Saturday, March 30, 2013

Ironies And Oxymorons…

Graduating from compulsory education.

A worker on an assembly line shocked he has been replaced by a machine that gets the job done quicker and cheaper.

Bank owned Governments bailing out Government regulated banks.

Realistic movies.

Dictators who refuse to acknowledge the global, military backed, hegemony of democracy.

Self-correcting science.

Defining someone who takes his or her beliefs seriously as extremists.


Europeans, whose countries are the size of U.S. states, ridiculing Americans, whose country stretches out over a continent, for not having passports.

A morbidly obese society fretting over the potential health hazards of smoking.

The Anti-Defamation League subsisting on, and by, the defamation of others.

A war on terrorism.

Zero tolerance for intolerance.

Wearing a baseball cap backwards.

Government assistance.

Free trade.


Wednesday, March 20, 2013

The Fall Of The West...

Less than a year after landing in Normandy, US soldiers had arrived at a rather startling, inconvenient and politically incorrect conclusion about the situation.

Namely, that the Germans were our kind of people and the French, our allies, were not.

To counter this growing sentiment the US government issued a propaganda booklet titled '112 Gripes about the French'.

Reading all the gripes it can be quickly surmised that the US soldier had come to the conclusion that Allied Society was decadent, corrupt and outright Marxist.

Let's just take a moment to consider who the main Allies of WWII were.

1. The Soviet Union
2. China
3. France
4. Great Briton
5. The United States

So the Allies were,

1. A Communist Empire in the process of murdering tens of millions of innocent people.

2. A blossoming Communist Empire in the process of killing tens of millions of innocent people.

3. A progressively Socialist Empire built upon murdering tens of thousands of innocent people.

4. An increasingly Socialist Empire which just a couple decades before had been America's biggest 'boogeyman'.

5. And then there was America. Us. An Empire founded upon proto-Marxist principles that deny the existence of nations and peoples and insist that all are "equal" and thus must assimilate into the collective.

And these Five Socialist Empires were the creators, and foundational pillars of, the United Nations, the jewel of leftist globalist ideology.

Of course the little man was unaware of this. His entire life he had been indoctrinated in leftist dogma and knew no better.

The poor American soldier thought he was fighting the "dreaded Hun". He thought he was fighting for America, his people -his particular White people.


But look at The West post-WWII.

Post-Allied Victory.

In the aftermath, the Allies divided up Europe, allowing tens of millions of people to fall into slavery and face mass-murder at the hands of the Red Army.

  Western Lands (ie White countries), immediately after 1945, became overwhelmingly Marxist in politics, religion and outlook. 

Whatever resistance to Marxism that existed was attacked and marginalized and, increasingly, outlawed in the name of tolerance and progress. 

Morals and traditions going back thousands of years were soon derided and, increasingly, outlawed in the name of tolerance and progress.

Corrupt and increasingly tyrannical bureaucrats are running every nation in the West.

The peoples very identity, as a historical people (ie, White, European and European-descended) was denied and, increasingly, is being outlawed in the name of tolerance and progress. 

 And every Western country is  being overrun by third-world hordes that are raping, murdering, pillaging and plundering at will.

Tolerance and progress are tolerating atrocious evils and progressing towards certain destruction.


This IS what the Allies fought for. Whether the grunt on the ground understood this or not, it remains an obvious fact.

Like it or not reader, the Allies fought to, at long last, overthrow the remnants of Western (which is to say, White) Civilization.

They succeeded and the world is burning down around us.


Thursday, March 14, 2013

True North Points East?...

Alternative Right writer Andy Nowicki demonstrates the illogic that must be harnessed to defend Christianity in this article.

He writes,

What is more, it is only through a transcendentalist creed like Christianity that one is enabled to advocate for justice for one’s own people, because only a transcendent, universalist perspective gives one the obligation to stand up for what is right, good, and proper.

And then he “borrows” an old C.S. Lewis gambit to try to drive home his point.

In Mein Kampf, the mustachioed one thunders against the “November criminals” whom, he believed, betrayed his country at the end of World War I. He also inveighs against the harsh and vindictive terms of the Versailles treaty, which seemed to be designed specially to humiliate Germans.
…Hitler seems to be making the point that his people have been treated unfairly, and deserve redress. This is well and good… but then Hitler’s patently atheistic and social Darwinist views seem to undermine whatever moral case could have been made against the legitimate grievances he expressed previously. Germany needs to crush its enemies, and show no mercy—weakness must not be tolerated, ever, at any juncture—Might Makes Right—the strong dominate the weak—such is the way of nature.

Of course what Mr. Nowicki, and Mr. Lewis before him, must do (with a terrific amount of obtuseness), is pretend not to notice that Hitler was pleading his case to the German people exclusively and not to the universe, or “mankind” at large.

Mein Kampf was a letter from a German to a German. It was not addressed to the world and made no appeal to a universal presupposition of morality.

What Mr. Nowicki and company are not willing to comprehend is that there is no universal morality. And particular morals very from race to race, era to era and from place to place.

That is why interracial marriage was viewed as immoral and illegal just two generations ago by all, but is considered ethical and moral by many today.

That is why homosexuality and gay marriage were viewed as immoral and illegal just one generation ago, but is deemed respectable and acceptable by many today.

And yet, what do all of those generations have in common?  The majority of them adhered to the Christian religion.

But this is what happens when you attempt to base your morality on an inconsistent foreign system which functions as a creed rather than a natural reaction endemic to your own kind.

 Even the writings of the Bible make no effort to purport a universal morality. Every significant figure within the Old and New Testament demonstrates a schizophrenic sense of right and wrong. From Yahweh crying over the ill treatment of his people but having no qualms about slaughtering women and children in “the promised land” to Jesus angrily beating moneychangers one minute then kicking back for a few beers with tax collectors the next (one minute his kingdom “is not of this world” the next a man-made stone building is his “my house”)

Mr. Nowicki continues,

In other words, where is the claim to justice? And indeed, in the wake of the devastation of World War II, why are we supposed to shed crocodile tears for battered, bombed-out Dresden, for the victims of merciless Allied aerial raids on civilian centers in Hamburg and Berlin and elsewhere? How can we, why should we feel the least bit sorry for Germany, following Hitler’s own Nietzschian-Darwinian-derived worship of ruthless strength?

Funny thing is I don’t recall seeing a single crocodile tear or even remorse for the atrocities committed against Germany outside of Germany.

Quite the opposite, I see annual celebrations of the atrocities by Mr. Nowicki’s universal-morality-minded Christian fellow travelers, i.e. the victors of WWII.

But of course it should be pointed out that the allies view of WWII was shaped and formed, in large part, by jews; a non-European people.

So again, one side has one set of particular morals and the other side has another. 
Not that that is a bad thing in and of itself. Each race does in fact have its own morality and notions of law and justice, and each one is valid to each people.

Of course the fact that the “Christian worldview” is so malleable is another demonstration of its lack of consistent standard.

Mr. Nowicki continues,

The Christian conception of things is quite different. It insists, not that might makes right, but that a just cause is a just cause, whether it be temporally triumphant or not.

And with that Mr. Nowicki successfully demolishes his own position. If there is a “Christian conception of things” and if it is indeed “quite different” then it is hardly universal, now is it.

In ‘Mere Christianty’ C.S. Lewis made the unconvincing argument that there is a universal morality that exists in all places and all times and is acknowledged by all, and that Christianity simply articulates the obvious. Attila the Hun would disagree, of course, but then so does Mr. Nowicki in that last quote.

 Mr. Nowicki continues

If a nation or a race is oppressed, then it has valid grounds to seek redress. Just as individuals possess the inherent dignity of being children of God, so does a particular subset of humanity.

This is a rather generous over extrapolation of a non-existent textual statement to the matter. Which is why so many of Mr. Nowicki’s “brothers and sisters in Christ” deny the reality of both nations (ethnic groups) and races.

Then Mr. Nowicki hits us with this assertion/back-track/comedy,

The notion that Christianity makes white Westerners into meek little lambs fit for racial dilution, if not slaughter, is thus a crass and ill-informed misconception. For it is in the context of Christianity—or some other universal vision of humanity and human justice—that White advocates can be sure of the worthiness of their cause.


“Christianity—or some other universal vision of humanity and human justice”

Not to be a smart-ass or anything, but isn’t the notion of multiple universals an oxymoron?

This is twice, in the same article, that Mr. Nowicki has discredited his own argument.

Mr. Nowicki stumbles on,

Christianity enjoins all people and all races to be mindful of justice, regardless of who is strong and who is weak.

Well, no, actually, it doesn’t.

If anything, the Old Testament flip-flops between orders to conquer and slaughter and orders to submit and die, while the New Testament says the same, except in a more subdued manner. Which is to say, it instructs its adherents to simply adapt to their ever-changing predicaments. See Romans, chapter 13 for a case in point.

In other words, the bible (and Christianity by extension) has no single standard, or concept, of justice or morality. It is, quite literally, all over the map.

Sometimes its inconsistencies are unintentionally humorous,

"And I [Jesus] say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do."
(Luke 12:4)

"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him."
(John 7:1)

 And other times they are downright revealing,

“love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you”
 -Jesus, Matthew 5:44

 "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.  For I have come to turn
" 'a man against his father,
a daughter against her mother a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law”
Jesus, Matt. 10:34

Either way, the Bible fails on multiple fronts to present itself as anything other than the incoherent ramblings of a bunch of uncivilized, backwater sand peoples from the orient. Which, in reality, is precisely what it is. 

If there is anything universal in or about it, its in the fact that its tenets are universally debated and argued about the world over.  


Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Re-Up (Famine relief by The Book…)

Genesis 37

1 And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger, in the land of Canaan.
Actually that's not true. The Israelites were just local Canaanites. 1

3 Now Israel (aka Jacob) loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours.
This is similar to Sauron, the evil nemesis of Lord of the Rings ditching his robe of pure white for one of many colors to symbolize his rejection of good.

5 And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it his brethren: and they hated him yet the more.
6 And he said unto them, Hear, I pray you, this dream which I have dreamed:
7 For, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and, lo, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and, behold, your sheaves stood round about, and made obeisance to my sheaf.
8 And his brethren said to him, Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over us? And they hated him yet the more for his dreams, and for his words.
9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me.
Needless to say humility was not a family trait...

22 And Reuben said unto them, Shed no blood, but cast him into this pit that is in the wilderness, and lay no hand upon him; that he might rid him out of their hands, to deliver him to his father again.
25 And they sat down to eat bread: and they lifted up their eyes and looked, and, behold, a company of Ishmeelites came from Gilead with their camels bearing spicery and balm and myrrh, going to carry it down to Egypt.
27 Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmeelites, and let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother and our flesh. And his brethren were content.
28 Then there passed by Midianites merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver: and they brought Joseph into Egypt.
These guys are about as proficient as the Polish Mafia
Genesis 39
1 And Joseph was brought down to Egypt; and Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh, captain of the guard, an Egyptian, bought him of the hands of the Ishmeelites, which had brought him down thither.
2 And the LORD was with Joseph, and he was a prosperous man; and he was in the house of his master the Egyptian.
Wow! So if your brothers throw you into a pit, take you out of the pit, sell you to foreigners where you end up being bought as a slave, God is really just doing you a favor? hmmm..
4 And Joseph found grace in his sight, and he served him: and he made him overseer over his house, and all that he had he put into his hand.
And it came to pass from the time that he had made him overseer in his house, and over all that he had.

Naturally. We didn't expect our hero would get stuck cleaning toilets the rest of the story now did we.
7 And it came to pass after these things, that his master's wife cast her eyes upon Joseph; and she said, Lie with me.

Naturally. We didn't expect our hero to be unattractive now did we.

8 But he refused...
10 And it came to pass, as she spake to Joseph day by day, that he hearkened not unto her, to lie by her, or to be with her.
11 And it came to pass about this time, that Joseph went into the house to do his business;
12 And she caught him by his garment, saying, Lie with me: and he left his garment in her hand, and fled, and got him out.

Yeesh. Guy couldn't even go to the crapper without getting mauled by this woman!..

13 And it came to pass, when she saw that he had left his garment in her hand, and was fled forth,
14 That she called unto the men of her house, and spake unto them, saying, See, he hath brought in an Hebrew unto us to mock us; he came in unto me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice:
Exact same thing happened on Dynasty once....

20 And Joseph's master took him, and put him into the prison, a place where the king's prisoners were bound: and he was there in the prison.
But the LORD was with Joseph.

Of course.

Genesis 41

1 And it came to pass at the end of two full years, that Pharaoh dreamed:

Wow! I dream just about every night..

14 Then Pharaoh sent and called Joseph

Joseph had been saving that one phone call for just such an occasion.

25 And Joseph said unto Pharaoh, The dream of Pharaoh is one

So Joseph interpreted the Pharaoh's dream. Tough crowd..

33 Now therefore (said Joseph) let Pharaoh look out a man discreet and wise, and set him over the land of Egypt.

hint, hint, *cough* hint, hint.....

39 And Pharaoh said unto Joseph, Forasmuch as God hath shewed thee all this, there is none so discreet and wise as thou art:
Thou shalt be over my house, and according unto thy word shall all my people be ruled: only in the throne will I be greater than thou.

Surprise, surprise, surprise!...

44 And Pharaoh said unto Joseph, I am Pharaoh, and without thee shall no man lift up his hand or foot in all the land of Egypt.
And Pharaoh called Joseph's name Zaphnathpaaneah; and he gave him to wife Asenath the daughter of Potipherah priest of On. And Joseph went out over all the land of Egypt.

So, to sum up the story to this point; Joseph was a pretentious brat who promised to make his entire family his slaves when he grew up. He was dropped in a hole, but then pulled back out and sold into slavery. He was sexually irresistible to Egyptian housewives and ended up being the belle of the ball in prison. He then interprets a dream and BAM, is made dictator of Egypt at the age of 30.
Yes I'm sure it was very common for Kings in ancient times to hand over their kingdoms to foreign fortunetellers dragged up out of a prison...

48 And he gathered up all the food of the seven years, which were in the land of Egypt, and laid up the food in the cities: the food of the field, which was round about every city, laid he up in the same.

The use of force is implied here, though not openly stated. I'm sure some farmers were hesitant to hand over the grain they had worked so hard for to the new kid in town...

56 And the famine was over all the face of the earth: and Joseph opened all the storehouses, and sold unto the Egyptians; and the famine waxed sore in the land of Egypt.
And all countries came into Egypt to Joseph for to buy corn; because that the famine was so sore in all lands.

Well isn't that nice of him. He sells them back the grain he took from them by force. And to add insult to injury, he sells it to every Tom, Dick and Harry who happens by...

Genesis 47

1 Then Joseph came and told Pharaoh, and said, My father and my brethren, and their flocks, and their herds, and all that they have, are come out of the land of Canaan; and, behold, they are in the land of Goshen.
5 And Pharaoh spake unto Joseph, saying, Thy father and thy brethren are come unto thee:
6 The land of Egypt is before thee; in the best of the land make thy father and brethren to dwell; in the land of Goshen let them dwell: and if thou knowest any men of activity among them, then make them rulers over my cattle.

This is just really nice huh. Of course, where in the world will Joseph find "the best of the land" for his fellow Hebrews to dwell?

12 And Joseph nourished his father, and his brethren, and all his father's household, with bread, according to their families.
And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine.
And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.

So while Joseph's family is getting fat on the bread that the Egyptians worked so hard for, Joseph continues to sell the Egyptians a portion of their own grain for a profit.
But it's more than that. What verse 14 tells us is that Joseph took the money out of circulation. And without it the Egyptians had nothing with which to buy the next portion of their own grain....or did they?

15 And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth.
And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail.
And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year.

Sweet guy.

19 Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.
20 And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's.

So. Good old Joseph now has their money, their grain, their livestock, their homes, their lands and even they themselves. He has reduced the entire population of Egypt to slavery. Surly he will stop at that...

21 And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof.

translation: Joseph sent out the Pharaoh's army to round up the helpless and impoverished (because of Joseph) Egyptians and herd them into pre-planned ghettos......Sound Familiar?

23 Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh

What an asshole!

And what of the Hebrews? Remember that Joseph (by way of Pharaoh) promised them the best of the land to dwell in. Well, now you know how they got it.

27 And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of Goshen; and they had possessions therein, and grew, and multiplied exceedingly.

No wonder!

Of course by the beginning of the next book, Exodus, the Hebrews are portrayed as being the victims of the Egyptians, lol.


1. An Invention Called 'The Jewish People' Ha' 2-29-8