Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Last Thing To Worry About...

Marfa's quiet country lifestyle and thriving art scene make this tiny west Texas town a favorite getaway.

But the city won't keep its police chief and two officers when the police department shuts down October 1.


-source


And then this one from Montana,


BILLINGS - The jail in Hardin has been empty for about two years, but on September 4th officials with the Two Rivers Authority, the economic development agency that paid for the facility, signed a contract with a private police firm called American Police Force to fill the jail.

"I think it's a great situation," said Al Peterson the Vice President of Two Rivers Authority. "I have found these people to be wonderful community partners."

-source



America is a bloated corporation barely keeping afloat. She is economically crumbling (even as the ranks of third world peoples swell by the tens of millions), infrastructureally crumbling and ethnically balkanized. And her political elites increasingly have as much reach across her 3 million+ sq. miles as the mayor of Kabul has over Afghanistan.

The last thing we have to worry about is a police state.


...

The Break...

from the Occidental Observer,


To say that the last few generations have been a demographic disaster for many White populations around the world is an understatement. That Whites in America are now slated to fall to a mere half of the population by 2042 is but one of the more telling signs of this sad truth.

Firebrand Pat Buchanan has been aware of this threat for a long time and even wrote a searing book on the subject, The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization.

Recently, while returning from a conference in Europe, he had the chance to reflect on trends in America, and came to a possibly pessimistic conclusion, “Is America Coming Apart?

We seem not only to disagree with each other more than ever, but to have come almost to detest one another. Politically, culturally, racially, we seem ever ready to go for each others’ throats….

In what sense are we one nation and one people anymore? For what is a nation if not a people of a common ancestry, faith, culture and language, who worship the same God, revere the same heroes, cherish the same history, celebrate the same holidays, and share the same music, poetry, art and literature?

Tellingly — for those who didn’t already know — Buchanan is talking about what most of us think of when we say “Whites.” And this pointedly excludes Jews, as indicated by the following: “The European-Christian core of the country that once defined us is shrinking.” Trust me, he has my full agreement on that definition of Whites.

Buchanan then asks us, “If a married couple disagreed as broadly and deeply as Americans do on such basic issues, they would have divorced and gone their separate ways long ago.”

And that, in short, is what I would like to write about today: Should America break up into more homogeneous parts, in large measure to assure the survival and eventual prosperity of Whites? In other words, is secession of one or more sectors of America a viable option?

-more here



...

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Everywhere You Look...

Indeed, on 2009’s Atlantic 50 list of most influential columnists, bloggers, and broadcast pundits, almost exactly half are Jewish, even though only about 2 percent of the population is Jewish. In particular, white Jewish males are represented at rates more than 50 times higher than the average American.

-source


Aside from the relevance of the subject, I'd point out that the term "white Jewish male" is Sailer's own creation.

You could just as easily call tens of millions of Chinese and Japanese "white Asian males" if the context was strictly about skin tone.

It isn't.

It's about race.

And White applies only to those of indigenous European descent.
Few sane people attempt to argue otherwise.

...

Sunday, September 27, 2009

The Warped World Of The Neo-Con...

When they aren't about advocating bombing nations in the name of bringing (forcing) corporate-democracy on the world, the neo-cons are hard at work in the rhetoric of pronouncing that only they should have free speech.

Case in point,

Germany in the 1920s was a land of broad literacy and diverse politics, boasting 146 daily newspapers in Berlin alone. Yet in the course of a few years, a fringe party was able to define a national community by scapegoating internal enemies; elevate a single, messianic leader; and keep the public docile with hatred while the state committed unprecedented crimes.


Amazing that they attempt to demonize Nazi Germany by describing EXACTLY what the U.S. and Israel are doing at present.
In fact, "scapegoating internal enemies" is exactly what Mr. Gershon (the writer of the article) is doing with his article. The media is overwhelmingly leftist and jewish and actively demonizes and makes scapegoats out of Whites on a daily basis.
When we defend ourselves, they call us "racists."

He goes on,

Ethicist Clive Hamilton calls this a "belligerent brutopia." "The Internet should represent a great flourishing of democratic participation," he argues. "But it doesn't. . . . The brutality of public debate on the Internet is due to one fact above all -- the option of anonymity. The belligerence would not be tolerated if the perpetrators' identities were known because they would be rebuffed and criticized by those who know them. Free speech without accountability breeds dogmatism and confrontation."


Translation; all who oppose the regime should be made to wear arm bands signifying their identity in public.

This destructive disinhibition is disturbing in itself. It also allows hatred to invade respected institutional spaces..

Respected by who?

Postings of this kind regularly attack immigrants and African Americans, recycle centuries of anti-Semitism and deny the events of the Holocaust as a massive Jewish lie.


In other words, facts and history.
And the Holocaust is not an event, it is a religion pure and simple. That's why it's adherents (much like their islamist cousins in the middle-east) seek to silence or imprison all who would dare question it.

But this does not mean that popular news sites, along with settings such as Facebook and YouTube, are constitutionally required to provide forums for bullies and bigots.


And yet the "respected" Washington Times is giving a platform for people like him to use as a bully pulpit.

Basically what Gerson is advocating is the cessation of free speech, one way or another. He doesn't want a free exchange of ideas because his ideology is about controlling the general populace with propaganda.
He knows that the media can exert so much pressure on people to publicly comply to an agenda, that they can scare most into silence.




Shine the light of truth on these people and they'll wail and cringe like a vampire in the sunlight. They prey upon unsuspecting victims with contempt and hate yet when they are caught they cry out, "persecution, persecution!"

People like Gerson imagined the Internet would work like television with the conversation going in one direction.

It both enrages and terrifies people of that ilk when the "little people" have a voice.



See here and here for more insight into the historic nature of their lament.




....

Friday, September 25, 2009

There Are No Germans...

Evidently.

Trying to interpret the following article is a true exercise in Orwellian double-talk.

Investigators have discovered a "Jihadi village" of white German al-Qaeda insurgents, including Muslim converts, in Pakistan's tribal areas close to the Afghan border.

In the video, the presenter, "Abu Adam", the public face of the group in Germany, points his finger and asks: "Doesn't it appeal to you? We warmly invite you to join us!"

According to German foreign ministry officials a growing number of German families, many of North African descent, have taken up the offer and travelled to Waziristan where supporters say converts make up some of the insurgents' most dedicated fighters.

Their recruitment drive has been led by "Abu Adam", a 24-year-old German believed to be of Turkish or North African descent who was raised with his, and fellow Jihadi, Abu Ibrahim, in the smart Bonn suburb of Kessenich.

-source



So if a Turk residing in Germany is a German, does that mean that a German residing in Japan is Japanese?

Of course not.

This is just part of the media's ongoing attempt to deny Whites actually exist as a distinct group. How very Stalinesque of them...


.

...

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Yeah, It's About Race...

With former Obama green jobs czar Van Jones gone, along with his views about whites directing poisons to minorities, focus is now shifting to race-based views of "diversity czar" Mark Lloyd, who has suggested "white people" step down from positions of power to allow "more people of color, gays" and "other people" to take those positions.

-source

Note he included gays. That's because the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle and the goals of the "civil rights" movement are part of the same leftist beast.

At the outset the radical left has had one exclusive target, and it ain't Christianity.
From day one they have marked the White race as their primary adversary. From the invention of the word "racist" (coined by none other than Trotsky himself) to demonize the right-to-life that the White race has, to degrading and distorting Western history, the radical left has waged open and unceasing warfare on Western Man.

And Western Man has acquiesced to every aggression.

In 1965 it was unheard of for a mainstream church to marry people of different races. Today they not only marry people of different races, but homosexuals and lesbians as well. The two events are interconnected. Had interracial marriage not begun to be accepted by the churches in the 70's and 80's then there would be no open homosexual marriage today, let alone advocacy for it or an attempt to make it socially acceptable. And the pro-gay activists confirm this with pointing out to opponents of gay marriage that not to long ago interracial marriage was socially unacceptable too, and that the same arguments were employed to oppose it.

The left won the propaganda war.
This is evidenced by today's "traditional, conservative, bible believing, Christians" whose beliefs are hardly discernible from radical Marxism. They have become atomized consumers, unconnected to any aspect of their past (and that includes their Christian beliefs which are almost completely unrecognizable to the Christianity of just 100 years ago).

They've been so thoroughly brainwashed that it never once enters their heads that without discrimination and intolerance, there would not be such concepts as Beauty, Truth or Good.
That is why, as the rejection of discrimination and intolerance have become accepted by society, society has lost the ability (and willingness) to recognize Beauty, Truth and Right from Wrong.

The society that denies the existence of race today, will deny the existence of gender tomorrow (and that has already happened).

For ages, adultery, homosexuality and interracial marriage were deemed to be sins (morally repugnant to society). And for those sins to remain sins, society required discrimination and intolerance of them.

Today, even the most conservative Christian is loathe to openly call those things sins. They'd rather talk about the new sins, "racism", "prejudice", "antisemitism" and the like. And for those sins to remain sins, society requires a rejection of discrimination and intolerance, which is to say, society rejects judgment and discernment.
Thus it is no wonder that our society today is filled to the brim with people completely lacking in the ability or willingness to discern beauty from ugliness, truth from lies, right from wrong etc....

The now tolerant and racially ambiguous America is increasingly violent, corrupt and crumbling. It's people are balkanized politically and morally and are increasingly doped up on a combination of pharmaceutical drugs (anti-depressants) and mind-numbing entertainment.

Yet the more depraved and desperate society becomes, the more the neo-Christians (aka Evangelicals) continue to announce and denounce their own invented sins of intolerance and discrimination.
And God help any people for whom the neo-Christian comes to evangelize. For it's no coincidence that the areas in Africa, Asia and Latin America that have seen growth in neo-Christianity in the last 30 years, have seen skyrocketing rates of crime, STD's, abortions, murder and corruption along with in increasingly tolerant society no longer inclined to discriminate against things such as homosexuality.
Indeed, Evangelical Christianity has become the kiss of death for any society who embraces it. It's emergence in an area is a harbinger of a broad and sweeping turn to the radical left in that society. In fact it could be seen as a general rule that dispensational (Evangelical) Christianity is a prerequisite to a society accepting interracial marriage, abortion, homosexuality and generally looser sexual morals and standards.

But the neo-Christian will never hear this or accept it. They'll never acknowledge that their version of Christianity isn't as old as the automobile. Or that their reversal of sins (such as "racism" now being declared a sin) over the past century actually mirrors biblical prophecy which states that there would come a time when people would declare to be good that which was once called evil, and call evil that which was once declared to be good.

They are caught in the ideological vacuum of the destructive wave they helped to unleash.


The "culture war" is about race, as race is not a social construct, but rather, societies are racial constructs.
And even as millions of Whites continue to deny that fact, their adversaries on the left not only admit it, they shout it from the rooftops and through the megaphones.



...

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

So Why Worry About Global Warming?...

The 61-year-old American, who has predicted new technologies arriving before, says our understanding of genes and computer technology is accelerating at an incredible rate.

He says theoretically, at the rate our understanding is increasing, nanotechnologies capable of replacing many of our vital organs could be available in 20 years time.

Mr Kurzweil adds that although his claims may seem far-fetched, artificial pancreases and neural implants are already available.

Mr Kurzweil calls his theory the Law of Accelerating Returns. Writing in The Sun, Mr Kurzweil said: "I and many other scientists now believe that in around 20 years we will have the means to reprogramme our bodies' stone-age software so we can halt, then reverse, ageing. Then nanotechnology will let us live for ever.

-source


Wow, another jewish scientist predicting utopia!


Of course, if technology progresses as fast as he says it will, then there is really no need to worry about things like global warming. We can just launch some nanobots into the atmosphere and let them do their thing, while we rest our immortal behinds in the shade.

Instead, if people will live forever, it might get a little crowded, so maybe immigration should be immediately halted, no?


But at any rate "futurists" have a piss poor track record. In the early 20th century many claimed wars to be a thing of the past.

And weren't we all suppose to be using flying cars by now?


...

Now, Why Would That Be?...

LOS ANGELES (AP) - The chickens have come home to roost for Los Angeles city dwellers who keep roosters.

The City Council on Tuesday passed an ordinance that—with few exceptions—allows only one rooster per property. It was spurred by complaints over noise and hygiene and concerns over illegal cockfighting.

-source


Races in Los Angeles:

  • Hispanic (46.5%)
  • White Non-Hispanic (29.7%)
  • Other race (25.7%)
  • Black (11.2%)
  • Two or more races (5.2%)
  • Filipino (2.7%)
  • Korean (2.5%)
  • Chinese (1.7%)
  • American Indian (1.4%)
  • Japanese (1.0%)
  • Other Asian (0.9%)
  • Asian Indian (0.7%)
  • Vietnamese (0.5%)
(Total can be greater than 100% because Hispanics could be counted in other races)

-source





...

Re-Up (Shooting At The Sun)...

It was once said that the sun never set on the British Empire; it's reach and influence being unmatched....it's language and culture (everything from Shakespeare and Dickens to common law) the envy of the world and the model of civilization, birthing nations such as Canada, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa and America.



Then came modern liberalism!!!!



Today the British Empire is still with us (though smaller and more ragged than before), yet she is immersed in self hatred and contempt for her own.
Like the jewish feminist writer Susan Sontag, the British elite believes Whites and all that they stand for (namely the belief in the need to pursue Law, Order and Justice) are a cancer to human history.

So today, unable to successfuly purge the earth of all things British just yet, the liberals in the UK have decided to simply shoot down the sun in hopes of plunging Britain into perpetual moral, ideological and civilizational darkness in the meantime.

A MUM claims she was arrested and had her DNA and fingerprints taken by police because she had a `golly' doll in the window of her home.

She claims the doll was put in the window by her young daughter, who found it in a bag of toys.

But police say she was arrested after a series of complaints of alleged racially-aggravated behaviour were made against her.

She was released without charge after being questioned.
-source

Now this woman was accused by the police of a "series of ALLEGED racially-aggrivated behavior".

YET

they pressed no charges.

In other words the anti-White British ploice are bullying and harrassing her to make an example out of her because she is White.

And to back that up, here is an example of what might be considered "racially aggrivated behavior" in modern day Britain,

Publishers and universities are outlawing dozens of seemingly innocuous words in case they cause offence.

Banned phrases on the list, which was originally drawn up by sociologists, include Old Masters, which has been used for centuries to refer to great painters - almost all of whom were in fact male.

It is claimed that the term discriminates against women and should be replaced by "classic artists".

The list of banned words was written by the British Sociological Association, whose members include dozens of professors, lecturers and researchers.

The list of allegedly racist words includes immigrants, developing nations and black, while so-called "disablist" terms include patient, the elderly and special needs.

It comes after one council outlawed the allegedly sexist phrase "man on the street", and another banned staff from saying "brainstorm" in case it offended people with epilepsy.

However the list of "sensitive" language is said by critics to amount to unwarranted censorship and wrongly assume that people are offended by words that have been in use for years.

Prof Frank Furedi, a sociologist at the University of Kent, said he was shocked when he saw the extent of the list and how readily academics had accepted it.

I was moved to despair when I found out that one of my favourite words, 'civilised', ought not be used by a culturally sensitive author because of its alleged racist implications."

Prof Furedi said that censorship is about the "policing of moral behaviour" by an army of campaign groups, teachers and media organisations who are on a "crusade" to ban certain words and promote their own politically correct alternatives.

The University of Bristol's School for Policy Studies recommends the guidelines to help students "challenge heterosexist assumptions", and they are included in a "toolkit" to combat institutional racism included on the University of Leeds' website.

King's College London says they "may provide a good starting point" and Liverpool John Moores University provides a link to them in its students' guide. The Open University said they are an "appropriate source of reference and advice" for students.

Napier University in Edinburgh says the list is "well worth looking at" while the University of East London advises its students they should "attempt to incorporate" it.

Even a secondary school in Norwich includes a link to the list on its website, with the statement: "Students may care to consider how far we inadvertently reproduce inaccurate sexist assumptions in the language we use, both written and spoken."

The list of racist terms features black, which "can be used in a racist sense" and should be changed to "black peoples" or "black communities".

Immigrants is said to have "racist overtones" because of its association with "immigration legislation", while developing nations - intended as a more sensitive replacement for Third World - is "prejudical" because it implies a comparison with developed countries.

Although not included on the Policy Press list, the BSA warns authors against using civilisation because of its "racist overtones that derive from a colonialist perception of the world".

"Able-bodied person" should be replaced with "non-disabled person", it is claimed.

-source


So while the British police are out and about- hard on the hills of some dastardly doll displaying criminal, the following is over looked if not outright encouraged,

On Thursday evening this week, at a packed meeting in London's East
End, two profoundly dangerous men urged the destruction of the British way of
life.
I was there as the radical cleric and self-styled sheikh Omar Bakri

Mohammed proclaimed that this country - where he received state
benefits for two decades - will soon be transformed into an Islamic
state, or Khilafah, run according to the rules of the Muslim holy book, the
Koran.


Bakri's black-robed right-hand man went one step further. Anjem
Choudary, a 41-year-old militant and the leading light of a thriving new
organisation called islam4UK declared:
'There are already six or seven million Muslims here in
Britain.

'By the year 2020, we will be the
majority.


By sheer numbers, Britain will become an
Islamic state.
'We will never need to conquer this country.
Our eyes are now on Downing Street,' he added, with an excited laugh.


He has described the 9/11 hijackers as the magnificent martyrs, and
said the Pope should be murdered for criticising aspects of Islamic extremism
.

Yet still nothing has been done to silence him.

The mosque has been visited by several Labour ministers and is
constantly cited as a model of moderation and religious tolerance.

And yet the Channel 4 footage showed that worshippers -
including babies, children and teenagers - are being told they must
lead separate lives from non-Muslims, and not befriend those from other
religions.
Undercover reporters found Christians being described as a 'vile,
disgusting, abomination'
.


The nature of some of these activities - and those in
Islamic centres across Britain - seems, however, to have passed the
New Labour government by.

Gordon Brown and Communities Minister Hazel
Blears welcomed Muslim worshippers from Regent's Park Mosque to a meeting in
Downing Street
to launch a huge Labour campaign to combat
Islamic extremism at grassroots level following the London bombings of 2005.


The official blurb accompanying the fund, published on a Whitehall
website, says the money will help Muslim women become role models, ambassadors
for Islam, and unlock their potential.


In Oldham, £20,000 has been given to help
imams speak English. In Birmingham, where £3million has been granted, local
councils have spent thousands on producing T- shirts proclaiming 'I love Islam'.

-source

And then there is the recent phenomena of black on White knifings that have become part of London life.

And that in turn has led to native Brits fleeing the city in record numbers.

Is it any wonder people are fleeing London?

In a north London suburb last week, a schoolgirl was beaten, gang-raped and then had drain-cleaning fluid poured on her body apparently to destroy DNA evidence. In the eternal cesspit of senseless urban crime, I feel that a dreadful nadir of sorts has been reached, a benchmark of slaked lust and casual, sadistic cruelty.

Police sources say the 16-year-old will never fully recover from the injuries caused by the caustic soda and, at the time of writing, she remains under heavy sedation in a burns unit, fighting for her life.

I'm almost embarrassed to say that the attackers have been described as "five black youths", in case you think I'm being racist in highlighting this crime.

Trevor Phillips, the chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, has pointed out that "white flight is accelerating" as Britain becomes increasingly polarised along ethnic lines.

Last year, nearly a quarter of a million decent, law-abiding citizens packed their bags and left the capital for good, seeking what they hope will be a better life elsewhere. They moved to outer boroughs, other city suburbs, rural areas, abroad, the back end of beyond, anywhere but here.

Elsewhere in London this week, a medical student was stabbed to death in a row over an orange in a Brixton fruit shop. A pupil who was expelled for allegedly having a knife took his school to the High Court. And about the time most of us were sitting down to dinner, watching The Bill on television or putting the children to bed, a teenage girl underwent an unimaginable ordeal in an ordinary suburban street.

What is going to happen to those of us left to live here if youths across the city continue to feel quite comfortable and confident in running amok? That's before you even factor in the older, more professional criminal gangs from more than 25 countries, who operate prosperous drug trafficking, people smuggling, prostitution, money laundering and fraud rackets on the capital's streets.
-source


In conclusion, here is a comment by a poster at American Renaissance in reply to a story about British civilizational breakdown,
It is basically a racial thing. Just like American liberals, British liberals attacked the schools, police, council flat and HUD projects managers, probation officers etc if they dared to apply the laws to non white feral youth.

About 1965, the consensus of opinion by the Judges and other authorities was that enforcing laws against non white criminals, especially black criminals was somehow racist and discriminatory.

That is how the situation got out of hand. Excusing black crime meant excusing all crimes.

When I was about 13, just getting interested in boys, I read a romantic novel. The heroine’s grandmother gave her some advice
“Don’t listen to what a man says, look at what he does.” I apply that to cities and countries run by liberals.

Don’t listen to their grandiose ideas, look at the results. And in every city and country run by liberals what do we see?

Rampant crime, dangerous neighborhoods, terrible non functioning physically dangerous schools turning out generation after generation of illiterates, pot holed streets, disfunctional government agencies run by the same affirmative action non whites who destroyed the neighborhoods, housing stock and schools, large scale long term homelessness, a disfunctional health system on the verge of collapse.

In short, every liberal city and country, from Cuba to Britian to America’s large cities has been destroyed by liberals and their petted and beloved minorities.

Posted by at 9:12 PM on July 14

-source



...

Monday, September 21, 2009

The God In "God We Trust"...

At least, now you know,

Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve Board has rejected a request by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for a public review of the central bank’s structure and governance, three people familiar with the matter said.

...

The Obama administration proposed on June 17 a financial- regulatory overhaul including a “comprehensive review” of the Fed’s “ability to accomplish its existing and proposed functions” and the role of its regional banks.

...

Some top central bank officials, after agreeing to the review, saw a potential threat to Fed independence after the Treasury released the proposal, two of the people said.

-source


Now you know where your actual government is.



I can picture the Fed responding back in Lumberghian tone, "Mmmm' Yeeeeahh. Um, we're gonna have to go ahead and say no on that request, mmm'kay. Thanks a bunch though, buh-bye."



...

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Calling Their Bluff...

President Obama said this week that his health care plan won’t cover illegal immigrants, but argued that’s all the more reason to legalize them and ensure they eventually do get coverage.

-source


Anyone who didn't see that one coming, isn't thinking.

But it does prove the point that attempting to appease your political adversaries to look "reasonable" is, well, not reasonable.
Those who have attempted to turn the argument about the thirdworldification of America from its racial context to one of "playing by the rules, and obeying the law" are left with nothing to say when the law is simply changed to make that which was once illegal, legal.


As for illegal immigration, it will never cease so long as nations do not protect their borders. Grant amnesty to the twenty million or more illegals here today and tomorrow brand new illegals will show up.
It will never end, and as the thirdworld is in the midst of a population explosion the masses of hordes are only apt to increase as the years roll on till a hundred years from now there won't be one square inch of North American soil that won't look like an over crowded, disease and crime riddled ghetto in Calcutta or Brazil.

A nations fortunes or misfortunes are directly correlated to their racial makeup. That's just reality.

The ONLY people who argue otherwise are White people, who are currently seeing their nations, cultures, fortunes and way of life fading away in sea of non-Whites who openly and loudly shout that race is all that matters to them.


...

The Russians Are Coming!...

Conservatives excoriated the White House for what they called a policy of "appeasement" to the Russians, who have maintained that the previous system was directed at Russia's defenses; something the Bush administration denied.

-source


That's what you call unabashed hypocrisy.

Not more than a year ago conservatives (read, neo-cons) were responding to Russia's concerns about the missile defense system by rolling their eyes and saying things like, "Russia is living in the past. The Cold War is over. This is not about Russia."

Now they're jumping up and down, hysterically screaming, "This is about Russia!, This is about Russia!!!!!"



Were it not for America's short attention span no politician would ever be re-elected.

Alas....


.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Why Only Certain Elected Officials Should Have Free Speech...

Nancy Pelosi makes the case,

Sept. 18 (Bloomberg) -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi raised concern that some of the heated political rhetoric against President Barack Obama’s policies may incite emotionally unstable people to acts of violence.

People who make political speeches “have to take responsibility for any incitement that they may cause,” Pelosi, a California Democrat, told a news conference yesterday in Washington.

“I wish all of us would curb our enthusiasm” and realize that some people who hear provocative messages “are not as balanced as the person making the statement might assume,” she said.

-source



Well, it worked in the Soviet Union. Kinda.

And if you think about it, the only way to keep all those "emotionally unstable" people calm is for elected officials to make all the decisions behind closed doors and without public approval or even awareness.
God forbid anyone get "worked up" over trivial things such as the economic infrastructure and legal as well as medical framework of the nation.

...

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Follow-Up...

As an addendum to the previous entry I offer up this quote from the movie 'Network'.

Reading it, see how many ideological points that modern Christians and "Conservatives" share with the corporate CEO character in the film,


You think you've merely stopped a business deal. That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country and now they must put it back. It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity. It is ecological balance. You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians, no east, no west, no Communists, no Third Worlds. There is only one holistic system of systems. One vast and immane, interwoven, interactive, multi-variant, multi-national dominion of dollars; Petrol-dollars, electro-dollars, Yens, Pounds, Rubles and sheckles. It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the stucture of the world today. That is the atomic, and sub-atomic, and galactic structure of things today. And you have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and you will atone. Am I getting through to you, Mr. Beale?

You get up on your twenty-one inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only I.B.M. and I.T.T. and A.T.&T and Dupont, Dow, Union Carbide and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today. What do you think the Russians talk about in their Council of States? Karl Marx? They sit down with their statistical decision theories, lineal programming charts, and their Mini-Mac solutions and compute the cost-price probabilities of their stocks and transactions, just like we do. We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, all inexorably determined by the immutable by-laws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale, and it has been ever since Man crawled out of the slime.

Our children, Mr. Beale, will live to see that perfect world in which there is no war or famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company for whom all men will work to serve a common profit; in which all will hold a share of stock; all necessities provided for, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.


-Network



You can read or hear the above sentiment approvingly expressed every week in "Conservative" opinion columns and every Sunday in churches across the land.


...

Why The "Conservative Movement" Is DOA...

Nothing illustrates the intentional ignorance and blind adherence to ideological falsehoods better than this article from WorldNetDaily's David Kupelian.

He writes,

Many Americans right now are wondering how on earth former President Jimmy Carter could be so utterly deluded as to accuse millions of regular Americans, from soccer moms and Wal-Mart greeters to military vets and grandmothers, who oppose the attempted socialist transformation of their country, of being racists. How could he be so out of touch with reality?

-source


He's not out of touch Dave, it's just that you are delusional. Of course the word, racist, was coined by none other than the Soviet Union's own Leon Trotsky as a means to attack the gentiles who were resistant to the jewish influenced policies of Marxism. But Carter's observation is right on. What he is attempting to describe is called tribalism, which is a natural, normal and healthy aspect of human nature.
White people are uncomfortable with a black president because black people are a different race with differing notions of morality, social order, organizational adherence to laws and so on. That's why 99% of those protesting against socialism are White.

Kupelian goes on,

Racism – in the form of slavery, and later segregation – was America's one great national sin.

I would point out to people that the first, and for a long time the only, people to say what Kupelian just said, were Marxists.


In the past some have called slavery a sin, but never "racism." For you see, "racism" is the sin which DID NOT EXIST ANY WHERE OR AT ANY TIME UNTIL evangelical Christians created this "sin" about 30 or 40 years ago.

So it should be of no surprise that those same Evangelical Christians are moving more and more to the left, increasingly supporting things such as "gay marriage", which many Christians don't even like to call a sin anymore.

So that which is actually listed in the bible as a sin (homosexuality), is no longer called a sin today. And that which is not listed in the bible as a sin ("racism") is instead called a sin today.

But that would actually fall in line with the biblical prediction that states that there would come a time when people would call that which is good, evil and that which is evil, good.

Kupelian stumbles on,

Moreover, because the national government (which opposed slavery) held the moral high ground over the southern states (which wanted to retain slavery), the vital power balance between states rights and the federal government was destroyed during the civil war, with the federal government establishing dominance and growing uncontrollably ever since.


I shouldn't say it, but I will. It takes a truly sick and twisted mind to write what Kupelian wrote there.

The Union held the moral high ground!
So, by extension then, he is admitting that the British held the moral high ground in 1776, is he not?

As for the north vs. south thing, well, the heart and soul of America has always been in the south. From the first settlement at Jamestown in Virginia, to the proportionally high number of southern Founding Fathers (such as Washington and Jefferson), the south was America.

The north, on the other hand, has ALWAYS been the seat of liberaldom in North America. It was the northerners who fostered every leftist social ill from abolition to the gay rights movement; from desegregation to banning prayer in schools.
And continuing that tradition, the north is currently, and by far, the most liberal place in America.

Kupelian goes on,

For decades afterwards, segregation remained a blight on our nation. Fortunately, it was legally and culturally purged during the 1960s civil rights movement, when the nation embraced Martin Luther King's "dream" of a colorblind America.


The above leads me to conclude that Kupelian is either intentionally misinforming or he just plain ignorant.

For one thing the "Civil Rights" movement was a fundamentally Marxist movement. You can not separate its varying aspects which run from desegregation to the promotion of gay rights and tossing prayer out of the schools. It is all one package.

Secondly, segregation is also called Freedom of Association. If a people do not have the right to discriminate in whom they will work, live and worship among, then they have no rights.

Thirdly, Martin Luther King DID NOT "dream" of a color blind society. In fact he specifically stated otherwise, quite openly.

"If a city has a 30 percent Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30 percent of the jobs in any particular company..."
-Martin Luther King

Kupelian mutters on,


Nevertheless, in this life, even if we face up to our personal sins, have apologized and made restitution if appropriate, there remains a certain pain called guilt – an uncomfortable memory of our past failings.


And so there Kupelian answers the question his article asks, which is 'Why the elites call you a racist'.

Because for brainwashed anti-White morons like Kupelian, it works!

They call us racists, and Kupelian agrees!

Only White people feel guilty for doing what every other race of people have done, and to far worse degrees.



Kupelian finishes,

So stop caring whether demagogues in high places call you racists, bigots, homophobes, Nazis or Islamophobes. You're Americans, the salt of this earth, and you're not racists. If electing a black man as president in a nation where less than 13 percent of the population is black is not proof positive that America is the least racist nation on earth, then nothing will ever prove it.

So after telling us we're racists and bigots, he advices us to stop caring about people who call us racists and bigots.

Dave, White people voted for Obama because of the guilt that people like you keep pushing on them in proclaiming their ancestors, and the society they created, to be racist.


(sigh)

Folks, to read Kupelian is to gain insight into a mind that has been saturated in anti-White propaganda for decades. It is full of twisted history, perverted and invented morals and prone to pronounce blatant hypocritical and conflicting rhetoric.

In other words, it is typically leftist mind.



...

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Think Before You Poll...

Trust in news media has reached a new low, with record numbers of Americans saying reporting is inaccurate, biased and shaped by special interests, according to a survey set to be released Monday.

-source


"Trust in news media."
What does that even mean?

You might ask about whether or not someone has trust in the idea of news media, or specific kinds of media, but not of the news media itself as though it were an entity. (the same goes for government)

I mean really, if you think about it, the presupposition sets up a false paradigm that reveals a tragic cultural construct in which there is an expectancy that a thing (the media in this case) is held to be either universally good or universally bad.

Or to unpack that, the poll should have asked the question, "do you have trust in your ability to sift through the various and often contradictory bits of information the media disseminates and come to a personal conclusion on any given subject?"


Otherwise the poll might as well have asked, "are you happy not thinking for yourself?"



...

"Pot Calls Kettle Black!" Story At Eleven!....

This story has everything you could ever want – corruption, sleazy actions at tax-funded organizations, firings, government ties, sex, hookers. It is a network news director’s dream. Imagine the ratings. But almost no one is covering it.

And yet. And yet it’s still been ignored by the network news. Nothing on ABC, CBS or NBC. The only thing any one of the three broadcast networks has done appeared in a blog post by ABC’s Jake Tapper. It's hardly worth noting except to show that the networks know about what’s going on. They just don’t care to report it. Only FOX News has bothered to report on the controversy.

-source

Two words for Fox News..................RON PAUL.

As for the media ignoring big stories, just go through the links list at the side here and you'll discover a whole world of major stories the media chooses to ignore.




...

Sunday, September 13, 2009

National White People's Day...

On a cloudy and cool day, the demonstrators came from all corners of the country, waving American flags and handwritten signs explaining the root of their frustrations. Their anger stretched well beyond the health care legislation moving through Congress, with shouts of support for gun rights, lower taxes and a smaller government.

But as they sang verse after verse of patriotic hymns like “God Bless America,” sharp words of profane and political criticism were aimed at Mr. Obama and Congress.


...the magnitude of the rally took the authorities by surprise, with throngs of people streaming from the White House to Capitol Hill for more than three hours.

-source



They say a picture is worth a thousand words. What do the pictures HERE say?



I'll tell you what they say, they say that race is not a social construct but that societies (and their governments) are racial constructs.

A fact that was once held to be obvious but is now spoken of in hushed whispers much like sex was in the Victorian Age...





...

Friday, September 11, 2009

Chasing Their Tale...

It's an undeniable fact that most people love a good self congratulatory tale. When such a proclivity is mixed up in national myth it produces zingers such as the following from Chuck Baldwin,

...it behooves me to comment on the spirit of hatred that seems to motivate many people in and out of our great land.

To be sure, one can count me in with those who hate the manner in which the international banking cartel has wormed its way into the inner workings of our federal government. I hate the condescending, elitist attitudes of many in higher education. I hate the way globalists—such as David Rockefeller and his ilk—have been able to use the federal government to promote and safeguard their own private financial and political agendas. I hate the way secularists in public education and private organizations—such as the ACLU, People For the American Way, the Anti Defamation League, etc.—have been able to strip our culture of its Christian heritage. I hate the way politicians from both parties in Washington, D.C., ignore and trample the U.S. Constitution. I hate the way professing Christians and "conservatives" turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the warmongering, police-state mentality of many within the national Republican Party.

I hate the way Nancy Pelosi and her gaggle of liberal Democrats use their power to promote socialism in America. I hate the liberal bias of the mainstream news media. I hate the so-called "political correctness" that permeates the philosophy of virtually every major organization in America these days. I hate the attempts by liberals and "do-gooders" of all stripes to take away my right to keep and bear arms. And, yes, I hate the way America's foreign policy has been manipulated by foreign lobbyists, socialists within the United Nations, and international business interests.

With all of that said, however, if you hate America, count me out!

If Canaan was the Promised Land for Old Testament Israel, America was an earthly Promised Land for Christians and lovers of liberty. In the Providence of God, America was established by the right people, at the right time, and for the right purpose. With all its shortcomings, the U.S. Constitution—along with the Bill of Rights—is the greatest governing document ever devised by man. And the Declaration of Independence is the greatest birth certificate a nation ever had.

In fact, without the freedom and liberty protected by a 200-year history of constitutional government, all those anti-America, anti-Constitution, and anti-Founding Fathers critics out there could not even exist! As God gives the atheist the breath he uses to blaspheme his Creator, so, too, the Constitution protects the right of America-haters to foment their delirium.

-source


Did you get that?
Allow me to unpack that last paragraph above into one simple sentence.

'Without America, all of the people and institutions currently destroying America wouldn't exist'.

And that on top of starting out his column by mentioning those outside of America who hate America, then finishing with the suggestion that only in America are you blessed with the gift to hate America.

But the real kicker is when he begins the article (see the link) with a repudiation of "isms" yet never blinks in his praise of a "nation" that is a creed-based proposition, purposefully devoid of a national language, national religion or ethnic and cultural exclusivity.




At some future post-America point in history a dictionary will carry the following entry,

America; 1. A former nation-state in North America. 2. A slang for a mutating and ill defined blob of ideological isms.




...

Thursday, September 10, 2009

THEY Can Write About It, But If You Point Out That It Is Them Writing About It, You're "Racist"...

From the NYT's Thomas Friedman

Watching both the health care and climate/energy debates in Congress, it is hard not to draw the following conclusion: There is only one thing worse than one-party autocracy, and that is one-party democracy, which is what we have in America today.

One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century.

-source





For more on this, see here.





...

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Aloha, White Devil...

With no known hate groups and a much-trumpeted spirit of aloha or tolerance, few people outside Hawaii realize the state has a racism issue. One reason: The tourism-dependent state barely acknowledges hate crimes. That makes it hard to know how often racial violence is directed at Caucasians, who comprise about 25% of the ethnically diverse state’s 1.3 million residents. Those who identify themselves as Native Hawaiian—most residents are of mixed race—account for nearly 20%.

Hawaii has collected hate crimes data since 2002 (most states began doing so a decade earlier). In the first six years, the state reported only 12 hate crimes, and half of those were in 2006. (All other things being equal, the state would be expected to have more than 800 such crimes annually, given the size of its population, according to a federal government study of hate crimes.) There was anti-white bias in eight of those incidents. But that doesn’t begin to reflect the extent of racial rancor directed at non-Native Hawaiians in the Aloha State, especially in schools.

-source



More at the link.



...

Of Bones And Social Constructs...

The conventional view of human evolution and how early man colonised the world has been thrown into doubt by a series of stunning palaeontological discoveries suggesting that Africa was not the sole cradle of humankind. Scientists have found a handful of ancient human skulls at an archaeological site two hours from the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, that suggest a Eurasian chapter in the long evolutionary story of man.

-source


Of course the standard procedure is to follow up stories like this with, "but other scientists aren't so sure", as though there was a grand consensus on other contentious topics.
Such is the media that "reports" on what science finds or purports to find.



It's interesting how the attitudes in regards to race and gender are so diametrically opposed to their own logical suppositions, as mouthed by the average purveyors of the equality myth.

For example, if you ask most people which was of a more pronounced and concrete absolute, Gender or Race, most would say gender. Yet it is gender, NOT race, that is commonly (if such a word can be used to describe it) changed in medical procedures across the Western world and is often legally recognized under various laws.

Or put another way (and Michael Jackson jokes aside), if gender is biological and race is a social construct, then why are there no "Race Change" operations? Why don't we routinely see guys who look like Brad Pitt going into operations wherein they come out looking like Yaphet Kotto? Or women who look like Oprah Winfrey coming out of surgery looking like Julia Roberts?
The answer is obvious, but it tends to shatter the hypocritical fantasy the Left has engineered.

(It is similar to the mental gymnastics the left does when they declare that there is no such as a White race yet insist that homosexuals are "born that way.")

So considering that there are some butch looking White women who can almost pass as White men, yet never pass for black women, it's probably not a stretch to say that race is AT LEAST as biological (and thus pronounced and written in stone) as Gender.




No, race is not a social construct anymore than gender is. And just as the outward physical distinctions of the different genders represent two different types of general personalities or "souls", if you will, (such as temperament, mood, intellectual application and so on) so too does the physical distinctions in the races.

And whether most people are willing to admit it or not, they find the sight of two people of different races married together just as disturbing as the sight of two people of the same gender married together.

But many do openly deny that. And sadly that is the mental state of the ideology of the Left, which holds sway today. It denies what is normal, declaring war on nature in all of its various outgrowths.






Race is not a social construct. Societies are racial constructs.



...

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

When The Empire Strikes Back?...

Former Obama green jobs czar Van Jones is gone, along with his views about whites directing poisons to minorities, his obscene condemnations of Republicans and his affiliation with the idea the U.S. government was behind 9/11.

Now critics of the cadre of unvetted political appointees charged by the president with "advising" on a broad range of critical issues are looking at some of the other names with White House access.

-source


That's great, but the Right should be careful not to hang out on any ice planets anytime soon.



...

A Salute To The MSM...

New surveys show steep declines in Obama's approval ratings among whites -- including Democrats and independents -- who were crucial elements of the diverse coalition that helped elect the country's first black president.
-source


A shout out to our corporate run Lefty media, whom thanks to running White-bashing articles such as this, have accelerated a re-emerging White Racial Consciousness in America.



Kudos, MSM!


...

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Yes Virginia, There Is A Re-Emerging White Racial Consciousness...

And it is in large part due to the outcome of the last election cycle.
.
.
.
.
.
.

CNN’s Roland Martin Says Opposition to Obama’s School Speech Is ‘Largely White’


-Source


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...

Friday, September 4, 2009

Think Of The Swine Flu...

Would they lie to you?



As regular readers of The Ticker know, we like to hammer on the official U.S. unemployment rate versus the unofficial rate, which we believe to be a truer picture of joblessness in this country.

This morning, the Labor Department said the official number climbed from 9.4 percent in July to 9.7 percent in August.

But the unofficial number jumped from 16.3 percent to 16.8 percent.

The difference between the two rates is due to who's counted among the unemployed.

The official number is arrived at by combining a rotating monthly survey of 60,000 U.S. households performed by the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics with jobs data sent in by employers. According to this measure, you are marked as "unemployed" if you're jobless and you meet certain criteria, including whether you looked for work in the previous four weeks.

-source



...

The Multi-CULT...

After 40 years of relentless immigration from the third world’s poorest nations, and an additional 100 million people added to America from all over the planet: White, Black, Hispanic and Muslims now battle for positioning within the United States. The fantasy of a human bouquet of civility degrades into harsher realities of a fast-Balkanizing civilization. In reality, each ethnic group finds comfort, solace and identity, not in America, but within its own tribe and language.

If the sheer addition of 100 million people doesn’t finish this nation in the next 30 years, multiculturalism will become the ultimate disintegration of America. New York City explodes as ‘ground zero’. On the West Coast, Los Angeles represents the next great racial incident.

In a brilliant expose’, writer Matthew Richer, Escape from New York—Into America, said, “I remember watching Escape from New York on television as a boy and thinking the plot was preposterous. Now, after living in New York City for several years as an adult, the film is actually starting to look plausible to me. That is because I have decided not just to leave New York City, but to escape it—and all that it has come to represent.”

...

As in the New York Puerto Rican Parade, Richer said, “Others, unfortunately, were not so lucky. Later that afternoon, gangs of black and Hispanic youth attacked a number of white women in Central Park. They doused them with beer, tore off their clothes, and sexually assaulted them—all the while laughing and shouting in jubilation. An 18 year old British female tourist was stripped naked and digitally raped for 30 minutes. A French female tourist was also stripped naked while her husband was held down and forced to watch as his wife was similarly assaulted.”

The media aired little of the footage and buried the racial nature of the assaults.

...

Every country deserves its own culture, language and identity. The further America, Canada, Great Britain, France and all other successful countries sink into the destructive forces of multiculturalism—the faster they ride the train to ultimate disintegration.

-source

There was never an American nation, as a nation is a biological entity (an extended family group) known as an ethnic or racial group.

No, America is an anti-Nation. It was set up as a corporation, not a country.

And despite the chest thumping of all those brave "patriots" who go on and on about the fight against socialism and communism, the fact remains that America's mirror image is the Soviet Union.

It will be a mean reality for the pledge-of-allegiance-crowd when they find that everything they believed about America was no more than a con sold by snake-oil salesmen.

And no amount of letter righting, organizing or orchestrated voting will alter the anti-Nation's course.

It is what comes after it has fallen (both the good and the bad), that we must turn our thoughts towards. America is the Titanic that has, in spite of assurance that it could never go down, struck the iceberg and is now in fact, going down.

The fools are fighting over who gets to steer here next. The wise are out looking for the lifeboats...


...


Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Pride Goes Before The Fall...

from WorldNetDaily,

On his Monday Fox News broadcast Sean Hannity's "great American panel" included singer Aubrey O'Day. Outspoken and articulate, O'Day insisted that the U.S. government should provide for all citizens what she repeatedly called "basic civil rights," meaning all of our basic needs, including free health care, free child care and so on. She seemed to care about people and apparently didn't want to see anyone suffer or go without.

Listening to her transported me back to a train ride I took through (what was then) Yugoslavia many years ago. While traveling across that communist country, I got into a conversation with a lady passenger about freedom and "basic rights." I explained that in America, we have fundamental freedoms of speech, of the press, of religion, association, travel and so on, as well as freedom of opportunity – that is, to succeed or fail, but also to be able to keep the fruits of our labors and to be free of the tyranny of a stifling and predatory government.

She countered, with words very close to these: "I know that's what you believe in America. But in my society, we believe basic rights include the right to a job, to housing, to health care, to the basics of life. We consider these to be our basic rights."

"OK," I said, "but what if you have to sacrifice your individual rights and liberties in order to provide such security for everyone?"

Her reply was that it was worth the tradeoff.

-source

What the writer of the above (David Kupelian) seems reticent in making a point of, is that both his examples of mouthpieces for socialism are women.

That's a shame because it is a relevant fact that America's slide towards socialism picked up considerable speed post-Women's Suffrage. That's because women are (by their natural inclination towards nurturing the young) designed to be more apologetic of tyrannical management of people. And tyrannical government (which is to say, socialist government) after all tends to see the citizenry as helpless infants in need of supervision and regulation.


Furthermore Kupelain glides lightly over the reality that with the commencement of the "civil rights" movement, with minorities allotted equal standing with White Men, the country plunged irrevocably into social and cultural (and eventually economic) ruin.


Of course stating these facts is considered "blasphemous" in the current dogmatic regime of political correctness.

But let's be honest, the entire push to artificially engineer equality is essentially one giant appeal to the vanity of the non-Whites.

Most say that truths, such as blacks have lower IQ's than Whites is "mean", "prejudiced" and "hurtful." But the truth is never any of those things. The only thing the truth hurts is someones PRIDE.

In the long run the truth does not hurt, but helps.

When a society reaches the point of sacrificing truth to prop up one segment's ego at the expense of its social and economic stability, that society is at the end of it's history.




...

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

The Outcome Has Yet To Be Determined...


On Sept. 1, 1939, 70 years ago, the German Army crossed the Polish frontier. On Sept. 3, Britain declared war.

Six years later, 50 million Christians and Jews had perished. Britain was broken and bankrupt, Germany a smoldering ruin. Europe had served as the site of the most murderous combat known to man, and civilians had suffered worse horrors than the soldiers.

By May 1945, Red Army hordes occupied all the great capitals of Central Europe: Vienna, Prague, Budapest, Berlin. A hundred million Christians were under the heel of the most barbarous tyranny in history: the Bolshevik regime of the greatest terrorist of them all, Josef Stalin.

...

The German-Polish war had come out of a quarrel over a town the size of Ocean City, Md., in summer. Danzig, 95 percent German, had been severed from Germany at Versailles in violation of Woodrow Wilson's principle of self-determination. Even British leaders thought Danzig should be returned.

...

If Hitler wanted the world, why did he not build strategic bombers, instead of two-engine Dorniers and Heinkels that could not even reach Britain from Germany?

Why did he let the British army go at Dunkirk?

Why did he offer the British peace, twice, after Poland fell, and again after France fell?

Why, when Paris fell, did Hitler not demand the French fleet, as the Allies demanded and got the Kaiser's fleet? Why did he not demand bases in French-controlled Syria to attack Suez? Why did he beg Benito Mussolini not to attack Greece?

Because Hitler wanted to end the war in 1940, almost two years before the trains began to roll to the camps.

Hitler had never wanted war with Poland, but an alliance with Poland such as he had with Francisco Franco's Spain, Mussolini's Italy, Miklos Horthy's Hungary and Father Jozef Tiso's Slovakia.

Indeed, why would he want war when, by 1939, he was surrounded by allied, friendly or neutral neighbors, save France? And he had written off Alsace, because reconquering Alsace meant war with France, and that meant war with Britain, whose empire he admired and whom he had always sought as an ally.

As of March 1939, Hitler did not even have a border with Russia. How then could he invade Russia?

Winston Churchill was right when he called it "The Unnecessary War" – the war that may yet prove the mortal blow to our civilization.

-source




...