.

Don't imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses - like the need to overcome generations of white racism - will be found to exonerate the guilty.

In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesn't exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the Westerners pressuring him to surrender.

When Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe murders his political opponents, ignores unfavorable court decisions, terrorizes the population and siphons off millions from the state treasury for himself and his friends, South Africa's new President Thabo Mbeki holds his hand and declares his support. That just happened a few weeks ago.

Your tax dollars will go to those who don't earn and don't pay. In South Africa, organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans' services, are simply abandoned.

What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within, used to suit the goals of the new rulers. And they will reign either through terror, as in Zimbabwe today, or exert other corrupt pressures to obtain, or buy votes. Once power is in the hands of aliens, don't expect loyalty or devotion to principle from those whose jobs are at stake. One of the most surprising and tragic components of the disaster in South Africa is how many previously anti-ANC whites simply moved to the other side.

Once you lose social, cultural, and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.

Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meetings. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses and hacks off the arms and legs of his political opponents.

To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, don't put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail.

Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, and your Constitution. What they want are your posessions, your power, and your status.

And they already know that their allies among you, the "human rights activists," the skillful lawyers and the left-wing politicians will fight for them, and not for you. They will exploit your compassion and your Christian charity, and your good will.

They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.

They know what to do.

Do you?

Thursday, May 28, 2009

GOP Boasts, "We Work Harder Than Dems To Sell Out America"...

It's continually bizarre, yet interesting, watching conservatives writhe under the weight of the thirdworld banana republic they've helped to create over the past 40 years.

It's almost like some sort of Shakespearean comedy seeing White republicans spout off about "color blindness" while cheerleading minorities who are none to shy about the importance race is to them as individuals and in their day-to-day lives.

It makes one wonder whether it is cowardice or stupidity that motivates them more.

Such as Rush Limbaugh, speaking of Supreme Court nominee judge Sonia Sotomayor, saying, "So here you have a racist....You might want to soften that and you might want to say a reverse racist.."

And why might you want to do that?
And why would a free market capitalist like Limbaugh indulge in using a word ("racist") which was first used by communist mass murder Leon Trotsky to describe the White gentiles who were resisting being mass murdered by the likes of (the jewish) Trotsky?

Perhaps it's fear. Perhaps it's just successful programing.

It shows up most comically in this article by Ann Coulter.

She writes,

For example, Judge Sotomayor apparently "empathized" more with New Haven, Conn., government officials than with white and Hispanic firefighters who were denied promotions by the city on the basis of their race.

In the now-famous firefighters' case, Ricci v. DeStefano, the New Haven Fire Department administered a civil service exam to choose a new batch of lieutenants and captains. The city went so far as to hire an outside consultant to design the test in order to ensure that it was job-related and not racially biased. (You know, just like all written tests were pre-screened for racial bias back when we were in school.)


But when the results came in, only whites and Hispanics scored high enough to earn promotions.

Actually, (apparently) only one hispanic passed the test.

Coulter attempts to play this up as a conflict between the city of New Haven and White and hispanics. (I emphasized the and because Ms. Coulter is apparently ignorant of the fact that hispanic is not a race and that many hispanics are in fact White)

But the interesting thing about New Haven that Ms. Coulter conveniently sidesteps is its demographics....

Races in New Haven:

  • Black (37.4%)
  • White Non-Hispanic (35.6%)
  • Hispanic (21.4%)
  • Other race (10.9%)
  • Two or more races (3.9%)
  • Chinese (1.4%)
  • American Indian (1.2%)
  • Other Asian (0.8%)
  • Asian Indian (0.7%)
(Total can be greater than 100% because Hispanics could be counted in other races)

And as White Non-Hispanic can include jews, Arabs, Turks, Iranians, Egyptians and host of other peoples, the actual percentage of Whites in that (very Leftist) city is probably around 12 to 15%.

That reality makes her following attempt at covering for the fact that, even though blacks are the dominant racial group in the city, no black (and apparently only one hispanic) could pass a test that was specifically dumbed down to ensure that they could, all the more ridiculous.

Such results never entice Democrats to reconsider their undying devotion to the teachers' unions that routinely produce students who can't read, write or do basic math. Obviously, disadvantaged children from single-parent homes suffer the most from inadequate public schools – and their tragic outcome bedevils the entire society for the rest of the students' lives.

Where in the hell did single-parent homes come from?

She beleaguers that typical leftist non-sense again, writing,

Instead, Democrats hide the failure of government schools by punishing the high-scoring whites, Asians and Hispanics, who presumably learned everything they know at home. (If only successfully applying a condom were relevant to firefighting, public school graduates raised in single-parent homes would crush the home-learners!)

Again, from where in that case does the presumption that blacks failed the test because they were raised in single parent homes come from?

Nowhere. That's where.
That's just the White conservative way of cowardly moving the issue away from IQ gaps between the races.

And, by the way, hispanics are not "high scoring".

To be sure, there is "precedent" for racial discrimination by the government, but Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned in 1954 by Brown v. Board of Education.

Yet she bemoans what the government school system has turned into over the past 55 years.

And Brown v. Board of Education was about the advocacy for government interference in schools, not lack of it. THAT WAS THE PRECEDENT!

It ended Freedom of Association in this nation by dictacting to the people what environment they could educate their children in.

She finishes up with the same line of pointless thought that The American Spectator indulges in as she writes,

After aggressively blocking Estrada's nomination to a federal appeals court during Bush's first term solely on the grounds that he is Hispanic and was likely headed for the Supreme Court – according to Senate Democrat staff memos – now Democrats have the audacity to rave that Sotomayor will be the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice!

Ironic, is it not, that conservatives are bringing up the (compassionate conservative) Bush era Estrada nomination since it only serves to illustrate that no matter how much the (Amnesty pushing, Obama-win celebrating) GOP sells out White people and kisses non-White ass, the non-Whites continue to tell them to go to hell.


Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Bone Deep...

People who have been led to believe that miscegenation is harmless have been tragically lied to.

Race is more than skin deep!

HAYWARD, Calif. – If Nick Glasgow were white, he would have a nearly 90 percent chance of finding a matching bone marrow donor who could cure his leukemia.

But because the 28-year-old bodybuilder is one-quarter Japanese, his doctor warned him the outlook was grim. Glasgow's background would make it almost impossible to find a match, which usually comes from a patient's own ethnic group.

"The truth is, when people of different backgrounds marry and produce offspring, it creates more types that are harder to match," said Michelle Setterholm, the program's director of scientific services. "The probability just gets lower when you have people of mixed ancestral DNA."


How many dull witted Americans who have been trained to spout the multicult state-religion propaganda know any of this?

Very few.

But then again this kind of information has been hidden in books, medical journals, studies, news articles and such, so.......

Researchers have found that Asian women pregnant with white men's babies are more likely to deliver by cesarean section, and are now recommending that doctors factor in both a mother and father's race when they consider the risk of birth complications.

Although controversial, race-based surveys of this kind will proliferate as prenatal doctors work with increasingly diverse patients, Dr. El-Sayed said.The doctors looked at data from 5,575 white, 3,226 Asian and 868 Asian-white couples who delivered between 2000 and 2005 at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital in Palo Alto, Calif., where Dr. El-Sayed works as an obstetrician. For the purpose of the study, all people who reported Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Taiwanese, Indian, Hmong, Thai or Cambodian as their ethnicity were categorized as Asian.

Few studies have focused specifically on Asian-Caucasian couples. Most research has focused on interracial Caucasian and black couples, and those studies found that couples with a white father and black mother had notably high rates of stillbirths, pre-term births and low-birth-weight babies, Dr. Caughey said.

CHAPEL HILL -- A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains.
Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.
"It did not matter what races the students identified with, the risks were higher for all of them if they did not identify with a single race," said Dr. J. Richard Udry, principal author of a paper on the work appearing in the November issue of the American Journal of Public Health.
In the detailed surveys they completed, students could give more than one answer when asked about their race. Those who called themselves biracial tended to be more likely to smoke and drink, Udry said. Overall, older biracial children were more likely to have sex at younger ages, to have access to guns and to have poorer experiences at school such as through suspensions, skipping class and repeating grades.

Enrico was diagnosed with leukemia at the age of four and suffered through three years of intensive chemotherapy.
...Enrico’s best chance for survival is a risky bone marrow transplant operation, which would require a three-month stay in the hospital.
“There are six antigens that we need to match perfectly,” Carol Gillespie, of the Asian American Donor Program, said. “You’ll get three of those antigens from mom and three from dad, which is already very unique. Enrico has three Chinese or Taiwanese antigens, and three Caucasian or Italian antigens — which is very rare.”
Gillespie said that there is a 40 percent chance for most people to find a match in the current registry, which only has about 4 million people in it.
These odds are reduced tremendously if you have a mixed blood person that is looking for a donor,” Gillepsie said.

"Race-mixing stems from self-loathing which one projects upon their race.
And then as a means to disassociate themselves from this hated race (the embodiment of their self-loathing), they choose a mate from a foreign race.
They believe by interbreeding and producing halflings they will, in effect, lessen this intense self-loathing by weakening the genetic code of their race of origin.

All things considered, race-traitors are the most hateful of racists in that they despise their own race!"
-H. Braun


Tuesday, May 26, 2009

'....diversity on the federal bench “will have an effect on the development of the law and on judging.”'...

WASHINGTON — In 2001, Sonia Sotomayor, an appeals court judge, gave a speech declaring that the ethnicity and sex of a judge “may and will make a difference in our judging.”

In her speech, Judge Sotomayor questioned the famous notion — often invoked by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her retired Supreme Court colleague, Sandra Day O’Connor — that a wise old man and a wise old woman would reach the same conclusion when deciding cases.

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor, who is now considered to be near the top of President Obama’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees.

Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said, for jurists who are women and nonwhite, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”

Her remarks came in the context of reflecting her own life experiences as a Hispanic female judge and on how the increasing diversity on the federal bench “will have an effect on the development of the law and on judging.”


And you know what, she's right.

This, I suppose, is the painful lessons Whites are going to have to learn all over again.

Race matters.

It is biological and it effects the way the various races view and react to the world.

Non-Whites do not share our perspective on law, justice, societal order, religion, history, name it.

They simply do not and will not embrace White ideas such as individualism or self-reliance. They do not "judge the individual" but rather act and react as a single tribe (race).

They are inherently Marxist in their worldview and that fact is about to come home to Joe Sixpack who thought the invasion of 40 million thirdworlders into his nation was "no big deal" and would work itself out.

Think again Joe!


Monday, May 25, 2009

Things People Don't Want To Hear...

from WorldNetDaily,

The United States has been an empire in decline since the 1970s....In looking at the situation, however, it is clear that there are a number of contributing factors that are more important than others. Among them include:

1. The abandonment of constitutional money

2. The expansion of the voting franchise

3. Global military aspirations

4. Transformation of the labor force

5. Mass immigration


The expansion of the voting franchise has exacerbated the problems created by the switch to a monetary system more susceptible to manipulation. The reason the Founding Fathers created a system of strictly limited democracy was because they knew its historical flaws and wished to prevent the larger part of the masses from having a voice in their governance. The expansion of the franchise to include many parties historically denied the vote has had the inevitable, and expected, effect of permitting society's non-productive members voting themselves the right to obtain wealth transferred from society's productive members.


Immigration and the entry of middle-class women into the labor force are closely related to each other and to the redistribution issue, because as American women elect to work and cease to replace themselves by having at least 2.1 children each, the pyramid scheme of wealth redistribution requires an ever-increasing number of immigrants to delay collapse.


The fact that these factors can be identified does not mean that they can be reversed...

Rather than lamenting the national mistakes of the past, Americans who value freedom, liberty and prosperity would do well to look to the possibilities of the post-American future.


Of course, number 5 on the above list is the reason America won't recover in the future.

Nations can survive any number of calamities (even simultaneously) but no nation survives undisputed invasions and demographic transformations.


Sunday, May 24, 2009

Jim Jones: Patron Saint Of Evangelical Christianity...

NEW PORT RICHEY — Michelle Schoeppe's three sons squirm on the couch as she reads through a Bible lesson about Moses and the parting of the Red Sea.

Normally her husband would tell the boys their nightly Bible story, but he's not here, and she feels like she's losing them.

She gives up and decides to just show them where Papa is on a map.

She points to China. Papa is picking up Henry right here, she says. None of them has ever met Henry, the little boy who is about to join their family.

"Where am I from?" asks her eldest son, Melvin, 7.

Her finger moves to Guatemala.

She turns to Jason, her 5-year-old, and points to the Philippines. That's where you're from, she tells him. Finally, she moves to St. Petersburg. Her youngest, Dawson, also 5, was born here.

Michelle has always wanted to adopt five boys. It has taken her six years to get these three.

She has combed the world and the Internet to cobble together her family, listening to God's whisper for guidance.

She thinks of all the children they missed out on adopting for one reason or another. Boys from Mexico and Ecuador. Twins from Cameroon. A blind boy from Guatemala. A deaf boy from India with one ear.

I often wonder how many Christians realize that the man who embodies every single one of modern Evangelical Protestant's social and religious ethics is none other than Jim Jones of Jonestown.

In fact Jim Jones was the first prominent Christian Preacher to embody EVERY SINGLE PRECEPT that is propagated by today's Christianity.

Jones and Marceline had one child together and adopted several children of various ethnicities. Jones was proud of his "rainbow family" and urged others to adopt interracially.

Jim Jones and his Evangelical church,

Peoples Temple was a cult founded in 1955 by Reverend James Warren Jones (Jim Jones). In 1961, Jones helped to (racially) integrate churches, restaurants, the telephone company, the police department, a theater, an amusement park, and the Methodist Hospital and became the executive director of the Indianapolis Human Rights Commission.

Jones received considerable criticism in Indiana for his integrationist views. In 1965, Jones left Indiana, moving the Peoples Temple to California.
The Peoples Temple purported to practice what it called "apostolic socialism....Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that "If you're born in this church, this socialist revolution, you're not born in sin. If you're born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you're born in sin.

Jones and his church earned a reputation for aiding the cities' poorest citizens, especially racial minorities
, drug addicts, and the homeless. Soup kitchens, daycare centers, and medical clinics for elderly people were set up, along with counseling programs for prostitutes and drug addicts who wanted to change their lives. The Peoples Temple made strong connections to the California state welfare system. During the 1970s, the Peoples Temple owned and ran at least nine residential care homes for the elderly, six homes for foster children, and a state-licensed 40 acre ranch for developmentally disabled persons.

In 1974, the Peoples Temple signed a lease to rent land in Guyana...Former Temple member Tim Carter describes the reason for this move...."the United States is a racist place."......Carter said the Temple concluded that Guyana was "a place in a black country where our black members could live in peace". Marceline Jones described Jonestown as "dedicated to live for socialism, total economic and racial and social equality. -wikipedia

And of course they all got together in their racially integrated, culturally diverse and "social justice" minded community and drank poisoned cool-aid...

The similarities between the goals, aspirations and beliefs behind Jonestown and modern multicultural America (and her Christianity) are chilling, and should serve as a wake up call to the most dense of American Citizenry.

Unfortunately many Americans have grown averse towards information and facts.

And after all, 'What the American People don't know, is what makes them the American people'.


Invasions Never End Well...

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is proposing to completely eliminate the state’s welfare program for families, medical insurance for low-income children and Cal Grants cash assistance to college and university students.

The proposals to sharply scale back the assistance that California provides to its neediest residents came in testimony by the administration this afternoon at a joint legislative budget committee hearing. It followed comments by the governor earlier today that he would be withdrawing a proposal to help balance the budget with billions of dollars of borrowing and replacing it with program reductions.


Well, when you import/allow millions of illiterate -low IQ- thirdworlders into your (welfare)state or nation and offer them financial "assistance" which is funded by a small number of White working class taxpayers who are themselves forced to flee to other lands due to the increasing tax burdens (as well as the lowering of the quality of living standards -brought about third world crime-) imposed upon them by Marxist and Christian social engineers, you inevitably sink the ship of state.

As I wrote 4 months ago,

"...this kind of super-charity (as opposed to the kind that flows naturally back and forth between peoples of similar racial, social and cultural standings) finds its greatest acts of giving through indirect compulsory sacrifice on the part of others. For example, if you and your church/charity arrange to bring a savage into America, you are, through force and cohesion, compelling other members of your community into giving as well. Their taxes and resources will be automatically re-distributed to the savage through healthcare, education, housing and so on. This also happens when tax dollars are sent abroad for charitable purposes.

This, then, is not the community giving but rather the charitable taking. Thus charity has now become an act of aggression which ultimately leads to the despoiling and plundering of communities and (eventually) nations.

We can see this playing out in places like California where dozens of hospitals have been closed due to the financial strain caused by the rapid influx of the poor and needy from Latin America. Or in once peaceful neighborhoods turned into violence-filled ghettos. Or in the spread across the nation of new and renewed (once defeated) diseases. It can also be seen in Africa where charity (in the form of food and medicine supplied by The West) has allowed/facilitated the already violent and starving populations of dysfunctional nations to explode, increasing the violence and poverty by a factor of ten.

This modern mutation of charity has appeared in two separate yet markedly similar groups: White liberals and White Christians. Both groups have a strong compulsion to send other people’s tax dollars across the sea to non-Whites while at the same time importing other non-Whites into the West, compelling the rest of us to fork over even more tax dollars to pay for their housing, medical care, education and (probably later) imprisonment. They are two groups with the same Achilles’ heel.


I once saw a documentary in which a young man described his aspiration towards rock-stardom and what he hoped that would bring to him. He said, roughly, “I’d like to be a famous rock-star so I could, like, go visit some sick kid in a hospital who’s dying wish was to meet me.”

That completely sums up the motivation for White Christian/Liberal Charity. Egotistically, the sky is the limit! It’s amazing how much moral superiority an act of overt humbleness can generate.

And, of course, Corporate America loves this kind of “charity”. In fact, its motivations and cost-displacement mirrors the White Christian/Liberal. It imports cheap labor which works at half the wage citizens do while transferring the costs onto those very same citizens (taxpayers) in the form of, yes, housing, medical care, education and (probably later) imprisonment."


Saturday, May 23, 2009

"Black Flight"?....

Federal authorities today unveiled a sweeping racketeering indictment accusing a southern Los Angeles County street gang of a litany of crimes, including killing a sheriff’s deputy and committing hate crimes against African Americans in order to rid them from their turf.


Notice when White people are attacked and driven from their communities the media calls it "White Flight" and infers it is motivated by prejudice on the part of Whites.

Yet when any other people face the same dilemma it's usually filed under the banner of "genocide" with those fleeing portrayed as victims.


Thursday, May 21, 2009

"...equal opportunity will result in equitable, though unequal outcomes"...

From Prof. Rushton and Prof. Jensen,

Contrary to many hopes and some claims, the narrowing of the gap in social conditions between Blacks and Whites has not led to any change in the magnitude of the Black-White IQ difference in over 100 years. Massive society-wide interventions such as ending segregation, the subsequent nationwide program of school busing to achieve racial balance, and the Head Start programs have failed to reduce this difference. Head Start programs did produce modest gains in school retention and graduation rates among Whites—but not Blacks


There is no value in denying reality. While improving opportunities and removing arbitrary barriers is a worthy ethical goal, we must realize that equal opportunity will result in equitable, though unequal outcomes. Expanding on the application of his “default hypothesis” that group differences are based on aggregated individual differences, themselves based on both genetic and environmental contributions, Jensen [59] proposed “two laws of individual differences”—(1) individual differences in learning and performance increase as task complexity increases, and (2) individual differences in performance increase with practice and experience (unless there is a low ceiling on proficiency). We must recognize that the more environmental barriers are ameliorated and everybody’s intellectual performance is improved, the greater will be the relative influence of genetic factors (because the environmental variance is being removed). This means that equal opportunity will result in unequal outcomes, within-families, between-families, and between population groups. The fact that we have learned to live with the first, and to a lesser degree the second, offers some hope we can learn to do so for the third.

-article here


Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Study Finds Grass Is Green!...

People with higher measures of cognitive ability are more likely to make good choices in several different types of economic decisions, according to a new study with researchers from the University of Minnesota’s Twin Cities and Morris campuses.

The study, set to be published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, was conducted with 1,000 trainee truck drivers at Schneider National, Inc., an American motor carrier employing 20,000. The researchers measured the trainees’ cognitive skills and asked them to make choices in several economic experiments, and then followed them on the job.

People with better cognitive skills, in particular higher IQ, were more willing to take calculated risks and to save their money and made more consistent choices. They were also more likely to be cooperative in a strategic situation, and exhibited higher “social awareness” in that they more accurately forecasted others’ behavior.


See the previous entry below for the "Duh" factor here.


Begs The Question....

What is a minority?

'Minorities affected most as New York foreclosures rise'

Late to arrive in the Northeast, the foreclosure crisis has swept through the New York region at an explosive pace in the past two years, destroying billions of dollars in housing wealth, according to a New York Times analysis of foreclosures filed since 2005 and federal mortgage data.

But the storm has fallen with a special ferocity on black and Latino homeowners, the analysis shows. Defaults occur three times as often in mostly minority census tracts as in mostly white ones. Eighty-five percent of the worst-hit neighborhoods — where the default rate is at least double the regional average — have a majority of black and Latino homeowners.

Now that is truly a Sovietesq propaganda type of news story (headline included).

Because in truth New York is only about 15% to 20% White.

Races in New York:

  • White Non-Hispanic (35.0%)
  • Hispanic (27.0%)
  • Black (26.6%)
  • Other race (13.4%)
  • Two or more races (4.9%)
  • Chinese (4.5%)
  • Asian Indian (2.1%)
  • American Indian (1.1%)
  • Korean (1.1%)
  • Other Asian (1.0%)
  • Filipino (0.7%)
(Total can be greater than 100% because Hispanics could be counted in other races)

note: White Non-Hispanic includes peoples from North Africa and the Middle-East (Jews, Arabs, Turks, Egyptians, Iranians and many others) of whom there are significant numbers in New York City.

Now lest someone should object by attempting to compartmentalize the subject by region, saying, "yes, but they are minorities within the United States", so be it.

Whites are a minority in North America (making up around around 48% of the total population).

Whites are a minority in the New World (being around 25% of the total population of the Americas).

And Whites are a minority within the total population of the world ( being about 13% of the total population).

White people wondering what it will be like when they become a minority.....wonder no more.


The New "Spirit"...

Here is the theology of the average Christian today,

An open letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:

Mr. Prime Minister: We stand with you.

I woke up this morning thinking about how alone you must feel. Please know that the current administration does not represent the views of Americans any more than Notre Dame's president, "Father" Jenkins, represents the Catholic faith.

You are not alone. Christians in America stand with you and your right to exist.

We apologize for the undue pressure that has been put upon you to jeopardize your vital interests to carve up yet more land for promises of peace from people who want to obliterate you. We also acknowledge that this pressure did not begin with the current administration.

-Janet Porter at WND

That, I'm afraid, is the mentality of the New Spirit residing in the hearts and minds (the Temple) of Christians today.
(Be sure to read the end of her article to see how disturbing this new theology is!)
They LITERALLY have made a golden calf out of Israel. Even though Judaism is the only religion/culture that (collectively) openly and pointedly reviles Jesus Christ.

Indeed, the texts discussed in the best book of the recent crop, Peter Schafer’s “Jesus in the Talmud,” were once considered so outrageous that they were self-censored from European editions of the Talmud. Not that the attempt succeeded: Christian authorities burned the Talmud anyway, and antisemitism continued unabated. But the censorship did succeed somewhat; these texts are practically unknown even today.

The image of Jesus that one gets from the Talmud is that of an illicit, sex-crazed black magician who uses trickery to lead Israel astray. In BT Sanhedrin 103a, Jesus is depicted as a poor disciple who “spoiled his food,” which Schafer speculates may be a euphemism for sexual misconduct: “to eat the dish” being a recognized Talmudic euphemism known for the sex act itself. A later emendation adds that he “practiced magic and led Israel astray.” And the virgin birth is ridiculed as a cover-up of Jesus’ true parentage: His mother was an “illicit woman” (another Talmudic locution), perhaps even a prostitute.

Strong stuff — no wonder they don’t teach it in Sunday school. But fascinating, as well, as long as, of course, we don’t take it too seriously (which, doubtless, some Jews do). The texts Schafer adduces — all of them relatively late, dating to the third- or fourth-century C.E., suggesting a conscious effort to fight the upstart sect — show that the Talmudic rabbis did not reject Jesus for the noble reasons that Klinghoffer and his ilk suggest. At least according to these texts, they rejected him because they thought he was evil, or saw him as a threat.

Shockingly, however, the Talmud does not shirk responsibility for Jesus’ death. On the contrary, it says that he deserved it and that the Jews did it themselves. Jesus was, the text relates, a sorcerer, an idolater and a heretic who led Israel to idolatry. His conviction was entirely just, and his execution — stoning and then hanging — was carried out in strict accordance with rabbinic law.


Now let me write again what was written above.
They (modern Christians) LITERALLY have made a golden calf out of Israel. Even though Judaism is the only religion/culture that (collectively) openly and pointedly reviles Jesus Christ and the values of Christendom.

According to the Gospel narrative, Christ was the sacrifice/offering to God on behalf of man for their sins. Jesus then rose from the dead and will rule over the world as King of Kings from Jerusalem.

In our modern narrative, the word Holocaust means 'burnt offering'. And after the Holocaust the Jewish nation was resurrected with the aim of establishing a world government, with Jerusalem as the new international capital.

Interestingly enough the phrase anti-Christ is best translated, not as Against-Christ but as 'In Place of Christ'.

Just saying...


Monday, May 18, 2009

Re-Up (Jonestowing America)....

Albert Mohler is 'president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary-the flagship school of the Southern Baptist Convention', which means he is a modern Politically Correct Christian...which means logic, reasoning and reality are, for him, contemptible paradoxes which must be attacked and destroyed with all of the frenzy of an Inquisitor hunting down 'heretics'.

For example, on his blog from Friday, May 23, 2008, he laments the fact that White people aren't dying fast enough, but are rather moving away from non-Whites.
(As a Christian, this grieves him deeply)

He starts off with this zinger,
Demography is not destiny, but that claim is not, humanly speaking, far off the mark. The pattern of populations and social behaviors will establish the character and contours of any civilization. For this reason, any major change in the population is significant, and the more unexpected the change, the more significant its impact.

Dr. Mohler, meet the dictionary;
a figure of speech that combines two apparently contradictory terms, for example cruel kindness [Greek oxus sharp + mōros stupid]

Collins Essential English Dictionary 2nd Edition 2006 © HarperCollins Publishers 2004, 2006

He continues,

Thus, Americans should take a close look at the fact that in a handful of major metropolitan areas, deaths now outnumber births. In times past, this would have indicated a major catastrophe such as famine, plague, or war. But with regard to these cities, the causes include nothing to do with famine, plague, or war.

FAMINE, PLAGUE AND WAR! In America! Surely not my good sir!

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, Rep.-Iowa...

But the carnage wrought by illegal alien murderers represents only a fraction of the pool of blood spilled by American citizens as a result of an open border and un-enforced immigration laws.

While King reports 12 Americans are murdered daily by illegal aliens, he says 13 are killed by drunk illegal alien drivers

(The Narrator note: For those keeping count, that means that since September 11, 2001, approx. 55,000 Americans have been killed by illegal immigrants!)

King also reports eight American children are victims of sexual abuse by illegal aliens every day – a total of 2,920 annually.

Based on a one-year in-depth study, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute of Atlanta estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each. She analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 that included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants.

As the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. increases, so does the number of American victims. the end of 2003, approximately 267,000 illegal aliens were incarcerated in all U.S. jails and prisons.

In April 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a report on a study of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003. It found the following:

  • The 55,322 illegal aliens studied represented a total of 459,614 arrests – some eight arrests per illegal alien;
  • Their arrests represented a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses – some 13 offenses per illegal alien;
  • 36 percent had been arrested at least five times before.


"...the increasing number of illegal aliens coming into the United States is forcing the closure of hospitals, spreading previously vanquished diseases and threatening to destroy America's prized health-care system, says a report in the spring issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

"The influx of illegal aliens has serious hidden medical consequences," writes Madeleine Pelner Cosman, author of the report. "We judge reality primarily by what we see. But what we do not see can be more dangerous, more expensive, and more deadly than what is seen."

According to her study, 84 California hospitals are closing their doors as a direct result of the rising number of illegal aliens and their non-reimbursed tax on the system.

In addition, the report says, "many illegal aliens harbor fatal diseases that American medicine fought and vanquished long ago, such as drug-resistant tuberculosis, malaria, leprosy, plague, polio, dengue, and Chagas disease."

Among the organizations directing illegal aliens into America's medical systems, according to the report, are the Ford Foundation-funded Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Immigration Law Center, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association's Commission on Immigration Policy, Practice, and Pro Bono, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the National Council of La Raza, George Soros's Open Society Institute, the Migration Policy Institute, the National Network for Immigration and Refugee Rights and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Many illegals entering this country have tuberculosis, according to the report.

"TB's swift, deadly return now is lethal for about 60 percent of those infected because of new Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Until recently MDR-TB was endemic to Mexico. This Mycobacterium tuberculosis is resistant to at least two major anti-tubercular drugs. Ordinary TB usually is cured in six months with four drugs that cost about $2,000. MDR-TB takes 24 months with many expensive drugs that cost around $250,000 with toxic side effects. Each illegal with MDR-TB coughs and infects 10 to 30 people, who will not show symptoms immediately. Latent disease explodes later.

TB was virtually absent in Virginia until in 2002, when it spiked a 17 percent increase, but Prince William County, just south of Washington, D.C., had a much larger rise of 188 percent. Public health officials blamed immigrants. In 2001 the Indiana School of Medicine studied an outbreak of MDR-TB, and traced it to Mexican illegal aliens. The Queens, New York, health department attributed 81 percent of new TB cases in 2001 to immigrants. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ascribed 42 percent of all new TB cases to 'foreign born' people who have up to eight times higher incidences.."

Al rambles on,
This report is certain to surprise many Americans -- those unaware of the looming demographic crisis faced by many American communities.

It sure will. Especially considering that America's population jumped form 150 million to 330 million from 1950 to 2008.
And it will continue to surprise us as the population continues to grow towards half a billion by 2050.
Yes I'm sure many people who have seen their towns and neighborhoods turned into crime riddled ghettos by unending hordes of Third World invaders will be shocked to hear of this demographic downturn.

Al then lets his anti-White venom foam,
Those same citizens are also probably unaware that America's birthrate just slightly above base population replacement is sustained at that level only by the higher reproduction rates of new immigrants -- to whom we should be grateful for representing their hopes by having children.

Yes isn't it beautiful the way Gabriela and Shanniqua "express their hopes" by having 37 kids by 37 different fathers and expecting White taxpayers to pay for their food, housing, education, incarceration and eventual treatment for STD related illnesses.
Also Al doesn't believe the racial makeup of America is relevant to it's history, character, culture or future. 'After all', Al reasons, 'Just because America was founded by and created in the image of White people, it would be racist to believe that it should remain White'. He is ecumenical on the matter you see.
Believing that only Whites can be Americans is as bigoted as believing only Christians go to heaven and...whoops, never mind.

The good Dr. has gone down the road of racial ecumenicalism and believes that heaven on Earth comes in the form of Marxist notions of Diversity, tolerance and Racial Integration.
Evidently, here is the Christian idea of Heaven.

Mohler quotes from the New York Times article,

And Pittsburgh is not alone:

Other metropolitan areas, too, are teetering on the brink of natural decrease.

In the 1990s, deaths outnumbered births in only four metropolitan areas with more than 250,000 people, and three of those were in the South. Since 2000, 10 metropolitan areas -- half of them outside the South -- have suffered a net loss of population to natural decrease.

In three other areas hurt by vanishing industry, Buffalo-Niagara Falls and Utica-Rome in upstate New York, and Duluth, Minn., deaths exceeded births in at least one year in this decade.

Okay, I shouldn't do it, but I'll go ahead and use the infamous Wikipedia here,

White flight is a term for the demographic trend where working and middle-class white people move away from racial-minority suburbs or inner-city neighborhoods to white suburbs and exurbs.[1][2] The phenomenon was first named in the United States, but has occurred in other countries as well. Some scholars have noted the impact of redlining, mortgage discrimination, and racially restrictive covenants on white flight: these factors denied or increased the cost of services, such as banking and insurance, to residents in minority suburbs and minority inner-city neighborhoods.

So yeah, as the percentage of non-Whites increase in an area, the percentage of Whites will drop and thus that area becomes yet another zone of death and disease like Mexico or Africa.

Mohler ends with a nugget,
Pittsburgh is becoming a parable of population loss for the rest of the nation. Will anyone take notice?

Gee I don't know Doc. Are you asking if your grandchildren will take note of the fact that there will be about ten times as many people in America in their day than there were in their grandparents day?
I kinda doubt population plunge will be a concern.

The fact is there are WAYYYYYYYYYYYY too many people in The West now anyway.
Worrying about population reduction at this point in time is kinda like fretting over the receding waters of post-Katrina New Orleans.

What Mohler and other anti-White Christian zealots dance around, is the fact that it is Whites alone whose percentage is decreasing. (yes Japan's population has decreased, but over all Asia contains half of the worlds 6.7 billion people)
But even this should not be seen as a problem as there have been ebbs and flows in European population numbers in the past ( the Black Death for example wiped out upwards of half of Europe's population, yet no European Monarch thought to import 40 million africans to 'fill the void'). The problem today is that the Corporate State and their lap dogs Media and Christianity are using the current, and much needed reduction in population in Western nations as an excuse to flood those nations with non-White consumers and pew sitters. This amounts to nothing less than the Passive Genocide of indigenous Europeans and their diaspora populations. And those like Mohler are cheerleading this development.

So where does the Mohleresque attitude of Christian Racial Harmony and Social Justice at the expense of White Civilization come from?

Where in modern America do we find the genesis of the Christian church seeking out equality, tolerance and social justice because, 'we're all God's Children'?

Peoples Temple was a cult founded in 1955 by Reverend James Warren Jones (Jim Jones). In 1961, Jones helped to (racially) integrate churches, restaurants, the telephone company, the police department, a theater, an amusement park, and the Methodist Hospital and became the executive director of the Indianapolis Human Rights Commission. Jones received considerable criticism in Indiana for his integrationist views. In 1965, Jones left Indiana, moving the Peoples Temple to California. The Peoples Temple purported to practice what it called "apostolic socialism....Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that "If you're born in this church, this socialist revolution, you're not born in sin. If you're born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you're born in sin. Jones and his church earned a reputation for aiding the cities' poorest citizens, especially racial minorities, drug addicts, and the homeless. Soup kitchens, daycare centers, and medical clinics for elderly people were set up, along with counseling programs for prostitutes and drug addicts who wanted to change their lives. The Peoples Temple made strong connections to the California state welfare system. During the 1970s, the Peoples Temple owned and ran at least nine residential care homes for the elderly, six homes for foster children, and a state-licensed 40 acre ranch for developmentally disabled persons. In 1974, the Peoples Temple signed a lease to rent land in Guyana...Former Temple member Tim Carter describes the reason for this move...."the United States is a racist place."......Carter said the Temple concluded that Guyana was "a place in a black country where our black members could live in peace". Marceline Jones described Jonestown as "dedicated to live for socialism, total economic and racial and social equality. -wikipedia
Jim Jones and his followers, comprising peoples of various races and backgrounds, gathered together in one integrated community of tolerance and social justice to promote racial harmony and diversity.....then they all drank poisoned cool-aid.

I encourage everyone to look further into the Peoples Temple Ideology, becuse the similarities between the goals, aspirations and beliefs behind Jonestown and modern multicultural America (and her Christianity) are chilling, and should serve as a wake up call to the most dense of American Citizenry.


Maybe The Rapture Did Happen!...

It's possible I suppose.
Maybe Jesus came and "escaped" all the Christians from Earth a few years back. Being few in number though nobody noticed. A Greyhound bus probably could have picked all of them up.

Seriously, about the only thing that keeps me still entertaining the notions of God, the Bible etc... is the fact that the world today looks an awful lot like the "Great Tribulation". Which is to say it looks mighty f*&%ed up.

Evil is called good and Good is called evil.

The Christian Churches are the most likely place where many will, in a few years hence, be brought and prosecuted for "hate" crimes.

Even the conservative Christian church is almost entirely within the Marxist sphere of thought in about 99% of their theology/philosophy/politics.

It is, after all, the Christians who are first among the Gentiles in leading the charge to rebuild Babel by supporting immigration, integration and miscegenation. That they believe these things to be natural and good (wherein their ancestors over the past 2,000 years considered them to be un-natural and evil) is testimony itself of the "new spirit" that has come upon Christianity in the past 40 years.


Sunday, May 17, 2009

Go Uh-Meri-kuh!!!...

from Pravda,

It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.

First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their "right" to choke down a McDonalds burger or a BurgerKing burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our "democracy". Pride blind the foolish.

The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.


The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.


That last line really nails it.

The American Exceptionalism crowd are still clinging to the belief that the greatest threat to America is a bunch of cave dwelling terrorists living half a world away.
Sure, some of them come here. But that is because WE LET THEM IN!

Immigrants (legal and illegal) cause more death and destruction every year than all of the "terrorists" combined have done to America over the past several decades.

The reason the first president of the banana republic of North America was elected in the first place is because of the changing demographics. (and that is the reason he will be re-elected at least once more)

Demographics is Destiny....


Saturday, May 16, 2009


from American Renaissance,

No successful society shows a spontaneous tendency towards multiculturalism or multiracialism. Successful and enduring societies show a high degree of homogeneity. Those who support multiculturalism either do not know this or, what is more likely, realize that if they are to transform Western societies into strictly regulated, racial-feminist bureaucracies they must first undermine those societies.

This transformation is as radical and revolutionary as the project to establish Communism in the Soviet Union. Just as every aspect of life had to be brought under political control in order for the commissars to impose their vision of society, the multiculturalists hope to control and dominate every aspect of our lives. Unlike the hard tyranny of the Soviets, theirs is a softer, gentler tyranny but one with which they hope to bind us as tightly as a prisoner in the Gulag. Today’s “political correctness” is the direct descendent of Communist terror and brainwashing.

Unlike the obviously alien implantation that was Communism, what makes multiculturalism particularly insidious and difficult to combat is that it usurps the moral and intellectual infrastructure of the West. Although it claims to champion the deepest held beliefs of the West, it is in fact a perversion and systematic undermining of the very idea of the West.

What we call “political correctness” actually dates back to the Soviet Union of the 1920s (politicheskaya pravil’nost’ in Russian), and was the extension of political control to education, psychiatry, ethics, and behavior. It was an essential component of the attempt to make sure all aspects of life were consistent with ideological orthodoxy—which is the distinctive feature of all totalitarianisms. In the post-Stalin period, political correctness even meant that dissent was seen as a symptom of mental illness, for which the only treatment was incarceration.

As Mao Tse-Tung, the Great Helmsman, put it, “Not to have a correct political orientation is like not having a soul.” Mao’s little red book is full of exhortations to follow the correct path of Communist thought, and by the late 1960s Maoist political correctness was well established in American universities. The final stage of development, which we are witnessing now, is the result of cross-fertilization with all the latest “isms:” anti-racism, feminism, structuralism, and post-modernism, which now dominate university curricula. The result is a new and virulent strain of totalitarianism, whose parallels to the Communist era are obvious. Today’s dogmas have led to rigid requirements of language, thought, and behavior, and violators are treated as if they were mentally unbalanced, just as Soviet dissidents were.

Some have argued that it is unfair to describe Stalin’s regime as “totalitarian,” pointing out that one man, no matter how ruthlessly he exercised power, could not control all the functions of the state. But, in fact, he didn’t have to. Totalitarianism was much more than state terror, censorship, and concentration camps; it was a state of mind in which the very idea of a private opinion or point of view had been destroyed. The totalitarian propagandist forces people to believe that slavery is freedom, squalor is bounty, ignorance is knowledge, and that a rigidly closed society is the most open in the world. And once enough people are made to think this way, it is functionally totalitarian even if a single dictator does not personally control everything.

Today, of course, we are made to believe that diversity is strength, perversity is virtue, success is oppression, and that relentlessly repeating these ideas over and over is “tolerance and diversity.” Indeed, the multicultural revolution works subversion everywhere, just as Communist revolutions did: judicial activism undermines the rule of law; “tolerance” weakens the conditions that make real tolerance possible; universities, which should be havens of free inquiry, practice censorship that rivals that of the Soviets. At the same time, we find a relentless drive for equality: the Bible, Shakespeare, and rap “music” are just texts with “equally valid perspectives;” deviant and criminal behavior is an “alternative life-style.” Today, Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment would have to be repackaged as Crime and Counseling.

In the Communist era, the totalitarian state was built on violence. The purges of the 1930s and the Great Terror (which was Mao’s model for the Cultural Revolution) used violence against “class enemies” to compel loyalty. Party members signed death warrants for “enemies of the people” knowing that the accused were innocent, but believing in the correctness of the charges. In the 1930s, collective guilt justified murdering millions of Russian peasants. As cited by Robert Conquest in The Harvest of Sorrow (p. 143), the state’s view of this class was, “not one of them was guilty of anything; but they belonged to a class that was guilty of everything.” Stigmatizing entire institutions and groups makes it much easier to carry out wholesale change.

This, of course, is the beauty of “racism” and “sexism” for today’s culture attackers—sin can be extended far beyond individuals to include institutions, literature, language, history, laws, customs, entire civilizations. The charge of “institutional racism” is no different from declaring an entire economic class an enemy of the people. “Racism” and “sexism” are multiculturalism’s assault weapons, its Big Ideas, just as class warfare was for Communists, and the effects are the same. If a crime can be collectivized all can be guilty because they belong to the wrong group. When young whites are victims of racial preferences they are to-day’s version of the Russian peasants. Even if they themselves have never oppressed anyone they “belong to the race that is guilty of everything.”

The purpose of these multi-cultural campaigns is to destroy the self.

-more here