Tuesday, February 23, 2010

The New World...

Modern classical music is so widely disliked by audiences because the human brain struggles to find patterns it needs to understand the compositions as music.

While traditional classical music follows strict patterns and formula that allow the brain to make sense of the sound, modern symphonies by composers such as Arnold Schoenberg and Anton Webern simply confuse listeners' brains.

Philip Ball, author of The Music Instinct, has drawn on the latest scientific findings from neuroscientists to show structure and patterns in music are a fundamental part of musical enjoyment.

He said: "Many people still seem to find modern classical music challenging. If that is the case, then they can relax as it is challenging for a good reason and it is not because they are in some way too musically stupid to appreciate it.


Hmmm, according to Wikipedia Mr. Schoenberg's music was labeled as degenerate by the Nazi party.

Ditto for Mr. Webern.

There are, in our times, two opposing forces in ideology which factor into morals, economy, philosophy and art. And those forces are tradition vs. modern, each representing a worldview which realizes the world it chooses to embrace. (one -the traditional-, however, is true while the other -modern- is an illusion which manifests contempt of the real; of truth, value and beauty)

But "modern" is a deceptive description, for it feigns to project itself as an updated rendition of what came before.

It isn't.

"Modern", as in modern art or modern classical music, is basically anti-Western, anti-truth, anti-value and anti-beauty.

And that raises the question,

What world did we embrace post-1945?


The New Right...

While polls show more people drifting away from acceptance of "global warming," the newest superstar among conservatives – Glenn Beck – is embracing it.

"You'd be an idiot not to notice the temperature change," he says. He also thinks it could be caused by man's activity.

At home, he's going green by using energy-saving products.


Beck was obviously a clown from day one. Why anyone would buy into his act is beyond me. He's the Alex Jones of TV.

Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) joined several other Republicans to help Democrats defeat a filibuster orchestrated by GOP leaders by a 62-30 tally. The vote to actually pass the measure is expected tomorrow.

The bill would allow businesses that hire unemployed workers to forgo paying Social Security payroll taxes on them through December and give the businesses a $1,000 credit if new workers stay on the job a full year.


Wow! A liberal politician from Massachusetts crosses the aisle to aid democrats! Shocking!!!!

The Texas congressman who rattled the GOP establishment with his libertarian-leaning outsider run for president has suddenly found himself the target of the anti-incumbent Tea Party movement some credit him with helping inspire.


They say that while Ron Paul's fiscal conservative message is sound, he's a little too fond of pork-barrel projects and nowhere near tough enough on national security.


If you read the full article it doesn't quite say what it's sub-headline suggests. But then it's Fox News. And Fox News considers anyone not cheering on endless wars in the middle east to be the anti-Christ.

Besides, didn't Paul just win a straw poll at this year's CPAC?

Ah yes, CPAC,

California Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) chairman Ryan Sorba generated a media controversy when he was shown at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) denouncing the organizers for inviting a homosexual Republican group, GOProud, into the event as an official sponsor.


Incredibly, McCobin of SFL told me that his group "is not a conservative organization" and that "We spent this past weekend reaching out to the left and the right at both the Young Democrats of America's convention and the Conservative Political Action Conference. We are not left or right."

If they are not conservative, Sorba asked, "What are they doing at CPAC?"

Sorba said the negative reaction he got from some in the CPAC audience came from those in libertarian and pro-Ron Paul groups whose purpose is "to infiltrate the conservative movement and take it over from within." He said that he received strong support after the event from traditional conservatives.

Proving the point, McCobin's SFL is based at the libertarian Cato Institute, which has a conservative view on federal spending issues but promotes a U.S. military withdrawal from much of the world and very liberal social views, such as legalization of marijuana and other drugs.

Adding to the controversy, the Cato Institute has been funded by the ultra-liberal billionaire George Soros, a major financial benefactor of many different "progressive" organizations. The Open Society Institute of Soros has put tens of thousands of dollars into Cato for such purposes as a "lecture series" on the dangers of a war on drugs, a project to prevent a national system of identification under the immigration laws, and a "Civil Liberties and Counterterrorism Initiative" that protects the civil liberties and human rights of accused terrorists.

What's more, GOProud isn't a conservative group, either. Christopher R. Barron, chairman of GOProud, runs CapSouth Consulting, which works for "centrist Republicans"--not conservatives.

So the issue isn't just why GOProud was at CPAC but why Students For Liberty, an admittedly non-conservative group, was there and had a speaking role.





In their Mount Vernon declaration of principles, conservatives called the Constitution their guiding star. But did not the author of that constitution, James Madison, warn us that wars are the death of republics?

Under Bush II, conservatives, spurning the wisdom of their fathers, let themselves be seduced, neo-conned into enlisting in a Wilsonian crusade that had as its declared utopian goal "ending tyranny in our world."

How could conservatives whose defining virtue is prudence and who pride themselves on following the lamp of experience have been taken into camp by the hustlers and hucksters of empire?


The infamous "mount Vernon Declaration". It basically stated that anyone opposed to mass third world invasion, endless wars in the middle east and the continuing progress of left of center political and social ideology is not a true conservative patriot.

So the opposition to the clown in the White House is Glen Beck (a tv show host with admitted mental problems), Sarah Palin (a Former beauty pageant contestant turned "girl-power" femitician), Scott Brown (a republican so far to the left that he was able to take Ted Kennedy's former seat in Massachusetts), Bobby Jindal (an east-Asian Indian headquartered in Louisiana and whose greatest quality as a GOP'er is, apparently, that he is not a White guy), Ron Paul (a 75 year old gynecologist/libertarian presiding over a district in one of the most overrun -by the third world- states in America) and to top it off, a group of gay republicans.

Basically it looks like the cast of some reality show featuring f***ed up -has been- celebrities.

Compared to the "right" The Left defiantly looks like they have their shit together!

And that's a scary thought.


Sunday, February 21, 2010


By A.W. Morgan

“This is embarrassing.”

That is what direct mail tycoon and conservative rainmaker Richard Viguerie told Ralph Hallow, official scrivener of the conservative “movement” for the Washington Times, when Hallow asked him about the ballyhooed Mount Vernon Statement.

(In case you hadn’t heard, the Mount Vernon Statement, released on Feb. 17, is a manifesto that America’s Beltway conservatives threw together to oppose President Barack Hussein Obama. At least ostensibly.)

“If the people in the leadership of the conservative movement are going to put out pablum like this, the tea party people are going to make them seem irrelevant. And the tea party people are going to march to the forefront,” the king of direct-mail fundraising huffed.

“[I]n a dig at current and former Republican congressional leaders whom many blame for betraying conservative principles of limited government and reduced spending, Hallow reported, “Mr. Viguerie added, ‘This is almost as if the movement’s leaders were taken over by Tom DeLay and John Boehner.’” [Conservative manifesto makes bid to reunify, By Ralph Z. Hallow, February 15, 2010]

In fact, it was as if the movement’s leader were taken over by … Viguerie himself. Two days later, Viguerie not only signed the Mount Vernon statement, but also pronounced it absolutely wonderful:

“I feel it’s a good first step, and I applaud those conservatives who have provided the leadership to produce this statement of conservative principles. In the coming weeks, I look forward to working with all principled conservatives, including the newest branch of the small-limited government coalition, the Tea Partiers, to take the steps necessary to maximize our victories in 2010 and beyond. For years, I’ve said the number one problem for the cause of limited government is that many conservatives became an appendage of the GOP.” [Richard Viguerie on the Mount Vernon Statement, February 17, 2010]

And, said he who had been embarrassed 24 hours earlier, “Hopefully, the Mount Vernon Statement will draw a line to clearly separate the principled conservatives from the majority of Washington politicians (Republican and Democratic) who want to continue to expand the reach, power, control, and influence of government at all levels.”

We don’t know what internecine infighting caused Viguerie to change his mind. But he and the rest of the usual crowd of Beltway conservatives ginned up The Conservative Action Project just in time for the Conservative Political Action Conference (see here for Peter Brimelow’s reflections on last year’s CPAC) and just days after the national Tea Party Convention in Nashville.

Anyone with a brain knows what’s going on here. The cast of conmen who have been helming the Beltway Right for 40 years, described by Fox News as a “Who’s Who” of “conservative grass roots leaders”, see in the newly awakened Americans who have taken to the streets to oppose the president’s leftist agenda a sorely-needed cash cow.

Check the Web sites that feature the statement. They ask for signatories to provide contact information, sometimes including…a mailing address! One site features a questionnaire asking the signer to reveal his “interests.”

And these professional “conservatives” really believe these Americans are going to buy their little document.

Well, they bought Dubya and they're buying Palin. So why not?

All a candidate would have to do is nuke Iran and paint all the highways 'Red, White and Blue' and the average conservative American would crown him emperor for life.

Most seem to forget that voters have very short memories.

They can be starved for three and half years then fed steak for six moths and they'll re-elect the crooks in "the beltway" all over again.


Charles Martel; The Original Epic Beard Man...

Growing in leaps and bounds, the Caliphate, as the Islamic realm is known, has thus far subdued much of Christendom, conquering the old Christian lands of the Mideast and North Africa in short order. Syria and Iraq fell in 636; Palestine in 638; and Egypt, which was not even an Arab land, fell in 642. North Africa, also not Arab, was under Muslim control by 709. Then came the year 711 and the Moors’ invasion of Europe, as they crossed the Strait of Gibraltar and entered Visigothic Iberia (now Spain and Portugal). And the new continent brought new successes to Islam. Conquering the Iberian Peninsula by 718, the Muslims crossed the Pyrenees Mountains into Gaul (now France) and worked their way northward. And now, in 732, they are approaching Tours, a mere 126 miles from Paris.

The Moorish leader, Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi, is supremely confident of success. He is in the vanguard of the first Muslim crusade, and his civilization has enjoyed rapidity and scope of conquest heretofore unseen in world history. He is at the head of an enormous army, replete with heavy cavalry, and views the Europeans as mere barbarians. In contrast, the barbarians facing him are all on foot, a tremendous disadvantage. The only thing the Frankish and Burgundian European forces have going for them is their leader, Charles of Herstal, grandfather of Charlemagne. He is a brilliant military tactician who, after losing his very first battle, is enjoying an unbroken 16-year streak of victories.

And this record will remain unblemished. Outnumbered by perhaps as much as 2 to 1 on a battlefield between the cities of Tours and Poitier, Charles routs the Moorish forces, stopping the Muslim advance into Europe cold. It becomes known as the Battle of Tours (or Poitier), and many historians consider it one of the great turning points in world history. By their lights, Charles is a man who saved Western Civilization, a hero who well deserves the moniker the battle earned him: Martellus. We thus now know him as Charles Martel, which translates into Charles the Hammer.

The Gathering Threat in the East
While the Hammer saved Gaul, the Muslims would not stop hammering Christendom — and it would be the better part of four centuries before Europe would again hammer back. This brings us to the late 11th century and perhaps the best-known events of medieval history: the Crusades.

Funny how whenever White people fight back there is "controversy" surrounding it.

Wonder why that is?

On June 9, 721 ad., Duke Odo of Aquitaine defeated Al-Samh ibn Malik al-Khawlani before the walls of the besieged city of Toulouse. This battle, followed by the victories of King Pelayo of Asturias and Charles Martel at the battles of Covadonga and Tours, brought to an end a century of remarkably successful Islamic expansion. Over the next 760 years, the Umayyads' conquests on the Spanish peninsula were gradually rolled back by a succession of Christian kings, a long process disturbed by the usual shifting of alliances as well as varying degrees of ambition and military competence on both sides of the religious divide. The "Reconquista" was completed with the fall of Muslim Granada in 1492 to the Castilian forces of King Ferdinand.

The Spanish Inquisition, which began in 1481, cannot be understood without recognizing the significance of this epic 771-year struggle between Christians and Muslims over the Spanish peninsula. What took the great Berber Gen. Tariq ibn Zayid only eight years to conquer on behalf of the Umayyad Caliphate required almost 100 times as long to regain, and neither King Ferdinand II of Aragon nor his wife, Queen Isabella of Castile, was inclined to risk any possibility of having to repeat the grand endeavor. Isabella, in particular, was concerned about reports of conversos, purported Christians who had pretended to convert from Judaism but were still practicing their former religion. This was troubling, as it was reasonable to assume that those who were lying about their religious conversion were also lying about their loyalty to the united crowns and it was widely feared that Jews were again encouraging Muslim leaders to attempt the recapture of al-Andalus, as they had its original capture eight centuries before.

("It remains a fact that the Jews, either directly or through their coreligionists in Africa, encouraged the Mohammedans to conquer Spain." The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906). Vol XI, 485.)

What happened in between November 1478 and September 1480 to inspire this sudden burst of action? While historians such as Henry Kamen pronounce themselves baffled as to what could have provoked the Spanish crown, the most likely impetus was that on July 28, three months before Ferdinand's decision to appoint the two inquisitors, a Turkish fleet led by Gedik Ahmed Pasha attacked the Aragonese city of Otranto. Otranto fell on Aug. 11, and more than half of the city's 20,000 people were slaughtered during the sack of the city. The archbishop was killed in the cathedral, and the garrison commander was killed by being sawed in half, alive, as was a bishop named Stephen Pendinelli. But the most infamous event was when the captured men of Otranto were given the choice to convert to Islam or die; 800 of them held to their Christian faith and were beheaded en masse at a place now known as the Hill of the Martyrs. The Turkish fleet then went on to attack the cities of Vieste, Lecce, Taranto and Brindisi and destroyed the great library at the Monastero di San Nicholas di Casole before returning to Ottoman territory in November.

It is one of the great ironies of history that three times more people died in the forgotten event that almost surely inspired the Spanish Inquisition than died in the famous flames of the inquisition itself. Despite its reputation as one of the most vicious and lethal institutions in human history, the Spanish Inquisition was one of the most humane and decent of its time, and one could even argue the most reasonable, considering the circumstances.

-more here


A Case Presented...

from First Word,

The “holocaust” story connected with the narrative of World War 2 is often claimed to be “the most thoroughly documented fact in all of history.” It turns out, however, that there are a number of prima facie reasons to question the official narrative. Here, I want to succinctly list a couple dozen reasons why I have become open to holocaust research. Number 1 is what opened my mind to the possibility; the rest are based on my preliminary scan of the state of affairs over the course of the last 3 or 4 years. I speak not as a professional historian, but as it were, a Grand Jury member applying common sense as to whether a case should be pursued further. It’s an indictment, not a verdict. Some of the reasons are weaker, some are stronger. Sometimes, I indicate some of the evidence; for others, not. For leads on where to start researching a particular item, feel free to inquire via commbox or email. In my mind, the last one in particular amounts to a virtual apodictic proof that at least something about the story is seriously wrong. But taking them all in correlative relation, I think the case for questioning the official story, and for the need for further research into this question, is established beyond all doubt.

(I. plausibility of big picture and motive)

1. The logistics needed to support the official story are stupendous

The number of total victims claimed used to vary wildly. In the 1980’s, a cousin of mine returned from an official tour and proclaimed to us with wild eyes that the number exterminated was actually over 20 million! Usually, however, the number of non-jewish victims is always kept just a little below that of the jewish victims, i.e. 5 million compared to their six. So stick with that for a moment.

As a budding Physicist, I was encouraged from a young age to visualize quantities, not just memorize them. If a dinosaur is said to be 30 feet tall, I look at a building and imagine a head poking in through a third-story window. That makes it vivid. We were also trained to do “order of magnitude” sanity checks of our calculations. One of my students carried out this agenda in a clever way. He supposed that every time a tire rotated, a one- atom- thick radius of rubber was removed by contact with the pavement. He then looked up the inter-atomic spacing of rubber, and calculated how long a tire should last. To order-of-magnitude, the tire life came out to be approximately right. That is the right way to test a model in a preliminary way.

Now, the serious accounts of the holocaust suggest that it took place mainly over a period of about two years — say, mid 1942 to mid-1944. Say there were six “death camps.” Then the average camp had to dispatch about 2 million victims, or 1 million per year. That is 20,000 per week, or 4,000 per day, if weekends or other rest days are allowed for.

4,000 per day, day in, day out, gassed, incinerated, and disposed of, for two years without letup, during the time that a desperate war was being waged, in which the Wehrmacht often had to resort to horses and wagons for its own logistics. Look up how long it takes a crematorium to incinerate one body with a Google search, and continue the calculation.

Perhaps, as Rocco in Godfather 2 said, “difficult; not impossible.” But almost impossible. Maybe impossible. It staggers the imagination in any case.

It was this kind of thought that first made me, with my background, open to the possibility of holocaust research. But it took years before I could work up the courage to actually start doing it.

2. There is more than one big-picture narrative, and these are contradictory

For example:

“No one knew” about the holocaust. That’s why it was rarely or never referred to explicitly by the officials.

On the other hand, “everyone knew” (e.g. the movie Amen.) That’s why the mass destruction of the German cities is justified, and never-ending reparations.

Likewise, at Treblinka, the bodies were dug up and burned, and everything bulldozed over without a trace, to remove all evidence prior to the allied victory.

On the other hand, “exterminations continued to the last day of the war” (e.g. the film We Were So Beloved).

Listen to enough discussions of the story with ears perked up, and such contradictory covering propositions will quickly be discovered. We know from logic that once contradictions are allowed, anything can be proved.

-rest of the list here


Re-Up (First They Came For The Statisticians)...

Rabbi Wise's Address

'There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism. They come not to beg, but ask for that which is higher than all material things. They seek to have satisfied the unquenchable thirst after the ideal. They ask to become once again the messengers of right, justice, and humanity."
The New York Times June 11 1900, page 7


Jacob H. Schiff, Meyer London, and Dr. Enelow Plead with the Rich to Give.

"Louis Marshall, speaking at a meeting in Temple Emanu-El last night, deplored what he termed the failure of the Jews of America, particularly of New York, to realize the terrible calamity that has overtaken the millions of Jews whose homes are in the eastern theater of the European war.

...more than 6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone; Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow..."
The New York Times January 14 1915

Germans Let Jews Die. Women and Children
in Warsaw Starving to Death

"Through the Intelligence Department of the Mayor's Committee on National Defense, the Provisional Zionist Committee last night made public a letter describing conditions among Jews in Warsaw under German rule....It is witnessed here all over, in every street, in every step, in every house. Jewish mothers, mothers of mercy, feel happy to see their nursing babies die; at least they are through with their suffering.....The veracity and authenticity of the letter is vouched for by the Zionist Committee,"
The New York Times August 10 1917


"Approval of the plans of Zionist leaders for the creation of a national Jewish Commonwealth in Palestine was given tonight by President Wilson to a delegation of representative American Jewish Leaders who spent an hour at the White House in conference with the President over the international status of Jews around the world.....Rabbi Wise spoke of the aspirations and hopes of American Jews and of Jewry around the world, told of his recent visit to Paris, in its bearing on the Peace Conference, and discussed the League of Nations, predicting that it would be part of the final Peace Treaty......The real question now is whether we will form a League of Nations, whether we will stay where we are and help keep the peace of the world, or come back here and have to go back and make war again."
The New York Times March 3 1919, page 1

Russian Revolution?

"It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type...
A table made up in 1918, by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the
London Times in Russia, shows at that time there were 384 commissars including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government."
Captain Montgomery Schuyler, military intelligence officer in Russia
U.S. National Archives. Record group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9, 1919.
-from Wikipedia note 16


"Felix M. Warburg, Chairman of the Joint Distribution Committee of American Funds for Jewish War Sufferers, who returned several days ago from a trip to Europe for that organization, made public yesterday some of his findings.....'The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of European Jewry,' he said, 'and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls.."
The New York Times November 12 1919, page 7

Non-Sectarian Appeal for $7,500,000 Starts Today with Sermons in All Churches.

"A famished child upon the auction block, a mother in the foreground pleading for aid, death with outstretched arms lurking near and the legend, 'Shall Death Be the Highest Bidder?'
$7,500,000 to be raised here this week by the Greater New York Appeal for Jewish War Sufferers.....'Hunger, cold rags, desolation, disease, death - Six million human beings, without food, shelter, clothing or medical treatment"
The New York Times May 2nd 1920, Section 2 page 1

(Former Governor of the State of N.Y.)

"From across the sea SIX MILLION men and women call to us for help, and eight
hundred thousand little children cry for bread....six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life.....In this threatened holocaust of life....."

The American Hebrew October 31 1919


"CALSBAD, Aug. 27 (Jewish Telegraphic Agency).--"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world's peace," declared Dr. Nahum Sokolow, Chairman of the Zionist Exocutive Committee, at a special meeting of the Zionist Conference today."
The New York Times August 27 1922 page 10

Ran the Front page headline from the Daily Express, March 24 1933, promising a boycott of German Goods.

Six years later World War II began. Lasting for Six Years, and ending with the Ruin of Europe, the destruction of Germany, the handing over of half of Europe to the Bolsheviks, the collapse of the British Empire, the beginning of the Cold War and the spread of Marxist demagoguery....
But....But it also led to the establishment of the United Nations, the fulfillment of Zionist ambitions in the creation of the state of Israel and Jerusalem designated an International City...

Of course the Arabs had a different vision for their homelands and war soon followed.

So, WWI gave us sad stories of six million persecuted Jews and a League of Nations. Neither one took.
WWII gave us sad stories of six million persecuted Jews and the United Nations. This time, both took.
Still, no capital of the world in Jerusalem, and the United Nations has limited power....
WWIII will give us....?

by Nathan Burstien

"It's a list of "the world's most powerful people," 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It's an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power.
More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish."

The Jerusalem Post October 12 2007


Thursday, February 18, 2010

The Cult Reaches Its End...

“We already have low marriage rates in low-income communities,” Edin told me, “including white communities. And where it’s really hitting now is in working-class urban and rural communities, where you’re just seeing astonishing growth in the rates of nonmarital childbearing. And that would all be fine and good, except these parents don’t stay together. This may be one of the most devastating impacts of the recession.”

Many children are already suffering in this recession, for a variety of reasons. Among poor families, nutrition can be inadequate in hard times, hampering children’s mental and physical development. And regardless of social class, the stresses and distractions that afflict unemployed parents also afflict their kids, who are more likely to repeat a grade in school, and who on average earn less as adults. Children with unemployed fathers seem particularly vulnerable to psychological problems.

But a large body of research shows that one of the worst things for children, in the long run, is an unstable family. By the time the average out-of-wedlock child has reached the age of 5, his or her mother will have had two or three significant relationships with men other than the father, and the child will typically have at least one half sibling. This kind of churning is terrible for children—heightening the risks of mental-health problems, troubles at school, teenage delinquency, and so on—and we’re likely to see more and more of it, the longer this malaise stretches on.

“We could be headed in a direction where, among elites, marriage and family are conventional, but for substantial portions of society, life is more matriarchal,” says Wilcox. The marginalization of working-class men in family life has far-reaching consequences. “Marriage plays an important role in civilizing men. They work harder, longer, more strategically. They spend less time in bars and more time in church, less with friends and more with kin. And they’re happier and healthier.”

Communities with large numbers of unmarried, jobless men take on an unsavory character over time. Edin’s research team spent part of last summer in Northeast and South Philadelphia, conducting in-depth interviews with residents. She says she was struck by what she saw: “These white working-class communities—once strong, vibrant, proud communities, often organized around big industries—they’re just in terrible straits. The social fabric of these places is just shredding. There’s little engagement in religious life, and the old civic organizations that people used to belong to are fading. Drugs have ravaged these communities, along with divorce, alcoholism, violence. I hang around these neighborhoods in South Philadelphia, and I think, ‘This is beginning to look like the black inner-city neighborhoods we’ve been studying for the past 20 years.’ When young men can’t transition into formal-sector jobs, they sell drugs and drink and do drugs. And it wreaks havoc on family life. They think, ‘Hey, if I’m 23 and I don’t have a baby, there’s something wrong with me.’ They’re following the pattern of their fathers in terms of the timing of childbearing, but they don’t have the jobs to support it. So their families are falling apart—and often spectacularly.”


The good old lefty Atlantic.

What's "funny" is that all of the above problems the article laments were caused directly by liberalism.

The unemployment rates and family disfunction are the results of,


No-fault divorce

Mass migration (legal and illegal) from the third world

The Welfare State

An ever expanding, ever more controlling, government

Left of center education

A media (movies, tv, magazines, etc..) which glamorize dysfunction



Yet, nature has a way of self-correcting.

Liberalism is based on the selfish fiction of an insane few. It has no basis in reality and is thus infinitely and eternally untenable.

It was best represented by Jonestown, wherein a group of racially diverse people gathered in a community to espouse the glories of tolerance, equality and diversity (under the overt expression of quintessential liberal ideals) and then committed mass suicide.

That is liberalism.

It is an ideology of destructive behavior culminating in death.

That it disguises itself as heaven even as it leaves a path of pain and sorrow in its wake should be signal enough to most.

Yet, as usual, it takes hitting the bottom for many before they will quit the behavior that laid them low...


Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The Weird, Wacky World Of "Anti-Racists"...

'How to raise racist kids'

Step One: Don’t talk about race. Don’t point out skin color. Be “color blind.”

Step Two: Actually, that’s it. There is no Step Two.

Congratulations! Your children are well on their way to believing that is better than everybody else.

Surprised? So were authors Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman when they started researching the issue of kids and race for their book NurtureShock. It turns out that a lot of our assumptions about raising our kids to appreciate diversity are entirely wrong:

“It is tempting to believe that because their generation is so diverse, today’s children grow up knowing how to get along with people of every race. But numerous studies suggest that this is more of a fantasy than a fact.”

{snip} What Bronson and Merryman discovered, through various studies, was that most white parents don’t ever talk to their kids about race. The attitude (at least of those who think racism is wrong) is generally that because we want our kids to be color-blind, we don’t point out skin color. We’ll say things like “everybody’s equal” but find it hard to be more specific than that. If our kids point out somebody who looks different, we shush them and tell them it’s rude to talk about it. We think that simply putting our kids in a diverse environment will teach them that diversity is natural and good.

And what are they learning? Here are a few depressing facts:

* Only 8% of white American high-schoolers have a best friend of another race. (For blacks, it’s about 15%.)

* The more diverse a school is, the less likely it is that kids will form cross-race friendships.

* 75% of white parents never or almost never talk about race with their kids.

* A child’s attitudes toward race are much harder to alter after third grade, but a lot of parents wait until then (or later) before they feel it’s “safe” to talk frankly about race.


So, in honor of Black History Month, talk to your kids about race. Need some help? Parenting.com recently posted 5 Tips for Talking About Racism With Kids. {snip}


I thought there was no such thing as race?

Nope, actually what the left means is that there is no such thing as a White race........accept of course when it comes to articles about "racism", colonialism, the Atlantic slave trade (shhh! let's not talk about those other slave traders down through the eons and up to the present) and so on.

But the admission of the article is rather bold in its hypocrisy.

It states that,

A. People become conscience of race all on their own, naturally.

B. The more "diverse" a place is (school, neighborhood, institution etc..) the more the various races stick to their own kind (which backs up the rule which states that White people's tolerance for diversity is directly correlated to their distance from it).

And it ends with a call to celebrate "black history month" while suggesting White parents talk to their under 10 children about race.

Let's see,

White parents,

black history month,

Conversation about race,

......but there's no such thing as race.

Got that?



Monday, February 15, 2010


Approximately 1/2 of immigrant households (both legal and illegal) with kids access welfare services, primarily food and Medicaid. Many argue that immigration is a social issue, but it's a fiscal issue as well.

The immigrant population has grown by an average of 1.3 million per year since 2000, plus an additional 1 million new births in those households. That's 23 million new people every decade, and HALF of all immigrant families are using welfare, especially food and Medicaid welfare! This includes illegal AND legal immigrants.


And this of course doesn't include schooling, hospital services for those not paying or who have no coverage, the rising expenses in crime related areas and imprisonment.

Immigration is literally draining America and turning it into yet another third world slum.

Like the Titanic it will eventually snap and sink...


Everything But The Obvious...

The Democrats’ loss of the Massachusetts Senate seat long held by Teddy Kennedy has driven Washington, which had spent most of the last couple of years worrying about subsidizing Wall Street and socializing health care, into finally starting to think about jobs.

It’s about time. The March issue of The Atlantic features Don Peck’s long, well-researched, and deeply depressing cover story How a New Jobless Era Will Transform America. Peck reports:

“[Men have] suffered roughly three-quarters of the 8 million job losses since the beginning of 2008 … In November, 19.4 percent of all men in their prime working years, 25 to 54, did not have jobs, the highest figure since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking the statistic in 1948.”

The implications, as Peck explains, are baleful:

“… this era of high joblessness is probably just beginning. Before it ends, it will likely … leave an indelible imprint on many blue-collar men. It could cripple marriage as an institution in many communities. It may already be plunging many inner cities into a despair not seen for decades.“

Despite the gravity of the unemployment problem, there has been almost zero discussion in the Main Stream Media of the role of immigration policy in how we got here—



Sunday, February 14, 2010

"Global Warming" And "Racial Equality"...

  • Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
  • There has been no global warming since 1995
  • Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes

The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.

Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.


Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.


No, the world is not going to melt and no, the races are not equal.

Too much of science today gives way to social politics.

Reality, however, still abounds.

By Professor J. Philippe Rushton

In his book, Intelligence and How to Get It, Richard E. Nisbett, a social psychologist at the University of Michigan, asserts that cultural factors alone are sufficient to explain all the race differences to be observed in IQ and educational achievement.

Nisbett [Email] criticizes the nature + nurture model Arthur Jensen and I presented in 2005 in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. . [Thirty Years Of Research On Race Differences In Cognitive Ability (PDF)] Nisbett claims the heritability of IQ is lower than assumed, that Blacks have substantially narrowed the gap on Whites, that any remaining differences can be eliminated through educational and social intervention, and that any assertion of a mean IQ of 70 for sub-Saharan Africans is “desperately wrong”.

The dust jacket blurb puts Nisbett’s book in the tradition of Stephen Jay Gould’s Mismeasure of Man (1981, 1996). What is striking, however, is how much ground the egalitarians have given since Gould’s effort to debunk race, genetics, and IQ.

Nisbett concedes that general intelligence exists, that IQ tests predict success at both school and work, that scores are influenced by genes, and that in White populations, genes contribute to social class differences. He even accepts that IQ is related to brain size and that “Blacks are sometimes found to have smaller brains than Whites”. Gould must be spinning in his grave!

Such is the state of expert opinion today that Nisbett simply had to make these concessions lest his book be disqualified as serious scholarship. But while he admits that genes play a role in accounting for within-group differences, he still maintains they play no significant part in between-group differences.

Nisbett acknowledges that measured group differences exist: Jewish (mean IQ = 113), East Asian (107), White (100), South Asian (87), Hispanic (87), African American (85), and sub-Saharan African (70), although he erroneously claims that South Asians score as highly as East Asians. But Nisbett asserts that family pressure for success leads East Asians and Jews to high levels of achievement, while low expectations and a lack of opportunity lead Hispanics and Blacks to much lower levels of achievement.

Jensen and I have provided a long point-counterpoint review of Nisbett’s book in The Open Psychology Journal. [Race and IQ: A Theory-Based Review of the Research in Richard Nisbett’s Intelligence and How to Get It(PDF)] We found much that was admirable and informative in it, such as the cost-benefit survey of the literature on educational interventions and what can be done to increase school performance. But, sadly, we concluded it was mainly a work of advocacy, not scholarship.

Nisbett misrepresents much of the available information using highly selective reviews of the literature. Especially egregious are his many errors of omission. For example, while complaining of unrepresentative samples in a 1991 review paper by Richard Lynn, Nisbett side-stepped the very much larger compilation of data in Lynn and Vanhanen’s 2006 book. Nisbett completely ignores the adoption studies of East Asians, as well as those on brain size showing a genetic contribution to their high achievement.

I’m going to group Nisbett’s flaws under seven heads:

-the rest here


Friday, February 12, 2010

History: Enemy Of The People!...

Academics have attacked a decision by a top university to scrap research into English history before 1700.

It was claimed that the move by Sussex University risked jeopardising the nation’s understanding of the subject and “entrenching the ignorance of the present”.

Under plans, research and in-depth teaching into periods such as the Tudors, the Middle-Ages, Norman Britain, the Viking invasion and the Anglo-Saxons will be scrapped, along with the Civil Wars.


History has always been an enemy of The Left.

When they aren't re-writing it they're outright banning it from being taught. That's because liberalism is generally the denial of reality. And history confirms reality.

The excuse of budget cuts is par for the course as well.

How much money does the British government spend on its vast welfare state that is currently flooding Britain with thirdworlders?

It's all by design.

It's all on schedule.

Britain is on its way to becoming another Haiti.


Thursday, February 11, 2010

Converting To A New Ethnicity?...

From the tenth to the sixth centuries B.C., the Greeks were able to form colonies from Spain to the Caucuses. Geneticists can still find traces of this colonization across the Mediterranean basin. When Ancient Greece was at its peak in the fifth and fourth centuries B.C., writers considered the city-states overpopulated. But by the second century B.C., Polybius would write:

“In our own time the whole of Greece has been subject to a low birth-rate and a general decrease of the population, owing to which cities have become deserted and the land has ceased to yield fruit although there have neither been continuous wars nor epidemics...For men had fallen into such a state of pretentiousness, avarice and indolence that they did not wish to marry, or if they married to rear the children born to them, or at most as a rule but one or two of them.”

As Greece fell, Rome rose. The evolution of that civilization seems to have been similar. After Hannibal and his troops wiped out 80,000 Roman soldiers in the third century B.C. there was no trouble in raising a new army. But only two centuries later Ovid would lament, “Rare is in our time [the woman] who wants to be a parent.” [Raraque in hoc aevo est quae velit esse parens.]

The emperor Augustus passed laws to increase fertility, but they were a failure. The rulers of the Antonine dynasty remained childless. They were able to maintain good governance that way because there were no incompetent or evil sons to take power. Unfortunately, there would soon be nobody to govern.

Actually, not everybody stopped breeding. There was one small cult the encouraged its flock to “be fruitful and multiply”. That cult was, of course, Christianity.

To have a respectable hypothesis about why Christians displaced pagans, all we have to do is use the same logic that might explain why the Cro-Magnons replaced the Neanderthals. If from 50 A.D. to 450 A.D. Christians had a 20 percent higher fertility rate than Pagans, Christians could’ve gone from two percent of the population to 20 percent. And the difference in birth rates was probably much larger.

In Europe today, whites are the new Pagans and Muslims the new Christians.


I highlighted that last part to illustrate how asinine such arguments are.

The native Europeans circa 3rd century through the 11th century BECAME Christians. They didn't immigrate into Europe from elsewhere.

The muslims in Europe today are not native Europeans converting. They're the result of mass migration.

The argument that the falling birthrates in The West is connected with thirdworld immigration is mere propaganda from the left.

There are more than 3 times as many people in Europe today as there was just two hundred years ago.

There are, if anything, too many people in The West today, not too few.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Good Christians Make Orphans Of Their Children....

At least, that's according to Albert Mohler, head-cheese of the Southern Baptists.

The boy had been given the penguin just after his birth. A Dutch couple was in the process of adopting him almost from the start of his life...


Richard and Rowena Pet were the young Dutch couple who wanted so badly to be Arno's mother and father. They had struggled with infertility for years before deciding to adopt. As they awaited the adoption of Arno, Rowena became pregnant. Last August she gave birth to Jim, who was left in the care of relatives as Richard and Rowena flew to Haiti in January to claim Arno and complete the adoption process.


According to Charter, adoptive parents often stay at the Hotel Villa Therese in the PĂ©tionville district of Port-au-Prince. That is where Richard and Rowena took Arno. That is where they were when the earthquake came. And that is where they died together.


Who can read this account without heartbreak . . . and a heart warmed? Is there a heart so cold that it does not feel the pathos of this report, and sense the sentiment of this family's tragedy?


Adoption is perhaps the most powerful depiction of the Gospel found in the Bible. We are all orphans, born under the curse of sin. By the sheer grace and mercy of God, those who come to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ are adopted as sons. Redeemed sinners are adopted as sons "through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will, to the praise and glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved." [Ephesians 1:5-6]

Arno Pet began life as an orphan, but he ended life as a son. He was abandoned at his birth, but he died in the arms of his parents. He did not die as Arno, he died as Arno Pet.

In the rubble of the Hotel Villa Therese the film crew found the bodies of Richard and Rowena and Arno Pet. In that same rubble, we find a picture of the Gospel of Christ. He who has eyes to see, let him see.


So these people abandon their own flesh and blood to travel across the globe to pick up the newest accessory for middle-class White people (colored children) and die in the process, leaving their own child without parents, and we're suppose to feel warm and fuzzy about this?

Christians in America have completely lost it.

They've made an idol out of Israel, which is beyond ironic considering that judaism is the only religion/creed on planet earth that makes detesting Jesus a central tenant of its ideology.

They actively advocate for WWIII (calling for an attack on Iran) to make Jesus return all the sooner.

They proclaim their is no such thing as race even as they insist jews are God's chosen race.

And now they make heroes out of thoughtless dumb-asses who abandon their children and get killed in earthquakes, consequently (gee, maybe God's trying to tell all of these adopters something).


Sunday, February 7, 2010

Booby Traps?...

LONDON – Agents for Britain's MI5 intelligence service have discovered that Muslim doctors trained at some of Britain's leading teaching hospitals have returned to their own countries to fit surgical implants filled with explosives...

Women suicide bombers recruited by al-Qaida are known to have had the explosives inserted in their breasts under techniques similar to breast enhancing surgery. The lethal explosives – usually PETN (pentaerythritol Tetrabitrate) – are inserted during the operation inside the plastic shapes. The breast is then sewn up.


I suppose (if the above is true) this demonstrates al-Qaida has a sense of cultural irony. Targeting sex-obsessed America with "crotch bombers" and explosive hooters.

Still, it also points out the continuing threat of liberal immigration policies. We allow into our nations the very people who wish us harm.

Having said that, where is al-Quaida?

They're everywhere but nowhere.

If a government can gain intelligence on the organization's plots, why can't they target said organization?


Friday, February 5, 2010

And France Is On The Moon...

From the people who brought you, "race is just a social construct" and "the Holocaust" comes the continuing saga of "climategate"....

The Netherlands has asked the UN climate change panel to explain an inaccurate claim in a landmark 2007 report that more than half the country was below sea level, the Dutch government said Friday.

According to the Dutch authorities, only 26 percent of the country is below sea level....


Oh yeah, unelected bureaucratic "panels" sponsored (inevitably) by corporations and private foundations never lie. Why would they?

And scientists, they're never human beings who are driven by agendas or peer pressure, no sir.


Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Those Pesky White Devils!...

While we'd like to think celeb bible Vanity Fair puts a great deal of thought and planning into its annual "New Hollywood" issue, this year the editors really limited their scope when it came to choosing the next big stars. (Or perhaps they overemphasized the "Fair"? ) Every woman on its new cover is extremely thin and very, very white. Unless Vanity Fair considers one redhead to be diversity, we feel the need to cry foul.




An all White magazine cover!

This kind of particularism could lead to more egregious "sins" like, say, oh, I don't know, an all black congressional caucus!

Nope, no that's too far.

But still, it might lead to all black colleges or something.

Then what will we all do?


Why It's Justifiable To Hate Christians...

Editor's note: Doug Phillips currently is leading Rescue Haiti's Children, a project of Vision Forum Ministries, in quake-ravaged Haiti. The mission's goal is "to establish a distinctively Christian reporting operations in Haiti to tell stories of the present crisis and the work of Christians there; to minister to the widows, the orphans and the sick; to facilitate the rescue and delivery of orphans to Christian families in America; to identify specific families that need direct support from the people of God in America; and to provide specific relief to people in distress." Phillips will file a series of exclusive reports for WorldNetDaily from Haiti in the next several days.


Doug Phillips is a prick. Let's be honest.

His money-making scheme in Haiti is one of the over ten thousand such"charities" at work there designed to exploit Haitians and guilt riddled White Americans (it is ONLY Whites abducting non-White children from foreign countries).

His actions and the actions of those (Christians) like him will cause irreparable harm to my country and my community.

Haiti has around ten million citizens, 99% of whom were not directly affected by the earthquake. There is no reason these orphans should be abducted by Whites and taken away from their country and their people.

The fact that Phillips is using the earthquake to exploit the situation and the people there, makes him and others like him particularly reprehensible.

And make no mistake, what these "charitable" organizations are doing is using extortion (via the economic needs after the quake and the accompanying lack of governmental oversight) to facilitate the abduction of children.

Those running these "charities" are motivated by money and money alone.

Those who facilitate placing refugees in America are motivated by money and vanity.

Mercy or pity does not in any way factor into it. This is evidenced by the fact that these 'white-gods' go half way around the world to be charitable when there are untold numbers of destitute and sick right in their own back yards.

Instead they turn communities into living hellholes to satiate their own self-righteousness.

The increasing hatred aimed at Christians due to the actions of these money-grubbing hypocrites like Phillips is completely justifiable. As will be the accompanying intolerance and discrimination towards them.

Completely, 100%, justifiable.

I wrote the following over a year ago and it aptly describes Phillips and his ilk.

There is an old, outdated saying that goes, “Charity begins at home”. I say outdated because, obviously, today charity begins at least a thousand miles from home. Whether it is flying half-way around the world to bring their self-righteous selves to the savages or just simply bringing the savages back home, the missionaries and charitable types love to seek out those who are least like themselves and take the opportunity to bask in their own benevolence.

And to note, I use the word “savage” in the true spirit of these people who travel about the globe and dazzle various primitives with their presence. After all, charity automatically requires one person to be in a superior position and another to be in an inferior position.

No wonder then that the most charitable people often strike us as the most arrogant and pompous. So referring to the beneficiaries of such self-aggrandizing types as savages or primitives is only done in deference to the social vantage point the aggrandizers enjoy.

Actually, this kind of super-charity (as opposed to the kind that flows naturally back and forth between peoples of similar racial, social and cultural standings) finds its greatest acts of giving through indirect compulsory sacrifice on the part of others. For example, if you and your church/charity arrange to bring a savage into America, you are, through force and cohesion, compelling other members of your community into giving as well. Their taxes and resources will be automatically re-distributed to the savage through healthcare, education, housing and so on. This also happens when tax dollars are sent abroad for charitable purposes.

This, then, is not the community giving but rather the charitable taking. Thus charity has now become an act of aggression which ultimately leads to the despoiling and plundering of communities and (eventually) nations.

We can see this playing out in places like California where dozens of hospitals have been closed due to the financial strain caused by the rapid influx of the poor and needy from Latin America. Or in once peaceful neighborhoods turned into violence-filled ghettos. Or in the spread across the nation of new and renewed (once defeated) diseases. It can also be seen in Africa where charity (in the form of food and medicine supplied by The West) has allowed/facilitated the already violent and starving populations of dysfunctional nations to explode, increasing the violence and poverty by a factor of ten.

This modern mutation of charity has appeared in two separate yet markedly similar groups: White liberals and White Christians. Both groups have a strong compulsion to send other people’s tax dollars across the sea to non-Whites while at the same time importing other non-Whites into the West, compelling the rest of us to fork over even more tax dollars to pay for their housing, medical care, education and (probably later) imprisonment. They are two groups with the same Achilles’ heel.


I once saw a documentary in which a young man described his aspiration towards rock-stardom and what he hoped that would bring to him. He said, roughly, “I’d like to be a famous rock-star so I could, like, go visit some sick kid in a hospital who’s dying wish was to meet me.”

That completely sums up the motivation for White Christian/Liberal Charity. Egotistically, the sky is the limit! It’s amazing how much moral superiority an act of overt humbleness can generate.

And, of course, Corporate America loves this kind of “charity”. In fact, its motivations and cost-displacement mirrors the White Christian/Liberal. It imports cheap labor which works at half the wage citizens do while transferring the costs onto those very same citizens (taxpayers) in the form of, yes, housing, medical care, education and (probably later) imprisonment.

Adding to all of this are the people who are seemingly hypnotized by the concept of The Poor.

U.S. a Place of Miracles for Somali Refugees

TUCSON — The white wooden door swung open and the dazed African villagers stepped into their new home. It was a modest apartment with secondhand furniture and a stove in need of repairs. But to Osman Yarrow, his wife and five children, refugees from Somalia’s civil war, it seemed like a place of miracles.

Clean water coursed out of gleaming faucets, an astonishing luxury for a rural family who had spent more than a decade in mud huts without indoor plumbing. “Red for hot,” Mr. Yarrow repeated wonderingly as he held his fingers in the steady stream. “Blue for cold.”

There were flush toilets instead of pit latrines and beds instead of straw mats. But what Mr. Yarrow treasured most on his first day in his American home was a sense of security. In Somalia, he witnessed the execution of his father and son by marauding militias. In Kenya, his family huddled in bleak refugee camps while bullets sang in the night.

Here, he listened to the squeals of his children and the hum of a contraption called an air conditioner. “We will sleep without hearing gunshots,” he said. “We’re finally living in a safe place.”

Mr. Yarrow, 40, represents the changing face of America’s refugees. Since May, more than 200 members of his tribe, the Somali Bantu, have been flown to 22 cities across the United States, the first wave of one of the government’s largest recent refugee resettlement efforts.

By the end of next year, officials plan to resettle nearly 13,000 Bantu, who were enslaved and persecuted for generations in Somalia until civil war scattered them to desolate and violent refugee camps in Kenya in the early 1990’s.

Now, needless to say, there are people less fortunate than others. But what I am speaking of is The Poor, not a fact of global economic life but a spiritual condition: those who, in the mind of the White Christian/Liberal, have no other quality but being The Poor. Never are The Poor the present or future thieves, drug-dealers, rapists, murderers and crack-whores who we see in real life as comprising the permanent underclass. Never do White Christians/Liberals think of what hideous abuses and atrocious behaviors they will likely enable when they “give to The Poor”.

Nope, to the White Christian/Liberal the means justify the ends. And if that involves importing a group of refugees from a ramshackle country who will, once here, go about raping and/or killing American citizens, well then, so be it. For the White Christian/Liberal, that warm fuzzy feeling of “having done the right thing”, of having procured the requisite satisfaction with self, is far more important than some rape or murder on the distant horizon.

Ironically, and even when they are sincere, White Christians/Liberals are replacing themselves by bringing refugees into the West and aiding population growth in the Third World. Their beneficiaries do not share their charitable inclinations. The White Christian/Liberal has no non-White counterpart.

So what of healthy, in-group altruism? Obviously, it replaces the narcissistic version with a more general notion of paying into the pot from which we will all draw a wage of comfort one day. The cost stays with the giver … or volunteer, since volunteering is a highly sincere form of in-group altruism. In this, the more alike two individuals are the more honest the exchange of assistance will be. Historically, when two parties of dissimilar race/ethnicity engage in assistance, it more often than not leads to usury.

Reciprocity is beautiful. Helping and aiding those of your own kind ensures greater community harmony and a better chance for the spread of your genes which those of your kindred will share.

Assistance given to those outside of your own kind, meanwhile, provides no physical benefit to the giver. In fact the dispersal of aid to those outside your own group diminishes such resources amongst kindred peoples and, therefore, is detrimental to the community.

In the strongest terms possible Charity is, at best, plain old fashion hubris and at worst a deep seated pathology. The White Christian/Liberal will drive past their local nursing homes, homeless shelters, etc, where far too many elderly Whites wither away poor, sick and alone, and head for the airport to fly off to exotic locales to find someone more deserving (non-Whites) of their glorious selves.

Charity then, if it is to be motivated by anything other than narcissism and arrogance, must not only begin at home but stay at home. But since the very concept behind the word will always appeal to the pride of fools, it doubtless never will. Arrogance will nurture it till it bears its ultimate fruit, the desolation of Western communities. And that is hardly hyperbole, since we can see that very thing happening to the West, and a portion of the despoiling of our nation at the hands of non-Whites has been justified in the name of charity.

And so there is a contemporary analysis of the motivations of the modern manifestation of the Charitable. Their actions are not done in the name of love, kindness, mercy or benevolence, for those are gifts that can never be given to strangers but, with a sincere heart, only to those of your own kin. Their actions are done with as much societal pomp as possible to adorn their own self-image, while the civilization that raised them up slides into a semi-functional state.

In conclusion … if you have something with which you can afford to part, then give it only to those whom you know (as in close friends and family) ... and those who you know will actually need it, and will use it well.