Wednesday, December 28, 2016
If not for Public Schools, you would be of no use what-so-ever to corporations.
Ever think about that?
Shelter, clothing and food are the requirements to sustain, and perpetuate, life.
Throughout most of history these things were acquired via trade or inheritance.
But with the rise of the merchant class these things are now acquired via “jobs”. And jobs require rudimentary training (public schools) to be employed by corporations so that you can go into debt for things you don’t need.....and also for shelter, clothing and food.
“Jobs” also requires a transient (rootless) lifestyle, as you move from town to town or state to state for a new or better “job”. At one time you were born, lived and died in the same village your ancestors had lived in for thousands of years.
“Opportunity” is the catch-phrase.
But what a vulgar, crass expression it is.
The lottery is also an opportunity. An open bank vault is an opportunity.
That’s why ‘opportunistic’is a derogatory word.
And yet it’s the foundation of modern life, as fashioned by the merchants.
Most of education is dry facts. The point of universal education is to train you to function as employee and consumer.
And the truly frightening thing is that this system creates a closed loop. You have no choice but to participate in it, so long as it dominates.
No one has the “opportunity” to leave it.
No freedom. No humanity. No roots. No culture. No society.
But jobs everywhere!
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Non Governmental Organization.
It’s an odd construct, when you think about it. In fact, one might call it a “Freudian Slip”.
Who, but the government, would apply the term, non-government, to anything?
After all, book clubs are non-governmental.
Family dinners are non-governmental.
Pretty much everything that is not government is non-governmental.
So, why in the world does such a construct as “non governmental organization” even exist?
Why not just say, ‘an organization’ or ‘private organization’?
How, and why, did ‘government’ get insinuated into the phrasing?
Again, who, but the government, would apply the term, non-government, to anything?
The obvious solution to the conundrum is that NGO’s are ways for governments to carry out foreign policy initiatives in such a way as to deny all culpability.
This way they can fund and train opposition parties (aka, terrorists), change the laws & morals of countries against the wishes of the people, topple regimes, overthrow governments and even re-draw national borders all under the cover of Non Governmental Organizations.
Are you a Christian Missionary? Congratulations! You work in coordination with the same people who fund ISIS in Syria.
Do you support the building of clean water systems in Africa? Congratulations! Your resources are also used to covertly funnel arms to radical Muslim groups in Libya.
Do you give money to “help feed the children” in third world countries? Congratulations! That money will also be used to open abortion clinics and fund gay pride parades in east-Asia.
I could go on. But hopefully you get the point.
Charity begins, and should stay, at home. There are needy people (sick, poor and elderly) within a 2 mile radius of your house. Help them. Stop helping evil globalists destroy the world.
Friday, December 23, 2016
Thursday, December 22, 2016
Or, Tradition vs. Democracy.
That’s pretty much what it boils down to.
Tradition is not arbitrary. Tradition is not fashion. Democracy is both.
Tradition is the recognition of, and submission to, discovered laws of the world we find ourselves in. A world of laws we did not create and do not sustain.
Marriage of a man and a woman is a tradition not made by man. Man and woman get together and have children. They form a family (an institution) to raise those children in till they are old enough to find their own mates, ad infinitum.
Mankind did not create this arrangement. We saw it, recognized and codified the process to enhance social harmony. But it is there, independent of our acknowledgment.
Gravity is a law.
Man+Woman= Children is a law.
An attempt to break either law will end the same way. Badly.
A Man is a King of his family, and his wife is his queen. This is tradition, because it is a discovered law.
This law points towards monarchy, not democracy, as the family is a microcosm of the greater society in which it dwells.
Thus the tradition of monarchy is not man-made, but a discovered law.
Show me a family that operates as a democracy and I’ll show you a family that is broken by rebellion, selfishness and self-destructive tendencies. You will see a family in hell.
A Christmas tree is a monarchy personified. It rises up and has a pinnacle. It has a point which stands above the rest. The star (or angel) at the top is given greater glory by the lights and adornments beneath it.
It is singled out from the furniture and dressed like a king. And when we enter into its presence, special honor and reverence is given to it, above all else that is in the house.
Christmas repudiates democracy and equality in every way, for it is a day singled out from all the rest for special honor and celebration. The season: the solstice and the climate, dictated this date of cold and long darkness for a time of illumination and life (the evergreen fir tree)
As with all true things, it is particular and defined by its inherent qualities.
Again: Tradition is the recognition of, and submission to, discovered laws.
Democracy is an attempt to overthrow discovered, and eternal, law.
Tradition is the law that requires us to accept who we are and our humble place in the world.
Democracy is an attempt to define yourself and the world and the law.
You do not define yourself, nor the world, nor the law.
That is the law.
Long live the King.
Sunday, December 18, 2016
The genocide no one talks about.
Prussia was once a powerful kingdom along the Baltic Sea -land currently controlled by Poland, Lithuania and Russia (Kaliningrad enclave).
Under Bismark, it united the German states/principalities/etc into a single empire.
It’s people, the Prussians, we must assume, were a distinct ethnic Baltic people existing for thousands of years.
Their language at the time of their disappearance was a dialect of German, as the region was conquered by the Teutonic Knights in the Middle Ages.
They were wiped off the map post-WWII by the Allies: Soviet Union, United States and Great Britain.
Many fled into Germany proper and were subsumed into it. Millions were abducted by the Soviet Army and shipped off to various parts of the Soviet Union (especially central Asia). Hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of others were murdered by the Allies (especially the Red Army).
Again, though these people spoke German, it would be fair to assume that they were, predominantly, an ethnic Baltic people whose original language was side-lined via Germanification.
But even if that were not the case, and they were of Germanic origin (similar to the English), they would still constitute a unique and particular people as their culture and identity, fashioned over nearly a thousand years, was distinct from other Germanic peoples (similar to the English) -even Hitler spoke disparagingly of the Prussians, due to their distinct and particular social and cultural customs and ways (an stoic, aristocratic culture that would not permit a commoner like him to rise to a position of power, among other things).
So here we have an actual, total, genocide of a people, taking place within the past 75 years, and there is nary a word spoken of it. Even the name of the people and the land has been wiped off contemporary maps and appears nowhere.
Complete, and total, genocide.
And it was carried out by.........The Allies!
Yes, the victors of WW II, who defeated Nazi Germany, actually succeeded in doing what they accused Germany of attempting.
Maybe that's why we don't talk about it.
Friday, December 16, 2016
The Internet is to the Corporate News Media what the printing press was to the Roman Catholic Church.
For centuries the Catholic Church claimed an intermediary role for itself between God and the average Joe.
Then came the printing press (and the accompanying increased literacy) and suddenly the average Joe could read the bible for himself.
The narrative of institutional religion was challenged and the power of the Catholic Church was broken, substantially.
Fast forward to the 21st century and the Internet has broken the Corporate News Media in much the same way.
The Corporate News Media wanted so badly to become the high priests of a global corporation, dispensing the approved truth to the little people. But social media came along and the little people began to read information that was unfiltered. Using their own intelligence and reasoning they were coming to conclusions that were not deemed “orthodox” by the establishment.
But the Corporate Media is now (mirroring their 17th century predecessors) trying to launch their counter-reformation with excommunications and denouncements of heresy of all who dare read the sacred texts (information) on their own.
But Pandora’s Box is open and its not going to be shut again.
No doubt the Corporate News Media will continue to have it’s faithful adherents, but the new reformation will continue on and take half of the former empire with it, leaving the beleaguered and broken old institution looking like what it actually is: a pitiful monument to self-aggrandizement.
Who is behind the fake news?
Johannes Gutenberg and Martin Luther, for starters.
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
America was founded and created by people from around the North Sea: mainly England and Scotland, but also Holland and the northern states of what is today, Germany (many of the so-called Irish are actually Scotch-Irish, which are people from southern-Scotland and northern-England who briefly settled in northern-Ireland before moving on to the New World).
Yes, French and Spanish ruled parts of the South and West were, unfortunately, absorbed later on by greedy merchants and their puppet politicians, but the critical phase of American identity was the first century of our history, 1607 to 1707.
Let me repeat, the key phase of American history is its first century of existence: 1607-1707.
And let me be specific: Americans are people descended, wholly, from English, Scottish, Dutch & German Protestant settlers who arrived in the New World between 1607 and 1707. If that isn’t you then you are an ethnic (a hyphenated American) citizen, not an American.
Other North Sea peoples came later and fit right in, but they are still Johnny-come-latelies.
Some might argue that there were Catholics in Maryland, but you’re missing the point. I’m not talking about zip-code identity. There were Indians here too, but they were Indians, not Americans.
As I’ve pointed out numerous times, a nation is an ethnic group, not a place.
The Revolutionary War of 1776 came late in our history and most Americans were opposed to it.
In fact a very good case could be made that real Americans lost in that war. 1776 was a Merchant’s Coup against the American people.
Basically, 1776 was the East India Company as a land-based empire. Maybe this is why the US flag is a near exact replica of the East India Company Flag -with stars instead of St. George’s cross in the blue box.
Again, the majority of Americans were opposed to the Revolutionary War of 1776. This is most likely why no one wanted to claim authorship to the Declaration of Independence. Today, it is generally accepted that Jefferson wrote it. He hinted at it decades after the fact, but it is still not known for certain who the authors were. They were afraid to owe up to it because the average American despised the perpetrators of the Revolution for generations after it.
The Civil War was (or became) an attempt to overthrow the yoke of oppression caused by 1776.
So yes, the Civil War was not a simple North vs. South conflict. A great many people in the north were sympathetic to the rebels and their cause, which was opposition to the ‘globalism’ ideology of the Seventy-Sixers and their ideological offspring who ruled out of D.C. and New York. It may not have been articulated in those terms at the time, but in retrospect that is indeed what it was.
The one percent who fostered 1776 ruled the north via industrialism, which blackened the skies of northern cities and herded children into their ‘Dark Satanic Mills’ to labor unto death, literally.
The South had its own one percent who imported Africans to labor in their more agrarian-based economy.
Whites didn’t benefit from the presence of African slaves. No, it drove down wages and pushed all but the richest one percent into the wilderness to scratch out an almost pre-historic level of subsistence. Exploration of the West was actually a flight to survive by dispossessed Southern Americans.
The wild and violent conflicts of the Old West of Jesse James and Billy the Kid was the result of ever expanding globalists snaking their way into the realms that previous generations of Whites had fled to, to escape globalism.
The outlaws of the Old West were the folk heroes of the common people because they were the despised (yet dashing) foes of the globalists, aka the one percent.
And the KKK?
A people with the power to rule over a society do no resort to the tactics of the original KKK. If the so-called W.A.S.P’s were in power they would have used the military openly to resolve their problems.
You’ll notice that the military was openly authorized by the United States Government to re-arrange and remove Indians. ‘Trail of Tears’ anyone?
No, the KKK was the result of the little people, Americans, fighting for survival against the Globalists, who were using everything from the U.S. military to freed African slaves to numerous immigrant groups (mostly Irish, Italian and German Catholics) to make war on them.
This is why the original KKK targeted mostly Whites (carpetbaggers). The blacks that were targeted were seen as the useful tools of the Globalists.
The original KKK was a manifestation of a last resort; a desperate fight for survival, not a representation of political and economic power.
The early 20th century version of the KKK became more of a social gathering centered mainly in the North (the midwest). Post WWII, the goofball incarnation of the KKK is comprised of drug addicts and runaways and seemingly run by the FBI and the ADL.
But the original KKK was a final, desperate push-back against the globalism of both Northern Industrialists and Southern Slavers, both of whom were driven by a universal mercantilist worldview. Today theses two globalist factions are importing Muslims and Mexicans for the same purposes.
In this sense the rise of the original KKK was similar to the Vikings, who are now thought to have been motivated to attack mainland Europe as a reaction to the expanding reach of Christendom.
And this is a historical pattern.
Those original North-Sea settlers were fleeing Europe to escape this growing Babylon. It might be dressed up as “religious freedom” but in truth it was more about the survival of their people, as a people, free from the universal machinery of globalism.
Before that came the Protestant Reformation, which was essentially a move by the North-Sea peoples to free themselves from the clutches of the global Catholic Roman Empire.
And before that you had the Saxons, led by Widukind, resisting the growing globalist-minded Kingdom of the Franks.
And before that it was the Scandinavians resorting to Viking to push back against the encroaching universal “Kingdom of God’.
Going all the way back to antiquity, it is said (by Saxo Grammaticus, I think) that the North God, Odin, was in fact a powerful Chieftain who fled north from his black sea homeland to escape the growing realm of the Roman Empire.
We come now to the great irony of all this: President Trump.
These Americans, these descendents of the North Sea peoples, who have forever and anon been at war with the one-percent globalist merchant class have, overwhelmingly, chosen a one-percenter globalist merchant to be their spear-point in the fight against their enemy!
And as there is no place left to go to escape, we seem to be reaching a climax in this cultural, political, ethnic and historical conflict.
The analysis and potential historical ramifications of that would be a whole other thesis.
So, I’ll end here.
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
'The LGBTQ is inclusive. Sorry everybody else.'
Yes, modernists, every definition you give yourselves only reinforces the system you think you oppose.
When you speak of “the current year” you are excluding all that is not what you define as current, thus becoming what you assert that you stand against.
Funny, ain’t it!
Any definition you give yourself or your “community” simply reinforces narratives of ‘Us vs. Them’ and tribalism and discrimination and exclusion, etc. You must build walls and exclude others to give your own identity meaning and definition.
Do you even understand that?
Any particular (person, place or thing) is defined thusly via exclusion of all that it isn’t.
Even to say you are a liberal, or are tolerant or that you believe in equality is to define and recognize yourself as set apart and particular from what you perceive is not liberal, tolerant or equal.
You can never destroy discrimination because to even define and identify it and your opposition to it, is to partake in it.
Again, do you understand this?
Unfortunately, I doubt it.
The rise of the alt-right and nationalism across the globe is thanks entirely to the modernist obsession with re-drawing old lines and inventing a thousand new ones.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Saturday, December 10, 2016
Saturday, December 3, 2016
Interviewer: “How did you prepare for your role as a doctor at a hospital in war torn Iraq?”
Movie star: “I went to a hospital in war torn Iraq and observed the doctors there in their war torn Iraqi doctor habitat.”
Political correctness not only requires you to wield a two-edged sword, it also insists that you inevitably fall upon it.