Wednesday, March 31, 2010

To Race Or Not To Race...

from Stever Sailer,

A friend comments:
This is weirdly fascinating. The proposition that individuals can differ by innate mental ability and that races can differ by the average of such abilities:

1) conflicts with no major Western religious tradition;

2) conflicts with no major Western philosophical tradition;

3) is consistent with everyday experience;

4) is probably believed by the majority of ordinary people of all races;

5) is consistent with the weight of evidence from the most exhaustive and sophisticated empirical studies;

6) is consistent with, indeed is an almost inevitable implication of, the most basic version of evolutionary theory, which theory all educated people are supposed to accept.

And yet the operative assumption of government policy and the protocols of almost all public journals are that this proposition cannot be true.


Yes, leftism is composed of multilayered, overlapping, hypocrisies.

Case in point,

The Obama administration has asked a federal appeals court to uphold a race-conscious admissions system at the University of Texas at Austin, aiming to stymie a lawsuit that conservatives hope will spur the Supreme Court to limit affirmative action at public colleges.

The Texas case tests a 2003 Supreme Court decision that upheld a race-conscious admissions system at the University of Michigan Law School. That ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger said the law school had "a compelling interest in attaining a diverse student body."


And of of course, if there is no such thing as race, then there's no such thing as diversity.

and on it goes....


Lesson's Not Learned...

The unsolved murder Saturday of a soft-spoken rancher in southern Arizona has become a new flashpoint in the debate over illegal immigration, with conservative media and politicians demanding increased border security.

Less than two days after authorities found the body of 58-year-old Robert Krentz, political bloggers and talk-show hosts began denouncing the federal government for a perceived failure to protect U.S. civilians from violent smugglers and other illegal border crossers.


The body was discovered in an all-terrain vehicle shortly before midnight by an Arizona Department of Public Safety search helicopter. Capas said Krentz, who was married with three children, apparently managed to drive a short distance from the shooting scene before he became unconscious. His dog also had been critically wounded.

Capas said Phil Krentz had called Border Patrol agents to the Krentz Ranch one day before the homicide after witnessing illegal immigrant activity. She said the agents found more than 200 pounds of discarded marijuana and arrested eight undocumented immigrants in the area.


However, Aja and others said Krentz was always soft-spoken and thoughtful, willing to help immigrants who became lost or desperate after entering the country unlawfully. "Rob Krentz, first of all, was a very gentle soul," Aja said. "He was a caretaker for his family, for the land and for the animals he raised."


Pity and Mercy are generally thought to be ideological virtues. In practice, however, they are generally a deadly vice that has caused more pain and suffering than smallpox.


Yes, We Are Being Invaded...

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, Rep.-Iowa...

But the carnage wrought by illegal alien murderers represents only a fraction of the pool of blood spilled by American citizens as a result of an open border and un-enforced immigration laws.

While King reports 12 Americans are murdered daily by illegal aliens, he says 13 are killed by drunk illegal alien drivers

(The Narrator note: For those keeping count, that means that since September 11, 2001, approx. 55,000 Americans have been killed by illegal immigrants!)

King also reports eight American children are victims of sexual abuse by illegal aliens every day – a total of 2,920 annually.

Based on a one-year in-depth study, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute of Atlanta estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each. She analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 that included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants.

As the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. increases, so does the number of American victims. the end of 2003, approximately 267,000 illegal aliens were incarcerated in all U.S. jails and prisons.

In April 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a report on a study of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003. It found the following:

  • The 55,322 illegal aliens studied represented a total of 459,614 arrests – some eight arrests per illegal alien;
  • Their arrests represented a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses – some 13 offenses per illegal alien;
  • 36 percent had been arrested at least five times before.


WASHINGTON – Mexican drug cartels operating in cities in the U.S. are buying up legitimate businesses to launder money and using some of the proceeds to win local mayoral and city council seats for politicians who can shape the policies and personnel decisions of their police forces, according to Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo....
Tancredo exposes what he has learned from meetings with law enforcement authorities regarding a concerted effort by the Mexican mafia and drug cartels to extend their corruptive influence in urban areas dominated by illegal alien populations.

"The Tijuana-based Felix drug cartel and the Juarez-based Fuentes cartel began buying legitimate business in small towns in Los Angeles County in the early 1990s," he writes in his new book published by WND Books. "They purchased restaurants, used-car lots, auto-body shops and other small businesses. One of their purposes was to use these businesses for money-laundering operations. Once established in their community, these cartel-financed business owners ran for city council and other local offices. Over time, they were able to buy votes and influence in an effort to take over the management of the town. They wanted to create a comfort zone from which they could operate without interference from local law enforcement." an example, to the L.A. County city of Bell Gardens – where corrupt elected officials under the influence of drug lords actually tried to shut down the police department.

"City officials who would not cooperate with the Mexican-born city manager were forced out of office," he writes. "Eventually, the L.A. County attorney's office moved in, and the city manager was prosecuted on charges of corruption. Unfortunately, Bell Gardens was only the tip of the iceberg. Other Los Angeles suburbs – including Huntington Park, Lynwood and Southgate – became targets for the cartels."

In fact, similar efforts to undermine law and order by Mexican criminal gangs are under way, Tancredo says, in Texas, Arizona and elsewhere. "The corruption spreading from south of the border is not confined to Southern California," he writes.

The number of illegals in America is unknown, but is estimated to be between 12 to 30 million. Every day thousands more pour across the border...
And these numbers do not even touch upon the millions more legal immigrants who are flooding the nation...

The New Century Foundation released the following report,

The great majority of Hispanics — 66 percent — are of Mexican origin. No less than ten percent of the population of Mexico now lives in the United States, and one out of every seven Mexican workers migrates here.(3) Many more would like to come: According to a recent survey, almost half of all Mexicans said that they would move to the United States if they had the chance.(4)

The 33 percent of Hispanics who are not from Mexico have mainly the following heritages: 17 percent Latin American, nine percent Puerto Rican, and four percent Cuban (See figure to the right).(5) The characteristics of these populations are often quite different, with Cuban immigrants generally more economically successful than those from Mexico, Central America, or Puerto Rico.

Major Findings

Income and Wealth

  • Per capita income of Hispanics is one half that of non-Hispanic whites, and household net worth is less than one tenth.

  • Fifty percent of Hispanic households use some form of welfare, the highest rate of any major population group.


  • Hispanics are 3.3 times more likely to be in prison than whites; they are 4.2 times more likely to be in prison for murder, and 5.8 times more likely to be in prison for felony drug crimes.

  • Young Hispanics are 19 times more likely than young whites (and slightly more likely than young blacks) to be in youth gangs.


  • Hispanics drop out of high school at three times the white rate and twice the black rate.

  • Even third-generation Hispanics drop out of school at a higher rate than blacks and are less likely to be college graduates.

  • From 1992 to 2003, Hispanic illiteracy in English rose from 35 percent to 44 percent.

  • The average Hispanic 12th-grader reads and does math at the level of the average white 8th-grader.

Families and Health

  • At 43 percent, the Hispanic illegitimacy rate is twice the white rate, and Hispanic women have abortions at 2.7 times the white rate.

  • Hispanics are three times more likely than whites not to have medical insurance, and die from AIDS and tuberculosis at three times the white rate.

  • In California, the cost of free medical care for illegal aliens forced 60 hospitals to close between 1993 and 2003.


  • Only 33 percent of citizens of Hispanic origin consider themselves "Americans" first. The rest consider themselves either "Hispanic/Latino" or their former nationality first.

article here

"...the increasing number of illegal aliens coming into the United States is forcing the closure of hospitals, spreading previously vanquished diseases and threatening to destroy America's prized health-care system, says a report in the spring issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

"The influx of illegal aliens has serious hidden medical consequences," writes Madeleine Pelner Cosman, author of the report. "We judge reality primarily by what we see. But what we do not see can be more dangerous, more expensive, and more deadly than what is seen."

According to her study, 84 California hospitals are closing their doors as a direct result of the rising number of illegal aliens and their non-reimbursed tax on the system.

In addition, the report says, "many illegal aliens harbor fatal diseases that American medicine fought and vanquished long ago, such as drug-resistant tuberculosis, malaria, leprosy, plague, polio, dengue, and Chagas disease."

Among the organizations directing illegal aliens into America's medical systems, according to the report, are the Ford Foundation-funded Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Immigration Law Center, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association's Commission on Immigration Policy, Practice, and Pro Bono, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the National Council of La Raza, George Soros's Open Society Institute, the Migration Policy Institute, the National Network for Immigration and Refugee Rights and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Many illegals entering this country have tuberculosis, according to the report.

"TB's swift, deadly return now is lethal for about 60 percent of those infected because of new Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Until recently MDR-TB was endemic to Mexico. This Mycobacterium tuberculosis is resistant to at least two major anti-tubercular drugs. Ordinary TB usually is cured in six months with four drugs that cost about $2,000. MDR-TB takes 24 months with many expensive drugs that cost around $250,000 with toxic side effects. Each illegal with MDR-TB coughs and infects 10 to 30 people, who will not show symptoms immediately. Latent disease explodes later.

TB was virtually absent in Virginia until in 2002, when it spiked a 17 percent increase, but Prince William County, just south of Washington, D.C., had a much larger rise of 188 percent. Public health officials blamed immigrants. In 2001 the Indiana School of Medicine studied an outbreak of MDR-TB, and traced it to Mexican illegal aliens. The Queens, New York, health department attributed 81 percent of new TB cases in 2001 to immigrants. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ascribed 42 percent of all new TB cases to 'foreign born' people who have up to eight times higher incidences.."



The Root...

And the “Hutaree militia”? I’m now old and scarred enough to say openly what as an MSM editor I would merely have cunningly proposed as an interesting hypothesis to some energetic young reporter: I don’t believe it. I don’t believe that any group of white blue collar workers would naturally want to attack the local police, another blue collar group.

I think, as Richard Hoste has argued, that it’s far more likely to turn out to be a case of entrapment by some ambitious prosecutor trying to please his/her political masters.

Of course, I may be wrong. I admit I am influenced by Paul Craig Roberts criticisms of prosecutorial abuse. I remain puzzled by Oklahoma City. (For that matter, I am puzzled why any would-be terrorist doesn’t just pick up a gun and walk into a crowded place like Major Hasan at Fort Hood).

But even if I am wrong, the left-right imbalance is flagrant. In America today, it is whites, and conservatives, who are physically afraid.

Ben Franklin famously told a questioner that the Constitutional convention had given America “a republic—if you can keep it.”

Thanks to immigration policy, America now is an empire—made up of warring, incompatible, mutually uncomprehending ethnic groups—if it can survive it.
-Peter Brimelow

And they'll continue to be physically afraid (and inevitably physically assaulted) until they get over the generic guilt trip leftist ideologues and "neo-con" republocrats continue to thrust on them.

To understand more on the cause of this, see here.


Saturday, March 27, 2010

In The Land Of Ten Million Invaders...

When Shannon Anderson asked the police officers standing on the porch of her Orland home why they planned to arrest her, an officer radioed the question to headquarters.

It was a recent March Monday, and Anderson had answered the door in her shorts, T-shirt and socks, hardly expecting to be greeted with handcuffs by Orland police officers. She was shocked by the one-word response that came back over the police radio: truancy. Then, the 37-year-old mother of four was booked into Glenn County Jail on a $10,000 warrant.

Anderson soon realized she had been arrested in connection with her dispute with the Orland Unified School District over her youngest son’s attendance record. Eight-year-old Logan suffers from asthma, the cause of most of his 24 absences this school year. Anderson has been able to persuade the school to excuse only 14 of the absences, even though she says that in some of those cases the district nurse agreed Logan should go home.

The charges filed against her were serious and distressing. There was a felony forgery charge based on the allegation she had altered a doctor’s note. There was a charge she had violated the education code by failing to get her child to school. And the same charges were filed against her husband, Jamie, who was arrested and jailed the following day.


If this shocks you, you're a worthless ass.

Sorry, but the time to have been outraged about this sort of thing was 50 years ago.

Americans have become fat, lazy and willfully ignorant and apathetic.

The best they can do is gather in orderly, government approved, "protests" and then brag afterwords about how calm and respectful it was and how they cleaned up afterwords.

This is why said government laughed at them and ignored them.

And for those who just don't like to "fret" about the long-term, consider that "healthcare" is both physical and mental. If the government can enforce and regulate it then they can then oversee the "mental health" of your household.

So if they determine that, say, Christianity or patriotism are mental disorders, they can take your kids from you on the grounds of defending their "healthcare rights".

Liberalism is pro-active evil. It is not a mere mistaken ideology of well meaning but misled individuals. It is knowingly and intentionally destructive.

The Tea Party rallies and other such efforts were merely exercises in the boot licking and ass kissing of the very people who hold them in contempt.

Not surprisingly Washington (through legislative gesture) told them to go f@$k themselves.

In the immortal words of Ferris Beuller, "you can't respect somebody who kisses your ass."



"Alternative Right....An Online Magazine Of Radical Traditionalism"

Radical and Alternative have certain meanings in our society today.

They generally don't connote that which is traditional.

Articles entitled 'Why I'm A Pagan', accompanied by a picture of a guy in a robe that looks like an homage to Mickey Mouse in 'Fantasia' is, well, deserving of satire.

As is hosting articles by jewish writers.

Note to AltRight editors- Israel is, historically and presently, located in Asia, not Europe. Ethnic jewish people are not White. They are an oriental people with an oriental mindset, thus intellectually, philosophically and historically residing outside of Western Civilization.

If you are going to host articles by Paul Gottfried and Larry Auster, will we soon see prose from Michele Malkin and Alan Keyes appear there as well?

If so, then I might recommended the new moniker, 'Alternative Traditionalism'.

A "big tent" is like a small tent. They both leak and really offer no shelter at all, either from inclement weather or wild animals.

If you want to help save our civilization, I'd humbly offer the following,

1. Get off the fence and pick one side or the other. You're either pro-White (which is to say pro-Western Civilization) or you aren't. Either limit your discourse to White people alone or give up the charade. Because those who attempt to straddle the political/social-fence inevitably end up getting their political/social nuts crushed.

2. Stop building tents, big or other wise. Nations and peoples are biological entities. They are families. And no serious and responsible man throws up a tent to raise his family in. Build a house with a firm foundation and you'll have something that will last; that will withstand the rains and the winds and the beats of the field.

Build something that will last. Something with a solid foundation, sturdy wall and a solid roof.

Tents are for circuses.


When Vice Is Politically Incorrect...

"The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice."
-G.K. Chesteron


Post-White Rule...

For us it is a saddening sight—a magnificent bull elephant struck down in his old age.

But for the starving of Zimbabwe, it was little short of a miracle.

The carcass provided a vital source of food, and hundreds of desperate villagers in the Gonarezhou National Park descended on the dead animal within minutes of its discovery.

Using machetes, axes and knives made from tin cans they set upon the six-ton carcass, which was found deep in scrubland.

Fights broke out as villagers battled to strip chunks of flesh from the animal and drag them away to feed their families.

It took just one hour and 47 minutes for the 13ft-tall elephant to be reduced to a skeleton. Every part was used for food, even the trunk and ears.

The bones of the 70-year-old animal were taken to boil for soup and within 24 hours nothing was left but a blood-stained patch of earth.

The images are undeniably shocking. But they illustrate the terrible lengths to which Zimbabweans are forced to go just to survive under Robert Mugabe.



Thursday, March 25, 2010

Of The Half-blood Prince And His Mingled Masses...

“If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the Whiteman's blood which had been mixed with that of the Negro.”

Senator from Mississippi-- Theodore G Bilbo 1947



Everyone I know is fuming over the "unconstitutional" health-care bill that was "un-democratically" shoved down our throats.

I have to keep explaining to such people that compared to legislation passed in the 1960's Obamacare is a minor triviality.

It's amazing (yet sadly not unexpected) that so many seem to gloss over the rather draconian and spirit-crushing bits of legislation commonly refereed to as "civil rights".

Many seem to prefer to ignore or forget that among the "civil rights" accomplishments were,

Legalizing Abortion

Throwing God out of the schools


Promoting homosexuality

amongst other equally insidious acts.

And these were done under the notion of "equality". And to bring about "equality" our society had to destroy, in theory and in fact, Freedom of Association.

Since the "civil rights" legislation went into effect, Americans have been told (under threat of government force) who they must live among, who they can do business with, who they can vacation with, who their children must attend school with and in what company they can congregate.
All done to criminalize discrimination.

Yet the most fundamental freedom that can be had (either collectively or individually) is the right to discriminate. Take away that right and freedom is instantly dead.

Demonize the concept (of discrimination) in a a society and that society WILL acquiesce all power over every aspect their lives.

Because discrimination, at its very root, is the freedom and will to say yes or no.

Without it there is neither ability nor will to differentiate between what is good or evil, true or false, beauty or ugliness, hope or despair, man or woman, black or White, up or down and so on.

The entire premise of "equality" is the certain erosion of sanity.

Because men and women are not equal.
Whites and blacks are not equal.
Adults and children are not equal.
Darkness and Light are not equal.
Christianity and judaism are not equal.

To deny such is to be, quite literally, delusional. Or put more bluntly, insane.

Thus we have to discriminate or society will collapse into chaos. Which, not surprisingly, it has been doing since the 1960's.

And naturally a cascading effect takes place.

For example, many Christian parents today rejected their ancestors stance and declared that there was nothing wrong with interracial marriage, yet they're downright perplexed as to why their children's generation of Christians increasingly declares that there is nothing wrong with gay marriage either.

The one leads to the other, yet these folks have been so indoctrinated by neo-Marxist-Christian group think over the past 30 years that they cannot and will not see it.
And in time even the most adamant of conservative 'bible believing' Christian WILL embrace homosexuality and find that it (much like interracial marriage before it) can be accommodated to a new biblical interpretation of certain passages.
It IS inevitable, as once you acclimate your worldview to the "equality" paradigm you have no foundation what-so-ever to reject all the "new" arrangements, lest you discriminate.

And 40 years from now their Christian grandchildren will declare with absolute conviction that there never was a biblical justification for anti-homosexual attitudes. That it was just a reflection of the bias of the era and that their grandparents views were "products of the time".

I can only suppose that it never really sinks in to many of these Christians that pre-Christian Europe was dominated by the Roman Empire (at its most decadent) -which was a multi-continental, multicultural, ethnically diverse and 'equality seeking' Empire. --and Christians were thrown to the lions.

The advent of Christianity ended that "we are the world" empire and ushered in a new age of ethnic/race based kingdoms and their perspective borders and natural divisions.

Today, we have worked to reconstruct that decadent and corrupt multicultural Rome with the help and advocacy of the neo-Babylonian Christians. And yet, not surprisingly, the Christians, once again, may not be too far away from being "live" entertainment to distract the crowds.

Ironically, most of those who see themselves as "true believers" will in fact be part of the eager audience.

Ultimately that is the problem with "conservatives" in general though. They are every bit the leftwing zealots as their openly radical liberal brethren.

The liberals have gone torch-happy and are running around our civilization setting everything ablaze.

The "conservatives" are following after them with the gasoline.


Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Sadly, Well Stated...


"In other words, the point of no return has already been passed. Obamacare isn't a warning sign, it is an exclamation point."
-Vox Day


Monday, March 22, 2010

Quick, Let's Vote Our Way Out...

"And although this struggle is enormously difficult even for our People, it only proves that absolutely no state would be able to resist this danger without Germany or with Germany as its enemy. Any hope by individual European nations of receiving lenient treatment in return for good behavior or by flattering the Muscovites, is at best childish stupidity or pitiful cowardice. Moreover, the belief that in place of Germany another, possibly even a non-European power, could take over the protection of this continent is not only thoughtless but reveals a genuine moral weakness. It is primarily due to the complete ignorance of middle class politicians that in many countries people act as though they believe that the Jewish plutocratic West will overcome the Jewish Bolshevist East. No, the opposite will occur. One day the Jewish Bolshevist East will make it unnecessary for the Jews in the West to indulge in further hypocrisy. They can then reveal their ultimate goal with absolute candor. For the Jewish western democracy will sooner or later itself end in Bolshevism. The same naive souls, however, who today believe that they have discovered in Stalin the spirit who will save them, will perhaps discover sooner than they imagine that the spirits which they have summoned from the underworld will strangle them, and do so in their own countries.... "
Adolph Hitler, speech November 8 1943 in Munich.

Current events of the day make the case that the experiment in democracy was not only ill conceived but that the men who carried it out were not as wise as many have thought them to be. (and I say that having great admiration for several of the Founding Fathers)

Present reality has a way of clearing all doubts as to what the (past-tense debated) truth was.

All Men are, rather obviously, not created equal. Were that not the case the Founding Fathers would not have been so distinguishable from the rest of the generation into which they were born.
They were exceptional men for certain, but they were not of royal blood. And their inadequate pedigrees shows glaringly forth in the present age which their folly helped to birth.

In the conceit of their own exceptionalness (which they, without justification, projected onto their fellow travelers) they overthrew the order of countless ages, usurping the very aristocracy which had, time and again, defended Western Civilization against almost inconceivable onslaughts.

Through invasions and plagues and natural disasters, the Kings and Queens of old continually shepherded the peoples of The West to greener pastures.

They not only patronized the arts but determined the standard for which art is critiqued and valued. (and that was a high standard)

They preserved the religious institutions, cultural traditions and the historical underpinnings of their respective peoples.

That they were flawed goes without saying. But the one unquestionable, redeemable, attribute which their noble blood bequeathed to them generation after generation was the wisdom and foresight to see that all men were not created equal; that some are born warriors while others are born farmers. That some are born to serve while others are born to rule. That the majority are born to contend with the perplexities of a single life, while a select few were born to wrestle with the complexities of sustaining an entire civilization.

Is that elitist?
Yes and no.

We certainly do have an elite, as there will always be an elite. But our elite now are bureaucrats born of the merchant class whose foresight revolves, not around the blood of a people and their civilization, but around the profit margins of an indistinguishable mass of wandering consumers perpetually desiring only to satiate their insatiable material lust.

The flesh and blood kings, and their class, were thrown down and in their place was set Wal-Mart and AT&T and Hollywood and Sony and McDonalds etc…etc….

Was our revolution worth it?
Did we not overthrow ourselves when we overthrew our Kings?

Certainly this is a controversial and contentious position, but one that should not be lightly ignored.

After all, how can a people who repeatedly turn to psychics, “self-help” gurus, obvious con-artist televangelists and other such snake oil salesmen be entrusted to choose their government and its leaders?

How can any people who believe “reality shows” are real make sound judgments in electing anyone?

Can a people who scarcely read books and often boast of their ignorance of history be trusted to choose the right paths in so treacherous a wood as this often merciless maze of a world?

I think not.


Friday, March 19, 2010

The Fall...

Texas Gov. Rick Perry today announced the deployment of Texas Military Forces OH-58 Kiowa and UH-72 Lakota helicopters to the area between El Paso and Brownsville as part of the first phase of the state's spillover violence contingency plan.

Perry activated the plan on Tuesday. He did not reveal how many helicopters would be deployed, nor their exact locations for operational security purposes.

The helicopters will help local law enforcement deter and detect crime along the border.


Perry has a standing request with the federal government for 1,000 Title 32 National Guardsmen to support civilian law enforcement efforts to enhance border security in Texas, as well as a more recent request for predator drones to be based in and operate over the Texas-Mexico border to provide essential information to law enforcement on the ground.



HEMET, Calif. – Police in this picturesque city in rural Riverside County have been on edge in recent weeks. Someone is trying to kill them.

First, a natural gas pipe was shoved through a hole drilled into the roof of the gang enforcement unit's headquarters. The building filled with flammable vapor but an officer smelled the danger before anyone was hurt.

"It would have taken out half a city block," Capt. Tony Marghis said.

Then, a ballistic contraption was attached to a sliding security fence around the building. An officer opening the black steel gate triggered the mechanism, which sent a bullet within eight inches of his face.

Gang enforcement officers appear to be the target of the assassination attempts, though Dana noted the devices were indiscriminate by nature and could have killed any police or law enforcement officer.


Let's see,

Declining Economy. Check

Overstretched Military. Check

Uncontrolled Borders. Check

Increasingly Authoritarian Government. Check

Crumbling Infrastructure. Check

Deracinated Population. Check


When Nations Arise...

What the splintering of the Soviet Union and of a Yugoslavia whose baptismal certificate dated to the Paris peace conference of 1919 revealed was the accuracy of Arthur Schlesinger's insight in his 1991 Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society:

"Nationalism remains after two centuries the most vital political emotion in the world -- far more vital than social ideologies such a communism or fascism or even democracy. ... Within nation-states, nationalism takes the form of ethnicity or tribalism."

Ethnic ties, Schlesinger wrote, might prove more powerful and historically important than the forces of globalism and democratism, which then seemed ascendant. He only neglected to mention religious faith as often a "far more vital" emotion than ideology.

And though the Iraq elections have been hailed as a triumph of democracy, they would seem to prove him right.

Kurds voted for Kurds, Shia for Shia, Sunni for Sunni on a slate led by Ayad Allawi, a secular Shia who campaigned on a unity ticket.

The election results resemble a national census.


America is not a nation, but an empire. When that empire falls, and it will (as empires are no more immortal than the people who inhabit them), it will fracture along ethnic lines.

And true nations (clans, ethnic groups, tribes) will indeed emerge and re-establish themselves independently. That is the natural order of things. It always has been. The notion of "creed based nations" is as fictional as a "creed based family" - because just as families are biological, so are true nations.


Radical Marxist Health Care Reform...


What Radical Marxist Health Care Reform?


Wednesday, March 17, 2010

How To Deflate High Hispanic Crime Rates...

Just re-categorize non-Whites as "white" on statistical records.


On August 19, 2003, two Mexican farm laborers, possibly illegal aliens, committed arguably the most heinous crime in the history of Wisconsin’s Green Bay. They abducted a 26-year-old woman from the parking lot of a Main Street nightclub, drove many miles to a remote area in another county, repeatedly gang-raped her, then doused her with lighter fluid and set her on fire.

"The woman testified she heard her attackers 'laugh, get in the truck, and leave.'" Fortunately or unfortunately, she survived but with "burns on 61% of her body", including her face. She will be grotesquely disfigured for life. She also "suffered" and survived, "respiratory failure". [Man Enters Pleas In Kidnapping, Rape, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 7, 2005]

In non-diverse Green Bay, the victim, then a mother of two young children, can be assumed to be white, although of course the politically correct Wisconsin newspapers didn’t say.

The two monsters: Gregario Morales, then 27 with a wife and three children, and Juan Nieto, 24, apparently the more vicious of the two and rumored to have possibly committed a similar rape/burning in Arizona. Morales was offered a plea bargain in exchange for his testimony against Nieto.

Their crime was featured on Fox TV’s America's Most Wanted, which resulted in Nieto's arrest in December 2004. But otherwise it received no national coverage.

Morales had been apprehended a few months earlier in Dexter, NM. He was sentenced to 50 years in prison in 2005 and is now living at Waupun Correctional Institution, the state's first prison, built in 1852. Nieto was sentenced to 70 years in prison and is now incarcerated at Columbia Correctional Institution, a maximum-security prison in Portage in Southwestern Wisconsin.

I suggest that readers look at Morales and Nieto on Wisconsin's sex offender registry. Morales is clearly a mestizo. Nieto is a pure (or almost pure) Amerindian. He could have worked as an "extra" in Mel Gibson's movie Apocalypto. And given Morales' wiry hair and Neito's dark skin, duskier than Obama's, it's possible that one or both of them could be 5-10% black. As Steve Sailer has noted, the average Mexican is 5% black.

But according to the registry, both are "white".

Then do a generic search for offenders with common "Hispanic"/Spanish surnames -e.g., Lopez, Garcia, Hernandez, Rodriguez, Gonzales, Martinez, etc.- and marvel at all the mestizos, pure or almost pure Amerindians, "zambos" (a mixture of black and Amerindian), mulattos, and even blacks who are defined as "white"!



Expose The Weaknesses?...

The world's five biggest AAA-rated states are all at risk of soaring debt costs and will have to implement austerity plans that threaten "social cohnesion", according to a report on sovereign debt by Moody's.

"We are not talking about revolution, but the severity of the crisis will force governments to make painful choices that expose weaknesses in society," he said.


What an odd way to phrase that, no?

Government will be forced to EXPOSE weaknesses in society. As though it were now intentionally hiding those weaknesses.


This study is a survey of people living in 41 different American communities that run from racially homogeneous rural South Dakota to San Francisco, which is one of the most racially mixed places on earth. The clearest finding was that the more diverse the area, the less people trusted each other. The graph on page three represents this by showing the 41 areas on a plot, with trust of other races on the vertical axis and an index of homogeneity on the horizontal axis.

(Prof. Putnam measured homogeneity with what is called a Herfindahl index, which is the likelihood that two randomly selected people in a given area—in this case a census tract—will be of the same race. A value of 1.00 means there is a 100 percent chance they will be the same, and a value of 0.50 means only a 50 percent chance.)

The study divided people into four groups—white, black, Hispanic, Asian—and asked whether they trusted the other groups. The percentage that said they trusted the other three groups “a lot” is on the vertical axis. Rural South Dakota and Lewiston, Maine, over to the right, were about as pure white as it was possible to be (this was in 2000, before Somalis converged on Lewiston because of its generous welfare—see “Lewiston Update,” AR, Aug. 2007) and had some of the highest levels of trust in “other races.” As diversity increases towards the left, trust in other races decreases.

The second graph, on page four, is a similar plot, except that the question was whether respondents trusted their neighbors “a lot.” Prof. Putnam recognizes that people usually have neighbors like themselves, so this question can be seen as an indication of trust not only in neighbors but in people like oneself. As the graph shows, people in virtually all areas are more likely to say they trust their neighbors “a lot” than to say they trust people of other races “a lot,” but again, the more diversity, the less trust.

The third graph, on page five, shows the results of asking whether people trust members of their own race “a lot.” Prof. Putnam points out that if diversity makes people distrust people of other races, it might be expected to increase their trust in people of their own race—and here is the surprise: Diversity reduces trust in everyone, even in people of one’s own race. This is what leads to Prof. Putnam’s widely quoted conclusion that diversity makes people behave like turtles—they pull into their shells. On the basis of other survey data, he lists other unhappy consequences for people who must live with diversity:

• Lower confidence in local government, local leaders and the local news media.

• Lower political efficacy—that is, confidence in their own influence.

• Lower frequency of registering to vote, but more interest and knowledge about politics and more participation in protest marches and social reform groups.

• Less expectation that others will cooperate to solve dilemmas of collective action (e.g., voluntary conservation to ease a water or energy shortage).

• Less likelihood of working on a community project.

• Fewer close friends and confidants.

• Less happiness and lower perceived quality of life.

• More time spent watching television and more agreement that “television is my most important form of entertainment.”



Monday, March 15, 2010

Down The Hole...

ONE million books from Manchester's Central Library – including valuable volumes dating back to the 15th century - are to be put into temporarily storage with many going deep underground in the Cheshire salt mines.

Works from the city's reference library will be stored in the mines, hundreds of feet below ground, for the next three years while the landmark city centre site undergoes a massive refurbishment to save it from ruin.

Experts say the mine's caverns – the size of 700 football pitches - provide the perfect environment for preserving the manuscripts, which include the works of eminent academics.


Symbolic? Sure.

Sign of impending Armageddon? Doubt it.


Saturday, March 13, 2010

Bordering Chaos...

BROWNSVILLE — The Zapata County sheriff Thursday was questioning why a Mexican military helicopter was hovering over homes on the Texas side of the Rio Grande.

It was one of the more jarring incidents of the fourth week of border tensions sparked by drug killings, and rumors of such killings, in the Mexican state of Tamaulipas.

Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez said he'd reviewed photos of the chopper flown by armed personnel Tuesday over a residential area known as Falcon Heights-Falcon Village near the binational Falcon Lake, just south of the Starr-Zapata county line. He said the helicopter appeared to have the insignia of the Mexican navy.

“It's always been said that the Mexican military does in fact ... that there have been incursions,” Gonzalez said. “But this is not New Mexico or Arizona. Here we've got a river; there's a boundary line. And then of course having Falcon Lake, Falcon Dam, it's a lot wider. It's not just a trickle of a river, it's an actual dam. You know where the boundary's at.”

The sighting came amid ongoing fighting between the Gulf Cartel and its former enforcers, Los Zetas. The mounting death toll and crisis of fear in cities across from the Texas border have drawn global attention, as has a news blackout in affected cities due to the kidnappings of eight Mexican journalists, at least one of whom was killed.

As violence continued Thursday with a highway shootout in Tamaulipas, a Senate subcommittee in Washington heard testimony that drug cartels are trying to infiltrate U.S. agencies along the border, with corruption cases among Homeland Security personnel on the rise.

In the past two years, there have been 400 public corruption cases involving federal, state and local law enforcement agents originating from the Southwest border region, Kevin Perkins, FBI assistant director for criminal investigations, told the Senate Homeland Security subcommittee on preparedness.

-more here

Race is not a social construct. Societies are racial constructs.

Thirdworlders are not going to become Western or American because those identities are eternally dependent upon the blood which doesn't flow in their veins.

Being Western means being of European descent (by blood). That's why blacks in America, despite being here for centuries, still reside completely outside of Western or American civilization and identity (a few token half White blacks in gov. not withstanding). They always will.

Should America be 90% hispanic/black a century from now it will not be America. It will be a land riddled with disease and poverty, where the life expectancy will be around 35 and horse drawn wagons will be the primary mode of travel. Things like electricity and running water will be a novelty for the very rich elite. The only thing that keeps Mexico from that now is its proximity to an Anglo-Saxon founded nation.

America is, and always will be, a distinctly White nation and identity. Nothing is going to change that.

When the Whites are gone, so also will be gone their way of life (prosperity, law and order, paved roads, national infrastructure, hospitals, schools, clean water, etc.. etc...).

Those who desire a multicultural America should think long and hard about what that actually means in the long term.


England Falls...

These haunting pictures show the extent to which a man with learning difficulties suffered 17 years of torment at the hands of youths, before he collapsed and died in his garden.

A film captured on a mobile phone shows how David Askew's agitators would stand inches from his garden fence and hurl abuse at him.

On Wednesday the 64-year-old could take no more and, as he tried to protect his property, he suffered a suspected heart attack and died on the spot.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Re-Up (Opposites Attract? Or Birds Of A Feather?...

I'm gonna have to go with Opposites Attract,

Franklin - Each Sunday, children gather in the fellowship hall at Faith Presbyterian Church to ponder the lessons of Christianity, among them, "Love your neighbor as yourself."

Now the church is setting a real-life example for the kids, by opening its Sunday school space to its Muslim neighbors for two of their five daily prayers.

Faith Presbyterian becomes the third satellite prayer center for area Muslims who wish to pray communally but may not be able to get across town to one of the four area mosques. The other prayer sites are at Waukesha Memorial Hospital and the Muslim Student Center on Milwaukee's east side.

Faith Presbyterian's pastor, the Rev. Deb Bergeson-Graham, welcomed the visitors as an opportunity for her congregation to live their Christian faith.

Faith Presbyterian isn't the first church to open its doors to Milwaukee-area Muslims. Before the Islamic Center purchased its building in 1982, it conducted its Friday congregational prayers in the basement of Kenwood United Methodist Church near the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, said Islamic Society of Milwaukee President Othman Atta.

Faith Presbyterian's decision to welcome its Muslim neighbors drew overwhelming - though not universal - support from parishioners, according to Bergeson-Graham.

One older member, who's been with the church for about a decade, strongly objected.

Christianity is a feminine religion.
Islam is a masculine religion.

And the imagery the article paints lays that all out.
The female Reverend.
The (feminine) Christian Churches "opening their doors" to the (masculine) muslims.

And it's pointless to argue what Christianity "once was", as the above article demonstrates what it can always become. (remember the good "reverend" above is quoting the words of Jesus -"love your neighbor as yourself"- to justify her actions)

This all reminds me of a (I guess you could call it) parable I once read but can find no author for.

It goes, roughly,

A stranger was walking the lane one day when he happened by beautiful, well ordered and highly productive fields of grains, vegetables, fruits and even flowers.

Noticing the farmer in one of the fields the stranger called out, "The Lord has certainly been good to these fields!"

The farmer, pausing from his busy work and wiping the sweat from his brow replied, "Yeah, but you should have seen how He treated them when I wasn't around!"

Adding to the above "parable" and keeping in mind the above article as well, is the following quote,
Civilisation is more than an abstraction. It must have a local habitation and a name. —Saunders Lewis (Welsh nationalist leader)

It's important to keep in mind that being Pragmatic, Practical, Logical, Rational etc... is fine up to a point, but as history (and present circumstances) seems to demonstrate, it's a mistake to be too practical.

"Being Practical" leads to a complete lack of conviction as conviction is, well, not practical.
Taking a pragmatic approach is the reason the Christian Church has, for the past 40+ years, been in the process of systematically dumping all of it's previously held beliefs.

In defending Western Civilization we want to be careful not to become coldly logical in its defense.
As Yeats put it, 'The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.'

The Religious Right, and conservatives in general, are the number one promoters of the notion that, as Saunders Lewis put it, civilization is an abstraction.
They believe in the perverse ideology that nations are simply, well, Ideologies. For them, America and The West is a creed to be adopted rather than a living-breathing-biological entity.
This is why the GOP presented Juan McCain as candidate to represent their party. A man who represents cold, calculated pragmatism as much as anyone can. And this is why "Uncle Juan" lost to a non-White candidate who let rip an unending stream of illogical, irrational and impractical policy platforms in oratory (passionate) intensity......

Reading through the letters of Founding Fathers and Civil War generals you see them express their intellectual justifications for their actions in the most eloquent and passionate comment and soliloquy imagined. Even when the tone is completely secular, the words, though grounded in logic, are deeply intense in their FAITH in the rightness of their cause.

When the Founders sought to make their case before the public, they looked not so much to the Sermon on the mount as they did to Cicero in the Senate!

Western Man must not only make a logical, fact-filled case for our continued existence, but a passionate one as well.

After all, what practical reason can you offer for why muslims shouldn't be allowed into your church to pray to their god?


'Let The Corn Be All One Sheaf -- And The Grapes Be All One Vine'...

The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk --
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to.
They are used to the lies I tell,
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy and sell.

The Stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
They think of the likes of me.

This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf --
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

-Rudyard Kipling


Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Same Old, Same Old...

from Sailer,

My article last week profiling historian Admiral Samuel Eliot Morison was inspired by David Brooks’ column, The Power Elite [NYT, February 18, 2010]. Brooks outlined some of the problems caused by the replacement of Morison’s old Protestant Establishment by what Brooks calls a “meritocratic elite”—actually, as I pointed out, substantially Jewish—more interested in short-term profit-making in than long-term caretaking of the country.


The most central aspect of this process was well described by David Samuels in Assimilation and Its Discontents in New York Magazine (September 28, 2008):

“Future historians will record that the Jews replaced the old Protestant elite, who had run the city [of New York] off and on since the eighteenth century until their power was finally shattered by the cultural metamorphosis of 1968…”

Samuels observes:

"It takes a certain amount of effort to remember that it was not surprising even into the late sixties for Jews to be excluded from top-tier jobs at the commercial banks, ad agencies, and insurance companies that formed the elite of the city’s business class … The Jews of New York City had their own banks, their own law firms, their own social clubs, and their own charities, which enabled them to function as a kind of parallel elite …"

Since then, there has been a huge diffusion of the talents and values of Jews throughout the financial industry.

Yet, as the New York Times’ Brooks asked, “would we say that banks are performing more ably than they were a half-century ago?”


In the early 20th Century, for example, leadership caste WASPs played a major role in setting aside National Parks and in limiting immigration.

Even more fundamentally, they tolerated criticism of themselves by others. Criticism encourages you to behave better.

Of course, the moribund WASP Establishment’s increasing fair-mindedness had its downsides. One problem with letting other people have their say about you is that they may undermine your power. Samuels writes of

"my own personal sorrow about the fate of the Harvard-educated Brahmins I admired in my youth, who cherished their belief in liberal openness while licking at the bleached bones of their family romances. Their mansions are threadbare and drafty, and stickers on their salt-eaten Volvos advertise the cause of zero population growth. It’s hard to imagine that their ancestors sailed clipper ships to China and wrote great books and built great companies and ran spies behind enemy lines in Europe." (VDARE.COM links added).

But, shouldn’t new elites be held to the same standards of criticism that helped them displace the old elites? Why is it considered admirable for the new establishment to try to destroy the careers of their critics?

For noblesse oblige to work, privileged and influential groups have to be publicly acknowledged to be privileged and influential. If, on the other hand, their main sense of collective identity is that of marginal members of society endangered by the might of the current majority, then the system doesn’t operate.

In 2006, blogger Noah Millman was surprised by a rabbi’s Purim sermon. Not by the message—Write your Congressman about Darfur!—but by the unusual explanation the rabbi offered: noblesse oblige.

"He compared the position of the Jewish community in America today with Queen Esther's position in King Ahashuerus's [Xerxes’s] Persia: that is to say, a position of power or, more precisely, profound influence on those who wield power. And, he said, that power implies responsibility."

Millman noted:

"But you (or at least I) rarely hear a Jewish leader saying, in so many words, that Jews must act to prevent this or that injustice because we are powerful, and power implies responsibility." [Gideon's Blog, March 13, 2006]

Instead, Jewish leaders typically exhort Jews with one of three arguments, all based around feelings of communal self-pity. Millman enumerates them:

(1) “We Jews have suffered, so we should be acutely sensitive to others' suffering …;”

(2) “As God liberated the Jews from captivity in Egypt … we have a religious obligation as Jews to help the oppressed”;

(3) “Jews should be aware of our collective vulnerability, historical and continuing, and therefore for our own good always take the other side of the kinds of groups, movements and individuals who have victimized us in the past, and who could threaten us again in the future.”

And yet that plain fact is that in modern America, Jews are the biggest winner among ethnic groups. Although only two percent of the American population, Jews make up about 35 percent of the Forbes 400 wealthiest individuals. (That percentage is from after the financial bubble burst in 2007-2008, so it likely reflects a long-run baseline.)


So jews in America see themselves as Esther in Persia.

Of course it's relevant to point out that Esther used her influence to call for the mass murder of the native Persians, then established her relatives to positions of power to rule over the terrorized survivors of their new dominion.

In the story the jews are free to return to their own land yet they refuse. They are rich and comfortable in Persia and looking to expand their power. Esther enters a "beauty contest" in which she outperforms the other contestants in the sexual acrobatics tryouts and then uses her skills in the sexual arts to manipulate the doddering old king to mass murder his own subjects.

The story of Joseph in Egypt is similar. A foreigner manipulates a mentally feeble old Egyptian king into allowing him to enslave and murder the Egyptian people which, in turn, allows (ultimately) for the plundering of Egypt by the foreigner's people.

Sound familiar?


Re-Up (Race Is Only Skin Deep....Till You Need A Kidney!)...

On the he eighth biennial American Renaissance Conference, held in February 2008,

The first speaker on Saturday morning was Philippe Rushton, the eminent psychometrician from the University of Western Ontario, who spoke about the heritability of racial differences in IQ. He first noted that the measured IQs of black Africans, which have consistently been found to be about 70, do not mean they are retarded. Instead, it is best to consider Africans as having the intelligence of normal 11-year-olds.

Prof. Rushton warned that despite optimistic predictions, India will not grow to become an economic superpower as he says China will. Although there are many smart Indians, their average IQ is 85, meaning that India will be outdistanced by China, where the average IQ is something over 100.

Prof. Rushton noted that it is common to argue that the meager, unpleasant surroundings in which low-IQ people live drag down their intelligence, and that this, rather than genes, causes racial differences. On the other hand, one would expect low-IQ people to create meager environments for themselves, and there is a mass of evidence to suggest that the causation is far more IQ-to-environment than environment-to-IQ.
Transracial adoption studies, for example, show that children reared by people of different races end up with IQs closer to the average for their own race than to that of their adoptive parents.

Likewise, non-whites have now lived for many generations in the United States and Europe, and their IQ scores are only slightly improved by better surroundings. Prof. Rushton cited the scores of second-generation North Africans living in Holland, whose average IQ of 89 is only a few points higher than the average in North Africa. “Genes,” explained Prof. Rushton, “keep culture on a leash.”

By now there are many mixed-race populations whose IQs have been carefully tested, and results are consistent with genetic explanations: Their average IQs tend to be mid-way between those of the parent populations. Finally, there is a clear correlation between brain size and IQ. Australian Aborigines, the population with the lowest recorded average IQ of 60, have the smallest brains, and North Asians have the largest brains. Findings such as this are very difficult to explain in terms of the impoverishing effect of environment.

Prof. Rushton noted that although the mainstream media do not yet report studies of this kind, they are published in top-notch journals and are generally accepted by scholars in the field. It will be only a matter of time before they become widely known.

The next speaker, (Dr.) Eugene Valberg, called upon many years of experience in South Africa to describe how Africans think. He said his interest in the subject was piqued by a conversation with Africans about gradation. How, he wanted to know, would a Zulu speaker describe a coconut as half-way up a tree? That can’t be expressed, was the answer; the coconut is “up” the tree or not, and its relative location cannot be expressed. Dr. Valberg has since found that Africans often have a hard time understanding gradation, and tend to think in terms of one extreme or the other.

He noted that African languages do not need dictionaries. Because they have no written literature, everyone who speaks them knows every word in the language. The resulting poverty of vocabulary reflects a poverty of expression and thought.

Today, non-native concepts have found their way into African languages, but it is important to distinguish between indigenous words and those that have been borrowed from Europeans. For example, there are now imported words in the Zulu language for “promise” or “obligation,” but Africans have a hard time understanding them.

Perhaps most characteristic of African thinking is an absence of abstraction. Africans rarely get beyond the concrete, present-oriented, visible, and tangible. Because the future is not tangible, it is difficult for Africans to think about it realistically. A man who is healthy may not understand the purpose of medical insurance. His mind may run no further than “I’m not sick now.” Likewise, the need to maintain machinery is often lost on Africans. If the motor is running fine now, why change the oil? Because Africans often cannot imagine things that do not exist, they cannot work seriously towards future goals.

Dr. Valberg argued that without abstract thinking it is hard to imagine the feelings of others. At the worst extreme, Africans can torture each other with astonishing callousness, and at the everyday level, they are often indifferent to or even unaware of their own rudeness or inconsiderateness. To be considerate requires an ability to imagine the feelings of others.

South Africa is often called the rape capital of the world, but Dr. Valberg believes Africans do not fully grasp the concept of rape. They have been told that “rape” is a bad thing, yet most African men do not think it wrong to force a woman to have sex. This unthinking acceptance of the actions that constitute rape makes it difficult to prosecute rapists. Dr. Valberg also said that for most Africans, romantic love does not exist, and sex is the only thing that draws men and women together.

Lack of abstract thinking can be an advantage. Africans are almost never introspective or self-conscious. They are only rarely neurotic, and Dr. Valberg suspects that impotence is essentially unheard of among them.

Dr. Valberg noted that although American blacks have higher IQs and operate at a higher level than African blacks, they exhibit many of the same tendencies.

Fred Reed, the man behind the popular Internet site “Fred on Everything,” has lived in Mexico for many years and spoke on “Mexico From the Inside.”

There are distinctly Third-World qualities about Mexico, and immigrants are bringing them to America. There is widespread disregard for law and regulations. Anyone who can, cheats the authorities, and Mexicans ignore traffic regulations—you take your life in your hands on the roads. Mexicans also have contempt for schooling, which translates into high dropout rates among emigrants to the US.

Some of Mr. Reed’s most interesting observations had to do with the maƱana attitude, which is a reality and not a caricature. Many Mexicans really do live in the present, and have little sense of urgency about anything. Many lack ambition, and seem not to care about their communities.

AR editor Jared Taylor next spoke about why it is so difficult to persuade white people to give up their illusions about race. He said that a realistic understanding of race includes three basic concepts: That race is a real, biological category; that racial differences go beyond gross morphology; and that racial loyalty is natural and healthy. Current orthodoxy denies all three.

Mr. Taylor argued that the view that race is some kind of sociological illusion will be the first building block of “race fantasy” to crumble. Everyone instinctively understands the reality of race, and no one who needs a kidney will ever say, “Don’t bother with tissue matching; we are all brothers under the skin.”

For more on the problems of race-mixing, see here