Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Fearaphobia...

pho·bi·a
n.
1. A persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous.


Western Man's greatest fear today is, fear.

We are afraid of fear.

Why?

Well, perhaps it is summed up in the nonsensical statement that says "people fear what they don't understand." The implication being that fear is a backward emotion anchored in ignorance.

Of course the truth is, rather obviously, the complete opposite. People fear what they do understand.

For example, we aren't afraid of falling from atop a skyscraper because we never took the time to get to know the ground. We fear it because we understand gravity.

Likewise, small children have to be taught not to put their hand on a hot stove because they lack the understanding to fear the effects of a hot fire on bare skin.


Never-the-less, today fear is cast as a condition to be healed from. The result is that our civilization has collectively plunged from the highest cliff.




The exception to the rule is history. It is okay to fear history.

Why?

Because history attacks and defeats the premise of our modern time. It tells us we are not "progressing" but are in fact decaying, dying.
History tells us that our society was in fact a better place when it was 90% White and lacking in "diversity".
It exposes the lie of equality, be it racial, gender, ethnic, religious, class and so on.

History is a towering, overshadowing monument that tells us our present lacks all credibility.

Thus it is constantly under attack.

But attacking it is proving to be useless. Ridicule won't remove it from sight. Ignoring it won't make it go away.
So the solution is to try and rewrite it or write over it.

Anyone who has been in school (grammar through college) in the past fifty years knows all about this. "Women's Studies", "Ethnic Studies" and other "alternate histories" (aka, alternate versions of what actually happened) are the Historaphobes answer to the problem.

In the wasteland of pop-culture this has taken the form of the "reboot". Since the present cultural matrix is to poor to conceive of new heroes from their multicult-ghetto, the solution is to simply take a White hero/character and re-cast the part as non-white.

Of course this isn't exactly working out either. Most non-Whites prefer to see White heroes because Whites have a spirit of compassion and justice about them.
Non-Whites tend to have rather soulless eyes and blank, fixed, expressions that denote an inherent apathy to all life.



The waiting game is on now, though. As with all constructs of radicals the foundation is faulty to the point of not even being a legitimate foundation.

Fearaphobia will not long last the unending everyday assaults, both moral and physical upon Western Man.

Western People are afraid. And for a good reason. Their way of life is under attack and their very existence is threatened.

What the radicals themselves fear most is the day when the White Man is no longer afraid to fear.


...



Monday, October 10, 2011

The Book Of Job: The Nature Vs. Nurture Argument...

You can find a seemingly endless variety of interpretations of the Book of Job, though its most overt point is often left un-approached.

The set up of the story is the impetus for all that happens thereafter.

Basically the Devil/Satan and God get into a debate over Job, the one man on earth who is a good man and who honors God.

Why is Job a good man?

God's argument is that Job is a good man, just because. Nothing made or makes Job good, he simply is.

Satan argues that it is environment that separates Job from the sinners. He is rich, has a nice home in a nice neighborhood and was generally privileged his entire life.

God replies that no, Job is just fundamentally a more moral person than others. He was that way from birth.

Satan insists that if Job had come from a broken home in a ghetto and discriminated against his whole life, he too would be a lying, thieving wretch like those sinners.

Again, God says no. Job is better because he is better. From the womb to the tomb Job is what he is. Nothing made him good, just as nothing made the sinners bad. Men are what they are from the get-go.

At the end of the book we learn that God was right and Satan was wrong.



Now the point here is this....... how many Christians today take Satan's side in this argument?



...

The Enlightenment Was, Frankly, Stupid...

Despite proclamations to the contrary, post-Roman-collapse Western Civilization reached its heights somewhere around 1250, and has been in decline ever since.

It all comes down to the metric one uses to measure High and Low.

For example, The West today is very rich. It's also dying out due to low birthrates.

Western Man can see the latest CGI effects in high resolution but refuses to see (acknowledge) the increasing number of Orcs rampaging through his streets.

Because, you see, observing the harmful presence of non-Whites wouldn't be progressive.

Strangely enough through, standing by as the Orcs rape and murder and plunder and destroy, IS progressive.
It's only 'un-progressive' to notice such things.

Truth then becomes the enemy of progress. The enemy of the state. The enemy of the people.



It is the very notion of progress which leads to the denunciation of truth and thus on to so much misery and sorrow. Progress is illusory, because man is fundamentally no different today than he was when Alexander the great walked the earth.
And the reality is, the more progressive Western Civilization has become over the past 50 years the greater the rot within.

No argument needs to be made to illustrate that fact, as everyone knows it. It's reflected in the number of broken homes, failed marriages, crime riddled neighborhoods, crumbling infrastructure and so on.

When half or more of the population is on sensation numbing "anti-depressants" to suppress their despair at the state of their world, then the very idea of progress goes from laughable to demonic.


During the Enlightenment this idea of utopia went from abstract poetics to boardroom pie-charts.

And so came the revolutions to throw down the obstructions standing in the way of progress. The primary target of these rebels was Monarchy.

Why?

Because Monarchy represented/reflected a natural hierarchy is the world. It testified to the inherent inequality of man. It symbolized structure -levels. It revealed the High and the Low, the beautiful and the base and the sacred and the profane.

So it had to be thrown down.

Thus came the Revolutionaries. Their head were the merchant class and their tail the ghetto-dwellers.
They believed themselves wiser than all the collective knowledge of Kings, Sages, Poets, Warriors, Prophets and Seers who had come in all the generations before them.

They threw down history. They exalted the profane and spat upon the sacred.

They are Cromwell and Napoleon. Washington and Jefferson. Marx and Engels. Lenin and Stalin.
Rebels. Revolutionists. Utopianits. Merchants.

And their bastard offspring divided into two camps and have fought for power, for the throne, ever since. They are generally known today as Fascists and Communists and all people in The West today are one or the other.
It was these two camps who fought it out during WWII, with the Communists (The Allies) winning.

And though they've struggled against one another for power, they both share the critical common theme of a rejection of Monarchy.

Their motto's are described always in relation to the denunciation of class. "We the people". Or, "Power to the people".

It is an old war as it is the rebellion of chaos against order. Because in Order, their is structure, hierarchy and thus inequality.

But in chaos, all things are blended into one. All are equal.


...