Thursday, June 16, 2016

How Charles Manson Saved Murica...



Everyone knows Charles Manson: the 6' 4", 230lb ex-Marine, five time Ultimate Fighting Champion, who, in the 1960's, led an army of millions of Mad Max-style dystopian brutes on a rampage across the continent of North America, leaving entire cities in ruins.

Well, no.

Actually Manson was a 5' 3" 100 lb spaz whose "army" consisted of a handful of low IQ dope-heads and toothless, strung out hookers, whose crimes appear to be drug related.

And, tragic as it is, the crimes were not that unusual in major cities like L.A., even at that time. It was the celebrity status of the victims at one crime scene that made national headlines.

Manson himself was never charged with murder in the infamous Tate murders, which drew national attention, but, rather, conspiracy to commit murder.


So how and why was he turned into the greatest existential threat to Murica, ever?


In the 1960's America was seemingly spiraling out of control. The sexual revolution, JFK, cities ravaged by race riots, Vietnam, smelly hippies, so on...you know the basics. Chaos was ascendant.

Manson presented the opportunity for the establishment to demonstrate that they were still in control. So he was turned into the anti-christ and then paraded around in handcuffs by guys in suits.

"See Murica, we've caught the devil himself! All is fine. We've got everything under control."

Manson, a goofball nobody, was turned into the effigy of Societal Chaos of the time. And he's been on display in prison ever since, demonstrating Murica's social solidity and political professionalism.


It is a decades long farce. A genuine tragicomedy. While certainly not a model citizen, Manson was also no more than a common pimp/drug dealer.


But the Murica vs. Manson episode stands tall as the mentality that prevails over Murican people and their elite in government, law enforcement, media, journalism, academia, etc.

As long as there are guys in suits and/or uniforms, giving "official statements" in front of the cameras, we can rest assured that everything is A-Okay.

If, god-forbid, a guy in a t-shirt and blue jeans should ever appear on TV as an official -official, and admit, "we really don't know what the hell is going on right now", Murica as we know it, would cease to exist.

Murica loves the notion of absolutes. Maybe this is due to the influence of Calvinism, which posits a god that pre-determines and pre-plans everything and thus is in control of everything, good and bad. Murica can accept any kind of tragedy so long as it can affirm that it was part of a grand plan and/or "officials" have everything under control.

 And maybe that explains the illuminati type conspiracy stuff, as Muricans believe that every-day random events "don't just happen" but are controlled by some all powerful group or individual mastermind.

But as was said above, this same mentality plays both ways via guys in suits or uniforms ("officials") in front of cameras with "official statements".

The presumption that somebody, somewhere, is in complete control is central to Murica's mental well being. American Exceptionalism, The End of History, Progress, etc... it's all the same thing.

The reality that the guys in suits or uniforms are just run of the mill jackasses like the rest of us, pretending to know what the hell is going on, is more terrifying to Muricans than the potential of the earth colliding with an asteroid.


So yes, Charles Manson, in his way, saved Murica. Manson, a villain with X-Men type superpowers and a legion of highly trained and well armed followers from all over the universe, is currently held in an 8 X 8 cell, watched over, and kept in check, by officials, aka, guys in suits.

The system works!

Our presuppositions are validated!

All is well!

Everything is under control!


Stay fat and in debt my fellow Muricans!


...











Monday, June 13, 2016

"What I've Discovered" Vs. "What I Believe"...



Progress functions on the notion that the present is better than the past (What metric is used to assert this is generally an ever evolving construct constantly redefined and reconstructed by progressives themselves).

GNON, however, would say otherwise. For those who don't know, GNON means 'the God of nature or Nature'. Here is a description of it from 'the Orthosphere',

'The general idea is  that, whether or not there be any God of Nature who is its source, Nature herself has an inherent and utterly implacable, incontrovertible order, which we contravene at our peril, and which it behooves us therefore to discover and then faithfully and meetly enact; so that, recusing ourselves for the nonce from any tiresome discussions of a religious sort, with their endless bitter controversies over obscure points of doctrine, we may get on quickly to remembering that it is a Very Bad Idea to Mess with Mother Nature, to learning about her, and to shaping our policies accordingly.'

No, I'm not a neo-reactionary. Though obviously some of their discoveries overlap with mine.

GNON is a brilliant articulation. It almost single-handedly justifies the existence of the internet.

The fact that there is a natural order that functions irrespective of man's personal wants and whims is at the heart of what has been called 'Paleo-conservatism',  'White Nationalism', 'Traditionalism', 'Neo-Reactionism' , 'Alt-Right', etc.

Far from representing supremacism, arrogance or hubris, they actually stand for the opposite: humility and submission to GNON, aka, Nature, the natural world, "god",  reality, what-have-you. Objective truth, in other words.

Progressives, Liberals and the like work to overthrow GNON and twist reality to fit their own finite, personal preferences or "emotional needs" -aka, The Narrative.


Which brings me to the post title.


Discovery vs. Belief.

Let's face it, belief today means "personal (subjective) choice".  And nothing better illustrates this than law. Laws are being invented to enforce the emotional zeitgeist of the current generation's elite and their hubris.

Yet, law cannot be invented. It can only be discovered and understood and then articulated. The Law of Gravity, for example.

Governments don't legislate gravity. Though progressives may just try to delegislate it in the name of equality. And no doubt many deaths would follow as the enemies of GNON would leap from rooftops, empowered by the notion that law is man-made and progressive/evolving.

The notion of Progress or of man "going forwards" or "going backwards" is a radical, unfounded, proposition of the current elite. Naturally they seek to justify their rule, like a politician claiming his tenure brought better jobs.

In reality, there is no forward or backward for mankind. There is only true or false, good or bad, etc.

Like with architecture: "modern" vs. "classical" is a false paradigm. Buildings are either ugly or beautiful. Saying some buildings are modern and some are classic is as nonsensical as saying some buildings are Thursday and some are apple.

Belief or ideology can only bulls@*it its way through life for so long. You can believe all men are created equal, but it is patently and observably not true. Your ideology might assert that a man can be a woman or that race doesn't matter, but eventually, inevitably, GNON will show that the opposite is reality.

GNON is constantly and eternally deconstructing the notion of progress in everything from grass breaking through cracks in the concrete to the rise, fall and rise of the sun, each and every day.

You can believe the sun won't set today. You can believe gravity doesn't apply to you. You can believe you are an oak tree.

See if GNON bows to your beliefs.

You can attempt to believe what you want to be true, or you set aside your hubris and emotional hysteria and discover what is true.

And even that is no more a "personal choice" than obeying the law of gravity is.



...


Sunday, June 12, 2016

Is Mitt Romney A White Nationalist?...


It would appear so!

Holy Cow!

With the internationalist wing of Conservative Inc. holding a "summit" on the 2016 election in a desperate bid to try and prove that they are still relevant, Mitt Romney (who lost to Barack Hussein Obama in 2012) has seemingly come out of the closet as a representative of nominal White Nationalism.

He expressed concerns about "trickle down racism" due to Barak Obama's administration...WHOOPS!, I mean, in regards to BlackLivesMatter....No, wait, I mean over La Raza, no, no, the Black Panthers, no, the ADL, no...

You get the point.

Romney, a white guy, expressed concern over positions held by HIS People, aka, White people.

See, that's the thing: when  white people expresses concern about "racism" it is ALWAYS in relation to other whites, aka, THEIR COMMUNITY -THEIR PEOPLE.  Which is an act of openly acknowledging the racial balkanization of America.

White people expressing concern about White "racism", White oppression, etc, is an explicit expression of their own White Racial consciousness. To criticize your own people, is to identify them (and with them) in a ethnic/tribal way, acknowledging that they are particular and set apart from non-Whites.

As the U.S. is currently just over 50% White; North America about 25% White; Globally, about 10% White, having a well known politician take such a position publicly is truly groundbreaking.


So Romney's comments are indeed a fantastic development and a historical moment for the cause of White Nationalism!



...





Saturday, June 4, 2016

The Legacy Of Anti-Nationalism...



Little known fact: systems, and the people who empower and participate in them, don’t like to have the ideological pillars upon which said system resides, questioned.

This fact astounds many people!

But it's true.

The extent to which systems will go to insulate themselves from reality, knows no bounds.


Take for example ideological presuppositions such as equality, tolerance and diversity.

Over the past century, more than a billion people were enslaved, and more than 100 million people murdered in the name of equality, tolerance and diversity. 


Great anti-nationalist heroes include, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot and Fidel Castro, just to name a few.

And, naturally, every one of them was a mass murdering maniac.

In fact, the promoters and practitioners of racial equality and anti-nationalism have been responsible for more death, destruction and horror than smallpox.


How do the defenders of equality, tolerance and anti-nationalism justify themselves?

By appealing to the utopia: The hypothetical New Eden exists, somewhere, some how, in the distant future. And if oceans of blood are the seas upon which mankind must sail to get there, then so be it. 


That is their creed. Hell on earth is their legacy.




...