Tuesday, October 31, 2017
This is where social-justice-warriors are offended if you don’t “appropriate” their moral and political world view.
Of course they’ll never see the irony in that because they are the spiritual descendents of the Puritans.
The Murican spirit lives on in the self-appointed self-righteous.
From physical to ideological colonialism. Yee-haw!
Sunday, October 29, 2017
Every time the globalists take away a freedom, they give you a “right” in place of it.
Without the media you would be left to your own devices and go right back to thinking for yourself.
In America the (((Left))) has legalized murdering babies, legitimized homosexuality, broken up the family, bypassed representative government via judicial activism, enslaved the populace through debt and terrorized citizens with rampaging hordes let loose by open borders and designated “minorities”, all the while “patriots” kept their guns and boasted of their 2nd Amendment.
Marxist revolutionaries illegally tearing down statues that represent our history gets a general shrug, but kneeling during a f*@$ing football game is “crossing a line”.
Friday, October 27, 2017
Thursday, October 26, 2017
“Tansgenderism”. Also known as cross dressing.
Remember feminist studies and gender studies?
Remember how, according to progressives, conformity to traditional gender roles are oppressive social constructs?
Now, how does a transgender dude express himself? By adopting the traditional gender role and socially recognized dress of, women.
Do you follow that? Transgenderism is expressed, solely, by conformity to “traditional notions” of gender and gender roles: the dresses, the make up, the girly gestures, etc.
Look again at “Caitlin Jenner” on the cover of Vanity Fair. What makes him “transgender” is his presenting himself all dolled up in what is socially recognized as, a woman’s role: women’s attire -wig and makeup included.
Could there be a bigger f#ck you to feminism and gender studies?
And yet, feminists and progressives alike celebrate this fundamental rejection of all that they claim to stand and fight for.
That’s because they are full of shit!
Like all so-called liberals/leftists/etc, these troglodytes don’t believe in or fight for anything. They just concoct ways to justify their own, selfish, anti-social, self-destructive urges and behavior.
Now think of the corporations who support this bullshit!
Think of the government programs concocted to support this bullshit!
Think of the churches and Christian leaders who support or tiptoe around this bullshit!
So yes, every time you hear of the latest outrageous “cause” and you mumble to yourself, “next thing you know they’ll be defending_______________ (fill in the blank)........yes, yes they will.
Monday, October 23, 2017
Did early humans believe in deities? Maybe. But probably not.
It’s interesting that religious phases are reflected in economic models.
Polytheism is the stage found in societies with limited centralization and who barter and trade.
Monotheism is the stage found in societies with high centralization and who create money in exchange for service and goods.
So it’s doubtful that early man, who were scavengers with no centralization, would have conceptualized gods, period.
But it’s interesting that the one-god hypothesis rests solely on money.
The beginning of “value” was the origin of monotheism. God is commerce. God is money.
But that in itself is telling as value is a highly dubious and subjective concept. Emeralds, diamonds, rubies, gold and so on are effectively worthless, but have value because they are rare and hard to get. And yet, to a hunter/gatherer they would have neither value nor worth because they have no practical application to survival.
Economy began with merchants. And merchants were dependent upon walled and policed (and thus organized) encampments that would eventually be called cities.
From scavenging (no gods) to bartering (many gods) to money (one god).
As I’ve said before, money makes everyone a prostitute, as everyone sells themselves (a service) in exchange for it. Construction workers sell their bodies to businesses to use to build and in exchange receive money. The same is true for doctors, accountants, lawyers and so on. We all sell a service (ourselves) for money.
Economy makes every single human being a prostitute.
And as economy requires centralization and regulation and planning, a society built up around it will perceive a mythology that reflects it. If the economy and the city are ordered, regulated and planned, then so too must be the world.
So this all begs the question of what happens if and when economy fails?
If economy fails then cities fail and organized and planned society fails.
Strange that in the end, the one-god would be cast down, not by the devil, but by out of control interest rates. Or in layman’s terms, a lack of faith.....in money.
Thursday, October 19, 2017
In the meantime the tools of civilization can be used to protect ourselves. Elections are important in dividing and defining territory in the short term. But you should be very careful about using economic variables to position yourself for the future.
The next few decades will be rough and ugly.
Looking into the long term, consider:
There is no such thing as progress -social, political, economic or otherwise.
Throughout 99.9% of human existence, humans have been hunter/gatherers.
Humans/Neanderthals have existed for millions of years. Civilization first blighted the land about 8,000 years ago and then slowly spread over the ensuing age.
In other words, Civilization is a bubble. And it will pop at some point.
Because Civilization is, obviously, unnatural.
I point this out as a reminder that the overarching structures of life, as defined by civilization, will collapse.
So the prepper mentality of stockpiling against the mood swings of civilization simply won’t do it.
Ironically enough, if you want a rough model of how survival will look in the future, look towards the homeless. They are, essentially, living a hunter/gatherer existence right now -only against the backdrop of Civilization.
So just imagine if you were forced to go onto the streets to live and to do so without the assistance of soup kitchens or shelters and so on, and you’ll begin to accustom your mind towards the reality that awaits us and/or our descendants.
The paradigm will continue to shift.
How, when and under what circumstances is anybody’s guess. It could happen suddenly or simply continue to unfold over a period of time.
Monday, October 16, 2017
Hey globalist. I See You.
Sheep no more.
White Americans in “fly over” country tasted blood in the 2016 election cycle and they savored the taste.
Over the past year the establishment, including the GOP, have doubled down in their indifference/betrayal.
So be it.
It has only enraged the rubes even more. And the appetite 2016's election engendered has only grown stronger.
2018 is a mid-term election year.
And the rubes are patiently awaiting it. They are sharpening their fangs and claws in anticipation of it.
The particular candidates who will emerge are not even the point.
And the vote will no longer be about sending messages.
The 2018 election will be about establishing territory. And defending it!
So, leftists, you want a message from middle-America?
Try reading our pissed off, fed up, faces!
Wolves do not.
Saturday, October 14, 2017
Nor should we.
For decades, as the Orcs ran amok, usurping and destroying every semblance of our culture and civilization, the self-anointed leaders of the right have counseled, not just reconciliation with the Orcs, but measured capitulation to their cause.
“Coming together as a nation” is the banner of those demanding submission to evil.
We are not going to get together with people who murder their babies.
We are not going to get together with people who willingly participate in depraved sexual acts.
We are not going to get together with Marxists just because they scream racism.
And as far as “understanding” these people. We do understand them. Very well. They’re evil.
Just a few facts to run down here:
1. The 20th Century was a catastrophe, and we have the burdensome task of undoing its damage.
2. There is no such thing as racism or sexism, anti-semitism, homophobia, etc....these words are constructs of globalists and socialists. They represent the paradigm of the very people who have committed themselves to destroying everything that is good and beautiful in the world.
So rather than argue a leftist’s beliefs, deny them. “There is no such thing as racism”.
Your denial of their terms robs them of whatever remaining power they have. Believe me, it works. They shut up and go away.
3. There is no such thing as progress. The idea of progress was promoted by the freaks who took control of our nations through bribery, subversion, blackmail and violence. They’ve tried desperately to convince us, and themselves, that their reign of terror represents some sort of golden age. But 100 years of unprecedented death and destruction testifies against them and their “progress”.
Evil flourishes when good men do nothing. And good men are, in all ages, outnumbered by evil and apathetic men.
There is nothing unusual about our time, save that the evil men have been unrestrained and unleashed without any real contention to their reign of terror.
But that age is waning. Going forward over the coming decades and centuries we are not going to be getting together with evil men. We are not going to dialogue with evil men. We are going to fight them and bring them to heel to restrain them and the harm they inflict on the world.
This is something that is really irritating to read. It’s when a purported conservative writer extrapolates some broad general lesson out of a topic-of-the-week news story.
The main problem is that they tend to take a disgusting example of a freak (movie star, criminal, etc) and use it to “cast a light” on “us” or explain what said freak says about “us” as a whole or “our” society.
First off, there is no us!
Second, this “we are them" horseshit is just slippery moral equivocation dressed up as virtue signaling false humility.
Freaks and freaks. Identify them as such.
Or better still,
Orcs are Orcs.
We are not Orcs.
We are Men.
Stop drawing lessons and Draw A Damn Line, Already!
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
The mainstream news is not there to tell you what just happened. It’s there to tell you what’s going to happen.
And when a breaking news story occurs, the media co-opts it to inform you what the reaction to it will be.
It tells you how “the world” or “the nation” feels about the story, even though you and everyone you know feels differently.
In that, the media is very much like the catholic church 500 years ago. It presumes a moral mandate to steer the course of human events towards “the end of history”.
But just as the printing press came along and unraveled Rome’s ubiquitous stranglehold on “the truth”, so too has the Internet and the advent of Alternative Media come along and broken the media’s grip on information flow.
To be sure, the establishment has launched its counter reformation and is busily hunting down heretics. But the reality is that its power has already been broken in large part and can never be restored to its former universality.
The similarities between the ensconced and out of touch establishment to that of the medieval church are numerous and glaring.
Monday, October 9, 2017
The main problem with pragmatism is its inherent shallowness. Or more specifically, its vulnerability to hypocritical outcomes once suppositions are considered.
Sane people agree that open borders are bad. The defining and fixing of places and peoples is an absolute necessity for long range social stability and order.
And yet, most sane people do not hesitate to pack up the family and move to another town or state for a better job opportunity or different climate and so on.
What’s the difference?
Borders are not merely national, they are sub-national or regional. And I’m not talking about designated lines on a map. I’m talking about extended family groups. If you are not living in close proximity to parents, grandparents, siblings, uncles, aunts and cousins in a multi-generational community, then you are a rootless cosmopolitan -a globalist denizen who respects neither borders nor nations.
These problems, you see, run deep.
Most conservatives disprove of homosexuality, yet give tacit approval to racially mixed marriages.
Most conservatives consider abortion to be murder, yet practice contraception.
On mixed race marriages the argument usually goes, ‘genetics don’t matter’ or ‘we’re all of the same species’.
But of course if the justification is that (for example) both Asians and Caucasians are of the same species so it’s okay if they mate, then what is the argument against a brother and sister mating? They’re both of the same species, after all. Both humans.
Naturally the counter point is made about defects in the offspring due to genetic closeness.
But now we’re talking about genetics, aren’t we. We’re talking about the scales of human kinds and the significance of genetic distance. Ooops! That’s literally Hitler!
And then what if these consenting sibling couples are "fixed" and incapable of having children? What then is the pragmatic argument against them?
The very idea that you would resort to defending basic values and principles solely on the grounds of arguments based in pragmatism or practicality is ludicrous.
Traditions are not merely customs, they are an age old, time tested, codification of the order of nature.
It’s obvious that nature itself informs us of these things. Different races have existed for hundreds of thousands of years. For all that time, these differing people groups practiced near monolithic in-group breeding, hence the continuing existence of, and successful perpetuation of, the races.
Blue Jays and Cardinals are both birds and yet, as a rule, Blue jays mate with Blue jays and Cardinals with Cardinals.
Human societies have always been hierarchical and structured around classes. Classes who married amongst their own.
We don’t call it the ‘Animal Republic’. We call it the ‘Animal Kingdom’, because there is a hierarchy and a food-chain. There are apex predators and then there are dinner.
The world functions within bounds and borders.
On abortion and contraception -again, if the argument is merely one of defining when life begins, then it abandons all consideration of what life is. Is life to be defined as the single, finite, span of time of a single human being? Or is life the existence of human kind?
In other words, and to put this into a Christian contextualization, does life begin at conception, or does life begin with the creation of the first man, Adam?
You see, there is more to it than technicalities or legalities. There are issues of deep complexity and meaning. Sidestepping them only compounds the problems in the long run.
If you are a conservative or a traditionalist and you defer to pragmatism or faddish humanistic scientism (the species type arguments) to defend your values then you had better be prepared to have them thrown back in your face.
If “personal freedom” is a value you support, be prepared to watch homosexuals parading down your streets.
If the “pursuit of happiness” is something you support, get ready to see your neighborhood turn into a Mexican slum.
If “religious freedom” is a value you value, prepare to watch your town turn into a Muslim Caliphate.
If a classless society is a Western Value, then you might want to start working on an explanation for the rule of the unelected political “deep state” and the extremist leftwing cultural dominance of the arts and media by people who tend to come from the same coastal cities and attend the same prestigious (read economically exclusive) universities.
Nature is not something you can escape. And nature observed is tradition.
And shallow arguments based on pragmatism fail.
Saturday, October 7, 2017
There are two kinds of our people: those who go along to get along and those who are defective.
Those who go along to get along are about as reliable as a cardboard box in a rainstorm.
The defectives are, well, defective.
Redpilling them is not only a waste of time it is actually counter productive. We want to mark them out and segregate them as far from us as possible. We do not want their genes in proximity to our posterity.
Because that is the issue.
Beliefs and opinions are byproducts of genes.
Lifestyles and worldviews do not form on the basis of consideration, knowledge or education.
Genetics is all.
Thursday, October 5, 2017
Funny that Christians argue against materialism on the basis that something exists instead of nothing.
This means the Christian appeals to the existence of the material world as evidence for God!
Whereas the atheist is looking for some sort of supernatural evidence beyond and apart from the material world!
So the Christian’s evidence for the existence of a supernatural deity is.....the existence of the material world.
And the atheist’s evidence against the existence of a supernatural deity is.....that there is nothing BUT the material world.
Wednesday, October 4, 2017
Talk about out of left field. At least from this side of the pond.
I don’t know what’s behind it but it seems strangely ominous -for good or ill, I don’t know.
This is Red History Month, after all.
I’ve no idea what it’s all about or who or what is behind it, but something about it feels very Balkanesque -circa June 1914-, to me.
Maybe I’m wrong. But these sort of queer, “over in the corner”, episodes have a precedent for spiraling into global cataclysm. If events were to turn ugly and then somebody blamed, say Russia, for destabilizing western Europe, that might unleash a series of events that quickly move towards an epoch changing climax.
Just wild speculation. Something strangely foreboding about it all though.
Monday, October 2, 2017
Yes, this October is the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
You know, the left-wing revolution that led to the murder of 30 million Russians and Ukrainians, most of whom were rural farmers and small town people living outside the major cities.
Leading up to that was Czar Nicholas II being forced to step down as leader -he was persuaded by members of the government that it was the only way to avoid civil war.
He and his family were then arrested, being accused of working in collusion with a foreign country (in that case, Germany).
An interim leadership took over. They were more “moderate” and from the more respectable establishment political system.
But the radicalized groups of insurgents were already rampaging through the streets in violent protests, assassinating officials, terrorizing citizens and sabotaging infrastructure, all the while shouting slogans of “JUSTICE” “EQUALITY” and “TOLERANCE”.
By October of that same year this multi-ethnic “international brotherhood” of social justice warriors forced the interim government to step aside and they took over.
It helped that the press was on their side and even church leaders cautioned against resistance to these vicious thugs. After all, only “rednecks” and “haters” would be against the Bolshevik cause of “social justice”.
Within days of grabbing power the revolutionaries began to destroy churches, execute preachers and began the mass slaughter of tens of millions of rural peoples who were no doubt a threat because they were backwards, ignorant, bigoted and clinging to their guns and bibles.
Surprisingly, much of the military sided with the leftists. Many didn't, but they were no match for the highly organized leftists who had spent decades converting people from every strata of society to their insane and murderous ideology.
They took over what was left of the independent press, appointed new generals for the army, created their own secret police, named new governors for every region, new mayors for every town and new teachers for every school, and so on. The new way would be the rule of the land and anyone who opposed or resisted would be labeled “mentally deranged”, “terrorists” or just “enemies of the people”.
I point all this out for no particular reason whatsoever.
Just thought it was an interesting bit of history.
Go back to Netflix now.