Thursday, July 25, 2013

America: That New Time Religion…


In both the Snowden whistle blower case and the Supreme Court gay marriage case the appeal is made (ostensibly, strictly) to constitutional authority and its interpretation.

Forget the morality of gay marriage and Western Civilization’s traditional views of it. Forget the ancient principles that speak of a regime’s abuse of power. No, instead it is asked whether it is constitutional or not.

Morality, tradition, customs, culture, religion, values, old truths and ancient principles must all take a back seat to, and be in subjugation towards, the constitution.

This is because America is not a nation, as the etymology of the word nation literally means “ethnic group”. A nation is a particular race of people, not a place or for form of government.
(Similarly, the word ‘patriot’ means of “of my father” and carries the connotation of a blood descendant of a particular race of people.)

A nation is not based upon a creed, set of principles or a constitution.

Religions however, are.


And that is what America is, a religion.

The constitution is the “holy text”. It is, in the eyes of many on the right, a religious document beyond touch or corruption, the very words of which are “divine” and “sacred”.

 And, of course, the Supreme Court justices are the high priests who “interpret” the sacred text for all.

And they fit the role of “high priests” explicitly: from their quasi-religious ceremonial garb, and their role as “interpreters” of the “Holy and Sacred Text”, to the fact that it is they (or a federal judge) who administers the oath of office for an incoming president, just as priests once presided over the coronations of kings.

Presidents, whilst being anointed to office by a Supreme Court Justice, pledge to “defend the Constitution”.

Christian Kings, whilst being anointed and crowned by a priest of the church, pledged to, “defend the faith”.

The parallels are many and significant.

And like any religion Americanism has its proselytizers and missionaries spreading the doctrine of “freedom and equality” to all four corners of the globe.

Europe was converted by force and propaganda post-WWII. Eastern Europe is in the process of being converted.
Those who refuse to convert, like Iraq, will face swift (and righteous) wrath.
And those who are born in the religion but grow to reject it are labeled heretics and blasphemers by both the right and left.

Thus the irony of Christian conservatives who, on the one hand, object to legislation that runs counter to the Christian religion, and then, on the other hand, appeal to the Constitutional religion to defend their objections to the legislation, which is contrary to their other faith.


And so, on the right, we have a group of people who have perverted the definition of “nation” and twisted the meaning of “patriot”, yet are confused and bewildered over how their most sacred and holy religious text, the constitution, is being used to destroy everything they consider sacred and holy.

I’m reminded of two verses from that other sacred text, the bible.


“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.”
Matt. 6:24

And,

A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.”
James 1:8


America is not a nation. It is a religion based on a business model. It was created by foolish businessmen and greedy merchants who were members of cult-like secret esoteric societies and who longed to overthrow the old world order and create a new world order in its place.




In conclusion, anything that is worth fighting for and worth preserving is going to be very particular, very exclusive and, most importantly, very, very old.

Blood and Soil, in other words. 

 Family and Country (the land the family live on and subsist from).

These are the things worth fighting for and preserving. (Forms of government come and go like fashion fads.)



But be careful in the meantime. Such ancient things are “relics” from the old world order and religion and provoke the followers of the new faith, the new world order, to wrath and declarations of condemnation and accusations of heresy and blasphemy (i.e., “racism” and “bigotry”).



...

Friday, July 19, 2013

Just Ahead...


Whites are set to fall below 50% of the population in just 20 years, officially (it may actually come earlier than that). 

..a historic effort to bail out a city that is sinking under billions of dollars in debt and decades of mismanagement, population flight and loss of tax revenue.
The bankruptcy filing makes Detroit the largest city in U.S. history to do so.
-source

In 1950 Detroit was 83% White.

In 2013 Detroit is 83% Black.

The most dysfunctional cities, countries, etc, are the ones with black majorities. There are no exceptions. 


In 2011, Brazil, now home to 194 million people, recorded 51,198 homicides, ranked seventh among the world's most violent nations after El Salvador, the US Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Colombia and Guatemala.
-source



 The countries with the highest murder rates are latino and black.



Again, Whites are set to fall below 50% of the population in just 20 years, if not sooner.



Race is not a social construct. Societies are racial constructs.

Likewise, environments don't create people, people create environments.

And the different races create vastly different communities, societies and so on, because they each have vastly different concepts of civilization, rule of law, etc.


Historical precedence and common sense assures us, with 100% certainty, that America will collapse in the coming years. And the aftermath will be terrible and tragic.

All of the neo-Marxist slogans about "diversity" and "equality" cannot hold back the tidal-wave of truth and reality.


Friday, July 12, 2013

Reality...

The WSJ reports:
“Beginning this fall, Alabama public schools will be under a new state-created academic accountability system that sets different goals for students in math and reading based on their race, economic status, ability to speak English and disabilities.” Alabama’s Plan 2020 “sets a different standard for students in each of several subgroups — American Indian, Asian/Pacific islander, black, English language learners, Hispanic, multirace, poverty, special education and white.”

 Of the 33 states granted a waiver last year, 27 now have different achievement goals for different groups of students.

-source


This is actually pragmatic and reasonable. As a wise man once said, the greatest injustice of all is to treat unequal things equal.

Although segregation in schools and academia will need to be restored and expanded if higher education is to once again have high standards.


 Over the past 45 years state and federal governments have thrown billions, if not trillions, of dollars into program after program in an effort to engineer equality. After all, it wasn't equal opportunity which they sought, but equal outcome. 

If you believe in equality, then it is an absolute guarantee that every single endeavor you undertake will fail.
Because equality, be it racial, ethnic, gender, class, etc., is non-existent. All of human history testifies to this reality. Nature itself rejects the premise.



Studies have consistently illustrated the racial IQ gap which finds hispanics and blacks on the low end.  Mongrels (mixed race peoples) group on the low end also, as well as having a host of physical and psychological problems which makes them maladjusted in societies across the world.


And beyond that you don't have to look very hard to see the reality of vast differences in the various races. Differences not only in IQ, but in temperament, morality, ethical standards, cognitive abilities and cultural associations as well as different approaches and expectations in social codes, laws and the general order of life.
And none of that is bad. Each group has its own inherent approach to civilization and each approach is valid for that group.
The problem comes when a few power mad "change agents" attempt to enforce a single social order upon divergent groups for whom such an arrangement runs contrary to their very nature. 

Were it not for the threat of government force, peoples would have segregated themselves along racial and cultural lines, naturally. When empires fall this always happens. The last such examples were in eastern Europe where, with the fall of the Soviet Union, the various ethnic groups segregated themselves from one another to live freely as they would. This also happened in the former Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia.

And it is a guarantee to happen in the United States as well.


Multiculturalism and racial diversity are only to be found under tyranny.



...













Tuesday, July 9, 2013

The Left Is Winning...

Yes, the left has been winning for the past 70 years.

The left always wins in the short term and almost always has quick victories.

Why?

Because of what the left is and always has been: the great wrecking-ball of civilizations.


Liberals don't build, they tear down.


Thus the liberals are winning because, as a historically observable fact, it is easier to destroy than to create.

...

The New World Order?…


I often wonder if those who fear and attempt to expose the new world order ever stop and ask themselves what the old world order is and was. From observation it is clear that those who speak contemptibly of the “new world order” actually believe in its tenants and would fight to preserve it.

What is the New World Order?

 It isn't some secret society or covert operation. It is the philosophical principles of 18th and 19th century revolutionaries and their ideological followers.

Here are the basic elements of the New World Order. Do you support these?


1. Democratic forms of government.

2. Equality in both social and legal standing.

3. The elimination of the lines and distinctions between classes, ethnic groups, racial groups and genders.

4. Free Trade and principles of supply and demand.

5. Freedom of movement within and across borders.

6. Legal and social ennoblement of and for self-identification and definition.

7. The fundamental principle of personal independence and freedom.

8. A universally applied standard of morality, economics, government and culture.

9. All people are “blank slates” and that “nurturing” produces attitudes, temperament, intelligence, etc.

10. The State as an instrument to engineer social change.




 Needless to say, the Old World Order was the inverse of the above.  

And the old world order produced a civilization, art and culture that even the crumbling ruins of which we still marvel at.

The New World Order, as listed in the 10 elements above, has brought Western society into rapid ruin and destruction in a brief period of time. AND YET, many still support the 10 elements on principle even though the fruits they have produced are so glaringly poisonous. 

The new world order was born in the age of “Enlightenment”, when new continents were being conquered, new social theories were proposed and taken as sacrosanct, “economic schools” of commerce were formed and universalistic fad societies like the Freemasons were blossoming in Europe.

Out went the old kings and princes and priests, who were content to merely act as caretakers of what had been handed down to them, and in their place would come revolutionaries bent on usurping the old world and reforging the elements into their own likeness and image. 

That is the difference between the two orders!


The Old World Order humbly preserved what had been passed down through the ages.
The New World Order sought to play god and attempt to remake the world in its own image.





Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Change, or Collapse?...


‘Change’, as a word, is relatively relative.

And yet, as defined by most, in the normative sense of the word, change is slow. It is gradual and natural.

Change, by definition, has to occur to a particular person, place or thing. A replacement is not change. A replacement is a wholly different person, place or thing. Different persons, places or things cannot change on behalf of other persons, places or things.

Think of the change of a 20-year-old man, strong and healthy, to a 90-year-old man, weary, sick and bedridden.

Now if the 20 year old man were to change into a 90 year old man in a single day, most would not see that kind of change in the same way as they would see it if it occurred over a lifetime (or if the 20 year old man were simply replaced by a 90 year old man).

Ageing 70 years over the course of 70 years engenders smiles, admiration and the like.

Ageing 70 years in one day will result in panic, with the victim being rushed to a hospital and various experts called in to study and attempt to reverse the phenomena.


Thus we all recognize that rapid radical change is a sign of collapse.




And so yes, that feeling or realization that is growing within you, that instinct inciting your thoughts toward foreboding events ahead of you and upon you is, in fact, the inherent recognition that our society, our “world”, is not “changing”, but is, in fact, in a state of rapid collapse. 


...