Friday, November 22, 2013

Racism: A Kind Of, Sort Of Watch-A-Macall-It...

Craig Bodeker's documentary 'A Conversation About Race' is still pertinent 5 years after its release as the sinister, but defiantly undefinable esoteric sin known as "racism" is, apparently, still haunting the land.

 Its brevity and its depth are what make it so compelling.

In the first five minutes of the documentary Bodeker demonstrates that there is actually no such thing as "racism".

He then spends the next 50 minutes illustrating that point by interviewing people from various walks of life (male/female, old/young, black/white).

It's also thought provoking in that it  highlights the extent to which so many people are not provoked to think.


Truth: Our Deadly Foe…

The findings highlight the complex role that race plays in medicine, especially as genetic studies reveal more biological reasons behind why racial and ethnic groups may have different propensities for disease, and respond in varying ways to drugs.

“We don’t like to admit that race and ethnicity count, but they certainly do...”

The pertinent question is, why don’t they like to admit that race and ethnicity count?

Of course, we know why.

It’s both a comedy and a tragedy when a society feels too burdened to discuss the truth for fear that the shadowy forces of “equality” will jump out and charge the windmills.

Monday, November 4, 2013

Who You Are...

When a mom and daughter were kidnapped, forced to withdraw money from an ATM, raped, then shot last week, the Indianapolis Star played it by the book: Do not mention the suspects are black.


The “book” in this case is written by the Society of Professional Journalists, headquartered just three miles from the scene of the crime. In last month’s issue of the SPJ magazine, the oldest and largest organization of journalists in America reminded its members how they should report racial violence.


 To be fair, Indianapolis is not remarkably different from Kansas City, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, Philadelphia, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Greensboro, Rochester, Richmond, Miami Beach, Fresno, Louisville, Memphis, Greensboro and more than 100 other centers of regular and intense black mob violence: The papers in those towns are loathe to report it as well. They say they are color blind.
These are the same papers that every day run stories about black caucuses, black churches, black colleges, black TV stations, black expos, black radio, black newspapers, black blogs and on and on.


For those of us who have spoken about, and written of, this reality for many years these stories no longer shock or cause much distress.
 The rate of increase in crime which is following the influx of third world peoples through legal and illegal immigration is similarly horrific.

What does cause distress is the level to which many (but increasingly fewer) still go to insulate themselves from the real world and the implications of having to acknowledge fundamental truths. 

All men are not created equal. Races exist and have a fundamentally different moral/social matrix inherent to each group.
That doesn't mean one is bad and the others good. Each is fine for that particular race or ethnic group.

The problem comes when they are forced (literally forced) to co-exist in the same space under the same generic system which is sustained by state and federal bureaucracies. That is how the Soviet Union functioned.

And though "equality" is the steel hammer which is carried forth in front of the citizenry as both a rallying banner and as a threat to those who do not comply, its practical application is to destroy every single representation of Western Civilization, traditions, customs, laws, morality and peoples.

Put it this way,

If your philosophy is "live and let live" and "as long as they don't bother me", then there is a 99.9% chance you are White.

Let that sink in for a while.


Saturday, October 26, 2013

Re-Up (The New World Order?)...

I often wonder if those who fear and attempt to expose the new world order ever stop and ask themselves what the old world order is and was. From observation it is clear that those who speak contemptibly of the “new world order” actually believe in its tenants and would fight to preserve it.
What is the New World Order?
 It isn't some secret society or covert operation. It is the philosophical principles of 18th and 19th century revolutionaries and their ideological followers.
Here are the basic elements of the New World Order. Do you support these?
1. Democratic forms of government.
2. Equality in both social and legal standing.
3. The elimination of the lines and distinctions between classes, ethnic groups, racial groups and genders.
4. Free Trade and principles of supply and demand.
5. Freedom of movement within and across borders.
6. Legal and social ennoblement of and for self-identification and definition.
7. The fundamental principle of personal independence and freedom.
8. A universally applied standard of morality, economics, government and culture.
9. All people are “blank slates” and that “nurturing” produces attitudes, temperament, intelligence, etc.
10. The State as an instrument to engineer social change.
 Needless to say, the Old World Order was the inverse of the above.  
And the old world order produced a civilization, art and culture that even the crumbling ruins of which we still marvel at.
The New World Order, as listed in the 10 elements above, has brought Western society into rapid ruin and destruction in a brief period of time. AND YET, many still support the 10 elements on principle even though the fruits they have produced are so glaringly poisonous. 
The new world order was born in the age of “Enlightenment”, when new continents were being conquered, new social theories were proposed and taken as sacrosanct, “economic schools” of commerce were formed and universalistic fad societies like the Freemasons were blossoming in Europe.
Out went the old kings and princes and priests, who were content to merely act as caretakers of what had been handed down to them, and in their place would come revolutionaries bent on usurping the old world and reforging the elements into their own likeness and image. 
That is the difference between the two orders!

The Old World Order humbly preserved what had been passed down through the ages.
The New World Order sought to play god and attempt to remake the world in its own image.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

When Businessmen Are Your Founding Fathers...

… What do you expect?

Excerpts from Forbes,

Workers’ wages buy less and less. In fact, workers have lost purchasing power during the past half-century.

Today’s minimum wage employee works 12 percent longer to earn a gallon of milk compared to 1965, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Today’s senior engineer works almost twice as long to buy a gallon of gasoline, according to the Department of Energy.

So, in real terms, wages have fallen. The drop is larger than it appears.

…milk used to be delivered to a home in a glass bottle. Today it comes in cheap plastic containers that consumers pick up at the store. A more recent example is wine, which is moving from expensive corks to cheaper screw tops.

By switching to gold, we can measure both wages and prices on an absolute scale—in ounces—and we can make precise comparisons.

The bottom line is that, in terms of gold, wages have fallen by about 87 percent.

…today’s highly skilled professional is making less in real, comparative terms than yesterday’s unskilled worker.

But measured in gold—and this is crucial to understanding why we need a gold standard—we see reality with clarity. Incomes are about one tenth what they were in the 60’s.
People who work for a living—those who produce every good and service—are being steadily and severely marginalized.

 The United States isn't a nation that is falling apart, because it's not a nation to begin with. It's a business that was created in the 1770's and 1780's by bankers and merchants.


Monday, September 16, 2013

Fear of History…

“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”

-George Orwell (1984)

The greatest fear known to post-modern man is the ever-threatening menace of the memory of the way the world once was.

And like all such fears there are those waiting to exploit it. Some of these choose to invoke the past to attack it in contrast to the moral fads of the moment while others simply re-write it to fulfill their fantasy of destroying the past altogether.

Yet there it stands like a grand unmovable monument symbolizing its’ own victory over the modern world.

Those who detest and attack the past do so for obvious reasons. Namely, that it is only in the past that we find solid footing upon which to stand with certainty in the present. And if there is one thing social engineers and change agents hate, it’s people standing upon the firm foundation of the past.

The present is ever fleeting.
The future is uncertain.
It is only in the past that we find our identity, our certainty and the peace of mind with which to go forward in our lives.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Run, It's Rain!!!...

 (the following post originally appeared in September 2011)

According to claims by the "World Health Organization" 100 million people died as a result of tobacco smoking over the course of the 20th century.

That's 1 million a year.

The W.H.O also claims that over 2 million people die a year from aids. Over 60 million have been a 30 year period.

The majority of Aids related cases are caused by sexual promiscuity, particularly among homosexuals.


There is an ongoing campaign among gov., media, church, community, etc... groups to warn of the dangers of tobacco while simultaneously those same groups are actively promoting the gay and lesbian "lifestyle" which destroys far more lives than tobacco.

When too much light is shown on the Leftists main two causes, Death and Destruction, they always flip reality or amp up their rhetoric to distract and delude.

The Aids epidemic spread like wildfire through the "gay community" -suddenly the left begins to promote that "lifestyle" even more than before, making the objection to homosexuality the bugaboo rather than that which is actually casing the pain and suffering and death.

Ditto immigration. Open borders and Multiculturalism bring death and despair (and terror attacks like 9-11 ) to every society where they are forced upon the populace, and yet the response of the Left is to attack those who are fighting for Life as haters.

Casual Sex causes immeasurable suffering through disease and sickness and death.

The Lefts response? Attack Tobacco.


Recently a hurricane wannabe tropical storm moved up the east coast causing minor wind damage and (in some places) substantial flooding. The reaction of the main stream news was, to put it mildly, bizarre. For two weeks there was a "build up" of this small storm's approach that could have led less astute observers to think the apocalypse was at hand.

At the same time a smiley face is placed on America's RAPIDLY crumbling economy and increasing racial tensions.

At a time when "flash mobs" are daily attacking Whites.
Inflation is skyrocketing.
Every single major manufacturer has either moved its facilities over seas or imported orcs to under-bid citizens in pay.
Third World Orcs are flooding across the border and destroying communities from Maine to Washington.
Crime is getting rampant and out of hand.
Blatant corruption among the political class is increasingly flaunted.
Critical Infrastructure is decaying before our eyes.
The Global Economy is approaching collapse.

And yet the mainstream news gives unprecedented wall-to-wall coverage to a tropical storm....during hurricane season....when tropical storms and hurricanes are common and expected and prepared for.

At a certain point people either choose to confront the fact that their being distracted and misled, or they choose to ignore it all and stand unmoved as the house burns down around them.

Bread and Circuses always come immediately before Civilizations collapse.


Thursday, July 25, 2013

America: That New Time Religion…

In both the Snowden whistle blower case and the Supreme Court gay marriage case the appeal is made (ostensibly, strictly) to constitutional authority and its interpretation.

Forget the morality of gay marriage and Western Civilization’s traditional views of it. Forget the ancient principles that speak of a regime’s abuse of power. No, instead it is asked whether it is constitutional or not.

Morality, tradition, customs, culture, religion, values, old truths and ancient principles must all take a back seat to, and be in subjugation towards, the constitution.

This is because America is not a nation, as the etymology of the word nation literally means “ethnic group”. A nation is a particular race of people, not a place or for form of government.
(Similarly, the word ‘patriot’ means of “of my father” and carries the connotation of a blood descendant of a particular race of people.)

A nation is not based upon a creed, set of principles or a constitution.

Religions however, are.

And that is what America is, a religion.

The constitution is the “holy text”. It is, in the eyes of many on the right, a religious document beyond touch or corruption, the very words of which are “divine” and “sacred”.

 And, of course, the Supreme Court justices are the high priests who “interpret” the sacred text for all.

And they fit the role of “high priests” explicitly: from their quasi-religious ceremonial garb, and their role as “interpreters” of the “Holy and Sacred Text”, to the fact that it is they (or a federal judge) who administers the oath of office for an incoming president, just as priests once presided over the coronations of kings.

Presidents, whilst being anointed to office by a Supreme Court Justice, pledge to “defend the Constitution”.

Christian Kings, whilst being anointed and crowned by a priest of the church, pledged to, “defend the faith”.

The parallels are many and significant.

And like any religion Americanism has its proselytizers and missionaries spreading the doctrine of “freedom and equality” to all four corners of the globe.

Europe was converted by force and propaganda post-WWII. Eastern Europe is in the process of being converted.
Those who refuse to convert, like Iraq, will face swift (and righteous) wrath.
And those who are born in the religion but grow to reject it are labeled heretics and blasphemers by both the right and left.

Thus the irony of Christian conservatives who, on the one hand, object to legislation that runs counter to the Christian religion, and then, on the other hand, appeal to the Constitutional religion to defend their objections to the legislation, which is contrary to their other faith.

And so, on the right, we have a group of people who have perverted the definition of “nation” and twisted the meaning of “patriot”, yet are confused and bewildered over how their most sacred and holy religious text, the constitution, is being used to destroy everything they consider sacred and holy.

I’m reminded of two verses from that other sacred text, the bible.

“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.”
Matt. 6:24


A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.”
James 1:8

America is not a nation. It is a religion based on a business model. It was created by foolish businessmen and greedy merchants who were members of cult-like secret esoteric societies and who longed to overthrow the old world order and create a new world order in its place.

In conclusion, anything that is worth fighting for and worth preserving is going to be very particular, very exclusive and, most importantly, very, very old.

Blood and Soil, in other words. 

 Family and Country (the land the family live on and subsist from).

These are the things worth fighting for and preserving. (Forms of government come and go like fashion fads.)

But be careful in the meantime. Such ancient things are “relics” from the old world order and religion and provoke the followers of the new faith, the new world order, to wrath and declarations of condemnation and accusations of heresy and blasphemy (i.e., “racism” and “bigotry”).


Friday, July 19, 2013

Just Ahead...

Whites are set to fall below 50% of the population in just 20 years, officially (it may actually come earlier than that). 

..a historic effort to bail out a city that is sinking under billions of dollars in debt and decades of mismanagement, population flight and loss of tax revenue.
The bankruptcy filing makes Detroit the largest city in U.S. history to do so.

In 1950 Detroit was 83% White.

In 2013 Detroit is 83% Black.

The most dysfunctional cities, countries, etc, are the ones with black majorities. There are no exceptions. 

In 2011, Brazil, now home to 194 million people, recorded 51,198 homicides, ranked seventh among the world's most violent nations after El Salvador, the US Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Colombia and Guatemala.

 The countries with the highest murder rates are latino and black.

Again, Whites are set to fall below 50% of the population in just 20 years, if not sooner.

Race is not a social construct. Societies are racial constructs.

Likewise, environments don't create people, people create environments.

And the different races create vastly different communities, societies and so on, because they each have vastly different concepts of civilization, rule of law, etc.

Historical precedence and common sense assures us, with 100% certainty, that America will collapse in the coming years. And the aftermath will be terrible and tragic.

All of the neo-Marxist slogans about "diversity" and "equality" cannot hold back the tidal-wave of truth and reality.

Friday, July 12, 2013


The WSJ reports:
“Beginning this fall, Alabama public schools will be under a new state-created academic accountability system that sets different goals for students in math and reading based on their race, economic status, ability to speak English and disabilities.” Alabama’s Plan 2020 “sets a different standard for students in each of several subgroups — American Indian, Asian/Pacific islander, black, English language learners, Hispanic, multirace, poverty, special education and white.”

 Of the 33 states granted a waiver last year, 27 now have different achievement goals for different groups of students.


This is actually pragmatic and reasonable. As a wise man once said, the greatest injustice of all is to treat unequal things equal.

Although segregation in schools and academia will need to be restored and expanded if higher education is to once again have high standards.

 Over the past 45 years state and federal governments have thrown billions, if not trillions, of dollars into program after program in an effort to engineer equality. After all, it wasn't equal opportunity which they sought, but equal outcome. 

If you believe in equality, then it is an absolute guarantee that every single endeavor you undertake will fail.
Because equality, be it racial, ethnic, gender, class, etc., is non-existent. All of human history testifies to this reality. Nature itself rejects the premise.

Studies have consistently illustrated the racial IQ gap which finds hispanics and blacks on the low end.  Mongrels (mixed race peoples) group on the low end also, as well as having a host of physical and psychological problems which makes them maladjusted in societies across the world.

And beyond that you don't have to look very hard to see the reality of vast differences in the various races. Differences not only in IQ, but in temperament, morality, ethical standards, cognitive abilities and cultural associations as well as different approaches and expectations in social codes, laws and the general order of life.
And none of that is bad. Each group has its own inherent approach to civilization and each approach is valid for that group.
The problem comes when a few power mad "change agents" attempt to enforce a single social order upon divergent groups for whom such an arrangement runs contrary to their very nature. 

Were it not for the threat of government force, peoples would have segregated themselves along racial and cultural lines, naturally. When empires fall this always happens. The last such examples were in eastern Europe where, with the fall of the Soviet Union, the various ethnic groups segregated themselves from one another to live freely as they would. This also happened in the former Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia.

And it is a guarantee to happen in the United States as well.

Multiculturalism and racial diversity are only to be found under tyranny.


Tuesday, July 9, 2013

The Left Is Winning...

Yes, the left has been winning for the past 70 years.

The left always wins in the short term and almost always has quick victories.


Because of what the left is and always has been: the great wrecking-ball of civilizations.

Liberals don't build, they tear down.

Thus the liberals are winning because, as a historically observable fact, it is easier to destroy than to create.


The New World Order?…

I often wonder if those who fear and attempt to expose the new world order ever stop and ask themselves what the old world order is and was. From observation it is clear that those who speak contemptibly of the “new world order” actually believe in its tenants and would fight to preserve it.

What is the New World Order?

 It isn't some secret society or covert operation. It is the philosophical principles of 18th and 19th century revolutionaries and their ideological followers.

Here are the basic elements of the New World Order. Do you support these?

1. Democratic forms of government.

2. Equality in both social and legal standing.

3. The elimination of the lines and distinctions between classes, ethnic groups, racial groups and genders.

4. Free Trade and principles of supply and demand.

5. Freedom of movement within and across borders.

6. Legal and social ennoblement of and for self-identification and definition.

7. The fundamental principle of personal independence and freedom.

8. A universally applied standard of morality, economics, government and culture.

9. All people are “blank slates” and that “nurturing” produces attitudes, temperament, intelligence, etc.

10. The State as an instrument to engineer social change.

 Needless to say, the Old World Order was the inverse of the above.  

And the old world order produced a civilization, art and culture that even the crumbling ruins of which we still marvel at.

The New World Order, as listed in the 10 elements above, has brought Western society into rapid ruin and destruction in a brief period of time. AND YET, many still support the 10 elements on principle even though the fruits they have produced are so glaringly poisonous. 

The new world order was born in the age of “Enlightenment”, when new continents were being conquered, new social theories were proposed and taken as sacrosanct, “economic schools” of commerce were formed and universalistic fad societies like the Freemasons were blossoming in Europe.

Out went the old kings and princes and priests, who were content to merely act as caretakers of what had been handed down to them, and in their place would come revolutionaries bent on usurping the old world and reforging the elements into their own likeness and image. 

That is the difference between the two orders!

The Old World Order humbly preserved what had been passed down through the ages.
The New World Order sought to play god and attempt to remake the world in its own image.

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Change, or Collapse?...

‘Change’, as a word, is relatively relative.

And yet, as defined by most, in the normative sense of the word, change is slow. It is gradual and natural.

Change, by definition, has to occur to a particular person, place or thing. A replacement is not change. A replacement is a wholly different person, place or thing. Different persons, places or things cannot change on behalf of other persons, places or things.

Think of the change of a 20-year-old man, strong and healthy, to a 90-year-old man, weary, sick and bedridden.

Now if the 20 year old man were to change into a 90 year old man in a single day, most would not see that kind of change in the same way as they would see it if it occurred over a lifetime (or if the 20 year old man were simply replaced by a 90 year old man).

Ageing 70 years over the course of 70 years engenders smiles, admiration and the like.

Ageing 70 years in one day will result in panic, with the victim being rushed to a hospital and various experts called in to study and attempt to reverse the phenomena.

Thus we all recognize that rapid radical change is a sign of collapse.

And so yes, that feeling or realization that is growing within you, that instinct inciting your thoughts toward foreboding events ahead of you and upon you is, in fact, the inherent recognition that our society, our “world”, is not “changing”, but is, in fact, in a state of rapid collapse. 


Sunday, June 30, 2013

Marriage Redefined…Again!…

With former Obama green jobs czar Van Jones gone, along with his views about whites directing poisons to minorities, focus is now shifting to race-based views of "diversity czar" Mark Lloyd, who has suggested "white people" step down from positions of power to allow "more people of color, gays" and "other people" to take those positions.


Note he included gays. That's because the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle and the goals of the "civil rights" movement are part of the same leftist beast.

At the outset the radical left has had one exclusive target, and it ain't Christianity.
From day one they have marked the White race as their primary adversary. From the invention of the word "racist" (put into popular use by Trotsky himself) to demonize the right-to-life that the White race has, to degrading and distorting Western history, the radical left has waged open and unceasing warfare on Western Man.

And Western Man has acquiesced to every aggression.

In 1965 it was unheard of for a mainstream church to marry people of different races. Today they not only marry people of different races, but homosexuals and lesbians as well. The two events are interconnected. Had interracial marriage not begun to be accepted by the churches in the 70's and 80's then there would be no open homosexual marriage today, let alone advocacy for it or an attempt to make it socially acceptable. And the pro-gay activists confirm this with pointing out to opponents of gay marriage that not to long ago interracial marriage was socially unacceptable too, and that the same arguments were employed to oppose it.

The left won the propaganda war.
This is evidenced by today's "traditional, conservative, bible believing, Christians" whose beliefs are hardly discernible from radical Marxism. They have become atomized consumers, unconnected to any aspect of their past (and that includes their Christian beliefs which are almost completely unrecognizable to the Christianity of just 100 years ago).

They've been so thoroughly brainwashed that it never once enters their heads that without discrimination and intolerance, there would not be such concepts as Beauty, Truth or Good.
That is why, as the rejection of discrimination and intolerance have become accepted by society, society has lost the ability (and willingness) to recognize Beauty, Truth and Right from Wrong.

The society that denies the existence of race today, will deny the existence of gender tomorrow (and that has already happened).

For ages, adultery, homosexuality and interracial marriage were deemed to be sins (morally repugnant to society). And for those sins to remain sins, society required discrimination and intolerance of them.

Today, even the most conservative Christian is loathe to openly call those things sins. They'd rather talk about the new sins, "racism", "prejudice", "antisemitism" and the like. And for those sins to remain sins, society requires a rejection of discrimination and intolerance, which is to say, society rejects judgment and discernment.
Thus it is no wonder that our society today is filled to the brim with people completely lacking in the ability or willingness to discern beauty from ugliness, truth from lies, right from wrong etc....

The now tolerant and racially ambiguous America is increasingly violent, corrupt and crumbling. It's people are balkanized politically and morally and are increasingly doped up on a combination of pharmaceutical drugs (anti-depressants) and mind-numbing entertainment.

Yet the more depraved and desperate society becomes, the more the neo-Christians (aka Evangelicals) continue to announce and denounce their own invented sins of intolerance and discrimination.

And God help any people for whom the neo-Christian comes to evangelize. For it's no coincidence that the areas in Africa, Asia and Latin America that have seen growth in neo-Christianity in the last 30 years, have seen skyrocketing rates of crime, STD's, abortions, murder and corruption along with an increasingly tolerant society no longer inclined to discriminate against things such as homosexuality.

Indeed, Evangelical Christianity has become the kiss of death for any society who embraces it. It's emergence in an area is a harbinger of a broad and sweeping turn to the radical left in that society. In fact it could be seen as a general rule that dispensational (Evangelical) Christianity is a prerequisite to a society accepting interracial marriage, abortion, homosexuality and generally looser sexual morals and standards.

But the neo-Christian will never hear this or accept it. They'll never acknowledge that their version of Christianity isn't as old as the automobile. Or that their reversal of sins (such as "racism" now being declared a sin) over the past century actually mirrors biblical prophecy which states that there would come a time when people would declare to be good that which was once called evil, and call evil that which was once declared to be good.

They are caught in the ideological vacuum of the destructive wave they helped to unleash.

The "culture war" is about race, as race is not a social construct, but rather, societies are racial constructs.
And even as millions of Whites continue to deny that fact, their adversaries on the left not only admit it, they shout it from the rooftops and through the megaphones.

note: the above post first appeared here in September 2009


Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Big Falls Too...

"Too big to fail"

It’s a worldview that could only be promulgated in America.


Because in the US you have the synergy of post-modern Christianity, the belief in “American Exceptionalism” and a deep rooted fascination with the “end of the world”.

The basic worldview runs thusly: “America can’t possibly fall apart or into ruin because the whole world would descend into chaos, war and panic. As such, America falling could only mean God is about to return (or some variation on an apocalyptic event) which in turn means the end of history and thus the burden on America to keep everything running smoothly.”

America, then, is too big to fail.

This is also why American evangelicals salivate in rapturous elation at Middle Eastern wars and Israel’s conquest of neighboring states. Because their entire theological worldview is based on the notion that this is the “end times” and modern Israel is synonymous with the mythological biblical one, and that according to their unique interpretation of the bible, Israel must conquer and enslave all. If this “prophecy” should fail, American Christianity fails.
Thus the nation-state of Israel is too big to fail. Just like America is too big to fail. And to that end we should launch nukes, if need be, to perpetuate their interpretations of certain texts of the bible.

They boast Israel will destroy all its “enemies”.
That it’s too big to fail.

Ahem, …and they also worshiped the beast and asked, "Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?" Rev. 13:4

End time’s prophecies suddenly became all the rage right around the same time Mr. Darwin’s theory was gaining widespread publication.
Which is to say, believers were so traumatized by the theory of evolution that they lost all faith in the present existence of the supernatural and instead focused all their attention on future “fulfillment of prophecies”.  In other words they could see no evidence for their belief system in the present so they focused all of their faith onto a future-evidence that, well, ought to be coming along any day now.

And it was the zionists luck that this was all happening around the time zionism was trying to gain political and economic traction.

So Israel became too big to fail because American Christianity was too big to fail.

And of course America is too big to fail because liberal democracy is too big to fail.

And liberal democracy is too big to fail because the myth of equality and the corporate model of the nation-state it too big to fail.

And if that happened it would most certainly interfere with many a corporation and bank’s bottom line!

Therein lies the greater problem, though. Much of the world has been forced to bow down to the image of liberal democracy, with America as the embodiment of that image. A great many of the true ideologues and zealous defenders of the faith (aka, Americanism) believe that if the American system crumbles then the entire philosophy upon which it is based will be undermined and the rest of the world will go on back about its business and run along more natural courses.
Heaven forbid!

In other words, when Sauron is defeated and Mordor collapses, the spell it has cast upon the world is broken and its followers will scatter in defeat.

That, however, is their problem.

Once you’ve embraced the notion that something, anything (man, building, ship, business, bank, republic or empire), is to big too fail, you’ve let go of reality and ignored a whole lot of human history.

The earth itself may one day be smacked by a giant asteroid or wiped out when the sun goes supernova.

Nothing is too big to fail.

 But there is many a banker, used car salesman, preacher and lobbyist who would like to convince you otherwise.


Saturday, May 11, 2013

The Dark Ages Are Coming To A Close…

Perspective affects everything, doesn’t it.

It’s often been repeated here that historical eras or epochs are generally defined AFTER the fact. For instance, those living in the aftermath of the fall of the Roman Empire might very well have reacted incredulously at the suggestion that the empire had fallen.
Case in point, it is historians who have given the title of Byzantine Empire to the eastern half of the Roman Empire. The Byzantines themselves would not have called themselves Byzantines as they considered their empire simply to be the still functioning, eastern half, of the Roman Empire.

So it is with that in mind that we look back to the more recent past and examine the curve and flow, or lack thereof. And in doing that we can’t help but notice the dark giant shadow that has seemingly swallowed the world whole over the past few centuries.

History, as in the normative day-to-day course of human lives/events as ordained by nature, went completely off the rails in the 18th century. Yes, it had been trying to jump the tracks since the 16th century, but by the late 1790’s it had leapt completely off the rails and landed in a swamp (where its wheels continued to spin for some time).

You see, when Nietzsche wrote, “God is dead” he wasn’t trying to troll Christendom. He was lamenting that Western Man had become smug and arrogant in his ignorant belief that he had, at last, the world by the tail and could re-forge the elements to fit his whims and fancies (which is to say, his notion of “progress”). This “new man” was obtusely celebrating his discovery of fire, oblivious to the forest burning down around him.

So yes, what is being said here is that the Dark Ages actually began about the time when many modernists have suggested that they ended.

If that runs counter to everything you’ve been told to think, consider the conundrum that both medieval tales and “post-apocalyptic” stories hold a certain appeal to people because they present a world more relatable and natural than the present system.

Civilization has indeed been lost.

Yes, science and technology have advanced, in some ways, but technological advancements have never been the measuring rod with which to adduce civilization’s standing pillars. (Right now, somewhere in the world, along a muddy road littered with garbage and sewage, stands a cobbled together shack with no running water; within which sits a semi-literate man in raggedy clothes checking his facebook updates.)

We have interesting gadgets all right. And we desperately need them to distract us from the horror and chaos enveloping us at every corner.

Technology has advanced to the point that we can get paramedics in automobiles promptly out to the scene of accidents, caused by automobiles.

Thus one of Civilizations central pillars, the concept of Cause and Effect, has long since crumbled, technology not withstanding.

And the cornerstone of civilization, Truth, has been thrown down in favor of populist slogans such as “Freedom and Equality” which, un-ironically, was essentially Satan’s rallying cry in the Garden of Eden.

In Dark Ages “new truths” are revered and enshrined, even as they posit a reality that inverts and perverts the very notion of truth.

As such, in our day,

We have access to better “healthcare”, and, subsequently, fewer hospitals.

We have “democracy” and, subsequently, our government is populist, morally ambiguous and self-serving.

We have “buying power” and, subsequently, our lives are full of cheap plastic junk.

We are “empowered”, and, subsequently, feel isolated and atomized.

We are “independent” and, subsequently, have the mammoth nanny welfare state that autocratically meets our every want from womb to tomb.

We have “freedom” and, subsequently, broken homes and more prisons.

We have “diversity” and, subsequently, the para-militaristic police forces that accompany it.

We are “more tolerant and less judgmental” and, subsequently, have the medications, antidepressants and ever-burgeoning number of mental health specialists to keep us from jumping off of bridges.

We “liberate” other peoples and, subsequently, have terrorist attacks in our own lands.

We are “better informed than people in the past” and, subsequently, score lower on tests in math, science, history, civics, biology, and geography, et al.

The list goes ever on.

No sane man or woman, of any era, could look upon the streets of the present age and not shudder at the sight. And it wouldn’t be the dazzling lights, towering buildings or dizzying technology that would catch their attention. No, it would be the slug-like denizens wandering the streets, nearly all of them drugged, obese, opaque and oblivious.

In other words, you could take a man from the 12th century and drop him into the 21th century and it would take him all of about two weeks to adapt to (and be comfortable with) recent technology, from cars to cell phones.

However he would most likely be unable to embrace 21st century Western Civilization’s sense of being. He would pity us as ignorant, dumb, vulgar and backwards. Which is to say, he would view us as uncivilized.

A great many people are deeply distraught and stressed out over what they see happening around them. Yes, it’s obvious the Age is coming to an end. But it’s the Dark Age that is coming to a close, and that is reason enough to have hope.

Our “way of life” is only falling apart if you think of it as “our way of life”. It’s a system that is dying, not the world; an unnatural system that has shrouded civilization in darkness for centuries. Its collapse was inevitable.

That system may have, for a moment, seemed like a mighty sorcerer bringing all under his spell, but increasingly it is revealed to be yet another phantom in the night, brushed away by the coming of dawn.

As the coming days and years unfold and the collapse of this Dark Age System rapidly increases, the spell will be broken and the system will be done in, not by armed conflict, but through ignoring it and letting it wither away.

In the meantime, you don’t conquer a wasteland by sword and fire, but by planting trees and gardens.

Turn away from the shadow and begin to rebuild and restore in the light. 


Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Diversity = Police State…

It’s both sad and comic to see so many patriotic Americans (meaning White people) wring their hands and furrow their brows over gun control measures and ever increasing police state tactics in neighborhoods from sea to shinning sea.
The recent episode in Boston in which police dressed in black military garb and with armored black vehicles stormed neighborhoods and went house to house is, as some have said, a scene right out of a post-apocalyptic movie.

Well, actually, it was more like a scene out of a third world country. In Latin America that type of scenario has been par for the course for decades now. American police now dress EXACTLY the way paramilitary police forces in the third world have been dressing for 30+ years.

But what do you expect? In 1965 America was around 90% White. Today is about 53% White and dropping.

Gun Control. 24-Hour Surveillance. Armed Troops Patrolling Streets. Curtailments On Free Speech. Restrictions On Personal Transactions. Monitoring Of Movement. Etc…

These are the price you pay for diversity.

Because diversity always (without exception) brings skyrocketing crime, corruption, causal daily violence, instability, economic stagnation, decay of infrastructure and subsequently disease, poverty, gang warfare and a general culture of death and despair.(1)

So until “patriots” find their backbones and call a spade a spade, they will continue to see their lives rapidly turn into the very nightmare they have long since feared.

Denying the existence of race and racial differences in IQ, Personality, Temperament, Civilization Capability, Etc, is not only patently and demonstrably dishonest it is cowardly. And, as the old saying goes, “a coward dies a thousand deaths”.

 You can continue to believe in old Marxist tropes such as  "diversity is our strength", "war is peace", "one race, the human race", "death is life", "surrender is victory" and so on, or you can accept reality, face the truth and re-build from there.

Otherwise, as millions of non-Whites continue to pour into America, prepare yourselves for an every-day existence that will be exactly like a Police State Prison Yard. 

1. This blog, as well as dozens of others, have linked to thousands of articles, studies, research, etc.. illustrating the fact of innate racial differences. It has also been pointed out that every reader will have had personal experiences which will reinforce this fact as well.  And it has been pointed out numerous times that all of history: written accounts, archeological evidence, etc.. testify to this undeniable fact.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Keeping Up With The Chaff-Caste…

Recently there has been a dustup between the writers of Counter Currents and Alternative Right over WWII and Hitler.

I’ve written about Alternative Right a few times before and have consistently dismissed them. Just a glance at two of their most recent recruits (an effete looking metrosexual dubbed “boy wonder” who is shown posing with a man-purse and a self-identified autistic “transhumanist” who looks like a walking parody of MTV) and you know where AR is headed. Nowhere.

And anyone who has witnessed the “seeker-sensitive” movement within American Christianity over the past 30 years can see exactly where AR is coming from.

In the 1980’s (and perhaps before) many churches began to pro-actively seek out, specifically, “young people”. 


Well, no one can say exactly, except to suggest, “young people are our future”. Of course, in truth, the proper expression would read, “young people will be our future”, but the proper usage of present and future tense is another subject.

Churches became “hip” and “cool” and did indeed attract younger people, even as they drove the adults out the door.

By, say, 1987 theses churches were full of twenty-somethings. And in 1997 they were full of twenty-somethings. And in 2007 they were full of twenty-somethings. And in 2017 they’ll be full of twenty-somethings.

You can see what’s missing.

And you can also see how “going to church” has become a phase in peoples lives that they grow out of.

You see, youth is a condition, much like an illness, that one hopes to move beyond so that one can get on with one’s life.

Though it is a natural stage of life, youth is a handicap. In youth one is not physically, intellectually or emotionally developed enough to properly function and lead a full, and fulfilling, life –let alone to make sound and rational decisions.

But when you enshrine youth you perpetuate youth and thus foster immaturity.

Any movement that wishes to be built upon a solid foundation that will stand the test of time should seek out adults: as in the over 30 or even over 35 crowd, aka thirty, forty and fifty+ somethings.

But not just any adults.

And this is where we get to the crux of the situation.

We must not forget the powerful force known as evolution and the implications thereof.  We know, through the exploration and explanation of the natural world, that the fittest survive. We know that all men are not in fact created equal. We know that environmental pressures in the past culled the herd, so to speak, and allowed the most fit to achieve the greatest survival strategies to perpetuate their genes and dominate or even eradicate those less fit.

But from time to time stumbling blocks are thrown in front of Mother Nature that, temporarily, interferes with natural currents.

 The effect of more recent developments such as the rapid growth of the merchant class, the subsequent wealth bubble, the Industrial Revolution, advanced and widespread medicines, etc, has allowed the chaff to outpace the wheat.

To put it bluntly, the past few generations have each produced a greater, and greater percentage of inferior (less fit) people who have survived due to temporary conditions allowed for by a temporary bubble of wealth.

The current stock is thus more easily sold on “tolerance” and “equality” because to hold up any sort of standard of intelligence, skill, beauty, etc, would be to automatically exclude themselves.

More than that, there is an intrinsic fear and paranoia about that which is beyond their ability to comprehend or grasp.

I came across an example of this recently when someone sent me a link to an article on how the nation’s capital was laid out in geometric grids which aligned buildings and streets in certain shapes or had this building or that building directly facing the sun on the equinox, etc.

Believe it or not there are a number of people who view this with great anxiety and fear, seeing the whole thing as some sort of mystical voodoo.

Why was this city planned out in such detail?

For the simple reason that the city planners, architects, engineers and politicians behind it had the necessary IQ and accompanying education/knowledge to do it.

In other words they did it because they could do it.

But to the average peopleofwalmart sort, such mathematical calculation and textbook engineering is some sort of devilish “sorcery”.

This is also why there is such a fear and even hatred of the past, particularly the past of Europeans (both in Europe and abroad). It casts far to great a shadow over the present.

Yes, the morbidly obese denizen of the current chaff-caste will proudly hold forth the ipod in his sausage-sized fingered hands to proclaim the present’s superiority. But ask him to explain exactly how sound and image can be sent through the air and displayed on his device and after thirty minutes of feverishly consulting Wikipedia he’ll still be at a loss for an answer.

Another example is how a great many of these people will speak of things such as “fossil fuels” with great authority, but ask them how and why the combustion engine works and as they stand gazing at you blankly you can literally see the slow moving gears behind their eyes grind to a halt.

Bottom line,

If you wish to create an effective and durable community to keep company with and affect positive developments in the present, as well as the future, then purposefully seek out the best –not the most. Discriminate. Elevate the superior and cast out, or relegate, the inferior. The majority of people are not only destined to follow but are more content and more productive and helpful to their kin in that state.

And on topics such as Hitler, it is inherently counter-productive to pander to the impressions the chaff-caste may or may not have about him.

And to those operating pro-White organizations, magazines, websites, etc, let your editors and authors be, exclusively, White, Male, (preferably) Educated and over the age of thirty-five.

Subsequently, you will find that those of a particular quality can dispassionately discuss and consider a variety of topics and opinions, and that their conclusions will prove infinity more constructive and beneficial overall; to both adults and those who will one day be adults.

As to what will ultimately lead the White race out of its current predicament, there are two possibilities.

  1. A natural, epoch –ending, catastrophe. Extreme as it is, it’s hardly without precedence. And with overpopulation, the end of the wealth bubbles already underway and the exponential growth of the chaff-caste, events have already aligned to usher in a new series of conditions which will cull the herd. This is the very thing that has happened occasionally over the past few thousand years, which allowed European peoples (White people) to consistently and repeatedly rise above and beyond the other races. The black death, which wiped out close to half of Europe's population, preceded an age of unprecedented knowledge, discovery and conquest by European peoples. 

  1. A Tyrant-King. Less effective in the long run, it would never the less set the stage for a more controlled, yet slower and less thorough, culling of the herd.

In the meantime, let us neither wander nor wallow amongst of the current era’s wretched refuse. 


Saturday, April 27, 2013

Anti-“Racism” IS a Mental Illness…

 From the New York Times,

In 2010, Stapel became dean of the university’s School of Social and Behavioral Sciences and Zeelenberg head of the social psychology department.

Stapel was an academic star in the Netherlands and abroad, the author of several well-regarded studies on human attitudes and behavior. That spring, he published a widely publicized study in Science about an experiment done at the Utrecht train station showing that a trash-filled environment tended to bring out racist tendencies in individuals. And just days earlier, he received more media attention for a study indicating that eating meat made people selfish and less social.

When Zeelenberg challenged him with specifics — to explain why certain facts and figures he reported in different studies appeared to be identical — Stapel promised to be more careful in the future. As Zeelenberg pressed him, Stapel grew increasingly agitated.

After he got home that night, he confessed to his wife. A week later, the university suspended him from his job and held a news conference to announce his fraud. It became the lead story in the Netherlands and would dominate headlines for months. Overnight, Stapel went from being a respected professor to perhaps the biggest con man in academic science.

When Stapel and I met for lunch in Antwerp, about a 50-mile drive from Tilburg, investigating committees at the three universities where he had worked — Amsterdam, Groningen and Tilburg — were in the process of combing through his several dozen research papers to determine which ones were fraudulent. The scrutiny was meant not only to clean up the scientific record but also to establish whether any of Stapel’s co-authors, including more than 20 Ph.D. students he supervised, shared any of the blame. It was already evident that many of the doctoral dissertations he oversaw were based on his fabricated data.

Stapel’s fraud may shine a spotlight on dishonesty in science, but scientific fraud is hardly new. The rogues’ gallery of academic liars and cheats features scientific celebrities who have enjoyed similar prominence. The once-celebrated South Korean stem-cell researcher Hwang Woo Suk stunned scientists in his field a few years ago after it was discovered that almost all of the work for which he was known was fraudulent. The prominent Harvard evolutionary biologist Marc Hauser resigned in 2011 during an investigation by the Office of Research Integrity at the Department of Health and Human Services that would end up determining that some of his papers contained fabricated data.

Every year, the Office of Research Integrity uncovers numerous instances­ of bad behavior by scientists, ranging from lying on grant applications to using fake images in publications. A blog called Retraction Watch publishes a steady stream of posts about papers being retracted by journals because of allegations or evidence of misconduct.

Each case of research fraud that’s uncovered triggers a similar response from scientists. First disbelief, then anger, then a tendency to dismiss the perpetrator as one rotten egg in an otherwise-honest enterprise. But the scientific misconduct that has come to light in recent years suggests at the very least that the number of bad actors in science isn’t as insignificant as many would like to believe. And considered from a more cynical point of view, figures like Hwang and Hauser are not outliers so much as one end on a continuum of dishonest behaviors that extend from the cherry-picking of data to fit a chosen hypothesis — which many researchers admit is commonplace — to outright fabrication. Still, the nature and scale of Stapel’s fraud sets him apart from most other cheating academics. “The extent to which I did it, the longevity of it, makes it extreme,” he told me. “Because it is not one paper or 10 but many more.”

Stapel did not deny that his deceit was driven by ambition. But it was more complicated than that, he told me. He insisted that he loved social psychology but had been frustrated by the messiness of experimental data, which rarely led to clear conclusions. His lifelong obsession with elegance and order, he said, led him to concoct sexy results that journals found attractive. “It was a quest for aesthetics, for beauty — instead of the truth,” he said.


Stapel reflected on why his behavior had sparked such outrage in the Netherlands. “People think of scientists as monks in a monastery looking out for the truth,” he said. “People have lost faith in the church, but they haven’t lost faith in science. My behavior shows that science is not holy.”


In late October, nearly two months after the scandal broke, the university issued an interim report portraying Stapel as an arrogant bully who cozied up to students in order to manipulate them. Stapel broke down after reading the personality assessment. “He was calling for his mother, he was freaking out,” Marcelle told me. “He was trying to get out of the window.” Stapel’s psychiatrist prescribed extra medication, 


 the universities (THAT'S UNIVERSITIE(S) PLURAL)  unveiled their final report at a joint news conference: Stapel had committed fraud in at least 55 of his papers, as well as in 10 Ph.D. dissertations written by his students. The students were not culpable, even though their work was now tarnished. The field of psychology was indicted, too, with a finding that Stapel’s fraud went undetected for so long because of “a general culture of careless, selective and uncritical handling of research and data.” If Stapel was solely to blame for making stuff up, the report stated, his peers, journal editors and reviewers of the field’s top journals were to blame for letting him get away with it. The committees identified several practices as “sloppy science” — misuse of statistics, ignoring of data that do not conform to a desired hypothesis and the pursuit of a compelling story no matter how scientifically unsupported it may be.


This is hardly the first of such an example of establishment fraud exposed.

Since the 1940's there has been an increasingly high number of extremist ideologues who have, in one way or another (whether legitimate or illegitimate) weaseled their way into the ranks of  the academic elite, where they have routinely terrorized dissenters and perpetuated scientific fraud to enshrine their progressive (read death-cult) beliefs.

And they have indeed operated like a Marxist cult. This is demonstrated best in how (exclusively) White students of these charlatans will shout and scream and rage in protest against "racism" or "White privilege"
in much the same manner as the brainwashed followers of the infamous anti-racist Jim Jones.

As the good professor pointed out, The West is post-Christian. But the culture is still under the spell of Christianity to one degree or another and has simply redefined that system's concepts. The mystical, magical made up sin of "racism" is now The West's Original Sin. Hitler is the devil. Holocaust museums are the churches. Auschwitz has replaced Calvary, Diversity is heaven, etc.

Yet the majority know all of this is wrong. They can both sense and see (with their own eyes) that the progress portrayed by their media and government is the complete opposite of the meaning of progress. The more diversity a city, town or nation is forced to endure, the quicker they fall to crime, poverty, disease, violence and ruin. Diversity always proves to be a living hell that utterly destroys once thriving communities.

And increasingly many people can feel and see that the United States looks exactly like the Soviet Union, just prior to its fall.


Thursday, April 18, 2013

Our Culture...

As preposterous as it may seem, there are White people who have been so conditioned towards hating their own race, that they vex grievous over the assertion that a White Culture (let alone race) exists.
Black culture? No Problem.
Hispanic Culture? Why, of course.
Asian Culture? Visible and obvious.
White Culture? What? What's that?...Never existed!!!!!!

Maybe because White culture has been so overwhelmingly dominating over the past 3,500 years, that its existence casts too bright a light on the lesser contributions of the other races.

What is White Culture?
It is Western Culture and Civilization, which is to say, European Culture and Civilization, whether it be found in Europe or her colonies around the world.
It is our way of thinking and acting or re-acting. It is the way we gather in groups and produce our rule-of-law to reflect our desire for our notions of a harmonious society.
It is in the way we express ourselves in our music, which tends towards the melodic rather than the rhythmic. In music we seek the divine and the glorious (non-Whites make music that aims for the hips, while Whites make music that aims for the Heavens).
It is the way we express ourselves in our art, Which seeks out the thoughtful and reflective, rather than the opportunisticness of self/collective adulation that infests so much of non-White art.
And in our literature, in which we are inspired (rather than reviled) by the honorable and idealistic, even when tragic, rather then the self-serving and opportunistic.

It is our ability to look beyond our most immediate wants and needs and see ourselves, both individually and collectively, as part of an as yet unfinished tapestry of a history to which we ourselves are but a small part.
It is our innate ability to ponder and reflect in both melancholy and joy, the what-ifs and the might have been(s) and the 'what is yet to be'.
It is in our wondering what is over the next hill, and finding out.
It is in our ability to behold nature, filled with both sorrow and delight at beauty for beauty's sake.
It is in our feeling that sense of spiritual ecstasy when gazing upon a glorious sunrise, or the feeling of reflective calm and thoughtful peace when viewing a long sunset.

White Culture is, simply put, what flows in the veins of every Son and Daughter of European descent. It cannot be described abstractly, only seen/and or experienced. And yet it can only be experienced by those who are born of it.
And being that we Whites are only 13% of the World's population and dropping (non-Whites making up 87% of the world's population), it is an experience that may soon fade from all knowledge and memory.

"Acting White" is what Whites do by nature, by being astute, inquisitive, polite and dignified.
Perfection is unattainable, but the pursuit in the belief of it is what most distinguishes Whites from the other races, who are more ready to simply accept the corrupt, the ugly and the broken as being "all that there need be".

White Culture is first and foremost what non-Whites so endlessly envy, even as they hate us for it. It is what they want more than anything in the world, willing to steal and kill to get close to it, feeling as if they deserve to have it, yet can never possess it.
As soon as they move in, Whites move out. And with the Whites goes their culture, their progress and their civilization. Whether it's a city like Detroit or a state like California, non-Whites can be gifted the physical territory, yet the intellectual and the "spiritual" (as in innate) qualities and aspects of White Culture, with its progress, relative stability and societal riches, escapes them.

White culture is, for instance.... William Shakespeare, Michaelangelo, Alexander 'the Great', Mozart, Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, Julius Caesar, Beowulf and King Arthur, Cicero, Herodotus, Paris, London, The Eiffel Tower, The Parthenon, Leonidas and his 300 Spartans, Socrates and Aristotle, Plato and Raphael, Columbus, George Washington, Napoleon, Electricity, Railroads, Gutenberg and his Printing Press, Tales of Hector and Achilles, Odin and Thor, The Nibelungenlied and the Norse Sagas, The Magna Carta, The Airplane, Representative Government, Archeology, Individualism and Monogamy, The Vikings and The Pilgrims, Knights and Chivalry, The Nuclear Family, Steam Ships and Space Shuttles, White Picket Fences and Shires, Automobiles and Computers, Charlemagne and Beethoven and the list goes ever on...


Thursday, April 4, 2013

'Hate Facts'...

Taki's Magazine points out that the Government has deleted one of its webpages which link to official statistics showing that blacks commit the overwhelming majority of homicides in the United States.

As you read the article keep in mind that hispanics are automatically classified as "white" when they commit a crime (just check out the FBI's most wanted lists), which means the actual percentage of White crime is even lower in comparison to the other races.


Saturday, March 30, 2013

Ironies And Oxymorons…

Graduating from compulsory education.

A worker on an assembly line shocked he has been replaced by a machine that gets the job done quicker and cheaper.

Bank owned Governments bailing out Government regulated banks.

Realistic movies.

Dictators who refuse to acknowledge the global, military backed, hegemony of democracy.

Self-correcting science.

Defining someone who takes his or her beliefs seriously as extremists.


Europeans, whose countries are the size of U.S. states, ridiculing Americans, whose country stretches out over a continent, for not having passports.

A morbidly obese society fretting over the potential health hazards of smoking.

The Anti-Defamation League subsisting on, and by, the defamation of others.

A war on terrorism.

Zero tolerance for intolerance.

Wearing a baseball cap backwards.

Government assistance.

Free trade.


Wednesday, March 20, 2013

The Fall Of The West...

Less than a year after landing in Normandy, US soldiers had arrived at a rather startling, inconvenient and politically incorrect conclusion about the situation.

Namely, that the Germans were our kind of people and the French, our allies, were not.

To counter this growing sentiment the US government issued a propaganda booklet titled '112 Gripes about the French'.

Reading all the gripes it can be quickly surmised that the US soldier had come to the conclusion that Allied Society was decadent, corrupt and outright Marxist.

Let's just take a moment to consider who the main Allies of WWII were.

1. The Soviet Union
2. China
3. France
4. Great Briton
5. The United States

So the Allies were,

1. A Communist Empire in the process of murdering tens of millions of innocent people.

2. A blossoming Communist Empire in the process of killing tens of millions of innocent people.

3. A progressively Socialist Empire built upon murdering tens of thousands of innocent people.

4. An increasingly Socialist Empire which just a couple decades before had been America's biggest 'boogeyman'.

5. And then there was America. Us. An Empire founded upon proto-Marxist principles that deny the existence of nations and peoples and insist that all are "equal" and thus must assimilate into the collective.

And these Five Socialist Empires were the creators, and foundational pillars of, the United Nations, the jewel of leftist globalist ideology.

Of course the little man was unaware of this. His entire life he had been indoctrinated in leftist dogma and knew no better.

The poor American soldier thought he was fighting the "dreaded Hun". He thought he was fighting for America, his people -his particular White people.


But look at The West post-WWII.

Post-Allied Victory.

In the aftermath, the Allies divided up Europe, allowing tens of millions of people to fall into slavery and face mass-murder at the hands of the Red Army.

  Western Lands (ie White countries), immediately after 1945, became overwhelmingly Marxist in politics, religion and outlook. 

Whatever resistance to Marxism that existed was attacked and marginalized and, increasingly, outlawed in the name of tolerance and progress. 

Morals and traditions going back thousands of years were soon derided and, increasingly, outlawed in the name of tolerance and progress.

Corrupt and increasingly tyrannical bureaucrats are running every nation in the West.

The peoples very identity, as a historical people (ie, White, European and European-descended) was denied and, increasingly, is being outlawed in the name of tolerance and progress. 

 And every Western country is  being overrun by third-world hordes that are raping, murdering, pillaging and plundering at will.

Tolerance and progress are tolerating atrocious evils and progressing towards certain destruction.


This IS what the Allies fought for. Whether the grunt on the ground understood this or not, it remains an obvious fact.

Like it or not reader, the Allies fought to, at long last, overthrow the remnants of Western (which is to say, White) Civilization.

They succeeded and the world is burning down around us.